Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:35:48.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Attempted predation and shell repair in Middle and Upper Ordovician gastropods from Sweden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

J. O. R. Ebbestad
Affiliation:
Department of Historical Geology and Paleontology, Institute of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 22, S-752 36, Uppsala, Sweden
J. S. Peel
Affiliation:
Department of Historical Geology and Paleontology, Institute of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 22, S-752 36, Uppsala, Sweden

Abstract

Repaired shell injuries are reported in 11 specimens including six genera and eight species of gastropods from the upper Middle Ordovician (Caradoc) Kullsberg Limestone and the Upper Ordovician (Ashgill) Boda Limestone, Siljan district, Sweden. The specimens are of different sizes and morphologies, including one isostrophic, three low-spired, and six moderately high-spired turbinate forms. Single and repeated episodes of shell damage and subsequent repair are preserved, the breaks ranging from simple arcuate or scalloped fractures to removal of large sections of the apertural margin. Both early and late growth stages show damage, but the injuries are usually restricted to only one whorl. No shell repairs were discovered on the 65 more or less complete specimens of the subulitids, although the smooth shell makes observation difficult. Injuries in the Siljan samples are found in both microgastropods and large specimens, but the sample is too small for meaningful quantification. The shell repair frequency is about 7 percent, based on examination of 404 specimens (54 from Kullsberg Limestone and 350 from Boda Limestone). Most of the repaired injuries are attributed to failed predation, adding significantly to the Lower Paleozoic documentation of predation on gastropods. The gastropod shells are morphologically weak by modern standards, but do show some architectural strengthening features such as narrow apertures, collabral or spiral threads, and other ornamentation. The identity of the predator(s) is unknown.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, R. R. 1986. Resistance to and repair of shell breakage induced by durophages in Late Ordovician brachiopods. Journal of Paleontology, 60:273285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allmon, W. D., Nieh, J. C., and Norris, R. D. 1990. Drilling and peeling of turritelline gastropods since the Late Cretaceous. Palaeontology, 33:595611.Google Scholar
Alpert, S. P., and Moore, J. N. 1975. Lower Cambrian trace fossil evidence for predation on trilobites. Lethaia, 8:223230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W. I., and Gurrola, R. A. 1979. Two boring organisms in a Lower Mississipian community of southern Indiana. Journal of Paleontology, 53:335344.Google Scholar
Babcock, L. E. 1993. Trilobite malformations and the fossil record of behavioral asymmetry. Journal of Paleontology, 67:217229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, L. E., and Robison, R. A. 1989. Preferences of Palaeozoic predators. Nature, 337:695696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, L. E., Feldmann, R. M., and Wilson, M. T. 1987. Teratology and pathology of some Paleozoic conulariids. Lethaia, 20:93105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumiller, T. K. 1990. Non-predatory drilling of Mississippian crinoids by platyceratid gastropods. Palaeontology, 33:743748.Google Scholar
Bengtson, S. 1968. The problematic genus Mobergella from the Lower Cambrian of the Baltic area. Lethaia, 1:325351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtson, S. 1994. The advent of animal skeletons, p. 412425. In Bengtson, S. (ed.), Early Life on Earth. Nobel Symposium no. 84, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bengtson, S., and Zhao, Yue. 1992. Predatorial borings in Late Precambrian mineralized exoskeletons. Science, 257:367369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benton, M. J. 1986. Predation by drilling gastropods. Nature, 321:110111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkenmajer, K. 1977. Trace fossil evidence for predation on trilobites from Lower Cambrian of south Spitsbergen. Årbok, Norsk Polarinstitutt, 1976:187194.Google Scholar
Blake, D. B., and Guensburg, T. E. 1992. A Late Ordovician asteroid and its pelecypod prey. Geological Society of America. Abstracts with Programs, 24(4)6.Google Scholar
Blake, D. B., and Guensburg, T. E. 1994. Predation by the Ordovician asteroid Promopalaeaster on a pelecypod. Lethaia, 27:235239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, D. S. 1992. Comparative taphonomy of two cincinnatian (Late Ordovician) trilobites. Geological Society of America. Abstracts with Programs, 24(7)345.Google Scholar
Carriker, M. R., and Yochelson, E. L. 1968. Recent gastropod boreholes and Ordovician cylindrical borings. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 593B, 69 p.Google Scholar
Clarkson, E. N. K., Harper, D. A. T., and Peel, J. S. 1995. Taxonomy and palaeoecology of the mollusc Pterotheca from the Ordovician and Silurian of Scotland. Lethaia, 28:101114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway Morris, S., and Bengtson, S. 1994. Cambrian predators: possible evidence from boreholes. Journal of Paleontology, 68:123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway Morris, S., and Jenkins, R. J. F. 1985. Healed injuries in Early Cambrian trilobites from South Australia. Alcheringa, 9:167177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbestad, J. O. R.In press. Multiple attempted predation in a Swedish Middle Ordovician gastropod, Bucania gracillima. Geologiska Förenings i Stockholm Förhandlingar.Google Scholar
Eichwald, E. d'. 1842. Die Urwelt russlands, durch abbildungen erläutere, 2. St. Petersburg. 272 p.Google Scholar
Feige, A., and Fürsich, F. T. 1991. Taphonomy of the recent molluscs of Bahia la Choya (Gulf of California, Sonora, Mexico), p. 89133. In Fürsich, F. T. and Flessa, K. W. (eds.), Ecology, Taphonomy, and Paleoecology of Recent and Pleistocene Molluscan Faunas of Bahia la Choya, northern Gulf of California. Zitteliana 18.Google Scholar
Fürsich, F. T., and Jablonski, D. 1984. Late Triassic naticid drillholes: carnivorous gastropods gain a major adaptation but fail to radiate. Science, 224:7880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, R. A., and Watkins, R. 1980. Cephalopod ecology across a late Silurian shelf tract. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen, 160:97117.Google Scholar
Hollman, R. 1968. Zur Morphologie rezenter Mollusken-Bruchschille. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 42:217235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horný, R. A. 1996a. Retractor muscle scars in Gamadiscus (Mollusca: Tergomya). Bulletin of the Czech Geological Survey 71:245249.Google Scholar
Horný, R. A. 1996b. Grandostoma: an additional bellerophontiform mollusc with circumbilical muscle attachment areas (Gastropodam Bellerophontacea). Journal of the Czech Geological Society, 41:223231.Google Scholar
Horný, R. A. 1997. Bucanopsina gen. n., a new bellerophontoidean gastropod with circumbilical muscle attachment areas from the Middle Ordovician of Bohemia. Bulletin of the Czech Geological Survey, 71:513.Google Scholar
Horný, R. A. and Peel, J. S. 1996. Carcassonnella, a new Lower Ordovician bellerophontiform mollusc with dorsally retractor muscle attachments (Class Tergomya). Bulletin of the Czech Geological Survey, 71:305332.Google Scholar
Isberg, O. 1934. Studien über Lammelibranchiaten des Leptaenakalkes in Dalarna. Lund. Håkan Ohlssons Buchdruckerei, Lund, 492 p.Google Scholar
Jaanusson, V. 1982. The Siljan District, p. 1542. In Bruton, D. L. and Williams, S. H. (eds.), Field excursion guide. IV International Symposium on the Ordovician System. Paleontological contributions from the University of Oslo 279.Google Scholar
Jensen, S. 1990. Predation by early Cambrian trilobites on infaunal worms—evidence from the Swedish Mickwitzia Sandstone. Lethaia, 23:2942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, B. 1982. Paleobiology of the Upper Silurian brachiopod Atrypoidea. Journal of Paleontology, 56:912923.Google Scholar
Kitchell, J. A., Boggs, C. H., Kitchell, J. F., and Rice, J. A. 1981. Prey selection by naticid gastropods: experimental tests and application to the fossil record. Paleobiology, 7:533552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koken, E. 1896. Die Leitfossilien. Chr. Herm. Tauchnitz, Leipzig, 848 p.Google Scholar
Koken, E., and Perner, J. 1925. Die Gastropoden des Baltischen Untersilurs. Mémoires de L'àcadémie des sciences de Russie Serie 8, Classe Physico-Mathématique, 37, 326 p.Google Scholar
Liljedahl, L. 1985. Ecological aspects of a silicified bivalve fauna from the Silurian of Gotland. Lethaia, 18:5366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, G. 1880. Fragmenta Silurica. Samson and Wallin, 41 p.Google Scholar
Lindström, A., and Peel, J. S. 1997. Failed predation and shell repair in the gastropod Poleumita from the Silurian of Gotland, Sweden. Bulletin of the Czech Geological Survey 72:115126.Google Scholar
Martell, D. M. 1990. Predation on Kosmoceras by semionotid fish in the Middle Jurassic of Lower Oxford Clay of England. Paleontology, 33:739742.Google Scholar
Martinson, A. 1962. Ostracods of the family Beyrichiidae from the Silurian of Gotland. Bulletin of the Geological Institutions of the University of Uppsala, 41:1369.Google Scholar
McMenamin, M. A. S., and McMenamin, D. L. S. 1990. The Emergence of Animals. Columbia University Press, New York, 217 p.Google Scholar
Neuman, R. B. 1969. Upper Ordovician Streptelasmatid corals from Scandinavia. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, 55:69115.Google Scholar
Nielsen, C. 1975. Obeservations on Buccinium undatum L. attacking bivalves and on prey respons, with a short review on attack methods of other prosobranchs. Ophelia 13:87108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, A. W. 1983. Abnormal cephalic fringes in the Trinucleidae and Harpetidae (Trilobita), p. 241248. In Briggs, D. E. G. and Lane, P. D. (eds.), Trilobites and other early arthropods: papers in honour of Professor H. B. Whittington, F. R. S. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 30.Google Scholar
Owen, A. W., and Bruton, D. L. 1980. Late Caradoc-early Asghill trilobites of the central Oslo Region, Norway. Paleontological Contributions from the University of Oslo, 245, 42 p.Google Scholar
Palmer, R. 1979. Fish predation and the evolution of gastropod shell sculpture: experimental and geographic evidence. Evolution, 33:697713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peel, J. S. 1984. Attempted predation and shell repair in Euomphalopterus (Gastropoda) from the Silurian of Gotland. Bulletin of the geological society of Denmark, 32:163168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perner, J. 1903. Gastéropodes. In Barrande, J.Systême Silurien du centre de la Bohême, 4(1):IXI, 1-164.Google Scholar
Perner, J. 1907. Gastéropodes. In Barrande, J.Systême Silurien du centre de la Bohême, 4(2):IIX, 1-380.Google Scholar
Pratt, B. R. 1994. Possible predation of early Late Cambrian trilobites, and its disappearance in the Marjuman-Steptoean extinction event. Terra Nova Abstract, Supplement, 3, 6.Google Scholar
Rohr, D. M. 1991. Borings in the shell of an Ordovician (Whiterockian) gastropod. Journal of Paleontology, 65:687688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohr, D. M. 1993. Middle Ordovician carrier shell Lytospira (Mollusca, Gastropoda) from Alaska. Journal of Paleontology, 67:959962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savazzi, E. 1991. Constructional morphology of strombid gastropods. Lethaia, 24:311331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schindel, D. E., Vermeij, G. J., and Zipser, E. 1982. Frequencies of repaired shell fractures among the Pennsylvanian gastropods of north-central Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 56:729740.Google Scholar
Schäfer, W. 1968. Aktuo-paläontologie nach Studien in der Nordsee. Senkenberg-Buch 41. Waldemar Kramer, Frankfurt am Maine, 666 p.Google Scholar
Schäfer, W. 1972. Ecology and Palaeoecology of marine environments. Craig, G. Y. (ed.). Oliver and Boyde, Edinburgh, 568 p.Google Scholar
Schoener, T. W. 1979. Inferring the properties of predation and other injury-producing agents from injury frequencies. Evolution, 60:11101115.Google Scholar
Signor, P. W. III. 1985. The role of shell geometry as a deterrent to predation in terebrid gastropods. The Veliger, 28:179185.Google Scholar
Signor, P. W. III, and Brett, C. E. 1984. The mid-Paleozoic precursor to the Mesozoic marine revolution. Paleobiology, 10:229245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simkiss, K. 1989. Biomineralisation in the context of geological time. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Earth Sciences, 80:193199.Google Scholar
Smith, S. A., Thayer, C. W., and Brett, C. E. 1985. Predation in the Paleozoic: gastropod-like drillholes in Devonian brachiopods. Science, 230:10331035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sohl, N. F. 1969. The fossil record of shell boring by snails. American Zoologist, 9:725734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1976. Fossil data and the Precambrian-Cambrian evolutionary transition. American Journal of Science, 276:5676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1982. Gastropod torsion: predation and the opercular imperative. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläeontologie Abhandlungen, 164:517.Google Scholar
Steel, M. H., and Sinclair, G. W. 1971. A Middle Ordovician fauna from Braeside, Ottawa Valley, Ontario. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, 211, 96 p.Google Scholar
Stridsberg, S. 1981. Apertural constrictions in some oncocerid cephalopods. Lethaia, 14:269276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stridsberg, S. 1985. Silurian oncocerid cephalopods from Gotland. Fossils and Strata, 18, 65 p.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. D., Cleevely, R. J., and Morris, N. J. 1983. Predatory gastropods and their activities in the Blackdown Greensand (Albian) of England. Palaeontology, 26:521553.Google Scholar
Thorslund, P. 1936. Siljanområdets brännkalkstenar och kalkindustri. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, Serie C 398. Årsbok, 30 (1936), 5, 64 p.Google Scholar
Underwood, C. J. 1993. The position of graptolites within Lower Palaeozoic planktic ecosystems. Lethaia, 26:189202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1977. The Mesozoic marine revolution: evidence from snails, predators and grazers. Paleobiology, 3:245258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1979. Shell architecture and causes of death of Micronesian reef snails. Evolution, 33:686696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vermeij, G. J. 1982a. Gastropod shell form, repair and breakage in relation to predation by the crab Calappa. Malacologia, 23:112.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1982b. Unsuccessful predation and evolution. American Naturalist, 120:701720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1983. Traces and trends of predation, with special reference to bivalved animals. Palaeontology, 26:455465.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1987. Evolution and Escalation—an Ecological History of Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 527 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1990. The origin of skeletons. Palaios, 4:585589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J., Zipser, E., and Dudley, E. C. 1980. Predation in time and space: peeling and drilling in terebrid gastropods. Paleobiology, 6:352364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J., Schindel, D. E., and Zipser, E. 1981. Predation through geological time: evidence from gastropod shell repair. Science, 214:10241026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vermeij, G. J., Zipser, E., and Zardini, R. 1982. Breakage-induced shell repair in some gastropods from the Upper Triassic of Italy. Journal of Paleontology, 56:233255.Google Scholar
Warburg, E. 1925. The trilobites of the Leptaena Limestone in Dalarna. Bulletin of the Geological Institute of the University of Uppsala, 27, 446 p.Google Scholar
Westermann, G. E. G. 1985. Post-mortem descent with septal implosion in Silurian nautiloids. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 59:7997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wängberg-Eriksson, K. 1964. Isospira reticulata n. sp. from the Upper Ordovician Boda Limestone, Sweden. Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar, 86:229237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wängberg-Eriksson, K. 1979. Macluritacean gastropods from the Ordovician and Silurian of Sweden. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning Serie C, 758, 33p.Google Scholar