Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T20:02:02.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Water-based Si3N4 suspensions: Part II. Effect of wet mixing/milling processes on the addition of the sintering aids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

C. Galassi
Affiliation:
IRTEC-CNR, Via Granarolo 64, I-48018 Faenza, Italy
F. Bertoni
Affiliation:
IRTEC-CNR, Via Granarolo 64, I-48018 Faenza, Italy
S. Ardizzone
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, University of Milan, Via Golgi 19, I-20133 Milan, Italy
C. L. Bianchi
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, University of Milan, Via Golgi 19, I-20133 Milan, Italy
Get access

Extract

Three mixing processes were used to introduce lanthanum oxide and yttrium oxide in silicon nitride suspensions. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was used to identify the surface composition and investigate the surface coverage by the added oxides. XPS results evidenced the protective effect against hydrolysis and oxidation of the coated layer. Electroacoustic measurements showed that the milling/mixing process and solids loading contents had a great influence on the isoelectric point (IEP) and on the dispersing degree for suspensions with sintering aids. With the change of solids load content and mixing energy, the IEP of mixed powders suspensions reflected a surface behavior dominated by the additives oxides. The attrition mixing and the ultrasonication resulted in the more efficient processing routes to distribute the sintering aids on the starting Si3N4 powders, especially at high solids volume fraction.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Pujari, V.K. and Aboual, M., Key Eng. Mater. 132–136, 341 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Dressler, W. and Riedel, R., Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 15, 13 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Ziegler, G., Heinrich, J., and Wotting, G., J. Mater. Sci. 22, 3041 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Tsuge, A., Nishida, K., and Komatsu, M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 58, 323 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Cinibulk, M.K., Thomas, G., and Johnson, S.M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75, 2037 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Carlström, E., in Surface and Colloidal Chemistry in Advanced Ceramics Processing, Surfactant Science Series, edited by Pugh, R.J. and Bergström, L. (Deckker, New York, 1994), Vol. 51.Google Scholar
7.Lange, F.F., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72, 3 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Morrell, R., in Microstructural Targets for Ceramics, Materials Science and Technology, Processing of Ceramics Part I, edited by Cahn, R.W., Haasen, P., and Kramer, E.J. (VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 1996).Google Scholar
9.Galassi, C., Biasini, V., and Bellosi, A., Process. Adv. Mater. 3, 153 (1993).Google Scholar
10.Bergström, L., Ernstsson, M., Gruvin, B., Brage, R., Nyberg, B., and Carlström, E., in Ceramics Today—Tomorrow's Ceramics, edited by Vincenzini, P. (Elsevier Science Publisher, B.V., 1991).Google Scholar
11.Bellosi, A., Monteverde, F., and Babini, G.N., in Engineering Ceramics '96: Higher Reliability through Processing (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996), Vol. 25, p. 197.Google Scholar
12.Galassi, C., Bertoni, F., Ardizzone, S., and Bianchi, C.L., J. Mat. Res. 15, 155 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Negita, K., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 4, 755 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Galassi, C., Rastelli, E., Roncari, E., Ardizzone, S., and Cattania, M.G., J. Mater. Res. 10, 339 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Hackley, V.A. and Malghan, S.G., J. Mater. Sci. 29, 4420 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Atlas of Metal-Ligand Equilibria in Aqueous Solution, edited by Kragten, J. (Ellis Horwood Limited, New York, 1978).Google Scholar