Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T22:44:56.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical and taxonomic scale of analysis in paleoecological data sets: Examples from neo-tropical Pleistocene reef coral communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

John M. Pandolfi
John M. Pandolfi*
Affiliation:
Department of Paleobiology, MRC-121, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. 20560-0121,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I investigated the degree to which the interpretation of reef coral distribution data is influenced by the numerical and taxonomic scale of analysis in Pleistocene coral communities from the Caribbean Sea. Patterns of community differentiation analyzed at both species and genus levels showed only small differences using different numerical scales (relative abundance, rank abundance and species presence and absence). Whereas some differences were observed between species and genus level patterns, they had little effect on paleoecological interpretations. The greatest differences occurred when presence and absence analyses of assemblages sampled along 40-m transects were compared with those sampled along 40-m transects augmented by a one-hour search for rare taxa. These results suggest that paleoecological interpretations of Quaternary coral communities are robust to numerical scale of analysis at the species and genus level, and to taxonomic scale between the species and genus level. However, interpretations of community structure are sensitive to sampling intensity, geographic scale, and sample size.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 75 , Issue 3: Special Issue , May 2001 , pp. 546 - 563
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bambach, R. K., and Bennington, J. B. 1996. Do communities evolve: A major question in evolutionary paleoecology, p. 123–160. In Jablonski, D., Erwin, D. H., and Lipps, J. (eds.), Evolutionary Paleobiology: Essays in Honor of James W. Valentine. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Bowman, M. F., and Bailey, R. C. 1997. Does taxonomic resolution affect the multivariate description of the structure of freshwater macroinvertebrate communities? Canadian Journal of Fish and Aquatic Sciences, 54:1802–1807.Google Scholar
Bray, J. R., and Curtis, J. T. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs, 27:325–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K. R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology, 18:117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K. R., and Warwick, R. M. 1994. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. National Environment Research Council. UK. 144 p.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. 1985. Taxonomic sufficiency in pollution assessment. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 16:439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faith, D. P., Minchin, P. R., and Belbin, L. 1987. Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio, 69:57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, S. P., and Cole, F. A. 1990. Taxonomic level and sample size sufficient for assessing pollution impacts on the Southern California Bight macrobenthos. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 67:251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, S. P., and Cole, F. A. 1992. Taxonomic level sufficient for assessing a moderate impact on macrobenthic communities in Puget Sound, Washington, USA. Canadian Journal of Fish and Aquatic Sciences, 49:1184–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, J. G., Clarke, K. R., and Warwick, R. M. 1982. A practical strategy for analysing multispecies distribution patterns. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 8:37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. S., Clarke, K. R., Warwick, R. M., and Hobbs, G. 1990. Detection of the initial effects of pollution on marine benthos: an example from the Ekofisk and Eldfisk oilfields, North Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 66:285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, S. J., and Raffaelli, D. 1991. Food-web patterns: lessons from a species-rich web. Journal of Animal Ecology, 60:823–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, L. C., and Buzas, M. A. 1997. Surveying Natural Populations. Columbia University Press, New York, 563 p.Google Scholar
He, X., and Wright, R. A. 1992. An experimental study of piscivoreplanktivore interactions: Population and community responses to predation. Canadian Journal of Fish and Aquatic Sciences, 49:1176–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, P. M. J., and Heip, C. 1988. On the use of meiofauna in ecological monitoring: Who needs taxonomy? Marine Pollution Bulletin, 19:665–668.Google Scholar
Herweijer, J. P., and Focke, J. W. 1978. Late Pleistocene depositional and denudational history of Aruba, Bonaire and Curaçao (Netherlands Antilles). Geologie en Mijnbouw, 57:177–187.Google Scholar
Hughes, T. P., Baird, A. H., Dinsdale, E. A., Moltschaniwskyj, N., Pratchett, M. S., Tanner, J. E., and Willis, B. 1999. Patterns of recruitment and abundance of corals along the Great Barrier Reef. Nature, 397:59–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C., Budd, A., and Pandolfi, J. M. 1996. The shifting balance of natural communities? p. 89–122. In Jablonski, D., Erwin, D. H., and Lipps, J. H. (eds.), Evolutionary Paleobiology: Essays in Honor of James W. Valentine. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C., Jung, P., Coates, A. G., and Collins, L. S. 1993. Diversity and extimction of tropical American Mollusks and emergence of the Isthmus of Panama. Science, 260:1624–1626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendall, M. G. 1962. Rank Correlation Methods. Charles Griffin, London, 199 p.Google Scholar
