Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T02:28:49.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surface mechanical properties of aluminum implanted nickel and co-evaporated Ni–Al on nickel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Gary S. Was
Gary S. Was
Affiliation:
Institut für Schicht- und Ionentechnik, Kernforschungsanlage Jülich GMBH, Jülich, Federal Republic of Germany
Get access

Abstract

Implantation of Al into nickel and co-evaporation of Ni–Al films onto nickel substrates followed by ion irradiation was conducted in order to investigate the mechanical properties of ion beam surface modifications and their relation to the composition and microstructure of the surface. Implantations were made using 400 keV Al+ to doses from 1 × 1015 to 6 × 1017 cm−2 at room temperature. Nickel films with 0–25% Al were co-evaporated onto nickel substrates and mixed using the same irradiation conditions but to a lower maximum dose. Hardness was measured using ultra-low load indentation, and residual stress was measured by the bending beam method. Results indicate that the primary contributor to the hardness increase of as-implanted surfaces is the irradiation-induced defects. The effect of Al in solution (γ phase) or Al in γ′ (Ni3Al) in either implanted or co-evaporated and mixed surfaces is evident only upon thermal treating to remove radiation damage. The high inherent hardness of the co-evaporated films is due to the small grain size of the film. The magnitude of the hardness in Al implanted nickel is very sensitive to the surface condition of the substrate. The observed hardness effects are all directly relatable to microstructure or phases present. Residual stresses change from tensile to compressive as a result of damage from low dose irradiation and heat treatment.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 5 , Issue 8 , August 1990 , pp. 1668 - 1683
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Clayton, C. R., Surface Alloying by Ion, Electron and Laser Beams, edited by Rehn, L. E., Picraux, S. T., and Wiedersich, H. (ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1986), p. 325.Google Scholar
2Hirvonen, J. K. and Clayton, C. R., Surface Modification and Alloying, edited by Poate, J. M., Foti, G., and Jacobson, D. C. (Plenum Press, New York, 1983), p. 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Doerner, M. F. and Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res. 1, 601 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Morrison, D., Jones, J. W., Alexander, D., Kovach, C., and Was, G. S., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 115 315 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Morrison, D., Jones, J. W., Grummon, D., and Was, G., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 115, 331 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Grummon, D., Jones, J. W., and Was, G. S., Metall. Trans. 19A, 2775 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Morrison, D. J., Jones, J. W., Was, G. S., Mashayekhi, A., and Hoffman, D. W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 30, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989), p. 53.Google Scholar
8Hentzell, H. T. G., Anderson, B., and Karlsson, S-E., Thin Solid Films 89, 116 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Hentzell, H. T. G., Anderson, B., and Karlsson, S-E., Acta Metall. 31, 2103 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Wierenga, P. E., Dirks, A. G., and Van Den Broek, J. J., Thin Solid Films 119, 375 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Walker, R. and Benn, R. C., Plating 58, 476 (1971).Google Scholar
12Oliver, W. C., McHargue, C. J., and Zinkle, S. J., Thin Solid Films 153, 185 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Nastasi, M., Hirvonen, J-P., Jervis, T. R., Pharr, G. M., and Oliver, W. C., J. Mater. Res. 3, 226 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Ziegler, J. F., Biersack, J. P., and Littmark, U., The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids (Pergamon Press, New York, 1984), p. 1.Google Scholar
15Doolittle, L. R., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B9, 344 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Pulker, H. K., Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Vacuum Metallurgy, Session C 4.2, p. 115, Linz (1985).Google Scholar
17Oliver, W., Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, personal communication (1989).Google Scholar
18Jena, A. K. and Chaturvedi, M. C., J. Mater. Sci. 19, 3121 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Cordts, B., Ahmed, M., and Potter, D. I., Nucl. Instr. Meth. 209/210, 873 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Ahmed, M. and Potter, D. I., Mater. Sci. Eng. 90, 127 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Ahmed, M. and Potter, D. I., Acta Metall. 35, 2341 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Eridon, J., Was, G. S., and Rehn, L., J. Appl. Phys. 62, 2145 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Alexander, D. and Was, G. S., in Beam-Solid Interactions Phenomena, edited by Knapp, J. A., Børgesen, P., and Zuhr, R. A. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 157, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989).Google Scholar
24Lebouvier, D., Gilormini, P., and Felder, E., J. Physics D 18, 199 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Thornton, J. A. and Hoffman, D. W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 14, 164 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Hoffman, D. W. and Thornton, J. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 16, 134 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar