Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:52:28.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pterygotids (Chelicerata; Eurypterida) from the Silurian Vernon Formation of New York

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Samuel J. Ciurca Jr.  and
O. Erik Tetlie
Samuel J. Ciurca Jr.
Affiliation:
154 Appleton Street, Rochester, NY 14611
O. Erik Tetlie*
Affiliation:
2Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queen's Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, United Kingdom
*
3Present address: Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, PO Box 208109, New Haven, CT 06520-8109 <erik.tetlie@yale.edu>
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pterygotus monroensis from the Pittsford and Harris Hill members of the Silurian Vernon Formation, New York State, USA, is here assigned to Erettopterus osiliensis, previously known only from Saaremaa, Estonia, based on new material (carapaces, chelicerae, a prosomal appendage VI, several metastoma, genital opercula with appendages, an almost complete opisthosoma, and several bilobed telsons), and reexamination of the original specimens. Telson morphology indicates assignment to Erettopterus or Truncatiramus, but the differences between these two genera are here interpreted as insignificant, and all species are treated as belonging to Erettopterus. the much rarer Pterygotus? sarlei n. sp., a possibly basal pterygotid, also from the Pittsford Member, is based on two telsons with pterygotid-like marginal cuticular sculpture. the telson shape is unlike that of any other adult pterygotid; it is relatively similar to juvenile pterygotids and Slimonia, but lacks the long posterior spine found in Slimonia. These systematic revisions have implications for other pterygotid taxa. Pterygotus impacatus, from Estonia, is a junior synonym of E. osiliensis. P. waylandsmithi, from slightly higher in the Vernon Formation, and is transferred to Erettopterus based on similarities of the chelicerae to E. osiliensis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 81 , Issue 4 , July 2007 , pp. 725 - 736
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agassiz, L. 1839. Fishes of the Upper Ludlow rock. p. 605–607. In Murchison, R.I. (ed.) The Silurian System, Pt. 1, Founded on geological researches in the counties of Solop, Hereford, Radnor, montgomery, Caermarthen, Brecon, Pembroke, Monmouth, Gloucester, Worchester, and Stafford: with descriptions of the coal-fields and overlying formations. London, J. Murray. 768 p.Google Scholar
Agassiz, L. 1844. Monographie des poissons fossiles du Vieux Gres Rouge, ou Systeme Devonien (Old Red Sandstone) des Iles Britanniques et de Russie. Neufchatel, folio, 171 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrande, J. 1872. Système silurien du centre de la Bohême, I. Recherches Paléontologique, supplément au, Volume 1, (Trilobites, Crustacés divers et Poissons). Prague and Paris. 1–647.Google Scholar
Braddy, S. J. 1996. The Palaeobiology of the Eurypterida. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester, United Kingdom, 505 p.Google Scholar
Braddy, S. J. 2000. Eurypterids from the Early Devonian of the Midland Valley of Scotland. Scottish Journal of Geology, 36(2): 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burmeister, H. 1843. Die Organisation der Trilobiten, aus ihren lebenden Verwandten entwickelt; nebst einer systematischen Uebersicht aller zeither beschriebenen Arten. G. Reimer, Berlin, 148 p.Google Scholar
Caster, K. E., and Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N. 1956. Some notes on the genus Dolichopterus Hall. Journal of Paleontology, 30(1):19–28.Google Scholar
Caster, K. E., and Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N. 1964. Upper Ordovician eurypterids from Ohio. Palaeontographica Americana, 4:297–358.Google Scholar
Chlupác, I. 1994. Pterygotid eurypterids (Arthropoda, Chelicerata) in the Silurian and Devonian of Bohemia. Journal of the Czech Geological Society, 39:147–162.Google Scholar
Ciurca, S. J. Jr., 1982. Eurypterids, stratigraphy, Late Silurian-Early Devonian of western New York State and Ontario, Canada. New York State Geological Association, 54th Annual Meeting, SUNY Buffalo, p. 99–120.Google Scholar
