Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T18:41:58.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Systematics and paleobiogeographic significance of the Upper Ordovician pterygometopine trilobite Achatella Delo, 1935

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2016

Robert E. Swisher ,
Stephen R. Westrop  and
Lisa Amati
Robert E. Swisher
Affiliation:
Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, and School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73072, USA 〈swestrop@ou.edu〉
Stephen R. Westrop
Affiliation:
Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, and School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73072, USA 〈swestrop@ou.edu〉
Lisa Amati
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, SUNY Potsdam, Potsdam, New York 13676, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Study of type and new material of the pterygometopine Achatella Delo, 1935 demonstrates the presence of four species in Upper Ordovician (Katian) strata of Laurentian North America, A. achates (Billings, 1860) from the northeastern United States and the St. Lawrence lowlands of Canada, A. carleyi (Meek, 1872) from the Cincinnati region, Ohio and Kentucky, A. katharina (Bradley, 1930), from Missouri and Oklahoma, and A. clivosa Lespérance and Weissenberger, 1998 from the Gaspé Peninsula, Quebec. Perhaps as many as five additional species are present in Sandbian–Katian strata of the Laurentian terranes of Scotland and Northern Ireland, although only three of these are known well enough to code for phylogenetic analysis. The oldest pterygometopines, including species of Achatella, are known from Middle Ordovician strata of Baltica. Phylogenetic analysis supports a single migration event from Baltica from Laurentia, followed by a modest diversification in the latter region.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 90 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 59 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amati, L., 2014, Isoteline trilobites of the Viola Group (Ordovician: Oklahoma): Systematics and stratigraphic occurrence: Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin, v. 151, 127 p.Google Scholar
Amati, L., and Westrop, S.R., 2006, Sedimentary facies and trilobite biofacies along an Ordovician shelf to basin gradient, Viola Group, south-central Oklahoma: Palaios, v. 21, p. 516–529.Google Scholar
Bergström, S.M., Chen, X., Gutiérrez-Marco, J.C., and Dronov, A., 2009, The new chronostratigraphic classification of the Ordovician System and its relations to major regional series and stages and to δ13C chemostratigraphy: Lethaia, v. 42, p. 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billings, E., 1860, Description of some new species of fossils from the Lower and Middle Silurian Rocks of Canada: Canadian Naturalist and Geologist, v. 5, p. 49–69.Google Scholar
Bradley, J.H., 1930, Fauna of the Kimmswick Limestone Missouri and Illinois: Contributions from the Walker Museum, University of Chicago, v. 2, p. 219–290.Google Scholar
Brett, C.E., Whiteley, T.E., Allison, P.A., and Yochelson., E.L., 1999, The Walcott-Rust Quarry: Middle Ordovician Trilobite Konservat-Lagerstätten: Journal of Paleontology, v. 73, p. 288–305.Google Scholar
Brett, C.E., McLaughlin, P.I., Cornell, S.R., and Baird, G.C., 2004, Comparative sequence stratigraphy of two classic Upper Ordovician successions, Trenton Shelf (New York–Ontario) and Lexington Platform (Kentucky–Ohio): implications for eustasy and local tectonism in eastern Laurentia: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 210, p. 295–329.Google Scholar
Bulinski, K.V., 2007, Analysis of sample-level properties along a paleoenvironmental gradient: The behavior of evenness as a function of sample size: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Paleoecology, v. 253, p. 490–508.Google Scholar
Carlucci, J. R., Westrop, S.R., Brett, C.E., and Burkhalter, R., 2014, Facies architecture and sequence stratigraphy of the Ordovician Bromide Formation (Oklahoma): a new perspective on a mixed carbonate-siliciclastic ramp: Facies, v. 60, p. 987–1012.Google Scholar
Chew, D.M., and Strachan, R.A., 2013, The Laurentian Caledonides of Scotland and Ireland: Geological Society of London Special Publication, v. 390, p. 45–91.Google Scholar
Clarke, J.M., 1897, The Lower Silurian trilobites of Minnesota, in Geological and Natural History Survey of Minnesota: Geology of Minnesota, v. 3, p. 695–759.Google Scholar
Cripps, A.P., 1988, A new species of stem-group chordate from the Upper Ordovician of Northern Ireland: Palaeontology, v. 31, p. 1053–1077.Google Scholar
Dalman, J.W., 1827, Om Palaeaderna eller de så kallade Trilobiterna: Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar, v. 1826, no. 2, p. 113–162, 226–294, pls. 1–6.Google Scholar
Datillo, B.F., Brett, C.E., Tsujita, C.J., and Fairhurst, R., 2008, Sediment supply versus storm winnowing in the development of muddy and shelly interbeds from the Upper Ordovician of the Cincinnati region, USA: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 45, p. 243–265.Google Scholar
Delo, D.M., 1935, A revision of the phacopid trilobites: Journal of Paleontology, v. 27, p. 33–48.Google Scholar
Delo, D.M., 1940, Phacopid trilobites of North America: Geological Society of America Special Paper, v. 29, p. 1–135.Google Scholar
Dix, G.R., Coniglio, M., Riva, J.F., and Achab, A., 2007, The Late Ordovician Dawson Point Formation (Timiskaming outlier, Ontario): key to a new regional synthesis of Richmondian–Hirnantian carbonate and siliciclastic magnafacies across the central Canadian craton: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 44, p. 1313–1331.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N., 1971, Patterns of cephalic musculature in the Phacopina (Trilobita) and their phylogenetic significance: Journal of Paleontology, v. 45, p. 52–67.Google Scholar
Foerste, A.F., 1919, Silurian fossils from Ohio, with notes on related species from other horizons: The Ohio Journal of Science, v. 19, p. 367–408.Google Scholar
Goloboff, P.A., Farris, J.S., and Nixon, K.C., 2008, TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis: Cladistics, v. 24, p. 774–786.Google Scholar
Goldman, D., Leslie, S.A., Nolvak, J., Young, S., Bergström, S.M., and Huff, W., 2007, The global stratotype section and point (GSSP) for the base of the Katian Stage of the Upper Ordovician Series at Black Knob Ridge, southeastern Oklahoma, USA: Episodes, v. 30, p. 258–270.Google Scholar
Harper, D.A.T., 1982, The stratigraphy of the Drummuck Group (Ashgill), Girvan: Geological Journal, v. 17, p. 251–277.Google Scholar
Harper, D.A.T., and Parkes, M.A., 2000, Ireland, in Fortey, R.A., Harper, D.A.T., Ingham, J.K., Owen, A.W., Parkes, M.A., Rushton, A.W.A., and Woodcock, N.H., A Revised Correlation of Ordovician Rocks in the British Isles: Geological Society Special Report 25, p. 52–64.Google Scholar
Holland, S.M., and Patkowsky, M.E., 1996, Sequence stratigraphy and long-term paleoceanographic change in the Middle and Upper Ordovician of the eastern United States: Geological Society of America Special Paper, v. 306, p. 117–129.Google Scholar
Jaanusson, V., and Ramsköld, L., 1993, Pterygometopine trilobites from the Ordovician of Baltoscandia: Palaeontology, v. 36, p. 743–769.Google Scholar
Lespérance, P.E., and Weissenberger, J.A.W., 1998, Trilobites of the Pabos Formation (Ashgillian, Upper Ordovician), Percé area, Quebec: Journal of Paleontology, v. 72, p. 303–316.Google Scholar
Ludvigsen, R., 1978a, Towards an Ordovician trilobite biostratigraphy of southern Ontario: Michigan Basin Geological Society, Special Paper, v. 18, p. 73–84.Google Scholar
Ludvigsen, R., 1978b, Middle Ordovician trilobite biofacies, southern Mackenzie Mountains: Geological Association of Canada Special Paper, v. 18, p. 1–37.Google Scholar
Ludvigsen, R., 1979, Fossils of Ontario. Part 1: The Trilobites: Life Sciences Miscellaneous Publications, Royal Ontario Museum, 96 p.Google Scholar
Ludvigsen, R., and Chatterton, B.D.E., 1982, Ordovician Pterygometopidae (Trilobita) of North America: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 19, p. 2179–2206.Google Scholar
McConnell, B., Crowley, Q.G., and Riggs, N., 2010, Laurentian origin of the Ordovician Grangegeeth volcanic arc terrane, Ireland: Journal of the Geological Society, London, v. 167, p. 469–474.Google Scholar
McFarland, S., Westrop, S.R., and Cheel, R.J., 1999, Allogenic versus autogenic processes in the genesis of Middle Ordovician brachiopod-rich shell beds, Verulam Formation, Ontario: Palaios, v. 14, p. 282–287.Google Scholar
McNamara, K.J., 1980, Evolutionary trends and their functional significance in chasmopine trilobites: Lethaia, v. 13, p. 61–78.Google Scholar
Meek, F.B., 1872, Descriptions of new species of fossil from the Cincinnati Group of Ohio: The American Journal of Science and Arts, v. 3, p. 423–428.Google Scholar
Meek, F.B., 1873, Descriptions of invertebrate fossils of the Silurian and Devonian systems: Geological Survey of Ohio, v. 1, no. 2, p. 1–296.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C.E., Adhya, S., Bergström, S.M., Joy, M.P., and Delano, J.W., 2004, Discovery of the Ordovician Millbrig K-bentonite Bed in the Trenton Group of New York State: implications for regional correlation and sequence stratigraphy in eastern North America: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 210, p. 331–346.Google Scholar
Morris, S.F., 1988, A review of British trilobites, including a synoptic revision of Salter’s monograph: Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society, v. 140, p. 1–316.Google Scholar
Morris, S.F., and Tripp, R.P., 1986, Lectotype selections for Ordovician trilobites from the Girvan District, Strathclyde: Bulletin of the Brithish Museum (Natural History), Geology series, v. 40, p. 161–176.Google Scholar
Nitecki, M. H., and Golden, J., 1970, Catalogue of Type Specimens of Trilobites in Field Museum of Natural History: Fieldiana Geology, v. 22, p. 1–134.Google Scholar
Nixon, K.C., 2002, WinClada ver. 1.00.08: Published by the author, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Okulitch, V. L., 1942, New Pterygometopinae from the Ordovician of Ontario and Quebec: Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, Section 4, v. 36, p. 96–106.Google Scholar
Pärnaste, H., Bergström, J., and Zhiyi, Z., 2013, High resolution trilobite stratigraphy of the Lower–Middle Ordovician Öland Series of Baltoscandia: Geological Magazine, v. 150, p. 509–518.Google Scholar
Romano, M., and Owen, A.W., 1993, Early Caradoc trilobites of eastern Ireland and their palaeogeographical significance: Palaeontology, v. 36, p. 681–720.Google Scholar
Osborne, R.H., 1968, American Upper Ordovician standard. IX. Bedrock geology of eastern Hamilton County, Ohio: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 52, p. 2137–2152.Google Scholar
Owen, A.W., 1986, The uppermost Ordovician (Hirnantian) trilobites of Girvan, SW Scotland, with a review of coeval trilobite faunas: Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, v. 77, p. 231–239.Google Scholar
Portlock, J.E., 1843, Report on the geology of the County of Londonderry, and parts of Tyrone and Fermanagh: Millikan and Longmans, Dublin and London, 784 pp.Google Scholar
Raymond, P.E., 1921, A contribution to the description of the fauna of the Trenton Group: Geological Survey of Canada, Museum Bulletin, v. 31, p. 1–64.Google Scholar
Reed, F.R.C., 1905, The classification of the Phacopidae: Geological Magazine, v. 5, no. 2, p. 172–178, 224–228.Google Scholar
