Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-hzqq2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-22T21:58:10.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The genera Calliotropis Seguenza and Ambercyclus n. gen. (Vetigastropoda, Eucyclidae) from the Early Jurassic of Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

S. Mariel Ferrari ,
Adrzej Kaim  and
Susana E. Damborenea
S. Mariel Ferrari
Affiliation:
Museo Paleontológico Egidio Feruglio, CONICET, Av. Fontana, 140. U9100GYO, Trelew-Chubut, Argentina, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina
Adrzej Kaim
Affiliation:
Institute of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warszawa, Poland,
Susana E. Damborenea
Affiliation:
Museo de Ciencias Naturales La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n, A1900FWA La Plata, Argentina, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The systematic position of the fossil species referred to Calliotropis is currently under debate due to the striking resemblance between these forms with their extant counterparts in general shell morphology and ornament pattern. We propose two temporal subgenera of Calliotropis: Calliotropis (Riselloidea) for Mesozoic species and Calliotropis (Calliotropis) for Cenozoic and Recent taxa. We also synonymize the families Eucyclidae and Calliotropidae, and redescribe the type genus of Eucylidae based on topotypic material of E. obeliscus from Normandy. We argue that the generic name Amberleya should be restricted to its type species Amberleya bathonica. For the species that were traditionally included in Amberleya, we propose the new genus Ambercyclus, with its type species Amberleya orbignyana. The present paper also provides descriptions of three Calliotropis species from the Early Jurassic marine deposits of Argentina. The occurrence of Calliotropis (Riselloidea) keideli n. sp., Calliotropis (Riselloidea) cf. C. (R.) keideli and Calliotropis (Riselloidea) sp. in the Jurassic of Chubut and Neuquén provinces represents a new record of the genus in Early Jurassic sediments of Argentina and South America. Moreover, two species of Ambercyclus n. gen., such as Ambercyclus espinosus and Ambercyclus? isabelensis n. sp., are described from the same deposits. Eucyclus, Amberleya, Ambercyclus, and Calliotropis are included into Eucyclidae, which we consider to be a family of Seguenzioidea.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 88 , Issue 6 , November 2014 , pp. 1174 - 1188
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ammon, L. Von. 1892. Die Gastropodenfauna des Hochfelln-Kalkes und über Gastropoden-Reste aus Ablegerungen von Adnet, Monte Nota und den Raibler Schichten. Geognostiche Jabreshefte, 5:161–122.Google Scholar
Bandel, K. 2010. Relationships of the Triassic Eucycloidea Koken, 1897 (Mollusca, Gastropoda) to modern genera such as Pagodatrochus, Calliotropis and Euchelus, based on morphology of the early shell. Bulletin of Geosciences, 85:435–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, J. F. 1905. A monograph of the fauna of the Cornbrash. Palaeontographical Society Monograph, 1905:1–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchet, P. and Rocroi, J. P. 2005. Classification and nomenclator of gastropod families. Malacologia, 47:1–397.Google Scholar
Böckh, J. 1874. A Bakony déli részének földtani viszonyai. II. rész (Die geologischenVerhältnisse des südlichen Theiles des Bakony. II). Annales Instititi Geologici Publici Hungarici, 3:1–180.Google Scholar
Brösamlen, R. 1909. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Gastropoden des schwäbischen Jura. Palaeontographica, 56:177–321.Google Scholar
Buckman, J. 1845. Description of the new species of fossils named in the foregoing list, p. 93–109. In Murchison, R. I. (ed.), Outline of the geology of the neighbourhood of Cheltenham, 2nd edition by Buckman, J. and Strickland, H.E.J., John Murray, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
Conti, M. A. A. and Monari, S. 2001. Middle Jurassic gastropods from the Central High Atlas; Morocco. Geobios, 34:183–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1895. Essais de paléoconchologie comparée 1. Paris, 159 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1909. Essais de Paléoconchologie Comparée. Huitième Livraison. M. Cossmann, F. R. de Rudeval, Paris, 248 p.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1918. Essais de paléoconchologie comparée, Huitième Livraison. M. Cossmann, F. R. de Rudeval, Paris, 388 p.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R and Arkell, W. J. 1950. A Survey of the Mollusca of the British Great Oolite Series, Part II, Palaeontographical Society Monographs, London, p. 49–105.Google Scholar
Crosse, H. 1893. Études malacologiques sur des genres nouveaux ou peu connus. IV. Sur le genre Bathybembix (emend.) Watson 1892. Journal de Conchyliologie, 3ème sér., 32 (40):288–292.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. 1795. Second mémoire sur l'organisation et les rapport des animaux à sang blanc, dans lequl on traite de la structure des Mollusques et de leur division en orders, lu à la Société d'histoire naturelle de Paris, le 11 Prairial, an III. Magazin Encyclopédique, ou Journal des Sciences, des Letters et des arts, 2:433–449.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1881. Reports on the results of dredging, under the supervision of Alexander Agassiz, in the Gulf of Mexico, and in the Caribbean Sea, 1877–79, by the United States Coast Survey Steamer “Blake”. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 9:33–144.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1889. Reports on the results of dredging under the supervision of Alexander Agassiz in the Gulf of Mexico and in the Caribbean Sea, 1879–80, by U.S coast survey streamer “Blake”. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College. 29 Report on the Mollusca. Part II–Gastropoda and Scaphopoda, 18:1–492.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1890. Scientific results of explorations by the U.S fish commission streamer Albatross. N° VII. Preliminary report on the collection of mollusca and brachiopod obtained in 1887–88. Proceeding of the National Museum, 12 (773):219–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damborenea, S. E. 1987. Early Jurassic Bivalvia of Argentina. Part 1: stratigraphical introduction and superfamilies Nuculanacea, Arcacea, Mytilacea and Pinnacea. Palaeontographica, A, 199:23–111.Google Scholar
Dell, R. K. 1990. Antarctic Mollusca. With special reference to the fauna of the Ross Sea. Bulletin of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 27:1–311.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A. 1850–60. Paléontologie Française. Terrain Jurassique II. Gastéropodes. Paris, Manson, 622 p.Google Scholar
Dzik, J. 1994a. Evolution of 'small shelly fossils' assemblages. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 39:247–313.Google Scholar
Dzik, J. 1994b. Machaeridians, chitons, and conchiferan molluscs of the Mójcza Limestone. Palaeontologia Polonica, 53:213–252.Google Scholar
Eudes-Deslongchamps, E. 1860. Observations concernant quelques Gastéropodes fossiles des terrains jurassiques placés par l'auteur de la Paléontologie française dans les genres Purpurina, Trochus et Turbo . Bulletin de la Société linnéenne de Normandie, 5: 119–137.Google Scholar
Fernández Garrasino, C. 1977. Contribución al conocimiento geológico de la zona comprendida entre Estancia Ferraroti, Cerro Colorado y Cerrito Negro, Departamento Tehuelches, Provincia del Chubut. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, 32 (2):130–144.Google Scholar
Ferrari, S. M. 2009. Cosmopolitan Early Jurassic marine gastropods from west-central Patagonia, Argentina. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 54:449–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, S. M. 2011. Gastrópodos marinos del Jurásico temprano de Chubut: revisión sistemática e implicancias paleoecológicas y paleobiogeográficas. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation,Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.Google Scholar
Ferrari, S. M. 2012. The genera Crypyaulax and Procerithium (Procerithiidae, Caenogastropoda) in the Early Jurassic of Patagonia, Argentina. Alcheringa, 36:323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, S. M. 2013. New Early Jurassic gastropods from west-central Patagonia, Argentina. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 58:579–593.Google Scholar
Ferrari, S. M. 2014. Patellogastropoda and Vetigastropoda (Mollusca, Gastropoda) from the marine Jurassic of Patagonia, Argentina. Historical Biology, 26:563–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer in Kiener, L. C. and Fischer, P. D. 1873–1880. Spécies général et iconographie des coquilles vivantes, comprenant la collection du Museum d'Histoire naturelle de Paris, la collection Lamarck, celle du prince Masséna (appartienant maintenant a Delessert, M. B.) et les découvertes récentes des voyageurs 12 volumes, Baillière, J.B., Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, J. and Weber, C. 1997. Révision critique de la Paléontologie Française d'Alcide d'Orbigny. Vol II. Gastropoden jurassiques, Masson, Paris, 300 p.Google Scholar
Giacosa, R. E. and Márquez, M. J. 2000. Jurásico y Cretácico de la Cordillera Patagónica septentrional y Precordillera Patagónica. In Caminos, R. (ed.), Geología Argentina. Anales del Servicio Geológico Minero Argentino, 29:444–459.Google Scholar
Golikov, A. N. and Starobogatov, Y. I. 1975. Systematics of prosobranch gastropods. Malacologia, 15:185–232.Google Scholar
Greppin, E. 1898. Description des fossiles de la Grande Oolithe des environs de Bâle. Mémoires de la Société paléontologique Suisse, 15:1–137.Google Scholar
Gründel, J. 2000. Archaeogastropoda aus dem Dogger Norddeutschlands und des nordwestlichen Polens. Berliner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen Reihe, E 34:205–253.Google Scholar
Gründel, J. 2003a. Gastropoden aus dem Unteren Lias (Ober-Hettangium bis Unter-Sinemurium) Südwestdeutschlands. Stuttgaret Breiträge zur Naturkunde, B340:1–55.Google Scholar
Gründel, J. 2003b. Gastropoden aus dem Bajocian und Bathonium von Sengenhtal und Kinding, Franken (Süddeutschland). Zitteliana, A43:45–91.Google Scholar
Gründel, J. 2003c. Die Gastropoden der Dogger-Geschiebe Deutschlands und des nordweslichen Polens. Archiv für Geschiebekunde, 4 (3–4):129–240.Google Scholar
Gründel, J. 2007. Gastropoden aus dem unteren Pliensbachium von Feuguerolles (Normandie, Frankreich). Freiberger Forschungshefte, C524 (15):1–34.Google Scholar
Gründel, J. and Koppka, J. 2007. Gastropoden aus einem Lias-Geschiebe von Lentschow bei Lassan (Vorpommern, Nordostdeutschland). Archiv für Geschiebekunde, 4 (10):643–658.Google Scholar
Gulisano, 1981. El Ciclo Cuyano en el norte de Neuquén y sur de Mendoza. Actas 8ª Congreso Geológico Argentino, Buenos Aires, 3:579–592.Google Scholar
Gulisano, C. A. and Gutiérrez-Pleimling, A. 1995. The Jurassic of the Neuquén Basin. A) Neuquén Province, Field Guide. Asociación Geológica Argentina, E2:1–111.Google Scholar
Habe, T. and Okutani, T. 1981. Two new Gastropods from the Philippines. Venus, 39 (4):193–196.Google Scholar
Herbst, R. 1966. La Flora Liásica del Grupo Pampa de Agnia, Chubut, Patagonia. Ameghiniana, 4:337–349.Google Scholar
Hickman, C. S. 1996. Phylogeny and patterns of evolutionary radiation in trochoidean gastropods, p. 177–198. In Taylor, J. D. (ed.), Origin and Evolutionary Radiation of the Mollusca. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hickman, C. S. and McLean, J. H. 1990. Systematic revision and suprageneric classification of trochacean gastropods. Science Series, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles Country, 35:1–169.Google Scholar
Hudleston, W. H. 1887–1896. A monograph of the Inferior Oolite Gasteropoda, Part 1. British Jurassic Gasteropoda. Monograph, The Palaeontographical Society of London, 1887, p. 57–136, pl. 1–6; 1888, p. 137–192, pl. 7–11; 1889, p. 193–224, pl. 12–16; 1891, p. 225–272, pl. 17–20; 1892, p. 273–324, pl. 21–26; 1894, p. 325–390, pl. 27–32; 1895, p. 391–444, pl. 33–40; 1996, p. 445–514, pl. 41–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hynda, V. A. 1986. Mielkaja bentosnaja fauna ordovika jugo-zapada Vostochno-Evropejskoj platformy, Kiev, Naukova Dumka, 156 p.Google Scholar
Jaitly, A. K. and Fürsich, T. 2000. Contributions to the Jurassic of Kachchh, western India. VII. The gastropod fauna. Part I. Pleurotomarioidea, Fissureloidea, Trochoidea and Eucycloidea. Beringeria, 27:31–61.Google Scholar
Jaitly, A. K., Szabó, J., and Fürsich, T. 2000. Contributions to the Jurassic of Kachchh, western India. VII. The gastropod fauna. Part I. Pleurotomarioidea, Fissureloidea, Trochoidea and Eucycloidea. Beringeri, 27:31–61.Google Scholar
Kaim, A. 2004. The evolution of conch ontogeny in Mesozoic open sea gastropods. Palaeontologia Polonica, 62:3–183.Google Scholar
Kano, Y. 2008. Vetigastropod phylogeny and a new concept of Seguenzioidea: independent evolution of copulatory organs in the deep-sea habitats. Zoologica Scripta, 37:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kano, Y., Chikyu, E., and Warén, A. 2009. Morphological, ecological and molecular characterization of the enigmatic planispiral snail genus Adeuomphalus (Vetigastropoda: Seguenzioidea). Journal of Molluscan Studies, 75:397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiel, S. and Bandel, K. 2001. Trochidae (Archaeogastropoda) from the Campanian of Torallola in nothern Spain. Acta Geologica Polonica, 5 (2):137–154.Google Scholar
Knight, J. B., Cox, L. R., Keen, A. M., Smith, A. G., Batten, R. L., Yochelson, E. L., Ludbrook, N. H., Robertson, R., Yonge, C. M., and Moore, R. C. 1960. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part I. Mollusca 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, 351 p.Google Scholar
Koken, E. 1897. Die Gastropoden der Trias um Hallstadt. Abhandlungen der K.K. Geologischen Reichsanstalt, 17 (4):1–112.Google Scholar
Kuroda, T. and Kawamura, R. 1956. On a new species of Lischkeia (Gastropoda): L. undosa from Japan. Venus, 19 (1):16–19.Google Scholar
Legarreta, L. and Gulisano, C. A. 1989. Análisis estratigráfico de la cuenca Neuquina (Triásico superior–Terciario inferior). In Chebli, G. A. and Spalletti, L. A. (eds.), Cuencas Sedimentarias Argentinas. Serie Correlación Geológica (Tucumán), 6:221–244.Google Scholar
Lischke, C. E. 1871. Japanische Meeres-Conchylien. Ein Beitrag zur Kentniss der Mollusken Japan's mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die geographische Verbreitung derselben, 2:1–184. T. Fischer, Cassel.Google Scholar
Lischke, C. E. 1872. Diagnosen neuer Meeres-Conchylien von Japan. Malakozoologische Blätter, 19:100–109.Google Scholar
Lycett, J. 1863. Supplementary to a Monograph of the Mollusca from the Great Oolite. Palaeontological Society of London, 15 (65):1–129, pl. 31–45.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. A. 1979. The Trochidae and Turbinidae of the Kermadec Ridge (Mollusca: Gastropoda). New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 6:521–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. 1858. Notice paléontologique et stratigraphique établissant une concordance inobservée jusqu'ici entre l'animalisation du lias inférieur de la côte-d'Or et de l'Yonne et celle des grès d'Hettange et Luxembourg. Congrès Scientifique de France, 25th Session, Auxerre, 1:343–392.Google Scholar
McLean, J. H. 1982. Importance of gill structure in Trochacean classification. The Western Society of Malacologists, Annual Report, 14:11.Google Scholar
Morris, J. and Lycett, J. 1851. A monograph of the Mollusca from the Great Oolite, chiefly from Minchinhampton and the coast of Yorkshire. Palaeontographical Society London Monographs, 1851:1–130.Google Scholar
Münster, G. G., zu 1844. Petrefacta Germaniae, Dritter Theil. In Goldfuss, G. A. (ed.), Petrefacta Germaniae, Dritter Theil. Düsseldorf, 128 p.Google Scholar
Nullo, F. 1983. Descripción de la hoja 45c, Pampa de Agnia, Provincia del Chubut. Boletín del Servicio Geológico Nacional (Argentina), 199:1–97.Google Scholar
Nützel, A., Hamedani, A., Senowbaris-Daryan, E., and Senowbary-Daryan, B. 2003. Some Late Triassic gastropods from the Nayband Formation in Central Iran. Facies, 48:127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nützel, A. and Senowbary-Daryan, B. 1999. Gastropods from the Late Triassic (Norian–Rhaetian) Nayband Formation of Central Iran. Beringeria, 23:93–132.Google Scholar
Pagani, A., Damborenea, S., Mancdeñido, M., and Ferrari, M. 2011. New early Jurassic decapod crustacean from Patagonia (Chubut province), Argentina. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 85:143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagani, M. A., Mancdeñido, M. O., Damborenea, S. E., and Ferrari, S. M. 2012. The ichnogenus Lapispira from the Early Jurassic of Patagonia (Chubut, Argentina). Revue de Paléobiologie, Special Volume, 11:409–416.Google Scholar
Philippi, R. A. 1844. Enumeratio Molluscorum Siciliae. Volumen Secundum. E. Anton, Halis Saxonum, 303 p.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. 1829. Illustrations of the Geology of Yorkshire: or a description of the strata and organic remains of the Yorkshire Coast. In T. Wilson and Sons (ed.), York, 1° edit, 192 p, 16 pl.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponder, W. F. and Lindberg, D. R. 1997. Towards a phylogeny of gastropod molluscs: an analysis using morphological characters. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 119:83–265.Google Scholar
Poppe, G., Tagaro, S., and Dekker, H. 2006. The Seguenziidae, Chilodontidae, Trochidae, Calliostomatidae and Solariellidae of the Philippine Islands. Visaya, supplement 2, 150 p.Google Scholar
Ramos, V. A. 1992. Geología de la Alta Cordillera de San Juan. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, 47:268–269 Google Scholar
Riccardi, A. C. 1983. The Jurassic of Argentina and Chile. p. 201–263. In Moullade, M. and Nairn, A. E. M. (eds.), The Phanerozoic Geology of the World II. The Mesozoic, B, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Riccardi, A. C. 2008a. The marine Jurassic of Argentina: a biostratigraphic Framework. Episodes, 31 (3):326–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riccardi, A. C. 2008b. El Jurásico de Argentina y sus amonites. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, 63 (4):625–643.Google Scholar
Riccardi, A. C., Damborenea, S. E., Manceñido, M. O., and Leanza, H. A. 2011. Megainvertebrados del Jurásico y su importancia geobiológica, p. 441–464. In Leanza, H. A., Arregui, C., Carbone, O., Danieli, J. C., J. C. and Vallés, J. M. (eds.), Geología y Recursos Naturales de la Provincia del Neuquén. Velatorio del 18ª Congreso Geológico Argentino.Google Scholar
Salvini-Plawen, L. V. 1980. A reconsideration of systematics in the Mollusca (phylogeny and higher classification). Malacologia, 19:249–278.Google Scholar
Schulbert, C. and Nützel, A. 2013. Gastropods from the Early/Middle Jurassic transition of Franconia (Southern Germany). Bulletin of Geosciences, 88:723–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seguenza, L. 1902. Molluschi poco noti dei Terreni Terziarii di Messina. Trochidae e Solariidae. Bollettino della Società Geologica Italiana, 21:455–465.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. 1819. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain. Part 3, London, p. 99–126.Google Scholar
Stanton, T. W. 1895. Contributions to the Cretaceous paleontology of the Pacific coast: the fauna of the Knoxville beds. United States Geological Survey Bulletin, 133:1–132.Google Scholar
Stilwell, J. 2005. A new species of Calliotropis (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Vetigastopoda: Trochidae: Eucyclinae) from the Eocene of Antarctica. Molluscan Research, 25:9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szabó, J. 1982. Lower and Middle Jurassic Gastropods from the Bakony Mountains (Hungary). Part IV: Neritacea, Craspedostomacea, Amberleyacea (Archaeogastropoda). Annales Historico-Naturales musei Nationalis Hungarici, 74:17–33.Google Scholar
Szabó, J. 1995. Eucyclidae (Eucycloidea), Gastropoda) as a Liassic palaeontological index in the Transdanubian Central Range (Hungary). Hantkeniana, 1:67–74.Google Scholar
Taki, I. and Okuta, Y. 1943. Genus Turcicula Dall. Conchologia Asiatica, 1 (3):93–108.Google Scholar
Tankard, A. J., Uliana, M. A., Welsink, H. J., Ramos, V. A., Turic, M., França, A. B., Milani, E. J., Brito Neves, B. B., Eyles, N., Skarmeta, J., Santa Ana, H., Wiens, F., Cirbián, M., López Paulsen, O., Germs, G. J. B., de Wit, M. J., Machacha, T., and Miller, R. 1995. Structural and tectonic controls of basin evolution in southwestern Gondwana during the Phanerozoic. In Tankard, A. J., Suárez Soruco, R. and Welsink, H. (eds.), Petroleum Basins of South America. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 62, p. 5–52.Google Scholar
Uliana, M. A. and Biddle, K. T. 1988. Mesozoic–Cenozoic paleogeographical and geodynamic evolution of southern South America. Revista Brasileira de Geociencias, 18:179–190.Google Scholar
Vergani, G. D., Tankard, A. J., Belotti, H. J., and Welsink, H. J. 1995. Tectonic evolution and paleogeography of the Neuquén Basin, Argentina. In Tankard, A. J., Suárez Soruco, R., and Welsink, H. J. (eds.), Petroleum Basins of South America. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 62, p. 383–402.Google Scholar
Verril, A. 1884. Second catalogue of Mollusca recently added to the fauna of the New England coast and the adjacent part of the Atlantic, consisting mostly of deep-sea species, with notes on others previously recorded. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 6 (1):139–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vicente, J. C. 2005. Dinamic paleogeography of the Jurassic Andean Basin: pattern of transgression and localization of main straits through the magmatic arc. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, 60:221–250.Google Scholar
Vilvens, C. 2004. Description of four new species of Calliotropis (Gastropoda: Trochidae: Eucyclinae: Calliotropini) from New Caledonia, Fiji and Vanuatu. Novapex, 5:19–31.Google Scholar
Vilvens, C. 2006. New records and new species of Calliotropis (Gastropoda: Chilodontidae: Calliotropinae) from the Madagascar, Mayotte Island and Renion Island. Novapex, 7 (2–3):55–71.Google Scholar
Vilvens, C. 2007. New record and new species of Calliotropis (Gastropoda: Chilodontidae: Calliotropinae) from Indo-Pacific. Novapex, 8 (HS 5):1–72.Google Scholar
Vilvens, C. and Swinnen, F. 2008. New records of Calliotropis (Gastropoda: Chilodontidae) from central eastern Atlantic. Novapex, 9:17–32.Google Scholar
Vilvens, C. and Sellanes, J. 2010. Description of Calliotropis ceciliae new species (Gastropoda: Chilodontidae: Calliotropinae) from off Chile. The Nautilus, 124:107–111.Google Scholar
Watson, R. B. 1879. Mollusca of H. M. S Challenger Expedition. IV. Trochidae continued, viz. the genera Basillisa and Trochus, and the Turbinidae, viz. the genus Turbo . Journal of the Linnean Society, Zoology, 14:692–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenz, W. 1938–1944. Gastropoda. Prosobranchia. In Schindewolf, O. H. (ed.), Handbuch der Paläozoologie, Band 6. Verlag von Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, 1639 p.Google Scholar
Williams, S. T., Karube, S., and Ozawa, T. 2008. Molecular systematics of Vetigastropoda: Trochidae, Turbinidae and Trochoidea redefined. Zoologica Scripta, 37:483–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar