Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T05:26:36.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In situ transmission electron microscopy studies of shear bands in a bulk metallic glass based composite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

E. Pekarskaya ,
C. P. Kim  and
W. L. Johnson
E. Pekarskaya
Affiliation:
Keck Laboratory of Engineering Materials, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
C. P. Kim
Affiliation:
Keck Laboratory of Engineering Materials, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
W. L. Johnson
Affiliation:
Keck Laboratory of Engineering Materials, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
Get access

Abstract

In situ straining transmission electron microscopy (TEM) experiments were performed to study the propagation of the shear bands in the Zr56.3Ti13.8Cu6.9Ni5.6Nb5.0Be12.5 bulk metallic glass based composite. Contrast in TEM images produced by shear bands in metallic glass and quantitative parameters of the shear bands were analyzed. It was determined that, at a large amount of shear in the glass, the localization of deformation occurs in the crystalline phase, where formation of dislocations within the narrow bands are observed.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 16 , Issue 9 , September 2001 , pp. 2513 - 2518
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Inoue, A., Zhang, T., and Masumoto, T., Mater. Trans. JIM 31, 177 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Peker, A. and Johnson, W.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 2342 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Johnson, W.L., MRS Bull. 24, 42 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Argon, A.S., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 43, 945 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Spaepen, F. and Turnbull, D., Scr. Met. 8, 563 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Zielinski, P.G. and Ast, D.G., Philos. Mag. A 48, 811 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Tabachnikova, E.D., Diko, P., Ocelik, V., and Duhaj, P., Solid State Phenom. 35–36, 569 (1994).Google Scholar
8Hufnagel, T.C., El-Deiry, P., and Vinci, R.P., Scr. Mater. 43, 1071 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Lowhaphandu, P., Ludrosky, L.A., Montgomery, S.L., and Lewandowski, J.J., Intermetallics 8, 487 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Inoue, A., Intermetallics 8, 455 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Donovan, P.E. and Stobbs, W.M., Acta Met. 29, 1419 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Glezer, A.M. and Molotilov, B.V., Structure and mechanical properties of amorphous alloys (Metallurgiya, Moskva, Russia, 1992), p. 90 (in Russian).Google Scholar
13Hays, C.C., Kim, C.P., and Johnson, W.L., Phys. Rev. Lett, 84, 2901 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Conner, R.D., Dandliker, R.B., and Johnson, W.L., Acta Mater. 46, 6089 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar