Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T21:12:24.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The microstructure and dealloying kinetics of a Cu-Mn alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Un-Sig Min  and
James C.M. Li
Un-Sig Min
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Materials Science Program, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627-0133
James C.M. Li
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Materials Science Program, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627-0133
Get access

Abstract

Porous copper was produced by electrolytic dealloying of a Cu-Mn alloy (Incramute: Cu, 40-48 wt. % Mn, 1.4-2.3 wt. % Al) conducted in a 0.3 N-NaCl solution at a potential of −0.2 V (SCE). The dealloying time needed for the as-received cold-rolled specimen (50 h) is shorter than that of the annealed specimen (850 °C for 2 h). The pore size, about 1 μm, of the dealloyed cold-rolled specimen is bigger than that, about 0.1 μm, of the dealloyed specimen after annealing. This is probably because annealing reduced the phase inhomogeneity and removed the rolling effects.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 9 , Issue 11 , November 1994 , pp. 2878 - 2883
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Heidersbach, R. and Verink, E., Corrosion-NACE 28, 397 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Sieradzki, K., Kim, J. S., Cole, A. T., and Newman, R. C., J. Electrochem. Soc. 134, 1635 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Pryor, M. J. and Fister, J. C., J. Electrochem. Soc. 131, 1230 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Keir, D. and Pryor, M., J. Electrochem. Soc. 127, 2138 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Sieradzki, K., Corderman, R., Shukla, K., and Newman, R., Philos. Mag. 59, 713 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Pickering, H. W., Corrosion Science 23, 1107 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Pickering, H. W. and Kim, Y. S., Corrosion Science 22, 621 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Pickering, H. W. and Byrne, J. B., J. Electrochem. Soc. 118, 209 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Tripathi, R. S. and Namboodhiri, T. K. G., International Congress on Metallic Corrosion 2, 593 (1984).Google Scholar
10Polan, N. W., Popplewell, J. M., and Pryor, M. J., J. Electrochem. Soc. 126, 1299 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Dean, R. S., Long, J. R., Graham, T. R., Pottar, E. V., and Hayes, E. T. (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1945), Vol. 34, p. 443.Google Scholar
12Goodwin, R. J., Metal Sci. J. 2, 1121 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, edited by Massalski, T. B. (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1986), Vol. 1.Google Scholar