Ciurca, S. J. Jr., 1990. Eurypterid biofacies of the Silurian–Devonian evaporite sequence: Niagara peninsula, Ontario, Canada and New York. New York State Geological Association, 62th Annual Meeting and Guidebook, p. 1–30.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. M., and Ruedemann, R. 1912. The Eurypterida of New York. New York State Museum Memoir No 14, 439 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diener, C. 1924. Eurypterida. Fossilium Catalogus I: Animalia, 25:1–28.Google Scholar
Dunlop, J. A., Braddy, S. J., and Tetlie, O. E. 2002. The Early Devonian eurypterid Grossopterus overathi (Gross, 1933) from Overath, Germany. Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin: Geowissenschaftliche Reihe, 5:93–104.Google Scholar
Eichwald, E. 1854. Die Grauwackenschichten von Live-und Esthland. Bulletin de la Societe Imperiale des Nauralistes de Moscou, 27:1–211.Google Scholar
Fischer de Waldheim, G. 1839. Notes sur un crustacé fossile du genre Eurypterus de Podolie. Bulletin de la Societe Imperiale des Nauralistes de Moscou, 11:125–128.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1859. Paleontology of New York, Volume 3, Containing Descriptions and Figures of the Organic Remains of the Lower Helderberg Group and the Oriskany Sandstones. Albany, New York, 532 p.Google Scholar
Heymons, R. 1901. Die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Scolopender. Zoologica, Band 13, Heft 33, Lieferung 2-3, 244 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, G. 1898. Über die Organisation des Eurypterus fischeri Eichw. Memories de l'Academie Imperiale des Sciences de St.-Petersbourg, ser. 8, volume 8, no. 2:1–57.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1914. Ein grosser Pterygotus aus dem rheinischen Unterdevon. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 1:379–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N. 1948. Two new eurypterids from the Silurian of Indiana. Journal of Paleontology, 22:465–472.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N. 1951. Downtonian (Silurian) Eurypterida from Perton, near Stoke Edith, Herefordshire. Geological Magazine, 88:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N. 1961a. The Silurian Eurypterida of the Welsh Borderland. Journal of Paleontology, 35:789–835.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N. 1961b. Eurypterids of the Devonian Holland Quarry Shale of Ohio. Fieldiana, Geology, 14(5):79–98.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N. 1964. A synopsis of the family Pterygotidae Clarke and Ruedemann, 1912 (Eurypterida). Journal of Paleontology, 38:331–361.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N. 1979. Eurypterida, p. 121–136. In Jaanusson, V., Laufeld, S., and Skoglund, R., (eds.), Lower Wenlock faunal and floral dynamics, Vattenfallet Section, Gotland. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, series C, 762.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N., and Caster, K. E. 1955. The Pterygotidae of the Silurian Vernon Shales of New York. Journal of Paleontology, 29:1041–1047.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N., and Heubusch, C. A. 1962. Some Eurypterida from the Ordovician and Silurian of New York. Journal of Paleontology, 36:211–221.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N., and Leutze, W. P. 1966. Eurypterids from the Silurian of West Virginia. Journal of Paleontology, 40:1109–1122.Google Scholar
Leutze, W. P. 1958. Eurypterids from the Silurian Tymochtee Dolomite of Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 32:937–942.Google Scholar
Leutze, W. P. 1961. Arthopods from the Syracuse Formation, Silurian of New York. Journal of Paleontology, 35:49–64.Google Scholar
Nieszkowski, J. 1859. Zusätze zur Monographie der Trilobiten der Osteeprovinzen, nebst der Beschreibung einiger neuen obersilurischen Crustaceen. Archiv für die Naturkunde Liv-, Ehst- und Kurlands, 1(2):345–384.Google Scholar
O'Connell, M. 1916. The habitat of the Eurypterida. Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences, 11:1–277.Google Scholar
Page, D. 1856. Advanced Text-Book of Geology. William Blackwood and Sons, Edinburgh, 326 p.Google Scholar
Plotnick, R. E. 1983. Patterns in the evolution of the eurypterids. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Chicago, 411 p.Google Scholar
Plotnick, R. E. 1999. Habitat of Llandoverian—Lochkovian eurypterids. p. 106–131. In Boucot, A., and Lawson, J. (eds.), Paleocommunities: A case study from the Silurian and Lower Devonian. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Plotnick, R. E., and Baumiller, T. K. 1988. The pterygotid telson as a biological rudder. Lethaia, 21:13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohlman, J. 1881. On certain fossils of the water-lime Group near Buffalo. Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences, 4:17–22.Google Scholar
Prantl, F., and Přibyl, A. 1948. Revision of the Bohemian Silurian Eurypterida. Rozpravy Státního Geologického Ústavu, 10:1–116.Google Scholar
Rawlinson, S. 2000. The functional morphology of raptorial appendages in predatory fossil arthropods. Master of Science thesis, University of Bristol, United Kingdom, 96 p.Google Scholar
Ritchie, A. 1968. Lanarkopterus dolichoschelus (Størmer) gen. nov., a mixopterid eurypterid from the Upper Silurian of the Lesmahagow and Hagshaw Hills inliers, Scotland. Scottish Journal of Geology, 4(4):317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanovskaya, L. V., Malchevskaya, T. M., and Kadlets, N. M. 1979. Catalogue of Holotypes of Fauna and Flora Species Stored in CNIGR Museum. Ministry of Geology of the USSR, Leningrad, 293 p.Google Scholar
Rosenheim, O. 1905. Chitin in the carapace of Pterygotus osiliensis, from the Silurian rocks of Oesel. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 511:398–400.Google Scholar
Ruedemann, R. 1918. A recurrent Pittsford (Salina) fauna. New York State Museum Bulletin, 219-220:205–220.Google Scholar
Ruedemann, R. 1935. A review of the eurypterid rami of the genus Pterygotus, with the description of two new Devonian species. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 24:69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, L. S. 1953. A new species of eurypterid from the Devonian of Gaspé. Annual Report of the National Museum for the Fiscal Year 1952-53, bulletin, 132:83–91.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1856. On some new Crustacea from the uppermost Silurian rocks. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, 12:26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1859a. On some species of Eurypterus; with notes on the distribution of the species. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 15:229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1859b. Description of the species of Pterygotus, p. 37–105. In Huxley, T. H., and Salter, J. W. (eds.), Memoires of the Geological Survey, United Kingdom, 1.Google Scholar
Sarle, C. J. 1903. A new eurypterid fauna from the base of the Salina in western New York. New York State Museum Bulletin, 69:1080–1108.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. 1859. Nachträge und Berichtigungen zu den Untersuchungen über die Silurische Formation von Estland, Nord-Livland und Oesel. Archiv für Naturkunde Liv-, Ehst- und Kurlands, series I, 2, 250 p.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. 1883. Die Crustaceenfauna der Eurypterenschichten von Rootziküll auf Oesel. p. 28-88. In Miscellanea Silurica III. Memoires l'Academie Imperiale des Sciences de St.-Petersbourg, series VII, 31(5).Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. 1904. Über die neue Merostomenform Stylonurus (?) simonsoni aus dem Obersilur von Rotziküll auf Oesel. Bulletin de l'Academie Imperales des Sciences de St.-Petersbourg, series V, 20(3):99–105.Google Scholar
Scotese, C. R. 2001. Atlas of Earth History. PALEOMAP Project, Arlington, Texas, 52 p.Google Scholar
Selden, P. A. 1981. Functional morphology of the prosoma of Baltoeurypterus tetragonophthalmus (Fischer) (Chelicerata: Eurypterida). Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 72:9–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selden, P. A. 1984. Autecology of Silurian eurypterids. p. 39–54. In Bassett, M. G. and Lawson, J. D. (eds.), Autecology of Silurian organisms. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 32.Google Scholar
Selden, P. A. 1986. A new identity for the Silurian arthropod Necrogammarus. Palaeontology, 29(3):629–631.Google Scholar
Semper, M. 1898. Die Gigantostraken des älteren Böhmischen Palaeozoicum. Beiträge zur Paläeontologie und Geologie Österreich-Ungarns und des Orients, 11:71–88.Google Scholar
Størmer, L. 1934a. Über den neuen, von W. GROSS beschriebenen Eurypteriden aus dem Unterdevon von Overath im Rheinland. Jahrbuch der Preussischen Geologischen Landesanstalt, 55:284–291.Google Scholar
Størmer, L. 1934b. Merostomata from the Downtonian Sandstone of Ringerike, Norway. Skrifter utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi i Oslo I. Matematisk-Naturvidenskapelig Klasse, 10:1–125.Google Scholar
Størmer, L. 1934c. A new eurypterid from the Saaremaa- (Oesel-) beds in Estonia. Loodusuurijate Seltsi Aruanded, 40:244–9.Google Scholar
Størmer, L. 1934d. Downtonian Merostomata from Spitzbergen, with remarks on the Suborder Synziphosura. Skrifter utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi i Oslo. I. Matematisk-Naturvidenskapelig Klasse, 3:6–26.Google Scholar
Størmer, L. 1936. Eurypteriden aus dem Rheinischen Unterdevon. Abhandlungen der Preussischen Geologischen Landesanstalt, neue folge, 175:1–74.Google Scholar
Størmer, L. 1955. Chelicerata. p. 1–41. In Moore, R. C. (ed), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology (P), Arthropoda 2. The University of Kansas Press and The Geological Survey of America, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Størmer, L. 1974. Arthropods from the Lower Devonian (Lower Emsian) of Alken an der Mosel, Germany, Pt. 4, Eurypterida, Drepanopteridae and other groups. Senckenbergiana Lethaea, 54:359–451.Google Scholar
Tetlie, O. E. 2004a. The genitalia of Jaekelopterus rhenaniae and its phylogenetic position. The Palaeontological Association Newsletter, 56:116–119.Google Scholar
Tetlie, O. E. 2004b. Eurypterid phylogeny with remarks on the origin of arachnids. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Bristol, United Kingdom, 320 p.Google Scholar
Tetlie, O. E. 2006a. Eurypterida (Chelicerata) from the Welsh Borderlands, England. Geological Magazine, 143:723–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlie, O. E. 2006b. Two new Silurian species of Eurypterus (Chelicerata: Eurypterida) from, Norway and Canada, and the phylogeny of the genus. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 4:397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobien, H. 1937. Über Sinneshaare bei Pterygotus (Erettopterus) osiliensis Schmidt aus dem Obersilur von Oesel. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 19:254–66.Google Scholar
Tollerton, V. P. Jr., 1989. Morphology, taxonomy, and classification of the order Eurypterida Burmeister, 1843. Journal of Paleontology, 63(5):642–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1882. Description of a new genus of the order Eurypterida from the Utica Slate. American Journal of Science, 3rd Series, 23:213–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterston, C. D. 1964. Observations on pterygotid eurypterids. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 66:9–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterston, C. D., Oelofsen, B. W., and Oosthuizen, R. D. F. 1985. Cyrtoctenus wittebergensis sp. nov. (Chelicerata: Eurypterida), a large sweepfeeder from the Carboniferous of South Africa. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 76:339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, D. 1908. Report on the fossil flora of the Coal Measures of Brazil, p. 337–607. In White, J. C. (ed.), Final report on the coal measures and associated rocks of South Brazil, Rio de Janeiro National Press.Google Scholar
Whiteaves, J. F. 1884. Palaeozoic fossils of Canada. Geology and Natural History Survey of Canada, 3:1–43.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. 1864. Descriptions of some new Palæozoic Crustacea. Geological Magazine, 1:196–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, H. 1866-1878. A monograph of the British fossil Crustacea belonging to the Order Merostomata. Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society, 5:181–263.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. 1913. The position of the Merostomata. Geological Magazine, 50:293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar