Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mx8w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-08T06:15:53.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carboniferous (upper Serpukhovian–Bashkirian) fenestrate bryozoans from the Pampa de Tepuel Formation, central-western Patagonia, Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2025

César Augusto Taboada Open the ORCID record for César Augusto Taboada [Opens in a new window] ,
María Alejandra Pagani  and
Marcelo Gabriel Carrera Open the ORCID record for Marcelo Gabriel Carrera [Opens in a new window]
César Augusto Taboada*
Affiliation:
CONICET—Museo Paleontológico Egidio Feruglio (MEF), Av. Fontana 140, Trelew, Argentina
María Alejandra Pagani
Affiliation:
CONICET—Museo Paleontológico Egidio Feruglio (MEF), Av. Fontana 140, Trelew, Argentina
Marcelo Gabriel Carrera
Affiliation:
CICTERRA (CONICET—Universidad Nacional de Córdoba), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Av. Vélez Sarsfield 1699, X5016GCA, Córdoba, Argentina
*
Corresponding author: César Augusto Taboada; Email: ctaboada@mef.org.ar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite being a conspicuous group in many fossil-bearing beds from the Tepuel–Genoa Basin, the knowledge of bryozoans from Patagonia is scarce and outdated. The majority of bryozoan records are known from faunal components of the Lanipustula patagoniensis Biozone (Carboniferous, upper Serpukhovian–Moscovian), in lower to middle levels of the Pampa de Tepuel Formation, Tepuel Group. For the present contribution, we conducted a taxonomic study on bryozoan samples from the lower third of the Pampa de Tepuel Formation at the type section, Sierra de Tepuel, central-western Patagonia, Argentina. We found Paraptylopora gondwanica n. sp. along with species of Penniretepora, Polyporella, Septatopora, Levifenestella, Rectifenestella, Spinofenestella, and others still under study. Most studied fenestrate species are restricted to central-western Patagonia, indicating a degree of biogeographical isolation, while a few imply faunal migration between the western and eastern margins of southern Gondwana during the Late Paleozoic Ice Age. The bryozoan growth habits association and accompanying fauna suggests a mid-shelf to upper-slope environment characterized by deep, low-turbidity, euhaline waters and a soft to firm substrate.

UUID: http://zoobank.org/3bf56286-9fd7-43c2-b5f6-417e86994d08

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 99 , Issue 1 , January 2025 , pp. 55 - 85
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Handling Editor: Marcus Key, Jr.

References

Amini, Z.Z., Adabi, M.H., Burrett, C.F., and Quilty, P.G., 2004, Bryozoan distribution and growth form associations as a tool in environmental interpretation, Tasmania, Australia: Sedimentary Geology, v. 167, p. 1–15.Google Scholar
Amos, A.J., 1979, Faunas Carbónicas y Pérmicas, Guía Paleontológica Argentina. Parte I. Paleozoico: Buenos Aires, CONICET, 154 p.Google Scholar
Astrova, G.G., and Morozova, I.P., 1956, About systematics of the order Cryptostomata: Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, v. 110, p. 661–664.Google Scholar
Bambach, R.K., 1990, Late Palaeozoic provinciality in the marine realm, in McKerrow, W.S. and Scotese, C.R., eds., Palaeozoic Palaeogeography and Biogeography: London, Geological Society Memoirs, p. 307–323.Google Scholar
Bancroft, A.J., 1988, Palaeocorynid-type appendages in upper Palaeozoic fenestellid Bryozoa: Palaeontology, v. 31, p. 665–675.Google Scholar
Bassler, R., 1929, The Permian Bryozoa of Timor: Palaeontologie von Timor, XVI Lieferung, v. 16, p. 37–90.Google Scholar
Bassler, R., 1952, Taxonomic notes on genera of fossil and Recent Bryozoa: Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, v. 42, p. 381–385.Google Scholar
Borg, F., 1926, Studies on Recent cyclostomatous Bryozoa: Zoologiska Bidrag Från Uppsala, v. 10, p. 181–507.Google Scholar
Campbell, K.S.W., 1961, Carboniferous fossils from the Kuttung rocks of New South Wales: Palaeontology, v. 4, p. 428–474.Google Scholar
Campbell, K.S.W., 1962, Marine fossils from the Carboniferous glacial rocks of New South Wales: Journal of Paleontology, v. 36, p. 38–52.Google Scholar
Ceretti, E., 1963, Briozoi carboniferi della Carnia: Giornale Di Geologia, Annali Del Museo Geologico Di Bologna, v. 30, p. 254–360.Google Scholar
Condra, G.E., 1902, New Bryozoa from the Coal Measures of Nebraska: American Geologist, v. 30, p. 337–359.Google Scholar
Crockford, J., 1944, Bryozoa from the Permian of Western Australia: Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, v. 69, p. 139–175.Google Scholar
Crockford, J., 1947, Bryozoa from the lower Carboniferous of New South Wales and Queensland: Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, v. 72, p. 1–48.Google Scholar
Crockford, J., 1949, Bryozoa from the upper Carboniferous of Queensland and New South Wales: Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, v. 73, p. 419–429.Google Scholar
d’Orbigny, A., 1849, Description de quelques genres nouveaux de Mollusques bryozoaires: Revue et Magasin de Zoologie, v. 1, p. 499–504.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C.G., 1831, Symbolae Physycae, seu icons et descriptions Corporum Naturalium novorum aut minus cognitorum, quae ext itineribus per Libyam, Aegyptum, Nubiam, Dangolam, Syriam, Arabiam, et Habessiniam. Animalia Evertebrata, exclusis Insectis: Pars Zoologica, v. 4, unpaginated.Google Scholar
Elias, M.K., 1957, Late Mississippian fauna from the Redoak Hollow Formation of Southern Oklahoma. Part 1. Pelecypoda: Journal of Paleontology, v. 31, p. 370–427.Google Scholar
Elias, M.K., and Condra, G.E., 1957, Fenestella from the Permian of west Texas: Memoirs of Geological Society of America, v. 70, 158 p.Google Scholar
Engel, B.A., 1975, A new ?bryozoan from the Carboniferous of eastern Australia: Palaeontology, v. 18, p. 571–605.Google Scholar
Engel, B.A., 1979, Fenestrate bryozoans with large apertural form in the Carboniferous of eastern Australia: Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, v. 103, p. 135–170.Google Scholar
Ernst, A., 2001, Bryozoa of the upper Permian Zechstein Formation of Germany: Senckenbergiana Lethaea, v. 81, p. 135–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, A., 2003, Upper Palaeozoic bryozoans from the Carnic Alps (Austria): Freiberger Forschungshefte C 499: Paläontologie, Stratigraphie, Fazies, v. 11, p. 55–77.Google Scholar
Ernst, A., 2012, Fenestrate Bryozoan fauna from the Lower–Middle Devonian of NW Spain: Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, v. 264, p. 205–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, A., 2020, Fossil record and evolution of Bryozoa, in Schwaha, T., ed., Phylum Bryozoa: Berlin, de Gruyter, p. 11–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, A., and Königshof, P., 2010, Bryozoan fauna and microfacies from a Middle Devonian reef complex (Western Sahara, Morocco): Abhandlungen der Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, v. 568, p. 1–91.Google Scholar
Ernst, A., and Minwegen, E., 2006, Late Carboniferous bryozoans from La Hermida, Spain: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 51, p. 569–588.Google Scholar
Ernst, A., and Winkler Prins, C.F., 2008, Pennsylvanian bryozoans from the Cantabrian Mountains (northwestern Spain): Scripta Geologica, v. 137, p. 1–123.Google Scholar
Ernst, A., May, A., and Marks, S., 2012, Bryozoans, corals, and microfacies of lower Eifelian (Middle Devonian) limestones at Kierspe, Germany: Facies, v. 58, p. 727–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, A., Wyse Jackson, P.N., and Aretz, M., 2015, Bryozoan fauna from the Mississippian (Visean) of Roque Redonde (Montagne Noire, southern France): Geodiversitas, v. 37, p. 151–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, A., Claussen, A.L., Seuss, B., and Wyse Jackson, P.N., 2022, Stenolaemate bryozoans from the Graham Formation, Pennsylvanian (Virgilian) at Lost Creek Lake, Texas, USA: Palaeontologia Electronica, v. 25, n. 25.2.a15, https://doi.org/10.26879/1174.Google Scholar
Fleming, P.J.G., 1972, Redescription of fenestellid species from the upper Carboniferous of eastern Australia: Publications of the Geological Survey of Queensland, v. 354, p. 1–8.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, C.R., 1972, La Formación Las Salinas, Paleozóico superior de Chubut (República Argentina): Revista de La Asociación Geológica Argentina, v. 27, p. 95–115.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, C.R., Musacchio, E.A., and Amos, A.J., 1972, Hallazgo de una fauna y una flora del Paleozoico en la Sierra de Agnia, Chubut: Ameghiniana, v. 9, p. 298–304.Google Scholar
Gonzalez Bonorino, G., Rafine, G., Vega, V., and Guerín, D., 1988, Ambientes de plataforma nerítica dominada por tormentas en la sección glacigénica del Grupo Tepuel, Chubut: Revista de La Asociación Geológica Argentina, v. 42, p. 239–252.Google Scholar
González Mora, S., and Sour Tovar, F., 2014, Briozoarios del Orden Fenestrida, Pensilvánico de la Formación Ixtaltepec, Municipio de Nochixtlán, Oaxaca; consideraciones paleoambientales: Boletín de La Sociedad Geológica Mexicana, v. 66, p. 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González Mora, S., Wyse Jackson, P.N., Quiroz Barroso, S.A., and Sour Tovar, F., 2023, Pennsylvanian bryozoans from the Ixtaltepec Formation, Oaxaca, Mexico, in Key, M.M. Jr., Porter, J.S., and Wyse Jackson, P.N., eds., Bryozoan Studies 2022: Boca Raton, Florida/Oxon, UK, CRC Press/Balkema, p. 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hageman, S.J., 1991, Approaches to systematic and evolutionary studies of perplexing groups: an example using fenestrate Bryozoa: Journal of Paleontology, v. 65, p. 630–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hageman, S.J., and McKinney, F.K., 2010, Discrimination of fenestrate bryozoan genera in morphospace: Paleontologia Electronica, v. 13, n. 13.2.7A, p. 1–43, http://palaeoelectronica.org/2010_2/206/206.pdf.Google Scholar
Hageman, S.J., Bone, Y., Mcgowran, B., and James, N.P., 1997, Bryozoan colonial growth-forms as paleoenviromnental indicators: evaluation of methodology: Palaios, v. 12, p. 405–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J., 1884, Descriptions of the bryozoans of the Hamilton Group: Albany, New York, Report of the State Geologist for the Year 1883, p. 5–61.Google Scholar
ICZN, 1999, International Code of Zoological Nomenclature: London, The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, 156 p.Google Scholar
Isbell, J.L., Gulbranson, E., Taboada, A.C., Pagani, M.A., Limarino, C.O., Fraiser, M., Pauls, K.N., and Henry, L., 2013, Carboniferous and Permian strata of the Tepuel–Genoa Basin, Patagonia, Argentina: a near continuous, deep-water record of polar Gondwana during the late Paleozoic Ice Age, in Lucas, S.G., DiMichele, W.A., Barrick, J.E., Schneider, J.W., and Spielmann, J.A., eds., The Carboniferous–Permian Transition: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, v. 60, p. 137–138.Google Scholar
Jeffords, R.M., and Miller, T.H., 1960, Air brush for whitening fossils, and notes on photography: Journal of Paleontology, v. 34, p. 275–276.Google Scholar
Kelly, S.R., Doubleday, P.A., Brunton, C.H., Dickins, J.M., Sevastopulo, G.D., and Taylor, P.D., 2001, First Carboniferous and ? Permian marine macrofaunas from Antarctica and their tectonic implications: Journal of the Geological Society, v. 158, p. 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, W., 1849, On some families and genera of corals: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, v. 3, p. 388–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonsdale, W., 1839, Corals, in Murchison, R.I., ed., The Silurian System. Part 2. Organic Remains: London, John Murray, p. 675–694.Google Scholar
Ma, J., Buttler, C.J., and Taylor, P.D., 2014, Cladistic analysis of the ‘trepostome’ Suborder Esthonioporina and the systematics of Palaeozoic bryozoans: Studi Trentini di Scienze Naturali, v. 94, p. 153–161.Google Scholar
Matthews, S.C., 1973, Notes on open nomenclature and on synonymy lists: Palaeontology, v. 16, p. 713–719.Google Scholar
Maxwell, W.G., 1964, The geology of the Yarrol Region. Part 1. Biostratigraphy: University of Queensland, Department of Geology, Papers, St. Lucia, v. 5, p. 1–79.Google Scholar
McKinney, F.K., and Kříž, J., 1986, Lower Devonian Fenestrata (Bryozoa) of the Prague Basin, Barrandian area, Bohemia, Czechoslovakia: Fieldiana, Geology, New Series, v. 15, p. 1–90.Google Scholar
McKinney, F.K., and Wyse Jackson, P.N., 2015a, Part G, Revised, Volume 2, Chapter 8A: Order Fenestrata: morphology and growth: Treatise Online, v. 66, https://doi.org/10.17161/to.v0i0.4952.Google Scholar
McKinney, F.K., and Wyse Jackson, P.N., 2015b, Part G, Revised, Volume 2, Chapter 8H: Names of indeterminate, unrecognizable, or excluded genera previously assigned to Fenestrata: Treatise Online, v. 64, https://doi.org/10.17161/to.v0i0.4855.Google Scholar
M’Coy, F., 1844, A Synopsis of the Characters of the Carboniferous Limestone Fossils of Ireland: Dublin, Dublin University, 207 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, F.B., 1872, Report on the paleontology of eastern Nebraska, in Hayden, F.V, ed., Final Report on the United States Geological Survey of Nebraska and Portions of Adjacent Territories: Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, p. 81–239.Google Scholar
Miller, T.G., 1961, New Irish Tournaisian Fenestellids: Geological Magazine, v. 98, p. 493–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R., 1930, New species of bryozoans from the Pennsylvanian of Texas: Denison University Bulletin, v. 25, p. 147–163.Google Scholar
Morozova, I.P., 1974, Revision of the genus Fenestella: Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, v. 2, p. 54–67.Google Scholar
Morozova, I.P., 2001, Bryozoans of the order Fenestellida (morphology, system, historical development): Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Rosiiskoi Akademmi Nauk, v. 227, p. 1–177.Google Scholar
Morozova, I.P., and Lisitsyn, D.V., 2002, A revision of bryozoans from the stratotype sections of the Gzhelian Stage (upper Carboniferous): Paleontological Journal, v. 36, p. 632–643.Google Scholar
Nakrem, H.A., 1994, Middle Carboniferous to early Permian bryozoans from Spitsbergen: Acta Paleontologica Polonica, v. 39, p. 45–116.Google Scholar
Nakrem, H.A., 2002, A Moscovian (Carboniferous) bryozoan buildup from Svalvard, in Wyse Jackson, P.N., Buttler, C.J., and Spencer Jones, M.E., eds., Bryozoan Studies 2001: Lisse, the Netherlands, Balkema, p. 239–245.Google Scholar
Nickles, J.M., and Bassler, R.S., 1900, A synopsis of American fossil Bryozoa: Bulletin of the United States Geological Survey, v. 173, 663 p.Google Scholar
Nikiforova, A.I., 1933, Kamennougol’nye otlozhenii’a stredneĭ Azii [The Carboniferous deposits of central Asia. Contributions to the knowledge of the Lower Carboniferous Bryozoa of the Turkestan]: Trudy Vsesoiuznogo Geologo-Razvedochnogo Ob” Edineniia NKTP SSSR [Transactions of the United Geological and Prospecting Service of USSR], v. 207, p. 1–78.Google Scholar
Olaloye, F., 1974, Some Penniretepora (Bryozoa) from the Viséan of County Fermanagh with a revision of the generic name: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy. Section B: Biological, Geological, and Chemical Science, v. 74, p. 471–506.Google Scholar
Pagani, M.A., and Taboada, A.C., 2010, The marine upper Palaeozoic in Patagonia (Tepuel–Genoa Basin, Chubut Province, Argentina): 85 years of work and future prospects: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 298, p. 130–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R.F.N., Limarino, O.C., López Gamundi, O., and Page, S., 1984, Estratigrafía del Grupo Tepuel en su perfil tipo en la región El Molle, Provincia del Chubut: Noveno Congreso Geológico Argentino Actas I, p. 619–632.Google Scholar
Pérez-Huerta, A., and Sheldon, N.D., 2006, Pennsylvanian sea level cycles, nutrient availability and brachiopod paleoecology: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 230, p. 264–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, J., 1836, Illustrations of the Geology of Yorkshire; or a Description of the Strata and Organic Remains: Accompanied by a Geological Map, Sections, and Diagrams, and Figures of the Fossils. Part II. The Mountain Limestone District: London, John Murray, 245 p.Google Scholar
Počta, P., 1894, Bryozoaires, hydrozoaires et partie des anthozoaries, in Barrande, J., ed., Systême Silurien du Centre de la Bohême: Prague, Charles Bellmann, p. 1–230.Google Scholar
Ramos, V.A., 2008, Patagonia: a Paleozoic continent adrift?: Journal of South American Earth Sciences, v. 26, p. 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, C.F.R., 1927, Upper Carboniferous fossils from Argentina, in Du Toit, A.L., ed., A geological comparison of South America with South Africa (with a paleontological contribution): Washington, DC, Carnegie Institution of Washington Publications, p. 129–150.Google Scholar
Reid, C.M., 2003, Permian Bryozoa of Tasmania and New South Wales: systematics and the use in Tasmanian biostratigraphy: Association of Australasian Palaeontologists Memoir, v. 28, p. 70.Google Scholar
Reid, C.M., 2010, Environmental controls on the distribution of late Paleozoic bryozoan colony morphotypes: an example from the Permian of Tasmania, Australia: Palaios, v. 25, p. 692–702.Google Scholar
Renda, E.M., Alvarez, D., Prezzi, C., Oriolo, S., and Vizán, H., 2019, Inherited basement structures and their influence in foreland evolution: a case study in central Patagonia, Argentina: Tectonophysics, v. 772, p. 228–232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2019.228232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, H.G., 1959, New Virgilian and Wolfcampian fenestrate bryozoans from Kansas: Journal of Paleontology, v. 33, p. 1115–1119.Google Scholar
Robles Vilches, A., 2016, Los Spiriferida y Spiriferidina (Brachiopoda) de la Formación Pampa de Tepuel en la Biozona de Lanipustula (Carbonífero), Cuenca Tepuel–Genoa, Chubut: Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, 120 p.Google Scholar
Rogers, A.F., 1900, New bryozoans from the Coal Measures of Kansas and Missouri: Kansas University Quarterly, v. 9, p. 1–12.Google Scholar
Ross, J.R.P., and Ross, C.A., 1990, Late Palaeozoic bryozoan biogeography, in MacKerrow, W.S., and Scotese, C.R., eds., Paleozoic Palaeogeography and Biogeography: Geological Society, London, Memoirs, v. 12, p. 353–362.Google Scholar
Sabattini, N., 1972, Los Fenestellidae, Acanthocladiidae y Rabdomesidae (Bryozoa, Cryptostomata) del Paleozoico superior de San Juan y Chubut: Revista del Museo de La Plata (Nueva Serie), v. 6, p. 255–377.Google Scholar
Sabattini, N., 1982, Eliasopora Bassler (Bryozoa, Ctenostomida) en el Carbónico del Grupo Tepuel, provincia de Chubut, Argentina: Ameghiniana, v. 19, p. 159–162.Google Scholar
Sabattini, N., 1983, Especies de Septatopora Engel (?Bryozoa) del Carbónico de la provincia de Chubut, Argentina: Ameghiniana, v. 20, p. 61–71.Google Scholar
Sabattini, N., 1986, Distribución geográfica y estratigráfica de los Cnidaria y Bryozoa del Carbonífero y Pérmico de la Argentina: Revista del Museo de La Plata (Nueva Serie), v. 9, p. 1–17.Google Scholar
Sabattini, N., 1990, Nueva especie de Penniretepora d’Orbigny (Fenestrata, Bryozoa), del Carbonífero de la Cuenca Tepuel-Genoa (Chubut, Argentina): Ameghiniana, v. 27, p. 185–187.Google Scholar
Sabattini, N., 2002, Los Cystoporata (Bryozoa) del Carbonífero de la Cuenca Tepuel–Genoa, provincia del Chubut, Argentina: Ameghiniana, v. 39, p. 201–211.Google Scholar
Sakagami, S., 1966, The cryptostomatous Bryozoa from Ko Muk peninsular Thailand: Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography, v. 37, p. 157–168.Google Scholar
Sakagami, S., Sciunnach, D., and Garzanti, E., 2006, Late Paleozoic and Triassic bryozoans from the Tethys Himalaya (N India, Nepal and S Tibet): Facies, v. 52, p. 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, C.A., Rasband, W.S., and Eliceiri, K.W., 2012, NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis: Nature Methods, v. 9, p. 671–675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulga-Nesterenko, M.I., 1941, Nizhnepermskie mshanki Urala [Lower Permian Bryozoa of Urals]: Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Rosiiskoi Akademmi Nauk, v. 5, p. 1–276.Google Scholar
Schulga-Nesterenko, M.I., 1951, Carboniferous fenestellids of the Russian Platform: Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, v. 32, p. 1–57.Google Scholar
Simanauskas, T., and Sabattini, N., 1997, Bioestratigrafía del Paleozoico superior marino de la Cuenca Tepuel–Genoa, provincia de Chubut, Argentina: Ameghiniana, v. 34, p. 49–60.Google Scholar
Simpson, G.B., 1895, A discussion of the different genera of Fenestellidae: Thirteenth Annual Report of the State Geologist of New York for the Year 1894, p. 687–727.Google Scholar
Snyder, E.M., 1991, Revised taxonomic procedures and paleoecological applications for some North American Mississippian Fenestellidae and Polyporidae (Bryozoa): Paleontological Research Institution, v. 57, p. 1–275.Google Scholar
Suero, T., 1948, Descubrimiento del Paleozoico superior en la zona extraandina de Chubut: Boletín de Informaciones Petroleras, v. 237, p. 31–48.Google Scholar
Suero, T., 1953, Las sucesiones sedimentarias Suprapaleozoicas de la zona extraandina del Chubut: Revista de La Asociación Geológica Argentina, v. 8, p. 37–53.Google Scholar
Taboada, A.C., 2001, Bioestratigrafía del Neopaleozoico del Valle de Tres Lagunas, Sierra de Tepuel, provincia de Chubut: Acta Geológica Lilloana, v. 18, p. 291–304.Google Scholar
Taboada, A.C., 2008, First record of the late Paleozoic brachiopod Verchojania Abramov in Patagonia, Argentina: Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, v. 120, p. 305–319.Google Scholar
Taboada, A.C., and Pagani, M.A., 2010, The coupled occurrence of Cimmeriella–Jakutoproductus (Brachiopoda: Productidina) in Patagonia: implications for early Permian high to middle paleolatitudinal correlations and paleoclimatic reconstruction: Geologica Acta, v. 8, p. 513–534.Google Scholar
Taboada, A.C., and Shi, G.R., 2011, Taxonomic review and evolutionary trends of Levipustulini and Absenticostini (Brachiopoda) from Argentina: palaeobiogeographic and palaeoclimatic implications: Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, v. 41, p. 87–114.Google Scholar
Taboada, A.C., Pagani, M.A., Pinilla, M.K., Tortello, F.M., and Taboada, C.A., 2019, Carboniferous deposits of northern Sierra de Tecka, central-western Patagonia, Argentina: paleontology, biostratigraphy and correlations: Andean Geology, v. 43, p. 629–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taboada, A.C., Pagani, M.A., Pinilla, M.K., Taboada, C.A., Robles Vilches, A. V, and Pardo, C.A., 2022, D.1. Invertebrados del Paleozoico superior marino de la Cuenca Tepuel-Genoa, in Giacosa, R.E., ed., Geología y Recursos Naturales de la Provincia del Chubut: Relatorio del XXI Congreso Geológico Argentino, p. 643–672.Google Scholar
Taboada, C.A., 2018, Fenestrata (Bryozoa) del Carbonífero de la Sierra de Tepuel (Chubut, Argentina): Universidad de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, 109 p.Google Scholar
Tavener-Smith, R., 1973, Fenestrate Bryozoa from the Visean of County Fermanagh, Ireland: Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Geology, v. 23, p. 389–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Termier, H., and Termier, G., 1971, Bryozoaires du Paleozoique superieur de l’Afghanistan: Documents des Laboratoires de Géologie de la Faculté des Sciences de Lyon, v. 47, p. 1–52.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E.O., 1890, Palaeozoic Bryozoa: Part II. Palaeontology of Illinois. Section VI. Palaeozoic Bryozoa: Report of the Geological Survey of Illinois, v. 8, p. 283–688.Google Scholar
Uriz, N.J., Cingolani, C.A., Taboada, A.C., Arnol, J.A., Basei, M.A.S., Abre, P., and Coelho dos Santos, G.S., 2022, Provenance of pre- and Carboniferous sequences of the Esquel–Arroyo Pescado–Tepuel regions (Argentine Patagonia): a combined U–Pb and Hf isotope study of detrital zircon and constraints on depositional setting: Journal of South American Earth Sciences, v. 119, n. 103953, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2022.103953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vine, G.R., 1883, Fourth report of the committe consisting of Dr. H. C. Sorby and Mr. G. R. Vine, appointed for the purpose of reporting of fossil Polyzoa: Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, v. 1883, p. 161–209.Google Scholar
Vine, G.R., 1884, Further notes on new species, and other Yorkshire Carboniferous fossil Polyzoa described by Prof. John Phillips: Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological and Polytechnic Scociety, v. 8, p. 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wass, R.E., 1966, A new name for Fenestella rectangularis (Crockford), 1949: Journal of Paleontology, v. 19, p. 40–41.Google Scholar
Wyse Jackson, P.N., 2011, Rediscovery of a type specimen of Retepora pluma Phillips, 1836, the type species of Penniretepora d’Orbigny, 1849 (Fenestrata, Bryozoa), and replacement of its neotype: Irish Journal of Earth Science, v. 29, p. 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyse Jackson, P.N., and Buttler, C.J., 2015, Part G, Revised, Volume 2, Chapter 3: Preparation, Imaging, and Conservation of Paleozoic Bryozoans for Study: Treatise Online, v. 63, https://doi.org/10.17161/to.v0i0.4854.Google Scholar
Wyse Jackson, P.N., Mckinney, F.K., and Bancroft, A.J., 2005, Fenestrate bryozoan genera based on species from Ireland originally described by Frederick M’Coy in 1844: Palaeontology, v. 49, p. 741–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J., and Young, J., 1874, On a new genus of Carboniferous Polyzoa: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, v. 13, p. 335–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J., and Young, J., 1875, New species of Glauconome from Carboniferous limestone strata of the west of Scotland: Proceedings of the Natural History Society of Glasgow, v. 2, p. 325–335.Google Scholar