Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T08:57:07.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of Mn on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the Al–5Mg–Mn alloy solidified under near-rapid cooling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2016

Yulin Liu*
Affiliation:
Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Light Alloys and Processing Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang, 110136, China
Liangyun Ou
Affiliation:
Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Light Alloys and Processing Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang, 110136, China
Chaofei Han
Affiliation:
Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Light Alloys and Processing Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang, 110136, China
Li Zhang
Affiliation:
Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Light Alloys and Processing Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang, 110136, China
Yuhua Zhao
Affiliation:
Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Light Alloys and Processing Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang, 110136, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: ylliu@sau.edu.cn
Get access

Abstract

A research was carried out to investigate the microstructures and mechanical properties of high Mn containing Al–5Mg–Mn alloys cast under near-rapid cooling. The results indicated that the mechanical properties of the hot bands and cold rolled sheets were remarkably improved with Mn content increasing to 1.6 wt%. The near-rapid cooling process greatly refined the intermetallic constituents. The intermetallic Al6(Fe,Mn) particles found in the hot bands were rare and small when the content of Mn was hypoeutectic. In the samples with higher Fe and Si content, a large amount of Al6(Fe,Mn) and Mg2Si particles remained in the hot bands. But the hot bands still showed better mechanical properties due to the refinement of the intermetallic constituents by the near-rapid cooling process. The results were of commercial interest to the production of AA5083 alloy via continuous strip casting process.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Davis, J.R.: Alloying: Understanding the Basics (ASM International, Materials Park, 2001); p. 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backerud, L., Krol, E., and Tamminen, J.: Solidification Characteristics of Aluminum Alloys (Skan Aluminium, Universitetsforlaget AS, Oslo, 1986); p. 119.Google Scholar
Bauccio, M.: ASM Metals Reference Book, 3rd ed. (ASM international, Materials Park, 1999); pp. 405 and 415.Google Scholar
Liu, Y.L. and Kang, S.B.: Influence of Mn on microstructure and solidification behavior of aluminum–magnesium alloys. Mater. Sci. Technol. 12, 12 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakthivel, A., Palaninathan, R., and Velmurugan, R.: Production and mechanical properties of SiC particle-reinforced 2618 aluminum alloy composites. J. Mater. Sci. 43, 7047 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, K., Cao, X., and Chen, X.G.: Tensile properties of Al–Cu 206 cast alloys with various Fe contents. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 45, 2498 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, R., Spanos, G., Pao, P.S., and Holtz, R.L.: Microstructural evolution and stress corrosion cracking behavior of Al-5083. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 42, 348 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, R. and Holtz, R.L.: Transmission electron microscopic investigations of grain boundary beta phase precipitation in Al 5083 aged at 373 K (100 ºC). Metall. Mater. Trans. A 44, 1279 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrell, T.J., Topping, T.D., Wen, H., Hu, T., Schoenung, J.M., and Lavernia, E.J.: Microstructure and strengthening mechanisms in an ultrafine grained Al–Mg–Sc alloy produced by powder metallurgy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 45, 6329 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Y., Liu, W., Wang, L., and Lavernia, E.J.: Ultra-fine grained structure in Al–Mg induced by discontinuous dynamic recrystallization under moderate straining. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 573, 197 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verma, R. and Kim, S.: Superplastic behavior of copper-modified 5083 aluminum alloy. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 16, 185 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolej, A., Skaza, B., and Dragojevic, V.: Superplastic behavior of Al–4.5Mg–0.46Mn–0.44Sc alloy sheet produced by a conventional rolling process. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 19, 221 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verma, R., Friedman, P.A., Ghosh, A.K., Kim, S., and Kim, C.: Characterization of superplastic deformation behavior of a fine grain 5083 Al alloy sheet. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 27, 1889 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyuk Shin, D., Hwang, D-Y., Oh, Y-J., and Park, K-T.: High-strain-rate superplastic behavior of equal-channel angular-pressed 5083 Al–0.2 wt pct Sc. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 35, 825 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, D., Nageswara Rao, P., and Jayaganthan, R.: Effect of deformation temperature on mechanical properties of ultrafine grained Al–Mg alloys processed by rolling. Mater. Des. 50, 646 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdu, M.T., Dheda, S.S., Lavernia, E.J., Topping, T.D., and Mohamed, F.A.: Creep and microstructure in ultrafine-grained 5083 Al. J. Mater. Sci. 48, 3294 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topping, T.D., Ahn, B., Li, Y., Nutt, S.R., and Lavernia, E.J.: Influence of process parameters on the mechanical behavior of an ultrafine-grained Al alloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 43, 505 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, I., Chauhan, M., Mohamed, F.A., and Lavernia, E.J.: Thermal stability in bulk cryomilled ultrafine-grained 5083 Al alloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 37, 721 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witkin, D., Han, B.Q., and Lavernia, E.J.: Mechanical behavior of ultrafine-grained cryomilled Al 5083 at elevated temperature. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 14, 519 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, S., Nie, Z., Huang, H., and Li, B.: Annealing behavior of a modified 5083 aluminum alloy. Mater. Des. 31, 1607 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dongxia, Y., Xiaoyan, L., Dingyong, H., and Hui, H.: Effect of minor Er and Zr on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–Mg–Mn alloy (5083) welded joints. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 561, 226 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malopheyev, S., and Kaibyshev, R.: Strengthening mechanisms in a Zr-modified 5083 alloy deformed to high strains. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 620, 246 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meng, C., Zhang, D., Hua, C., Zhuang, L., and Zhang, J.: Mechanical properties, intergranular corrosion behavior and microstructure of Zn modified Al–Mg alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 617, 925 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., Liu, M., Luo, L., Wang, J., and Liu, C.: The solidification behavior of AA2618 aluminum alloy and the influence of cooling rate. Materials 7, 7875 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xia, S.L., Ma, M., Zhang, J.X., Wang, W.X., and Liu, W.C.: Effect of heating rate on the microstructure, texture and tensile properties of continuous cast AA 5083 aluminum alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 609, 168 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Bernal, M.A., Mishra, R.S., Verma, R., and Hernández-Silva, D.: Hot deformation behavior of friction-stir processed strip-cast 5083 aluminum alloys with different Mn contents. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 534, 186 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S., Hari Babu, N., Scamans, G.M., Fan, Z., and O'Reilly, K.A.Q.: Twin roll casting of Al–Mg alloy with high added impurity content. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 45, 2842 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, W.C. and Morris, J.G.: Quantitative analysis of texture evolution in cold-rolled, continuous-cast AA 5xxx-series aluminum alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 35, 265 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Y.M. and Morris, J.G.: Comparison of the texture evolution of direct chill and continuous cast AA5052 hot bands during isothermal annealing. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 36, 2505 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, R.E. Jr.: Continuous casting for aluminum sheet: A product perspective. JOM 64, 291 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., Luo, L., Han, C., Wang, J. and Liu, C.: The effect of Fe, Si and cooling rate on the solidification structures of Al–5Mg–0.8Mn alloy. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 32, 305 (2016).Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Huang, G., Sun, Y., Zhang, L., Huang, Z., Wang, J. and Liu, C.: Effect of Mn and Fe on the formation of Fe- and Mn-rich intermetallics in Al–5Mg–Mn alloys solidified under near-rapid cooling. Materials 9, 88 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y.L., Zhang, L., Zhao, Y.H., Wang, J.J., and Liu, C.Z.: The Near-rapid Solidification Behavior of AA1070 Aluminum Alloy, Light Metals 2014, Grandfield, J., ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, 2014); pp. 981986.Google Scholar
Huskins, E.L., Cao, B., and Ramesh, K.T.: Strengthening mechanisms in an Al–Mg alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 527, 1292 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryen, Ø., Nijs, O., Sjolander, E., Holmedal, B., Ekstrom, H., and Nes, E., Strengthening mechanisms in solid solution aluminum alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 37, 1999 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AA-TEAL-1-2006: International Alloy Designations and Chemical Composition Limits for Wrought Aluminum and Wrought Aluminum Alloys (The Aluminum Association Inc., Arlington, 2006).Google Scholar