Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-30T18:27:41.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Numerical Investigation on the Effect of the Size and Number of Stages on the Tesla Microvalve Efficiency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2013

K. Mohammadzadeh
Affiliation:
Foolad Institute of Technology, Foolad Shahr, Esfahan, Iran
E. M. Kolahdouz
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Buffalo, U.S.A
E. Shirani*
Affiliation:
Foolad Institute of Technology, Foolad Shahr, Esfahan, Iran
M. B. Shafii
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
*
*Corresponding author (eshirani@ictp.it)
Get access

Abstract

In the present study, the effect of the number of stages of Tesla Micro-Valve (TMV), as well as the dependency of Reynolds number, Re, on the valve performance has been analyzed. For this purpose, different layouts include one to four-stage with different sizes are investigated numerically. The main criterion for evaluation of valves performance is diodicity, Di. Unsteady and steady flow in valve have been simulated and compared. It is shown that although there are some difference but the trend is similar for both responses. Finally, 2-D and steady state computations of the fluid flow have been utilized that reveal a strong dependence of Di on Re and pressure drop, ΔP. The results showed that the maximum Di of the two-stage microvalve is approximately 1.45 times of that of one-stage. Additional stages increase the complexity, and they do not change Di appreciably. It is concluded that two-stage layout of Tesla type valve is the best option. Also, the two-stage valve performance for three different sizes is compared with Nozzle-Diffuser type Micro-Valve (NDMV). Comparisons, which are performed based on calculation Di in applicable range of Re, showed that Di as a function of Re is independent of the valve size. Also, the superiority of the Tesla type valve at higher Re and its weakness at lower Re is observed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Laser, D. J. and Santiago, J. G., “A Review of Micropumps,” Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 14, pp. 3564 (2004).Google Scholar
2.Woias, P., “Micropumps—Past, Progress and Future Prospects,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 105, pp. 2838 (2005).Google Scholar
3.Nisar, A., Afzulpurkar, N., Mahaisavariya, B. and Tuantranont, A., “MEMS-Based Micropumps in Drug Delivery and Biomedical Applications,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 130, pp. 917942 (2008).Google Scholar
4.Iverson, B. D. and Garimella, S. V., “Recent Advances in Microscale Pumping Technologies: A Review and Evaluation,” Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 5, pp. 145174 (2008).Google Scholar
5.Nabavi, M., “Steady and Unsteady Flow Analysis in Microdiffusers and Micropumps: A Critical Review,” Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 7, pp. 599619 (2009).Google Scholar
6.Amirouche, F., Zhou, Y. and Johnson, T., “Current Micropump Technologies and Their Biomedical Applications,” Microsystem Technologies, 15, pp. 647666 (2009).Google Scholar
7.Stemme, E. and Stemme, G., “A Valveless Diffuser Nozzle-Based Fluid Pumps,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 39, pp. 159167 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Forster, F., Bardell, R., Afromowitz, M., Sharma, N. and Blanchard, A., “Design, Fabrication and Testing of fixed-Valve Micropumps,” In Proceedings of the ASME Fluids Engineering Division, San Francisco (1995).Google Scholar
9.Tesla, N., “Valvular Conduit,” U. S. Patent, 329, p. 559 (1920).Google Scholar
10.Reed, J. L. and Fla, O., “Fluidic Rectifier,” U. S. Patent, 265, p. 636 (1993).Google Scholar
11.Forster, F. K., Bardell, R. L., Blanchard, A. P., Afromowitz, M. A. and Sharma, N. R., “Micropumps with Fixed Valves,” U. S. Patent, 876, p. 187 (1999).Google Scholar
12.Stemme, E. and Stemme, G., “Valve-Less Fluid Pump,” Swedish Patent Application, 300, pp. 604607 (1993).Google Scholar
13.Forster, F. and Williams, B., “Parametric Design of Fixed-Geometry Microvalves-The Tesser Valve,” Proceedings of IMECE2002, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A (2002).Google Scholar
14.Liao, P. F., “A Study on No-Moving-Part Valves for Flows in Microchannels,” M. S. Thesis, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, National Cheng Kung University, China (2004).Google Scholar
15.Gamboa, A. R., Morris, C. J. and Forster, F. K., “Improvement in Fixed-Valve Micropump Performance Through Shape Optimization of Valves,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, 127, pp. 339346 (2005).Google Scholar
16.Kolahdouz, E. M., “Design and Fabrication of a Piezoelectrically Actuated Micropump Using Modified Tesla Type Micovalves,” M. S. Thesis, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran (2010).Google Scholar
17.Bardell, R., “The Diodicity Mechanism of Tesla-Type-No-Moving-Part Valves,” Ph. D. Thesis, Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Washington, U.S.A (2000).Google Scholar
18.Yamahata, C., “Magnetically Actuated Micro-pumps,” Ph.D. Thesis, Laboratory for Microsystems, Institute of Microelectronics and Microsystems, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, EPFL (2005).Google Scholar