Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-rx8cm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-04T14:27:37.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Finite-Volume Multi-Stage Scheme for Advection-Diffusion Modeling in Shallow Water Flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2011

W.-D. Guo ,
J.-S. Lai ,
G.-F. Lin ,
F.-Z. Lee  and
Y.-C. Tan
W.-D. Guo
Affiliation:
Taiwan Typhoon and Flood Research Institute, National Applied Research Laboratories, Taipei, Taiwan 10093, R.O.C.
J.-S. Lai*
Affiliation:
Hydrotech Research Institute, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
G.-F. Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
F.-Z. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
Y.-C. Tan
Affiliation:
Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
*
**Research Fellow, corresponding author
Get access

Abstract

This paper adopts the finite-volume multi-stage (FMUSTA) scheme to the two-dimensional coupled system combining the shallow water equations and the advection-diffusion equation. For the convection part, the numerical flux is estimated by adopting the FMUSTA scheme, where high order accuracy is achieved by the data reconstruction using the monotonic upstream schemes for conservation laws method. For the diffusion part, the evaluations of first-order derivatives are solved via the method of Jacobian transformation. The hydrostatic reconstruction method is employed for treatment of source terms. The overall accuracy of resulting scheme is second-order both in time and space. In addition, the scheme is non-oscillatory and conserves the pollutant mass during the transport process. For scheme validation, six advection and diffusion transport tests are simulated. The influences of the grid spacing and limiters on the numerical performance are also discussed. Furthermore, the scheme is employed in the simulation of suspended sediment transport in natural-irregular river topography. From the satisfactory agreements between the simulated results and the field measured data, it is demonstrated that the proposed FMUSTA scheme is practically suitable for hydraulic engineering applications.

Keywords

Finite-volume multi-stage schemeShallow water equationsAdvection-diffusion equationMonotonic upstream schemes for conservation laws methodHydrostatic reconstruction method

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 415 - 430
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Vreugdenhil, C. B. and Koren, B., Numerical Method for Advection-Diffusion Problems, Braunschweig, Wiesbaden, Vieweg (1993).Google Scholar
2. Hirsch, C., Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows, 2, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1990).Google Scholar
3. Toro, E. F., Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Zalesak, S. T., “A Preliminary Comparison of Modern Shock-Capturing Schemes: Linear Advection. In R. Vichnevetsky and R. S. Stepleman, Ed.,” Advances in Computer Methods for Partial Differential Equations VI, pp. 15–22 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Yang, H. Q. and Przekwas, A. J., “A Comparative Study of Advanced Shock-Capturing Schemes Applied to Burger'S Equation,” Journal of Computational Physics, 102, pp. 139–159 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Sweby, P. K., “High Resolution Schemes Using Flux Limiters for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws,”SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 21, pp. 995–1011 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Roe, P. L., “Characteristic-Based Schemes for the Euler Equations,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 18, pp. 337–365 (1986).Google Scholar
8. van Leer, B., “Towards the Ultimate Conservation Difference Scheme V, A Second-Order Sequel to Godunov's Method,” Journal of Computational Physics, 32, pp. 101–136 (1979).Google Scholar
9. Smith, P. E. and Larock, B. E., “High-Resolution Two-Dimensional Advection Transport,” in Proceedings of the 1989 National Conference on Hydraulic Engineering, New Orleans, La., August 14-18, American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 1005–1001 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Lal, A. M., “A TVD MacCormack Method for Open Water Hydraulics and Transport,” Water Forum'92, pp. 494–499 (1993).Google Scholar
11. Monthe, L. A., Benkhaldoun, F. and Elmahi, I., “Positivity Preserving Finite Volume Roe Schemes for Transport-Diffusion Equations,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 178, pp. 215–232 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Wang, J. S. and He, Y. S., “High-Resolution Numerical Model for Shallow Water Flows and Pollutant Diffusions,” Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 23, pp. 741–747 (2002).Google Scholar
13. Benkhaldoun, F., Elmahi, I. and Seaid, M., “Well-Balanced Finite Volume Schemes for Pollutant Transport by Shallow Water Equations on Unstructured Meshes,” Journal of Computational Physics, 226, pp. 180–203 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Petti, M. and Bosa, S., “Accurate Shock-Capturing Finite Volume Method for Advection-Dominated Flow and Pollution Transport,” Computers & Fluids, 36, pp. 455–466 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Guo, W. D., Lai, J. S. and Lin, G. F., “Finite-Volume Multi-Stage Schemes for Shallow-Water Flow Simulations,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 57, pp. 177–204 (2008).Google Scholar
16. Hu, K., Mingham, C. G. and Causon, D. M., “A Bore-Capturing Finite Volume Method for Open-Channel Flows,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 28, pp. 1241–1261 (1998).3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Mohammadian, A., Le Roux, D., Tajrishi, M. and Mazaheri, K., “A Mass Conservative Scheme for Simulating Shallow Flows Over Variable Topography Using Unstructured Grid,” Advances in Water Resources, 28, pp. 523–537 (2005).Google Scholar
18. Audusse, E., Bouchut, F., Bristeau, M. O., Klein, R. and Perthame, B., “A Fast and Stable Well-Balanced Scheme with Hydrostatic Reconstruction for Shallow Water Flows,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 25, pp. 2050–2065 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. van Rijn, L. C., Principles of Sediment Transport in Rivers, Estuaries and Coastal Seas, Aqua Publications, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (1993).Google Scholar
20. Ziegler, C. K. and Nisbet, B. S., “Long-Term Simulation of Fine-Grained Sediment Transport in Large Reservoir,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 121, pp. 773–781 (1995).Google Scholar
21. Teisson, C., “Cohesive Suspended Sediment Transport: Feasibility and Limitations of Numerical Modeling,” Journal of Hydraulic Research, 29, pp. 755–769 (1991).Google Scholar
22. Liu, W. C., Hsu, M. H. and Kuo, A. Y., “Modelling of Hydrodynamics and Cohesive Sediment Transport in Tanshui River Estuarine System, Taiwan,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, 44, pp. 1076–1088 (2002).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Tan, W. Y., Shallow Water Hydrodynamics, Elsevier, New York (1992).Google Scholar
24. Toro, E. F., Shock-Capturing Methods for Free-Surface Shallow Water Flows, John Wiley & Sons, New York (2001).Google Scholar
25. Erduran, K. S., Kutija, V. and Hewett, C. J. M., “Performance of Finite Volume Solutions to the Shallow Water Equations with Shock-Capturing Schemes,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 40, pp. 1237–1273 (2002).Google Scholar
26. Lai, J. S., Lin, G. F. and Guo, W. D., “Simulation of Hydraulic Shock Waves by Hybrid Flux-Splitting Schemes in Finite Volume Method,” Journal of Mechanics, 21, pp. 85–101 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Jan, C. D., Chang, C. J., Lai, J. S. and Guo, W. D., “Characteristics of Hydraulic Shock Waves in an Inclined Chute Contraction - Numeral Simulations,” Journal of Mechanics, 25, pp. 75–84 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Lai, J. S., Guo, W. D., Lin, G. F. and Tan, Y. C., “A Well-Balanced Upstream Flux-Splitting Finite-Volume Scheme for Shallow-Water Flow Simulations with Irregular Bed Topography,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 62, pp. 927–944 (2010).Google Scholar
29. Leveque, R. J., “Balancing Source Terms and Flux Gradients in High-Resolution Godunov Methods: the Quasi-Steady Wave-Propagation Algorithm,” Journal of Computational Physics, 146, pp. 346–365 (1998).Google Scholar
30. Northern Region Water Resource Office, Water Resources Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs, “Study on the Analysis and Reforming Strategy of Water Supply Shortage Caused by Exceeded Turbidity in Shihmen Reservoir,” Research Report (2006). (in Chinese).Google Scholar
31. Environmental Modeling Research Laboratory, “SMS 8.0 Tutorials,” Brigham Young University, Utah (2002).Google Scholar