Reed, F.R.C., 1914, The Lower Palaeozoic trilobites of Girvan: Supplement. Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society, p. 1–56, pls 1–8.Google Scholar
Sharma, S., Dix, G.R., and Riva, J.F., 2003, Late Ordovician platform foundering, its paleoceanography and burial, as preserved in separate (eastern Michigan Basin, Ottawa Embayment) basins, southern Ontario: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 40, p. 135–148.Google Scholar
Shaw, F.C., and Fortey, R.A., 1977, Middle Ordovician trilobites and facies in North America: Geological Magazine, v. 114, p. 409–443.Google Scholar
Sinclair, G.W., 1944, Some Ordovician trilobites from Ontario: Transactions of the Royal Canadian Institute, v. 25, p. 15–20.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F., 1881, Revision der ostbaltischen Trilobiten, nebst geognostischer Übersicht des ostbaltischen Silurgebiets. I. Phacopiden, Cheiruriden und Encrinuriden: Mémoires de ľ Académie Impériale des Sciences de St.-Pétersbourg, Série 7, v. 30, p. 1–237.Google Scholar
Strong, E.E., and Lipscomb, D., 1999, Character coding and inapplicable characters: Cladistics, v. 15, 363–371.Google Scholar
Swisher, R.E., 2015, Trilobite faunas, sedimentary facies and sequence stratigraphy of the Upper Ordovician (Sandbian–Katian) succession of Missouri [Ph.D. dissertation]: Norman, University of Oklahoma, 305 p.Google Scholar
Swofford, D. L., 2001, PAUP*, Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony version 4: Sunderland, Massachusetts, Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Tripp, R.P., 1954, Caradocian trilobites from mudstones at Craighead quarry, near Girvan, Ayrshire: Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, v. 62, p. 655–693.Google Scholar
Tripp, R.P., 1980a, Trilobites of the Ordovician Balclatchie and lower Ardwell groups of the Girvan district, Scotland: Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, v. 71, p. 123–145.Google Scholar
Tripp, R.P., 1980b, Trilobites of the Ordovician Ardwell Groups of the Craighead Inlier, Girvan district, Scotland: Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, v. 71, p. 147–157.Google Scholar
Warburg, E., 1925, The trilobites of the Leptaena Limestone in Dalarne: Bulletin of the Geologic Institute of the University of Upsala, v. 27, p. 1–446.Google Scholar
Wilson, A.E., 1947, Trilobita of the Ottawa Formation of the Ottawa - St. Lawrence Lowland: Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin, v. 9, p. 1–86.Google Scholar
Westrop, S.R., Amati, L., Brett, C.E., Swisher, R.E., and Carlucci, J.R., 2012, When approaches collide: reconciling sequence stratigraphy, chemostratigraphy and biostratigraphy in the correlation of the Katian (Upper Ordovician) reference section, central Oklahoma: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 44, no. 7, p. 606.Google Scholar
Whitely, T.E., Kloc, G.J., and Brett, C.E., 2002, Trilobites of New York, An Illustrated Guide: Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press, 203 p.Google Scholar
Whittington, H.B., 1966, Phylogeny and distribution of Ordovician trilobites: Journal of Paleontology, v. 40, p. 696–737.Google Scholar
Whittington, H.B., Chatterton, B.D.E., Speyer, S.E., Fortey, R.A., Owens, R.M., et al. 1997, Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part O, Arthropoda 1, Trilobita Revised. Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO and University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, p. 530.Google Scholar
Young, S.A., Saltzman, M.R., and Bergström, S.M., 2005, Upper Ordovician (Mohawkian) carbon isotope (δ13C) stratigraphy in eastern and central North America: Regional expression of a perturbation of the global carbon cycle: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeogeography, v. 222, p. 53–76.Google Scholar