Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Virtual machine concept applied to uncertainties estimation in instrumented indentation testing

  • Thierry Coorevits (a1), Stephania Kossman (a1), Didier Chicot (a2), François Hennebelle (a3), Alex Montagne (a1) and Alain Iost (a1)...

Abstract

The basis of the virtual machine concept, which is commonly used in coordinate measuring machines, was implemented to determine more realistic uncertainties on the estimation of the elastic modulus obtained from nanoindentation tests. The methodology is based on a mathematical model applied to simulate the testing process and to evaluate the uncertainties through Monte Carlo simulations whose application depends on the studied system (instrument, material, scale, etc.). The methodology was applied to the study of fused silica (FQ) and steel samples tested in a nanoindentation system. The results revealed that the most relevant sources of uncertainty are related to the calibration procedure, particularly to the elastic modulus of the calibration material, and to the contact depth estimation; however, the relevance of the uncertainties is system dependent. This work represents a first insight for a deeper consideration of the uncertainties in instrumented indentation testing.

Copyright

Corresponding author

a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: stephaniakossman@gmail.com

References

Hide All
1.Cagliero, R., Barbato, G., Maizza, G., and Genta, G.: Measurement of elastic modulus by instrumented indentation in the macro-range: Uncertainty evaluation. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 101, 161 (2015).
2.Ullner, C.: Critical points in ISO 14577 part 2 and 3 considering the uncertainty in measurement. In Proceedings HARDMEKO (Washington D.C., 11–12 November, 2004).
3.Menčík, J.: Uncertainties and errors in nanoindentation. In Nanoindentation in Materials Science, Nemecek, J., ed. (InTech, London, U.K., 2012).
4.Menčik, J. and Swain, M.V.: Errors associated with depth-sensing microindentation tests. J. Mater. Res. 10, 1491 (1995).
5.BIPM—guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). Available at: https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html (accessed April 06, 2018).
6.Herrmann, K., Lucca, D.A., Klopfstein, M.J., and Menelao, F.: CIRP sponsored international comparison on nanoindentation. Metrologia 47, S50 (2010).
7.Giusca, C.L., Leach, R.K., and Forbes, A.B.: A virtual machine-based uncertainty evaluation for a traceable areal surface texture measuring instrument. Measurement 44, 988 (2011).
8.Sładek, J. and Gąska, A.: Evaluation of coordinate measurement uncertainty with use of virtual machine model based on Monte Carlo method. Measurement 45, 1564 (2012).
9.Sładek, J., Ostrowska, K., and Gąska, A.: Modeling and identification of errors of coordinate measuring arms with the use of a metrological model. Measurement 46, 667 (2013).
10.Gąska, A., Harmatys, W., Gąska, P., Gruza, M., Gromczak, K., and Ostrowska, K.: Virtual CMM-based model for uncertainty estimation of coordinate measurements performed in industrial conditions. Measurement 98, 361 (2017).
11.Ceria, P., Ducourtieux, S., Boukellal, Y., Allard, A., Fischer, N., and Feltin, N.: Modelling of the X, Y, Z positioning errors and uncertainty evaluation for the LNE’s mAFM using the Monte Carlo method. Meas. Sci. Technol. 28, 034007 (2017).
12.Xu, M., Dziomba, T., and Koenders, L.: Modelling and simulating scanning force microscopes for estimating measurement uncertainty: A virtual scanning force microscope. Meas. Sci. Technol. 22, 094004 (2011).
13.Trenk, M., Franke, M., and Schwenke, H.: The Virtual CMM, a software tool for uncertainty evaluation—Practical application in an accredited calibration lab. In Proceedings of ASPE: Uncertainty Analysis in Measurement and Design (University Park, Pennsylvania, 2004).
14.ISO/TS 15530-1:2013: Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—Coordinate measuring machines (CMM): Technique for determining the uncertainty of measurement—Part 1: Overview and metrological characteristics.
15.Joskowicz, L., Ostrovsky-Berman, Y., and Myers, Y.: Efficient representation and computation of geometric uncertainty: The linear parametric model. Precis. Eng. 34, 2 (2010).
16.Piratelli-Filho, A. and di Giacomo, B.: CMM uncertainty analysis with factorial design. Precis. Eng. 27, 283 (2003).
17.Summerhays, K.D., Baldwin, J.M., Campbell, D.A., and Henke, R.P.: Application of simulation software to coordinate measurement uncertainty evaluation. In Proceedings of ASPE: Uncertainty Analysis in Measurement and Design (University Park, Pennsylvania, 2004).
18.Sładek, J. and Gaska, A.: Modelling of the coordinate measuring systems accuracy. J. Mach. Eng. 16, 34–46 (2016).
