Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T03:21:07.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nondestructive measurement of striation defect spacing using laser diffraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Dylan E. Haas
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721–0012
Dunbar P. Birnie III*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721–0012
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: birnie@AML.arizona.edu
Get access

Abstract

A simple method is presented for measuring the characteristic spacing between striation defects that sometimes develop when coatings are deposited by the spin-coating process. Striation defects, because of their substantial regularity of thickness variation, are able to diffract laser light. By measuring the diffraction angle, it is possible to determine a characteristic spacing that corresponds to the most dominant spatial frequency for the striation defects that have formed. This diffraction technique is compared with other methods for determining the average striation spacing. This noncontact characterization technique may also be applicable to other regularly or quasi-regularly spaced defect structures that appear in coatings or other materials. The limits and accuracy of this technique are discussed in detail.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Du, X.M., Orignac, X., and Almeida, R.M., J.Am. Ceram. Soc. 78, 2254 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Elliot., D.J. and Hockey, M.A., Solid State Technol. 22, 53 (1979).Google Scholar
3.Daniels, B.K., Szmanda, C.R., Templeton, M.K., and Trefonas, P., Proc. SPIE. 631, 192 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Larson., R.G. and Rehg, T.J., in Liquid Film Coating, edited by Kistler, S.F.. and Schweizer, P.M.. (Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom, 1997), pp. 703734.Google Scholar
5.Haas., D.E. and Birnie., D.P. III, (unpublished).Google Scholar
6.Haas, D.E., Birnie., D.P. III, Zecchino, M.J., and Figueroa, J.T., (unpublished).Google Scholar
7.Haas, D.E., Quijada, J.N., Picone, S.J., and Birnie., D.P. III, in Sol-Gel Optics V, edited by Dunn, B.S., Pope, E.J.A., Schmidt, H.K., and Yamane, M. (Proc. SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 3943, 2000), pp. 280284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Haas., D.E. and Birnie., D.P. III, in Proc. Am. Ceram. Soc. Symposium on Sol-Gel Processing, Commercialization & Applications (Ceramic Transactions), edited by Feng, Xiangdong, Klein, Lisa C., Pope, Edward J.A., and Komarneni, Sridhar (Am. Ceram. Soc., Westerville, OH, 2001), Vol. 123.Google Scholar
9.Leers, D., Solid State Technology 24, 90 (1981).Google Scholar
10.Frasch, P. and Saremski, K.H., IBM J. Res. Dev. 26, 561 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Ananst, M., Jamting, A., Bell, J.M., and Ben-Nissan, B., Thin Solid Films 253, 303 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Rehg., T.J. and Higgins, B.G., Phys. Fluids 31, 1360 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Rehg., T.J. and Higgins, B.G., AIChE J. 38, 489 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Block, M.J., Nature 178, 650 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Pearson, J.R.A., J. Fluid Mech. 4, 489 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Nield, D.A., J. Fluid Mech. 19, 341 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Cobb., E.C. and Saunders, O.A., Proc. R. Soc. (London) 236, 343 (1956).Google Scholar
18.Kreith, F., Taylor, J.H., and Chong, J.P., J. Heat Transfer May, 95 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Birnie., D.P. III and Manley, M., Phys. Fluids 9, 870 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Jenkins., F.A. and White, H.E., Fundamentals of Optics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1976) p. 360.Google Scholar
21.Meyerhofer, D., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 3993 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar