Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:32:54.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improved mechanical properties of Mg matrix composites reinforced with Al and carbon nanotubes fabricated by spark plasma sintering followed by hot extrusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2016

Yan Yan
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Interface Science and Engineering in Advanced Materials, Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; Shanxi Key Laboratory of Advanced Magnesium-based Materials, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; and Shanxi Research Center of Advanced Materials Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
Hua Zhang*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Interface Science and Engineering in Advanced Materials, Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; Shanxi Key Laboratory of Advanced Magnesium-based Materials, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; and Shanxi Research Center of Advanced Materials Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
Jianfeng Fan
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Interface Science and Engineering in Advanced Materials, Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; Shanxi Key Laboratory of Advanced Magnesium-based Materials, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; and Shanxi Research Center of Advanced Materials Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
Lifei Wang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Interface Science and Engineering in Advanced Materials, Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; Shanxi Key Laboratory of Advanced Magnesium-based Materials, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; and Shanxi Research Center of Advanced Materials Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
Qiang Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Interface Science and Engineering in Advanced Materials, Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; Shanxi Key Laboratory of Advanced Magnesium-based Materials, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; and Shanxi Research Center of Advanced Materials Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
Minjian Hou
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Interface Science and Engineering in Advanced Materials, Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; Shanxi Key Laboratory of Advanced Magnesium-based Materials, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; and Shanxi Research Center of Advanced Materials Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
Hongbiao Dong
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
Bingshe Xu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Interface Science and Engineering in Advanced Materials, Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; Shanxi Key Laboratory of Advanced Magnesium-based Materials, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China; and Shanxi Research Center of Advanced Materials Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: zhanghua2009@tyut.edu.cn, zhanghua2009@126.com
Get access

Abstract

The new processing method of spark plasma sintering (SPS) followed by hot extrusion was developed to produce Mg–1Al–xCNTs composites. Microstructural characterization revealed that the reinforcement particles were distributed uniformly in Mg matrix. The results of mechanical properties indicated a fact that compared with monolithic Mg, all Mg–1Al–xCNTs composites, especially the Mg–1Al–0.15CNTs composite, fabricated by SPS followed by hot extrusion exhibited better tensile and compressive properties. Under tension, Mg–1Al–0.15CNTs composite exhibited higher 0.2% tensile yield strength (TYS) (157 MPa versus 98 MPa, increased by ∼60%) and ultimate tensile strength (271 MPa versus 188 MPa, increased by ∼44%) than monolithic Mg. In compression, Mg–1Al–0.15CNTs composite also obtained a great enhancement in 0.2% compressive yield strength (118 MPa versus 81 MPa, increased by ∼46%) and ultimate compressive strength (321 MPa versus 255 MPa, increased by ∼26%) compared to monolithic Mg. Meanwhile, Mg–1Al–0.15CNTs composite maintained a high tensile failure strain of ∼8.8% and a high compressive failure strain of ∼17.9%.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Mordike, B.L. and Ebert, T.: Magnesium: Properties-applications-potential. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 302, 37 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L.F., Mostaed, E., Cao, X.Q., Huang, G.S., Fabrizi, A., Bonollo, F., Chia, C.Z., and Vedani, M.: Effects of texture and grain size on mechanical properties of AZ80 magnesium alloys at lower temperatures. Mater. Des. 89, 1 (2016).Google Scholar
Zhou, G., Jain, M.K., Wu, P., Shao, Y., Li, D., and Peng, Y.: Experiment and crystal plasticity analysis on plastic deformation of AZ31B Mg alloy sheet under intermediate temperatures: How deformation mechanisms evolve. Int. J. Plast. 79, 19 (2016).Google Scholar
Yu, M.F., Files, B.S., Arepalli, S., and Ruoff, R.S.: Tensile loading of popes of single wall carbon nanotubes and their mechanical properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5552 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, W., Bai, X., Wang, E., and Xie, S.: Synthesis, structure, and properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Adv. Mater. 21, 4565 (2009).Google Scholar
Li, W.X., Nie, Y.F., and Wang, D.D.: Mechanical behavior of CNTs/SiCp/AZ91D magnesium matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Forum 694, 635 (2011).Google Scholar
Paramsothy, M., Chan, J., Kwok, R., and Gupta, M.: Addition of CNTs to enhance tensile/compressive response of magnesium alloy ZK60A. Composites, Part A 42, 180 (2011).Google Scholar
Park, Y.H., Park, Y.H., Park, I.M., Oak, J.J., Kimura, H., and Cho, K.M.: Fabrication and characterization of AZ91/CNT magnesium matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Forum 620–622, 271 (2009).Google Scholar
Yuan, Q., Zeng, X., Liu, Y., Luo, L., Wu, J., Wang, Y., and Zhou, G.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of AZ91 alloy reinforced by carbon nanotubes coated with MgO. Carbon 96, 843 (2016).Google Scholar
Han, G., Wang, Z., Liu, K., Li, S., Du, X., and Du, W.: Synthesis of CNT-reinforced AZ31 magnesium alloy composites with uniformly distributed CNTs. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 628, 350 (2015).Google Scholar
Straffelini, G., Dione Da Costa, L., Menapace, C., Zanella, C., and Torralba, J.M.: Properties of AZ91 alloy produced by spark plasma sintering and extrusion. Powder Metall. 56, 405 (2013).Google Scholar
Drescher, P., Witte, K., Yang, B., Steuer, R., Kessler, O., Burkel, E., Schick, C., and Seitz, H.: Composites of amorphous and nanocrystalline Zr–Cu–Al–Nb bulk materials synthesized by spark plasma sintering. J. Alloys Compd. 667, 109 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shongwe, M.B., Diouf, S., Durowoju, M.O., and Olubambi, P.A.: Effect of sintering temperature on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Fe–30% Ni alloys produced by spark plasma sintering. J. Alloys Compd. 649, 824 (2015).Google Scholar
Muhammad, W.N.A.W., Sajuri, Z., Mutoh, Y., and Miyashita, Y.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of magnesium composites prepared by spark plasma sintering technology. J. Alloys Compd. 509, 6021 (2011).Google Scholar
Wang, F.C., Zhang, Z.H., Sun, Y.J., Liu, Y., Hu, Z.Y., Wang, H., Korznikov, A.V., Korznikova, E., Liu, Z.F., and Osamu, S.: Rapid and low temperature spark plasma sintering synthesis of novel carbon nanotube reinforced titanium matrix composites. Carbon 95, 396 (2015).Google Scholar
Sule, R., Olubambi, P.A., Sigalas, I., Asante, J.K.O., and Garrett, J.C.: Effect of SPS consolidation parameters on submicron Cu and Cu-CNT composites for thermal management. Powder Technol. 258, 198 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, B., Ertorer, O., Li, Y., and Zhou, Y.: High strength, nano-structured Mg–Al–Zn alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528, 2180 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, K.K., Wang, X.J., Zheng, M.Y., and Wu, K.: Dynamic recrystallization behavior during hot deformation and mechanical properties of 0.2 μm SiCp reinforced Mg matrix composite. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 560, 824 (2013).Google Scholar
Doherty, R.D., Hughes, D.A., Humphreys, F.J., Jonas, J.J., Juul Jensen, D., Kassner, M.E., King, W.E., McNelley, T.R., McQueen, H.J., and Rollett, A.D.: Current issues in recrystallization: A review. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 238, 219 (1997).Google Scholar
Humphreys, F.J. and Kalu, P.N.: Dislocation-particle interactions during high temperature deformation of two-phase aluminium alloys. Acta Metall. 35, 2815 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, X.L., Wong, W.L.E., and Gupta, M.: Enhancing strength and ductility of magnesium by integrating it with aluminum nanoparticles. Acta Mater. 55, 6338 (2007).Google Scholar
Goh, C.S., Wei, J., Lee, L.C., and Gupta, M.: Development of novel carbon nanotube reinforced magnesium nanocomposites using the powder metallurgy technique. Nanotechnology 17, 7 (2006).Google Scholar
Rashad, M., Pan, F., Tang, A., Asif, M., and Aamir, M.: Synergetic effect of graphene nanoplatelets (CNTs) and multi-walled carbon nanotube (MW-CNTs) on mechanical properties of pure magnesium. J. Alloys Compd. 603, 111 (2014).Google Scholar
Eustathopoulos, N., Nicholas, M.G., and Dreve, B.: Wettability at High Temperatures (Pergamon, New York, USA, 1999).Google Scholar
Gupta, M., Lai, M.O., and Soo, C.Y.: Effect of type of processing on the microstructural features and mechanical properties of Al–Cu/SiC metal matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 210, 114122 (1996).Google Scholar
Habibnejad-Korayem, M., Mahmudi, R., and Poole, W.J.: Enhanced properties of Mg-based nano-composites reinforced with Al2O3 nano-particles. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 519, 198 (2009).Google Scholar
Kim, D., Seong, B., Van, G., Ahn, I., and Lim, S.: Microstructures and mechanical properties of CNT/AZ31 composites produced by mechanical alloying. Curr. Nanosci. 10, 40 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimizu, Y., Miki, S., Soga, T., Itoh, I., Todoroki, H., Hosono, T., Sakaki, K., Hayashi, T., Kim, Y.A., Endo, M., Morimoto, S., and Koide, A.: Multi-walled carbon nanotube-reinforced magnesium alloy composites. Scr. Mater. 58, 267 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matin, A., Saniee, F.F., and Abedi, H.R.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg/SiC and AZ80/SiC nano-composites fabricated through stir casting method. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 625, 81 (2015).Google Scholar
Wong, W.L.E. and Gupta, M.: Development of Mg/Cu nanocomposites using microwave assisted rapid sintering. Compos. Sci. Technol. 67, 1541 (2007).Google Scholar
Das, A. and Harimkar, S.P.: Effect of graphene nanoplate and silicon carbide nanoparticle reinforcement on mechanical and tribological properties of spark plasma sintered magnesium matrix composites. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 30, 1059 (2014).Google Scholar
Nguyen, Q.B. and Gupta, M.: Enhancing compressive response of AZ31B magnesium alloy using alumina nanoparticulates. Compos. Sci. Technol. 68, 2185 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habibi, M.K., Joshi, S.P., and Gupta, M.: Hierarchical magnesium nano-composites for enhanced mechanical response. Acta Mater. 58, 6104 (2010).Google Scholar
Habibi, M.K., Joshi, S.P., and Gupta, M.: Size-effects in textural strengthening of hierarchical magnesium nano-composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 556, 855 (2012).Google Scholar
Sanaty-Zadeh, A.: Comparison between current models for the strength of particulate-reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites with emphasis on consideration of Hall–Petch effect. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 531, 112 (2012).Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. and Chen, D.: Consideration of Orowan strengthening effect in particulate-reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites: A model for predicting their yield strength. Scr. Mater. 54, 1321 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashad, M., Pan, F., Tang, A., Asif, M., Hussain, S., Gou, J., and Mao, J.: Improved strength and ductility of magnesium with addition of aluminum and graphene nanoplatelets (Al + GNPs) using semi powder metallurgy method. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 23, 243 (2015).Google Scholar
Aikin, R.M. and Christodoulou, L.: The role of equiaxed particles on the yield stress of composites. Scr. Metal. Mater. 25, 9 (1991).Google Scholar
Zhang, Q. and Chen, D.L.: A model for predicting the particle size dependence of the low cycle fatigue life in discontinuously reinforced MMCs. Scr. Mater. 51, 863 (2004).Google Scholar
Meyers, M.A. and Chawla, K.K.: Mechanical Behaviour of Materials (Prentice Hall, Saddle River, NJ, 1999).Google Scholar
Clyne, T.W. and Withers, P.J.: An Introduction to Metal Matrix Composites (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993).Google Scholar
Lee, J.U., Yoon, D., and Cheong, H.: Estimation of Young's modulus of graphene by Raman spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 12, 4444 (2012).Google Scholar
Száraz, Z., Trojanová, Z., Cabbibo, M., and Evangelista, E.: Strengthening in a WE54 magnesium alloy containing SiC particles. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 462, 225 (2007).Google Scholar
Dai, L.H., Ling, Z., and Bai, Y.L.: Size-dependent inelastic behavior of particle-reinforced metal-matrix composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 61, 1057 (2001).Google Scholar
Miller, W.S. and Humphreys, F.J.: Strengthening mechanisms in particulate metal matrix composites. Scr. Metall. Mater. 25, 33 (1991).Google Scholar
Frost, H.J. and Ashby, M.F.: Deformation-mechanism Maps: The Plasticity and Creep of Metals and Ceramics (Pergamon, Oxford, UK, 1982).Google Scholar
Luster, J.W., Thumann, M., and Baumann, R.: Mechanical properties of aluminium alloy 6061-Al2O3 composites. Mater. Sci. Technol. 9, 853 (1993).Google Scholar
Reed-Hill, R.E. and Robertson, W.D.: The crystallographic characteristics of fracture in magnesium single crystals. Acta Metall. 5, 728 (1957).Google Scholar