Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:02:11.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A response to—“Comment on the evaluation of the constant β relating the contact stiffness to the contact area in nanoindentation for sphero-conical indenters:” Comment to paper “Penetration depth and tip radius dependence on the correction factor in nanoindentation measurements” by J.M. Meza et al. [J. Mater. Res. 23(3), 725 (2008)]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2012

Juan Manuel Meza ,
Fazilay Abbes ,
Jaime Alexis Garcia Guzman  and
Michel Troyon
Juan Manuel Meza
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Group, CTM, School of Materials Engineering, National University of Colombia, Medellin, Colombia
Fazilay Abbes
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Microscopies et d’Étude de Nanostructures, EA 3799, Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne, 51685 Reims Cedex 2, France
Jaime Alexis Garcia Guzman
Affiliation:
Grupo de Investigacion en Nuevos Materiales (GINuMa) Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellin, Colombia
Michel Troyon*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Microscopies et d’Étude de Nanostructures, EA 3799, Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne, 51685 Reims Cedex 2, France
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: michel.troyon@univ-reims.fr
Get access

Abstract

The signification of the correction factor β that we defined for elastic material [J.M. Meza et al. J. Mater. Res.23(3), 725, (2008)] does not correspond to that of factor β in the Sneddon relationship between unloading contact stiffness, elastic modulus, and contact area as remarked by Durst et al. in their Comment (doi:10.1557/jmr.2012.41). To complete the results of Durst et al., the calculation of β is extended to a larger penetration depth range. It is shown that β depends on the depth to tip radius ratio, h/R, and on the Poisson’s ratio according to dimensionless analysis. The variation range of β is about 1.02–1.09 for 0.3 < h/R < 3 for purely elastic materials but can be much larger in case of elastic–plastic materials as shown [F. Abbes et al. J. Micromech. Microeng.20, 65003 (2010)].

Keywords

Nanoindentation
Type
Comments and Reply
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 27 , Issue 8 , 28 April 2012 , pp. 1208 - 1210
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Meza, J.M., Abbes, F., and Troyon, M.: Penetration depth and tip radius dependence on the correction factor in nanoindentation measurements. J. Mater. Res. 23, 725 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Hay, J.C., Bolshakov, A., and Pharr, G.M.: Critical examination of the fundamental relations used in the analysis of nanoindentation data. J. Mater. Res. 14, 2296 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Abbes, F., Troyon, M., Meza, J.M., and Potiron, S.: Finite element analysis of the penetration depth/tip radius ratio dependence on the correction factor β in instrumented indentation of elastic–plastic materials. J. Micromech. Microeng. 20, 65003 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Strader, J.H., Shim, S., Bei, H., Oliver, W.C., and Pharr, G.M.: An experimental evaluation of the constant β relating the contact stiffness to the contact area in nanoindentation. Philos. Mag. 86, 5285 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Bolshakov, A., Oliver, W.C., and Pharr, G.M.: An explanation for the shape of nanoindentation unloading curves based on finite element simulation, in Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties V, edited by Baker, S.P., Ross, C.A., Townsend, P.H., Volkert, C.A., and Børgesen, P. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 356, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995), pp. 675–680.Google Scholar
6.Chudoba, T. and Jennett, N.M.: Higher accuracy analysis of instrumented indentation data obtained with pointed indenters. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41, 215407 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Cheng, Y-T. and Cheng, C-M.: Scaling approach to conical indentation in elastic–plastic solids with work hardening. J. Appl. Phys. 84, 1284 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Troyon, M. and Huang, L.: Comparison of different analysis methods in nanoindentation and influence on the correction factor for contact area. Surf. Coat. Technol. 201, 1613 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Troyon, M. and Lafaye, S.: About the importance of introducing a correction factor in the Sneddon relationship for nanoindentation measurements. Philos. Mag. 86, 5299 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar