Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-c8zdz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T11:56:31.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Synthesis of oxide perovskite solid solutions using the molten salt method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Srikanth Gopalan ,
Karun Mehta  and
Anil V. Virkar
Srikanth Gopalan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 304 EMRO, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
Karun Mehta
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 304 EMRO, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
Anil V. Virkar
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 304 EMRO, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
Get access

Abstract

The molten salt method has in the past been employed to synthesize a large number of compounds at low temperatures. In this work we report the formation of solid solutions of BaTiO3–SrTiO3 and BaZrO3–SrZrO3 using a molten salt eutectic of NaOH–KOH as a solvent. Alkaline earth carbonates and titanium oxide were used as precursors for the titanate system, and alkaline earth carbonates and zirconium oxide were used as precursors for the zirconate system. It was found that both systems form solid solutions throughout the composition range. The implications of these results with regards to the applicability of the molten salt method as a tool to investigate low temperature phase equilibria are discussed.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 11 , Issue 8 , August 1996 , pp. 1863 - 1865
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1.Arendt, R. H., J. Solid State Chem. 8, 339 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Arendt, R. H., Rosolowski, H. H., and Szymaszek, J.W., Mater. Res. Bull. 14, 703 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Graham, M., Holmes, M., Schultze, W., and Newnham, R.E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 64, C68 (1981).Google Scholar
4.Lopatin, S. S., Lupeiko, T. G., and Ivelva, T. V., Zh. Neorg. Khim. 32, 865 (1987).Google Scholar
5.Chiu, C. C., Li, C. C., and Desu, S. B., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 38 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Hayashi, Y., Kimura, T., and Yamaguchi, T., J. Mater. Sci. 21, 2876 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Kimura, T., Kanazawa, T., and Yamaguchi, T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 66, 597 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Gopalan, S. and Virkar, A. V., J. Electrochem. Soc. 140, 1060 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Yashima, M., Takashina, H., Kakihana, M., and Yoshimura, M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77, 1869 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Barin, I., Thermochemical Data of Pure Substances: Parts 1 / 2 (VCH Publishers, New York, 1989).Google Scholar