Levin, S. A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology, 73:1943–1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchant, R., Barmuta, L. A., and Chessman, B. C. 1995. Influence of sample quantification and taxonomic resolution on the ordination of macroinvertebrate communities from running waters in Victoria, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research, 46:501–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, N. D. 1993. Effects of resolution on food web structure. Oikos, 66:403–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCune, B. 1987. Multivariate analysis on the PC-ORD system: A software documentation report. Holcomb Research Institute Report No. 75, Butler University, Indianapolis, Indiana.Google Scholar
Pandolfi, J. M. 1996. Limited membership in Pleistocene reef coral assemblages from the Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea: constancy during global change. Paleobiology, 22:152–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandolfi, J. M., and Jackson, J. B. C. 1997. The maintenance of diversity on coral reefs: Examples from the fossil record. Proceedings of the 8th International Coral Reef Symposium, 1:397–404.Google Scholar
Pandolfi, J. M., and Jackson, J. B. C. 2001. Community structure of Pleistocene coral reefs of Curaçao, Netherlands Antilles. Ecological Monographs, 71:49–67.Google Scholar
Pandolfi, J. M., and Jackson, J. B. C. In press. Broad-scale patterns in Pleistocene coral reef communities from the Caribbean: implications for ecology and management. In: Aronson, R. B. (ed.), The Destruction of Coral Reef Ecosystems: Paleoecological Perspectives on the Human Role in a Global Crisis. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Pandolfi, J. M., and Minchin, P. R. 1995. A comparison of taxonomic composition and diversity between reef coral life and dead assemblages in Madang Lagoon, Papua New Guinea. Palaegeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 119:321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandolfi, J. M., Llewellyn, G., and Jackson, J. B. C. 1999. Interpretation of ancient reef environments in paleoecological studies of community structure: Curaçao, Netherlands Antilles, Caribbean Sea. Coral Reefs, 18:107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahel, F. J., 1990. The hierarchical nature of community persistence: A problem of scale. The American Naturalist, 136:328–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sale, P. F., and Guy, J. A. 1994. Persistence of community structure: What happens when you change taxonomic scale? Coral Reefs, 11:147–154.Google Scholar
Smith, S. D. A., and Simpson, R. D. 1993. Effects of pollution on holdfast macrofauna of the kelp Ecklonia radiata: Discrimination at different taxonomic levels. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 96:199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A. J. 1997. Ecological Experiments: their Logical Design and Interpretation using Analysis of Variance. Cambridge University Press, 504 p.Google Scholar
Underwood, A. J., and Chapman, M. G. 1998. A method for analysing spatial scales of variation in composition of assemblages. Oecologia, 117:570–578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varis, O. 1991. A canonical approach to diagnostic and predictive modeling of phytoplankton communities. Arch Hydrobiology, 122:147–166.Google Scholar
Warwick, R. M. 1988a. Analysis of community attributes of the macrobenthos of Frierfjord/Lanesundfjord at taxonomic levels higher than species. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 46:167–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, R. M. 1988b. The level of taxonomic discrimination required to detect pollution effects on marine benthic communities. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 19:259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, R. M. 1993. Environmental impact studies on marine communities: pragmatical considerations. Australian Journal of Ecology, 18:63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterhouse, J. C., and Farrell, M. P. 1985. Identifying pollution related changes in chironomid communities as a function of taxonomic rank. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 42:406–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiens, J. A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology, 3:385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, I. A., Chessman, B. C., Fairweather, P. G., and Benson, L. J. 1995. Measuring the impact of sewage effluent on the macroinvertebrate community of an upland stream: The effect of different levels of taxonomic resolution and quantification. Australian Journal of Ecology, 20:142–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yant, P. R., Karr, J. R., and Angermeier, P. L. 1984. Stochasticity in stream fish communities: An alternative interpretation. American Naturalist, 124:573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, G., Goetz, M., and Meilke, P. W. Jr. 1985. Use of an improved statistical method for group comparison to study effects of prairie fire. Ecology, 66:606–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar