Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-kl2l2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-27T08:34:04.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of Combustion Models in Cleanroom Fire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2011

Y.-L. Huang ,
H.-R. Shiu ,
S.-H. Chang ,
W.-F. Wu  and
S.-L. Chen
Y.-L. Huang*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
H.-R. Shiu*
Affiliation:
Energy and Environment Research Laboratories, ITRI, Hsinchu 30011, Tainan 70955, Taiwan, R.O.C.
S.-H. Chang*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
W.-F. Wu*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
S.-L. Chen*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
*
*Ph.D. Candidate
**Ph.D.
***Professor
***Professor
***Professor
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, the cleanroom fire simulation in a semi-conductor factory is investigated by using the commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code. We using three different combustion models in the fire simulation. The combustion models including the volume heat source (VHS) model, the eddy break-up (EBU) model and the presumed probability density function (prePDF) model are considered to predict the cleanroom fire. The turbulence models coupled with different combustion models, while the radiation model is coupled with the turbulent combustion processes. Additionally, the discrete transfer radiation method (DTRM) is used in the global radiation heat exchange. For the fire simulation, the different combustion models are evaluated for their performance and compared with the experimental data from the literature to verify. Thus, these numerical simulations can be adopted as a useful tool to design and optimize the smoke control strategy in cleanroom fire.

Keywords

CleanroomFireNumerical simulationCombustion modelRadiation model.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 267 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1.Eaton, A. M., Smoot, L. D., Hill, S. C. and Eatough, C.N., “Components, Formulations, Solutions, Evaluation, and Application of Comprehensive Combustion Models,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 25, pp. 387–436 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Joulain, P., “Convective and Radiative Transport in Pool and Wall Fires: 20 Years of Research in Poitiers,” Fire Safety Journal, 26, pp. 99–149 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Nam, S., “Numerical Simulation of Smoke Movement in Clean Room Environments,” Fire Safety Journal, 34, pp. 169–189 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Xue, H., Ho, J. C. and Cheng, Y. M., “Comparison of Different Combustion Models in Enclosure Fire Simulation,” Fire Safety Journal, 36, pp. 37–54 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Wen, J. X. and Huang, L. Y., “CFD Modeling of Confined Jet Fires under Ventilation-Controlled Conditions,” Fire Safety Journal, 34, pp. 1–24 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Goldin, G. M. and Menon, S., “A Comparison of Scalar PDF Turbulent Combustion Models - Reduced Kinetic Mechanisms and Asymptotic Approximations for Methane-Air Flames,” Combustion and Flame, 113, pp. 442–453 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Heskestad, G., “Final Technical Report-Escape potential from Apartments Protected by Fire Detectors in High-Rise Buildings,” Factory Mutual Research Corp., Norwood, M. A. (1974).Google Scholar
8. “Fluent 5 User's Guide,” Lebanon, N. H. (1998).Google Scholar
9.Spalding, D. B., “Mixing and Chemical Reaction in Steady Confined. Turbulent Flames,” in Thirteenth Symposium (International) on Combustion, pp. 649–657 (1971).Google Scholar
10.Jones, W. P. and Whitelaw, J. H., “Calculation Methods for Reacting Turbulent Flows: a Review,” Combustion and Flame, 48, pp. 1–26 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Sivathanu, Y. R. and Faeth, G. M., “Generalized State Relationship for Scalar Properties in Non-Premixed Hydrocarbon/Air Flame,” Combustion and Flame, 82, pp. 211–230 (1990).Google Scholar
12.Kuo, K. K. Y., “Principles of Combustion,” John Wiley and Sons, New York (1986).Google Scholar
13.Shah, N. G., “A New Method of Computation of Radiant Heat Transfer in Combustion Chambers,” Imperial College of Science and Technology, London, England (1979).Google Scholar