Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:49:50.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resonant Raman Effect in Single-wall Carbon Nanotubes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

M. A. Pimenta
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
A. Marucci
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
S. D. M. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
M. J. Matthews
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
A. M. Rao
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy and Center for Applied Energy Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506
P. C. Eklund
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy and Center for Applied Energy Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506
R. E. Smalley
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Center for Nanoscale Technology & Science, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005
G. Dresselhaus
Affiliation:
Francis Bitter Magnet Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
M. S. Dresselhaus
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A resonant Raman study of single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWNT) using several laser lines between 0.94 and 3.05 eV is presented. A detailed lineshape analysis shows that the bands associated with the nanotube radial breathing mode are composed of a sum of individual peaks whose relative intensities depend strongly on the laser energy, in agreement with prior work. On the other hand, the shape of the Raman bands associated with the tangential C–C stretching motions in the 1500–1600 cm−1 range does not depend significantly on the laser energy for laser excitation energies in the ranges 0.94–1.59 eV and 2.41–3.05 eV. However, new C–C stretching modes are observed in the spectra collected using laser excitations with energies close to 1.9 eV. The new results are discussed in terms of the difference between the 1D electronic density of states for the semiconducting and metallic carbon nanotubes.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

References

1.Iijima, S., Nature (London) 354, 56 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Saito, R., Dresselhaus, M. S., and Dresselhaus, G., Physical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes (Imperial College Press, London, 1998, in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Saito, R., Takeya, T., Kimura, T., Dresselhaus, G., and Dresselhaus, M. S., Phys. Rev. B 57, 41454153 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Dresselhaus, M. S., Dresselhaus, G., Eklund, P. C., and Saito, R., Physics World 11 (1), 3338 (January 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Dresselhaus, M. S., Dresselhaus, G., and Eklund, P. C., In Science of Fullerenes and Carbon Nanotubes (Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1996).Google Scholar
6.Saito, R., Dresselhaus, G., and Dresselhaus, M. S., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 494 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Dresselhaus, M. S., Dresselhaus, G., Pimenta, M. A., and Eklund, P. C., Analytical Applications of Raman Spectroscopy (Chapman & Hall, London, 1998).Google Scholar
8.Thess, A., Lee, R., Nikolaev, P., Dai, H., Petit, P., Robert, J., Xu, C., Lee, Y. H., Kim, S. G., Rinzler, A. G., Colbert, D. T., Scuseria, G. E., Tománek, D., Fischer, J. E., and Smalley, R. E., Science 273, 483487 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Bandow, S., Rao, A. M., Williams, K. A., Thess, A., Smalley, R. E., and Eklund, P. C., J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 8839 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Cardona, M., in Light Scattering in Solids II, chapter: Resonance Phenomena (Springer, Berlin, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Rao, A. M., Richter, E., Bandow, S., Chase, B., Eklund, P. C., Williams, K. W., Menon, M., Subbaswamy, K. R., Thess, A., Smalley, R. E., Dresselhaus, G., and Dresselhaus, M. S., Science 275, 187191 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Bandow, S., Asaka, S., Saito, Y., Rao, A. M., Grigorian, L., Richter, E., and Eklund, P. C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3779 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Richter, E. and Subbaswamy, K. R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2738 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Charlier, J. C. and Lambin, Ph., Phys. Rev. B (1998, in press).Google Scholar
15.Saito, R. (1998, private communication).Google Scholar
16.Wildöer, J. W. G., Venema, L. C., Rinzler, A. G., Smalley, R. E., and Dekker, C., Nature (London) 391, 5962 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar