Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Understanding nanoindentation unloading curves

  • G. M. Pharr (a1) and A. Bolshakov (a2)

Abstract

Experiments have shown that nanoindentation unloading curves obtained with Berkovich triangular pyramidal indenters are usually welldescribed by the power-law relation P = α(hhf)m, where hf is the final depth after complete unloading and α and m are material constants. However, the power-law exponent is not fixed at an integral value, as would be the case for elastic contact by a conical indenter (m = 2) or a flat circular punch (m = 1), but varies from material to material in the range m = 1.2–1.6. A simple model is developed based on observations from finite element simulations of indentation of elastic–plastic materials by a rigid cone that provides a physical explanation for the behavior. The model, which is based on the concept of an indenter with an “effective shape” whose geometry is determined by the shape of the plastic hardness impression formed during indentation, provides a means by which the material constants in the power law relation can be related to more fundamental material properties such as the elastic modulus and hardness. Simple arguments are presented from which the effective indenter shape can be derived from the pressure distribution under the indenter.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1.Pethica, J.B., Hutchings, R., and Oliver, W.C., Philos. Mag. A 48, 593 (1983).
2.Loubet, J.L., Georges, J.M., Marchesini, O., and Meille, G., J. Tribol. 106, 43 (1984).
3.Doerner, M.F. and Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res. 1, 601 (1986).
4.Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).
5.Pharr, G.M. and Oliver, W.C., MRS Bull. 17, 28 (1992).
6.Pharr, G.M., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 253, 151 (1998).
7.Hay, J.L. and Pharr, G.M., in ASM Handbook Volume 8: Mechanical Testing and Evaluation, 10th ed., edited by Kuhn, H. and Medlin, D. (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 2000), pp. 232243.
8.Sneddon, I.N., Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3, 47 (1965).
9.Pharr, G.M., Oliver, W.C., and Brotzen, F.R., J. Mater. Res. 7, 613617 (1992).
10.Hainsworth, S.V., Chandler, H.W., and Page, T.F., J. Mater. Res. 11, 1987 (1996).
11.McElhaney, K.W., Vlassak, J.J., Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res. 13, 1300 (1998).
12.Stelmashenko, N.A., Walls, M.G., Brown, L.M., and Milman, Y.V., Acta Metall. 41, 2855 (1993).
13.Ma, Q. and Clark, D.R., J. Mater. Res. 10, 853 (1995).
14.Nix, W.D. and Gao, H., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 46, 411 (1998).
15.Bolshakov, A., Oliver, W.C., and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 11, 760 (1996).
16.Bolshakov, A. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 13, 1049 (1998).
17.Tsui, T.Y., Oliver, W.C., and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 11, 752 (1996).
18.Hay, J.C., Bolshakov, A., and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 14, 2296 (1999).
19.Johnson, K.L., Contact Mechanics, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1985).
20.Johnson, K.L., in Engineering Plasticity, edited by , Heyman and , Leckie (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1968).
21.Hirst, W. and Howse, M.G.J.W., Proc. R. Soc. A 311, 429 (1969).

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed