Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Urban and rural voting patterns in Senegal: the spatial aspects of incumbency, c. 1978–2012*

  • Dominika Koter (a1)

One of the most striking voting patterns in many African elections is the marked difference between urban and rural voters in their willingness to support the incumbent. In many countries, incumbents receive their worst electoral scores in the cities, whereas the countryside votes overwhelmingly for them. This pattern is puzzling because there is no evidence that rural areas benefit more from government policies. On the contrary, most governments in Africa exhibit a pro-urban policy bias. Why then do rural voters support incumbents at higher rates? Using evidence from original interviews with politicians in Senegal, coupled with media coverage from several elections, I contend that incumbents enjoy higher success in rural vis-à-vis urban areas because rural voters are more susceptible to clientelism. Tight social structure, cohesion and the prominent role of local patrons facilitate the acquisition of entire blocs of rural voters for the incumbent. These findings are independent of ethnic, religious or party identity.

Corresponding author
Hide All

Fieldwork conducted by the author in Senegal was generously supported by the Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation Research Award, the Macmillan Center at Yale University and the Research Council at Colgate University. The author thanks Nathaniel Cogly, Jeff Conroy-Krutz, Keith Darden, William Foltz, Ellen Lust, Susan Stokes, the editors and two anonymous reviewers, and the participants of the Comparative Politics Workshop at Yale University for helpful comments on previous drafts.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. Anderson & H. Maupeu . 2003. ‘Kenya, la succession de Moi’, Politique Africaine 90: 516.

L. Beck 1997. ‘Senegal's “patrimonial democrats”: incremental reform and the obstacles to the consolidation of democracy’, Canadian Journal of African Studies 31, 1: 131.

L. Beck 2001. ‘Reining in the Marabouts? Democratization and local governance in Senegal’, African Affairs 100: 601–21.

L. Beck 2008. Brokering Democracy in Africa: the rise of clientelist democracy in Senegal. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

D. Bezemer & D. Headey . 2008. ‘Agriculture, development, and urban bias’, World Development 36, 8: 1342–64.

C. Boone 2003. Political Topographies of the African State: territorial authority and institutional choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

M-C. Diop , M. Diouf & A. Diaw . 2000. ‘Le Baobab a été déracine. L'alternance au Sénégal’, Politique Africaine 78: 157–79.

R. Fatton 1986. ‘Clientelism and patronage in Senegal’, African Studies Review 29, 4: 6178.

J. Herbst 2001. ‘Political liberalization in Africa after ten years’, Comparative Politics 33, 3: 357–76.

R. Jeffries 1998. ‘The Ghanaian elections of 1996: towards the consolidation of democracy?’, African Affairs 97, 387: 189208.

S. Lindberg 2003. ‘It's our time to “chop”: do elections in Africa feed neo-patrimonialism rather than counteract it?’, Democratization 10, 2: 121–40.

M. Lipton 1993. ‘Urban bias: of consequences, classes and causality’, Journal of Development Studies 29, 4: 229–58.

B. Magaloni 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

A. Patterson 2002. ‘The impact of Senegal's decentralization on women in local governance’, Canadian Journal of African Studies 36, 3: 490529.

D. Posner 2005. Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

D. Posner & D. Simon . 2002. ‘Economic conditions and incumbent support in Africa's new democracies: evidence from Zambia’, Comparative Political Studies 35, 3: 313–36.

D. Sahn & D. Stifel . 2003. ‘Urban-rural inequality in living standards in Africa’, Journal of African Economies 12, 4: 564–97.

R. Sandbrook 1996. ‘Transitions without consolidation: democratization in six African cases’, Third World Quarterly 17, 1: 6987.

K. van Walraven 2002. ‘The end of an era: the Ghanaian elections of December 2000’, Journal of Contemporary African Studies 20, 2: 183202.

P. Vicente & L. Wantchekon . 2009. ‘Clientelism and vote buying: lessons from field experiments in African elections’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 25, 2: 292305.

L. Villalón 1995. Islamic Society and State Power in Senegal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Modern African Studies
  • ISSN: 0022-278X
  • EISSN: 1469-7777
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-modern-african-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 74 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 255 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.