Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Accuracy in the estimation of children's food portion sizes against a food picture book by parents and early educators

  • Kaija Nissinen (a1) (a2), Liisa Korkalo (a2), Henna Vepsäläinen (a2), Päivi Mäkiranta (a2), Leena Koivusilta (a3), Eva Roos (a4) (a5) and Maijaliisa Erkkola (a2)...

Abstract

Validated methodological aids for food quantification are needed for the accurate estimation of food consumption. Our objective was to assess the validity of an age-specific food picture book, which contains commonly eaten foods among Finnish children, for parents and early educators in estimating food portion sizes. The food picture book was developed to assist in portion size estimation when filling in food records in the Increased health and wellbeing in preschools (DAGIS) study. All ninety-five food pictures in the book, each containing three or four different portion sizes, were evaluated at real-time sessions. Altogether, seventy-three parents and 107 early educators or early education students participated. Each participant evaluated twenty-three or twenty-four portions by comparing presented pre-weighed food portions against the corresponding picture from the food picture book. Food portions were not consumed by participants. The total proportion of correct estimations varied from 36 % (cottage cheese) to 100 % (fish fingers). Among the food groups, nearly or over 90 % of the estimations were correct for bread, pastries and main courses (‘piece products’ such as meatballs and chicken nuggets). Soups, porridges, salads and grated and fresh vegetables were least correctly estimated (<65 % correct estimations). There were small differences in evaluations of berries and fresh fruits, warm vegetables and pastries between the parents and early educators, but other estimations were mostly similar. The children's food picture book was found to be a useful aid for the estimation of food portion sizes. Parents and early educators evaluated the portion sizes with similar accuracy.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Accuracy in the estimation of children's food portion sizes against a food picture book by parents and early educators
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Accuracy in the estimation of children's food portion sizes against a food picture book by parents and early educators
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Accuracy in the estimation of children's food portion sizes against a food picture book by parents and early educators
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author: Kaija Nissinen, email kaija.nissinen@seamk.fi

References

Hide All
1.Turconi, G, Guarcello, M, Berzolari, FG, et al. (2005) An evaluation of a colour food photography atlas as a tool for quantifying food portion size in epidemiological dietary surveys. Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 923931.
2.Ovaskainen, M-L, Paturi, M, Reinivuo, H, et al. (2008) Accuracy in the estimation of food servings against the portions in food photographs. Eur J Clin Nutr 62, 674681.
3.Korkalo, L, Erkkola, M, Fidalgo, L, et al. (2013) Food photographs in portion size estimation among adolescent Mozambican girls. Public Health Nutr 16, 15581564.
4.Trolle, E, Vandevijvere, S, Ruprich, J, et al. (2013) Validation of a food quantification picture book targeting children of 0–10 years of age for pan-European and national dietary surveys. Br J Nutr 110, 22982308.
5.Lillegaard, ITL, Overby, NC & Andersen, LF (2005) Can children and adolescents use photographs of food to estimate portion sizes? Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 611617.
6.Foster, E, Matthews, JNS, Lloyd, J, et al. (2008) Children's estimates of food portion size: the development and evaluation of three portion size assessment tools for use with children. Br J Nutr 99, 175184.
7.Foster, E, Adamson, AJ, Anderson, AS, et al. (2009) Estimation of portion size in children's dietary assessment: lessons learnt. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, Suppl. 1, S45S49.
8.Foster, E, Hawkins, A & Adamson, AJ (2010) Young Person's Food Atlas – Pre-School. London: Food Standards Agency.
9.Andersen, LF, Lioret, S, Brants, H, et al. (2011) Recommendations for a trans-European dietary assessment method in children between 4 and 14 years. Eur J Clin Nutr 65, Suppl. 1, S58S64.
10.Foster, E & Adamson, A (2014) Challenges involved in measuring intake in early life: focus on methods. Proc Nutr Soc 73, 201209.
11.Subar, AF, Crafts, J, Zimmerman, TP, et al. (2010) Assessment of the accuracy of portion size reports using computer based food photographs aids in the development of an automated self-administrative 24-hour recall. J Am Diet Assoc 110, 5564.
12.Foster, E, Hawkins, A, Simpson, E, et al. (2014) Developing an interactive portion size assessment system (IPSAS) for use with children. J Hum Nutr Diet 27, Suppl. 1, 1825.
13.Naska, A, Valanou, E, Peppa, E, et al. (2016) Evaluation of a digital food photography atlas used as portion size measurement aid in dietary surveys in Greece. Public Health Nutr 19, 23692376.
14.de Boer, EJ, Slimani, N, van ‘t Veer, P, et al. (2011) The European Food Consumption Validation Project: conclusions and recommendations. Eur J Clin Nutr 65, Suppl. 1, S102S107.
15.Foster, E, Matthews, JNS, Nelson, M, et al. (2006) Accuracy of estimates of food portion size using food photographs – the importance of using age-appropriate tools. Public Health Nutr 9, 509514.
16.Määttä, S, Lehto, R, Nislin, M, et al. (2015) Increased health and well-being in preschools (DAGIS): rationale and design for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 15, 402.
17.Erkkola, M, Saloheimo, T, Hauta-alus, H, et al. (2016) Burden of allergy diets in Finnish day care reduced by change in practices. Allergy 71, 14531460.
18.Nelson, M & Haraldsdóttir, J (1998) Food photographs: practical guidelines I. Design and analysis of studies to validate portion size estimates. Public Health Nutr 1, 219230.
19.Noether, GE (1987) Sample size determination for some common nonparametric tests. J Am Stat Assoc 82, 645647.
20.Nelson, M, Atkinson, M & Darbyshire, S (1996) Food photography II: use of food photographs for estimating portion size and the nutrient content of the meals. Br J Nutr 76, 3149.
21.De Keyzer, W, Huybrechts, I, De Maeyer, M, et al. (2011) Food photographs in nutritional surveillance: errors in portion size estimation using drawings of bread and photographs of margarine and beverages consumption. Br J Nutr 105, 10731083.
22.Statistics Finland (2008) Liitetaulukko 1. Suurimmat naisten ammattiryhmät (naisia 90–100 % ammattiryhmästä) vuonna 2008 (Appendix table 1. The largest professional women's groups (women 90–100 % of the professional category) in 2008). https://www.stat.fi/til/tyokay/2008/04/tyokay_2008_04_2010-12-03_tau_001_fi.html (accessed December 2018).

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Nissinen et al. supplementary material
Appendices

 PDF (398 KB)
398 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed