Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T19:28:09.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimization of powder metallurgy parameters to attain maximum strength coefficient in Al–10 wt% MoO3 composite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2015

Manickam Ravichandran*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kings College of Engineering, Pudukkottai-613 303, Tamilnadu, India
Veeramani Anandakrishnan
Affiliation:
Department of Production Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli-620 015, Tamilnadu, India
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: smravichandran@hotmail.com
Get access

Abstract

Aluminum matrix composite with 10 wt% of MoO3 particulate reinforcement was synthesized through powder metallurgy technique. The cold upsetting studies of the composites were investigated based on Taguchi L9 orthogonal array experimental design to evaluate the significance of compaction pressure, sintering temperature, and sintering time on strength coefficient. The combination of 350 MPa pressure, 600 °C temperature, and 90 minutes sintering time was identified as the optimum blend for maximum strength coefficient using the main effect plot. From the analysis of variance, compaction pressure and sintering temperature were identified as highly contributing parameters on strength coefficient. Further, a confirmation test was also conducted with the optimum parameter for validation of the Taguchi results. X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy were used to confirm the presence of MoO3 and its uniform distribution over the aluminum matrix.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ted Guo, M.L. and Tsao, C.Y.A.: Tribological behavior of self-lubricating aluminium/SiC/graphite hybrid composites synthesized by the semi-solid powder densification method. Compos. Sci. Technol. 60, 65 (2000).Google Scholar
Wang, J., Li, Z., Fan, G., Pan, H., Chen, Z., and Zhang, D.: Reinforcement with graphene nanosheets in aluminum matrix composites. Scr. Mater. 66, 594 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohammad Sharifi, E. and Karimzadeh, F.: Wear behavior of aluminum matrix hybrid nanocomposites fabricated by powder metallurgy. Wear 271, 1072 (2011).Google Scholar
Slipenyuk, A., Kuprin, V., Yu, M., Spowart, J.E., and Miracle, D.B.: The effect of matrix to reinforcement particle size ratio (PSR) on the microstructure and mechanical properties of a P/M processed AlCuMn/SiCp MMC. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 381, 165 (2004).Google Scholar
Corrochano, J., Cerecedo, C., Valcárcel, V., Lieblich, M., and Guitián, F.: Whiskers of Al2O3 as reinforcement of a powder metallurgical 6061 aluminium matrix composite. Mater. Lett. 62, 103 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajkumar, K. and Aravindan, S.: Tribological performance of microwave sintered copper–TiC–graphite hybrid composites. Tribol. Int. 44, 347 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrochano, J., Lieblich, M., and Ibáñez, J.: The effect of ball milling on the microstructure of powder metallurgy aluminium matrix composites reinforced with MoSi2 intermetallic particles. Composites, Part A 42, 1093 (2011).Google Scholar
Rahimian, M., Parvin, N., and Ehsani, N.: The effect of production parameters on microstructure and wear resistance of powder metallurgy Al–Al2O3 composite. Mater. Des. 32, 1031 (2011).Google Scholar
Martınez Flores, E., Negrete, J. and Torres Villasenor, G.: Structure and properties of Zn–Al–Cu alloy reinforced with alumina particles. Mater. Des. 24, 281 (2003).Google Scholar
Abdizadeh, H., Ashuri, M., Tavakoli Moghadam, P., Nouribahadory, A., and Reza Baharvandi, H.: Improvement in physical and mechanical properties of aluminum/zircon composites fabricated by powder metallurgy method. Mater. Des. 32, 4417 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensam Raj, J., Marimuthu, P., Prabhakar, M., and Anandakrishnan, V.: Effect of sintering temperature and time intervals on workability behaviour of Al–SiC matrix P/M composite. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 61, 237 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dikshit, S., Gurjar, V., Dasgupta, R., Chaturvedi, S., Pathak, K.K., and Jha, A.K.: Studies on cold upsetting behaviour of AA2014-based metal matrix composites, FEM simulation, and comparison with experimental results. J. Mater. Sci. 45, 4174 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramesh, T., Prabhakar, M., and Narayanasamy, R.: Workability studies on Al–5%SiC powder metallurgy composite during cold upsetting. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 44, 389 (2009).Google Scholar
Hamidreza Sadeghi, S., Moosavi, V., Karami, A., and Behnia, N.: Soil erosion assessment and prioritization of affecting factors at plot scale using the Taguchi method. J. Hydrol. 448449, 174 (2012).Google Scholar
Sivasankaran, S., Narayanasamy, R., Ramesh, T., and Prabhakar, M.: Analysis of workability behavior of Al–SiC P/M composites using backpropagation neural network model and statistical technique. Comput. Mater. Sci. 47, 46 (2009).Google Scholar
Hayajneh, M.T., Mahmood Hassan, A., and Mayyas, A.T.: Artificial neural network modeling of the drilling process of self-lubricated aluminum/alumina/graphite hybrid composites synthesized by powder metallurgy technique. J. Alloys Compd. 478, 559 (2009).Google Scholar
Varol, T., Canakci, A., and Ozsahin, S.: Artificial neural network modeling to effect of reinforcement properties on the physical and mechanical properties of Al2024–B4C composites produced by powder metallurgy. Composites, Part B 54, 224 (2013).Google Scholar
Ravindran, P., Manisekar, K., Narayanasamy, P., Selvakumar, N., and Narayanasamy, R.: Application of factorial techniques to study the wear of Al hybrid composites with graphite addition. Mater. Des. 39, 42 (2012).Google Scholar
Dasgupta, K., Singh, D.K., Sahoo, D.K., Anitha, M., Awasthi, A., and Singh, H.: Application of Taguchi method for optimization of process parameters in decalcification of samarium–cobalt intermetallic powder. Sep. Purif. Technol. 124, 74 (2014).Google Scholar
Beygi, H., Zare, M., and Sajjadi, S.A.: Fabrication of FeNi–Al2O3 nanocomposites and optimization of mechanical properties using Taguchi method. Powder Technol. 232, 49 (2012).Google Scholar
Ravichandran, M., Naveen Sait, A., and Anandakrishnan, V.: Synthesis and forming behavior of aluminium-based hybrid powder metallurgic composites. Int. J. Miner., Metall. Mater. 21(2), 181 (2014).Google Scholar
Ravichandran, M., Naveen Sait, A., and Anandakrishnan, V.: Densification and deformation studies on powder metallurgy Al-TiO2-Gr composite during cold upsetting. J. Mater. Res. 29(13), 1480 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dongxia, Y., xiaoyan, L., dingyong, H., Zuoren, N., and Hui, H.: Optimization of weld bead geometry in laser welding with filler wire process using Taguchi’s approach. Opt. Laser Technol. 44, 2020 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemal Bilici, M., Irfan Yükler, A., and Kurtulmus, M.: The optimization of welding parameters for friction stir spot welding of high density polyethylene sheets. Mater. Des. 32, 4074 (2011).Google Scholar
Ho Min, K., Pil Kang, S., Gun Kimb, D., and Do Kim, Y.: Sintering characteristic of Al2O3-reinforced 2xxx series Al composite powders. J. Alloys Compd. 400, 150 (2005).Google Scholar