19.JCGM 101:2008: Supplement 1 to the ‘guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement’-propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. Available at: http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html (accessed February 27, 2017).
20.Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M.: An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).
21.Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M.: Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: Advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J. Mater. Res. 19, 3 (2004).
22.Pratt, J.R., Kramar, J.A., Newell, D.B., and Smith, D.T.: Review of SI traceable force metrology for instrumented indentation and atomic force microscopy. Meas. Sci. Technol. 16, 2129 (2005).
23.Kim, M.S. and Pratt, J.R.: SI traceability: Current status and future trends for forces below 10 microNewtons. Measurement 43, 169 (2010).
24.Fujii, Y.: Method of generating and measuring static small force using down-slope component of gravity. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 066104 (2007).
25.Pratt, J.R., Smith, D.T., Kramar, J.A., and Newell, D.B.: Microforce and instrumented indentation research at the national institute of standards and technology, Gaithersburg, MD. In Society for Experimental Mechanics Annual Meeting on Experimental Mechanics (Charlotte, NC, 2003).
26.Smith, D.T., Shaw, G.A., Seugling, R.M., Xiang, D., and Pratt, J.R.: Traceable Micro-Force Sensor for Instrumented Indentation Calibration, Vol. 1021E (MRS Spring Meeting, San Francisco, California, 2007); pp. 1021-HH1005-1003.
27.Lawall, J. and Kessler, E.: Michelson interferometry with 10 pm accuracy. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71, 2669 (2000).
28.ISO 14577-2:2015: Metallic materials—Instrumented indentation test for hardness and materials parameters—Part 2: Verification and calibration of testing machines.
29.Song, J.F., Rudder, F.F., Vorburger, T.V., and Smith, J.H.: Microform calibration uncertainties of Rockwell diamond indenters. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 100, 543 (1995).
30.Germak, A. and Origlia, C.: New possibilities in the geometrical calibration of diamond indenters. In XIX IMEKO World Congress (Fundamental and Applied Metrology, Lisbon, Portugal, 2009); p. 1016.
31.VanLandingham, M.R., Juliano, T.F., and Hagon, M.J.: Measuring tip shape for instrumented indentation using atomic force microscopy. Meas. Sci. Technol. 16, 2173 (2005).
32.Pelletier, C.G.N., Dekkers, E.C.A., Govaert, L.E., den Toonder, J.M.J., and Meijer, H.E.H.: The influence of indenter-surface misalignment on the results of instrumented indentation tests. Polym. Test. 26, 949 (2007).
33.Fischer-Cripps, A.C.: Nanoindentation, 3rd ed. (Springer, New York, New York, 2011); pp. 2137.
34.Crawford, G.A., Chawla, N., Koopman, M., Carlisle, K., and Chawla, K.K.: Effect of mounting material compliance on nanoindentation response of metallic materials. Adv. Eng. Mater. 11, 45 (2009).
35.Marteau, J., Mazeran, P-E., Bouvier, S., and Bigerelle, M.: Zero-point correction method for nanoindentation tests to accurately quantify hardness and indentation size effect. Strain 48, 491497 (2012).
36.Hogan, R.: Type A and Type B Uncertainty: Evaluating Uncertainty Components (Isobudgets, 2017). Available at: http://www.isobudgets.com/type-a-and-type-b-uncertainty/ (accessed August 03, 2018).
37.Manual of the Nano Indenter® XP, MTS Systems Corporation.
38.Huan, Y., Liu, D., Yang, R., and Zhang, T.: Analysis of the practical force accuracy of electromagnet-based nanoindenters. Measurement 43, 1090 (2010).
39.Capacitive Displacement Sensors-Nanometrology Solutions: Application note from Physik Instrumente (PI), 2007. Available at: http://www.capacitance-sensors.com/pdf/Cap_Sens_Web_PI_Capacitive_Displacement_Nanometrology_Capacitance_Gauge_Sensor_E.pdf (accessed October 14, 2018).
40.Nano Indenters: Application note from micro star technologies, 2009. Available at: https://www.microstartech.com/ (accessed October 11, 2018).
41.Klein, C.A.: Anisotropy of Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio in diamond. Mater. Res. Bull. 27, 1407 (1992).
42.Gao, C. and Liu, M.: Instrumented indentation of fused silica by Berkovich indenter. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 475, 151 (2017).
43.Pharr, G.M. and Bolshakov, A.: Understanding nanoindentation unloading curves. J. Mater. Res. 17, 2660 (2002).
44.Loubet, J.L., Bauer, M., Tonck, A., Bec, S., and Gauthier-Manuel, B.: Nanoindentation with a surface force apparatus. In Mechanical Properties and Deformation Behavior of Materials Having Ultra-Fine Microstructures, M. Nastasi, D.M. Parkin, and H. Gleiter, eds.; NATO ASI Series, Series E: Applied Sciences (Springer, Dordrecht 1993); pp. 429447.
45.Bec, S., Tonck, A., Georges, J-M., Georges, E., and Loubet, J.L.: Improvements in the indentation method with a surface force apparatus. Philos. Mag. A 74, 1061 (1996).
46.King, R.B.: Elastic analysis of some punch problems for a layered medium. Int. J. Solids Struct. 23, 1657 (1987).
47.ISO 14577-1:2015: Metallic materials—Instrumented indentation test for hardness and materials parameters—Part 1: Test method.
48.Greaves, G.N., Greer, A.L., Lakes, R.S., and Rouxel, T.: Poisson’s ratio and modern materials. Nat. Mater. 10, 823 (2011).
49.Romdhani, F., Hennebelle, F., Ge, M., Juillion, P., Coquet, R., and Fontaine, J.F.: Methodology for the assessment of measuring uncertainties of articulated arm coordinate measuring machines. Meas. Sci. Technol. 25, 125008 (2014).
50.Kossman, S., Chicot, D., and Iost, A.: Multi-scale instrumented indentation applied to the study of bulk metallic materials. Matér. Tech. 105, 104 (2017).
51.Cabibbo, M., Ricci, P., Cecchini, R., Rymuza, Z., Sullivan, J., Dub, S., and Cohen, S.: An international round-robin calibration protocol for nanoindentation measurements. Micron 43, 215 (2012).
52.Chudoba, T. and Griepentrog, M.: Comparison between conventional Vickers hardness and indentation hardness obtained with different instruments. Z. Metallkd. 96, 1242 (2005).
53.Harris, P.M. and Cox, M.G.: On a Monte Carlo method for measurement uncertainty evaluation and its implementation. Metrologia 51, S176 (2014).
54.Bamber, M.J., Cooke, K.E., Mann, A.B., and Derby, B.: Accurate determination of Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio of thin films by a combination of acoustic microscopy and nanoindentation. Thin Solid Films 398, 299 (2001).
55.Gadelrab, K.R., Bonilla, F.A., and Chiesa, M.: Densification modeling of fused silica under nanoindentation. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 358, 392 (2012).
56.Keryvin, V., Meng, J-X., Gicquel, S., Guin, J-P., Charleux, L., Sanglebœuf, J-C., Pilvin, P., Rouxel, T., and Le Quilliec, G.: Constitutive modeling of the densification process in silica glass under hydrostatic compression. Acta Mater. 62, 250 (2014).
57.Herrmann, K., Jennett, N., Wegener, W., Meneve, J., Hasche, K., and Seemann, R.: Progress in determination of the area function of indenters used for nanoindentation. Thin Solid Films 377, 394 (2000).
58.Kossman, S., Coorevits, T., Iost, A., and Chicot, D.: A new approach of the Oliver and Pharr model to fit the unloading curve from instrumented indentation testing. J. Mater. Res. 32, 2230 (2017).
59.Marteau, J. and Bigerelle, M.: Toward an understanding of the effect of surface roughness on instrumented indentation results. J. Mater. Sci. 52, 7239 (2017).
60.Kim, J.Y., Lee, J.J., Lee, Y.H., Jang, J., and Kwon, D.: Surface roughness effect in instrumented indentation: A simple contact depth model and its verification. J. Mater. Res. 21, 2975 (2006).
61.Laurent-Brocq, M., Béjanin, E., and Champion, Y.: Influence of roughness and tilt on nanoindentation measurements: A quantitative model: Influence of roughness and tilt. Scanning 37, 350 (2015).
62.Zhou, X., Jiang, Z., Wang, H., and Yu, R.: Investigation on methods for dealing with pile-up errors in evaluating the mechanical properties of thin metal films at sub-micron scale on hard substrates by nanoindentation technique. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 488, 318 (2008).
63.Hay, J.L., Oliver, W.C., Bolshakov, A., and Pharr, G.M.: Using the ratio of loading slope and elastic stiffness to predict pile-up and constraint factor during indentation. MRS Proc 522 (1998).
64.Bolshakov, A. and Pharr, G.M.: Influences of pileup on the measurement of mechanical properties by load and depth sensing indentation techniques. J. Mater. Res. 13, 1049 (1998).
65.Lee, Y.H., Hahn, J.H., Nahm, S.H., Jang, J.I., and Kwon, D.: Investigations on indentation size effects using a pile-up corrected hardness. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41, 074027 (2008).
66.Yetna N’jock, M., Chicot, D., Ndjaka, J.M., Lesage, J., Decoopman, X., Roudet, F., and Mejias, A.: A criterion to identify sinking-in and piling-up in indentation of materials. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 90, 145 (2015).

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary material

Coorevits et al. supplementary material
Supplementary material

 Word (18 KB)
18 KB

Virtual machine concept applied to uncertainties estimation in instrumented indentation testing

  • Thierry Coorevits (a1), Stephania Kossman (a1), Didier Chicot (a2), François Hennebelle (a3), Alex Montagne (a1) and Alain Iost (a1)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed