Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:48:05.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Second time around: Ex-combatants at the polls in Liberia*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2013

Johanna Söderström
Johanna Söderström*
Affiliation:
Department of Government, Uppsala University, Sweden The Nordic Africa Institute, Box 514, 751 20 Uppsala, Sweden
*
Email: johanna.soderstrom@statsvet.uu.se and johanna.soderstrom@nai.uu.se
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A precondition for sustainable peace and democracy is the acceptance of new ways of solving political problems without resorting to arms. Post-war elections are an important point for testing the legitimacy of the new regime, highlighting the depth of micro-level support for democracy. In the case of Liberia, the most notable problem of the elections of 2005 related to the issue of legitimacy. The ex-combatants did not trust the results and felt abandoned after the elections. Such experiences stand in the way of further deepening democracy in Liberia and may offer the grounds for mobilising anew. Yet, it is only by repeated experiences with elections that a process of democratisation takes place. This article addresses how the second experience with elections has changed ex-combatants' relation with democracy and experience of legitimacy, through re-interviewing a number of ex-combatants concerning their electoral experience from 2005 and 2011.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Modern African Studies , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 409 - 433
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am very grateful for the feedback I have received from Enzo Nussio, Ben Oppenheim, Mats Utas and the Democracy and Development seminar at the University of Bergen, during the development of this manuscript. The fieldwork for this article was funded by Göransson-Sandvikens resestipendium and a grant from the Borbos Erik Hansson fund.

References

REFERENCES

Birch, S. 2008. ‘Electoral institutions and popular confidence in electoral processes: a cross-national analysis’, Electoral Studies 27, 2: 305–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, M. 1998. ‘Second Elections in Africa’, Journal of Democracy 9, 3: 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bøås, M. & Utas, M.. forthcoming. ‘The political landscape of post-war Liberia: historical dividing lines and the 2011 elections.’Google Scholar
Christensen, M. & Utas, M.. 2008. ‘Mercenaries of democracy: the ‘Politricks’ of remobilized combatants in the 2007 general elections, Sierra Leone’, African Affairs 107, 429: 515–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowen, M. & Laakso., L. 1997. ‘An overview of election studies in Africa’, Journal of Modern African Studies 35, 4: 717–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujii, L. A. 2010. ‘Shades of truth and lies: interpreting testimonies of war and violence’, Journal of Peace Research 47, 2: 231–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, D. 2006. ‘Liberia 2005: an unusual African post-conflict election’, Journal of Modern African Studies 44, 3: 375–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, S. & Petersson, O.. 1980. ‘Den magiska felmarginalen’, Inom felmarginalen: En bok om politiska opinionsundersökningar. Stockholm: Liber förlag, 41–75.Google Scholar
Höglund, K., Jarstad, A. & Söderberg Kovacs, M.. 2009. ‘The predicament of elections in war-torn societies’, Democratization 16, 3: 530–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höglund, K. & Öberg, M., eds. 2011. Understanding Peace Research: Methods and Challenges. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, K. 2007. ‘The struggle to satisfy: DDR through the eyes of ex-combatants in Liberia’, International Peacekeeping 14, 2: 204–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, S. I. 2004. ‘The democratic qualities of competitive elections: participation, competition and legitimacy in Africa.’ Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 42, 1: 61–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, S. I., ed. 2009. Democratization by Elections: A New Mode of Transition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, J. J. & Stepan, A. C.. 1996. ‘Toward consolidated democracies’, Journal of Democracy 7, 2: 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, T. 2004. ‘Post-conflict elections and the process of demilitarizing politics: the role of electoral administration’, Democratization 11, 3: 36–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Elections Commission. 2011a. ‘National Tally Center Tally Report for the Presidential and Legislative Elections on 11 October 2011’. Monrovia: Republic of Liberia.Google Scholar
National Elections Commission. 2011b. ‘National Tally Center Tally Report for the Run-off Election of the President and Vice-President on 08 November 2011’. Monrovia: Republic of Liberia.Google Scholar
National Democratic Institute (NDI). 2007. ‘Observing Presidential and Legislative Elections in Liberia’. The National Democratic Institute and the Carter Center.Google Scholar
Nilsson, R. A. 2008. ‘Dangerous Liaisons. Why Ex-Combatants Return to Violence – Cases from the Republic of Congo and Sierra Leone.’ Uppsala: Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Nussio, E. 2012. ‘Emotional legacies of war among former Colombian paramilitaries’, Peace & Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 18, 4: 369–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, B. 2002. ‘Elections in post-conflict scenarios: constraints and dangers’, International Peacekeeping 9, 2: 118–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, A. 2008. ‘Emerging patterns in Liberia's post-conflict politics: observations from the 2005 Elections’, African Affairs 107, 427: 177–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, J. 1998. ‘‘A baby who does not cry will not be suckled’: AMODEG and the reintegration of demobilised soldiers’, Journal of Southern African Studies 24, 1: 207–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, A. 1998. ‘What is democratic consolidation?’, Journal of Democracy 9, 2: 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, P. C. & Karl, T. L.. 1991. ‘What democracy is … and is not’, Journal of Democracy 2, 3: 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Söderström, J. 2009. ‘Valerfarenheter bland f.d. kombattanter: En ny syn på demokrati i Liberia?’, Politica 41, 3: 300–14.Google Scholar
Söderström, J. 2010. ‘Ex-combatants at the polls: exploring focus groups & electoral meaning’, Anthropology Matters 12, 1.Google Scholar
Söderström, J. 2011a. ‘Dissent and opposition among ex-combatants in Liberia.’ Democratization 18, 5: 1146–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Söderström, J. 2011b. ‘Focus groups: safety in numbers?’, in Höglund, K. & Öberg, M., eds. Understanding Peace Research: Methods and Challenges. New York: Routledge, 146–64.Google Scholar
Söderström, J. 2011c. Politics of Affection: Ex-Combatants, Political Engagement and Reintegration Programs in Liberia. Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Unity Party. 2011. ‘Monkey still working, Let Baboon wait small’. Monrovia.Google Scholar
Utas, M. 2003. ‘Sweet Battlefields. Youth and the Liberian Civil War.’ Cultural Anthropology, Uppsala University, Uppsala.Google Scholar
Utas, M. 2005. ‘Building a future? the reintegration and re-marginalisation of youth in Liberia’, in Richards, P. & Helander, B., eds. No Peace, No War: an anthropology of contemporary armed conflicts. Athens, OH and Oxford: Ohio University Press and James Currey, 137–54.Google Scholar
Utas, M. 2012a. ‘Liberia post-election: on CDC popularity and odd election results’. WordPress. <http://matsutas.wordpress.com/2012/04/05/liberia-post-election-on-cdc-popularity-and-odd-election-results/>, accessed 18.6.2012.,+accessed+18.6.2012.>Google Scholar
Utas, M., ed. 2012b. African Conflicts and Informal Power: Big Men and Networks. London: Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, T. 1993. ‘Elections and electoral politics in Africa’, Africa: Journal of the International African Institute 63, 3: 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar