Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:49:59.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cenozoic Ampullinidae and Naticidae (Mollusca, Gastropoda) from Patagonia, Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2015

Miguel Griffin  and
Guido Pastorino
Miguel Griffin
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n, B1900FWA La Plata, Argentina,
Guido Pastorino
Affiliation:
Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia,” Av. Angel Gallardo 470 3° piso lab 57, C1405DJR Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A revision of the Cenozoic Ampullinidae and Naticidae from a wide range of localities and stratigraphic units in Patagonia revealed the occurrence there of thirteen species referable to these families. Ampullinid species described are Tejonia? tapia (Feruglio, 1935); Tejonia arroyoensis n. sp. and Pseudamaura dubia (Petersen, 1946). Naticids are represented by the following valid species: “Natica”entreriana Borchert, 1901; Euspira patagonica (Philippi, 1845); Notocochlis borrelloi (Brunet, 1995); Bulbus subtenuis (Ihering, 1897); Polinices santacruzensis Ihering, 1907; Polinices puntarenasensis Ihering, 1907; “Polinices”ortmanni Ihering, 1907 (nomen dubium); Polinices mina n. sp.; Glossaulax secundum (Rochebrune and Mabille, 1885); and Darwinices claudiae n. gen. n. sp.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 87 , Issue 3 , May 2013 , pp. 502 - 525
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, R.T. 1974. American Seashells. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, 663p.Google Scholar
Ameghino, F. 1898. Sinopsis geológico-paleontológica. Segundo Censo de la República Argentina, 1:111–225.Google Scholar
Anton, H. E. 1839. Verzeichniss der Conchylien welche sich in der Sammlung von Hermann Eduard Anton befinden. Halle, 110p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barreda, V. 1996. Bioestratigrafía de polen y esporas dela Formación Chenque, Oligoceno tardío? Mioceno de las provincias de Chubut y Santa Cruz, Patagonia, Argentina. Ameghiniana, 33:35–56.Google Scholar
Barreda, V. 1997 a. Palynomorph assemblage of the Chenque Formation, late Oligocene? Miocene from Golfo San Jorge Basin, Patagonia, Argentina. Part 1: Terrestrial algae, trilete and monolete spores. Ameghiniana, 34:69–80.Google Scholar
Barreda, V. 1997 b. Palynomorph assemblage of the Chenque Formation, late Oligocene? Miocene from Golfo San Jorge Basin, Patagonia, Argentina. Part 2: Gymnosperm and Colpate Pollen. Ameghiniana, 34:81–92.Google Scholar
Barreda, V. 1997 c. Palynomorph assemblage of the Chenque Formation, late Oligocene?–Miocene from Golfo San Jorge Basin, Patagonia, Argentina. Part 3: Polycolpate and tricolpate pollen. Ameghiniana, 34:131–144.Google Scholar
Barreda, V. 1997 d. Palynomorph assemblage of the Chenque Formation, late Oligocene? Miocene from Golfo San Jorge Basin, Patagonia, Argentina. Part 4: Polycolporate and porate pollen. Ameghiniana, 34:145–154.Google Scholar
Barreda, V. 1997 e. Palinoestratigrafía de la Formación San Julián en el área de Playa La Mina (provincia de Santa Cruz), Oligoceno de la cuenca austral. Ameghiniana, 34:275–294.Google Scholar
Barreda, V. and Palamarczuck, S. 2000. Estudio palinoestratigráfico del Oligoceno tardío—Mioceno en secciones de la costa patagónica y plataforma continental argentina. INSUGEO, Serie Correlación Geológica, 14:103–138.Google Scholar
Bellosi, E. S. 1990. Formación Chenque: registro de la transgresión Patagoniana (Terciario Medio) de la Cuenca San Jorge, Argentina, p. 57–60. In11 Congreso Geológico Argentino Actas 2.Google Scholar
Bellosi, E. 1995. Paleografía y cambios ambientales de la Patagonia Central durante el Terciario Medio. Boletín de Informaciones Petrolíferas, 44:50–83.Google Scholar
Bertels, A. 1970. Sobre el “Piso Patagoniano” y la representación de la época del Oligoceno en Patagonia austral, República Argentina. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, 25:495–450.Google Scholar
Bertels, A. 1975. Bioestratigrafía del Paleógeno en la República Argentina. Revista Española de Micropaleontología, 7:429–450.Google Scholar
Bertels, A. 1977. Estratigrafía y micropaleontología de la Formación San Julián en su área tipo, Provincia de Santa Cruz, República Argentina. Ameghiniana, 14:233–293.Google Scholar
Bertels, A. 1980. Estratigrafía y foraminíferos (Protozoa) bentónicos de la Formación Monte León (Oligoceno) en su área tipo, provincia de Santa Cruz, República Argentina. 2 Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Bioestratigrafía y 1 Congreso Latinoamericano de Paleontología, Actas 2:213–273.Google Scholar
Beu, A. G. 2009. Before the ice: biogeography of Antarctic Paleogene molluscan faunas. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 284:191–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beu, A. G. and Marshall, B. A. 2011. New Cenozoic records of genera and families from New Zealand (Mollusca, Gastropoda): highlights from Phillip Maxwell's collection. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 54:13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beu, A. G. and Maxwell, P. A. 1990. Cenozoic mollusca of New Zealand. New Zealand Geological Survey Paleontological Bulletin, 58:1–518.Google Scholar
Borchert, A. 1901. Die Mollusc enfauna und das Alter der Parana-Stuffe, p. 171–245. InSteinmann, G.(ed.), Beiträge zur Geologie und Paläontologie von Südamerika, IX. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie, Mineralogie und Paläontologie 14.Google Scholar
Bouchet, P. and Rocroi, J. P. 2005. Clasification and nomenclator of gastropod families. Malacologia, 47:1–397.Google Scholar
Brandmayr, J. 1945. Contribución al conocimiento geológico del extremo S.S.W.del Territorio de Santa Cruz (región Cerro Cazador-Río Turbio). Boletín de Informaciones Petroleras, 22:415–443.Google Scholar
Brunet, R. F. J. 1995. New species of Mollusca from the Entrerriense Formation (upper Miocene) of Chubut Province, Argentina and species not previously reported from this formation. Part 1—Gastropoda and Scaphopoda. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 28:1–56.Google Scholar
Brunet, R. F. J. 1997. New species of Mollusca from the Entrerriense Formation (upper Miocene) of Chubut Province, Argentina and species not previously reported from this formation. Part 2—Gastropoda. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 30:61–98.Google Scholar
Bucquoy, E., Dautzenberg, P., and Dollfus, G. F. 1883. Gastropodes. Familles: Naticidae, Pyramidellidae, p. 137–196. InLes mollusques marins du Roussillon. Baillière and fils. Ed. Dollfus G., Paris.Google Scholar
Camacho, H. H. 1967. Sobre las transgresiones del Cretácico Superior y Terciario de la Argentina. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, 22:253–280.Google Scholar
Camacho, H. H. 1974. Bioestratigrafía de las formaciones marinas del Eoceno y Oligoceno de la Patagonia. Anales de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, 26:39–57.Google Scholar
Casadío, S., Feldmann, R. M., and Foland, K. A. 2000. 40Ar/39Ar age and oxygen isotope temperature of the Centinela Formation, southwestern Argentina: an Eocene age for crustacean-rich “Patagonian” beds. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 13:123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casadío, S., Parras, A. M., Marenssi, S. A., and Griffin, M. 2001. Edades 87Sr/86Sr de Crassostrea? hatcheri (Ortmann)—Bivalvia, Ostreoida—en el “Patagoniano” de Santa Cruz, Argentina. Ameghiniana Suplemento Resúmenes, 38:30R.Google Scholar
Chiesa, J. O. and Camacho, H. H. 1995. Litoestratigrafia del Paleogeno marino en el Noroeste de la provincia de Santa Cruz, Argentina. Monografias de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, 11:9–15.Google Scholar
Chiesa, J. O., Parma, S. G., and Camacho, H. H. 1995. Invertebrados marinos de la Formacion El Chacay (Eoceno), provincia de Santa Cruz, Argentina. Sistemática y Bioestratigrafia. Monografias de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, 11:17–68.Google Scholar
Clark, B. L. and Durham, J. W. 1946. Eocene Faunas from the Department of Bolivar, Colombia. Geological Society of America Memoir, 16:1–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Codignotto, J. O. and Malumián, N. 1981. Geología de la región al norte del paralelo 4°S de la Isla Grande de Tierra del Fuego. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, 36:44–88.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1855. Report of Mr. T. A. Conrad on the fossil shells collected in California by W. P. Blake, geologist of the expedition, under the command of Lieutenant R. S. Williamson, United States Topographical Engineers, p. 5–20. InW. Blake, Description of the Fossils and Shells Collected in California. Palaentology. House Document 129.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. and Peyrot, A. 1919. Conchologie néogénique de l'Aquitaine. Tome III. Scaphopodes et gasteropodes. Actes de la Société Linnéenne de Bordeaux, 69:181–356. For dates, see Lozouet and Lesport. 1994. Sur les dates de publication de la Conchologie néogénique de l'Aquitaine par Cossmann and Peyrot (1909–1924) puis par Peyrot (1925–1935). Cossmanniana 3:9–12.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1846. Geological observations on South America being the third part of the geology of the voyage of the Beagle during 1832–1836. Smith, Elder and Co., London, 279p.Google Scholar
del Río, C. J. 1990 a. Bioestratigrafía y cronoestratigrafía de la Formación Puerto Madryn (Mioceno Medio) provincia del Chubut, Argentina. Anales de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales, 40:231–254.Google Scholar
del Río, C. J. 1990 b. Composición, origen y significado de la malacofauna “Entrerriense” (Mioceno medio) de la Argentina. Anales de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, 42:205–224.Google Scholar
del Río, C. J. 1991. Revisión sistemática de los bivalvos de la Formación Paraná (Mioceno medio). Provincia de Entre Ríos–Argentina. Monografías de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Buenos Aires, 7:1–93.Google Scholar
del Rio, C. J. 1992. Middle Miocene Bivalves of the Puerto Madryn Formation, Valdes Peninsule, Chubut Province, Argentina. (Nuculidae–Pectinidae). Part 1. Palaeontographica A, 225:1–57.Google Scholar
del Rio, C. J. 1994. Middle Miocene Bivalves of the Puerto Madryn Formation, Valdes Peninsule, Chubut Province, Argentina. (Lucinidae –Pholadidae). Part 2. Palaeontographica A, 231:93–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
del Rio, C. J. and Camacho, H. H. 1998. Tertiary nuculoids and arcoids of eastern Patagonia (Argentina). Palaeontographica A, 250:47–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell, R. K. 1990. Antarctic Mollusca with special reference to the fauna of the Ross sea. Bulletin of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 27:1–311.Google Scholar
Deshayes, M. G. P. 1832. Descriptions des coquilles fossiles des environs de Paris. Chez l'auteur et d'autres, Paris, vols. 1, 2; p.814+101 pls.; for 1824–1837.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G. P. 1839. Nouvelles espèces de mollusques, provenant des côtes de la Californie, du México, du Kamtschatka et de la Nouvelle-Zélande. Revue Zoologique par La Société Cuvierienne, 2:356–361.Google Scholar
Di Paola, E. and Marchese, H. 1973. Litoestratigrafía de la Formación Patagonia en el área tipo (Bajo de San Julián)–desembocadura del Río Santa Cruz), Provincia de Santa Cruz, República Argentina. 5to Congreso Geológico Argentino, Actas 3:207–222.Google Scholar
Duméril, A. M. C. 1806. Zoologie analytique, ou méthode naturelle de classification des animaux, rendue plus facile à l'aide de tableaux synoptiques. H. L. Perronneau, Paris, 344p.Google Scholar
Feruglio, E. 1935. Relaciones estratigráficas y faunísticas entre los estratos cretácicos y terciarios en la región austral del Lago Argentino y en la del Golfo San Jorge (Patagonia). Boletín de Informaciones Petroleras, 128:69–93; 130:65–100.Google Scholar
Feruglio, E. 1937. Paleontographia patagonica. Memorie dell'Istituto Geologico della R. Università di Padova, 9–12:1–384.Google Scholar
Feruglio, E. 1949. Descripción Geológica de la Patagonia. Dirección General de Y. P. F., volume II, Buenos Aires, 349p.Google Scholar
Finlay, H. J. and Marwick, J. 1937. The Wangaloan and associated molluscan faunas of Kaitangata–Green Island Subdivision. New Zealand Geological Survey Paleontological Bulletin, 15:1–140.Google Scholar
Fischer, P.1880–1887. Manuel de conchyliologie et de paléontologie conchyliologique ou historie naturelle des mollusques vivants et fossils. Paris,1369p. (Naticidae: 764–769, 1885).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, C. A. 1972. Part II. Pliocene marine invertebrates from Chepu district, Chiloé. InWatters, W.A. and Fleming, C.A., Contributions to the geology of Chiloé Island, southern Chile. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences, 269 (853):369–408.Google Scholar
Frassinetti, D. and Covacevich, V. 1999. Invertebrados fósiles marinos de la Formación Guadal (Oligoceno Superior–Mioceno inferior) en Pampa Castillo, Región de Aisén, Chile. Boletín del Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería, Chile 51:1–96.Google Scholar
Furque, G. and Camacho, H. H. 1972. El Cretácico superior y Terciario de la región austral del Lago Argentino (Provincia de Santa Cruz). 4tas Jornadas Geológicas Argentinas (Mendoza 1969)), Actas 3:61.Google Scholar
Gould, A. A. 1847. Shells collected by the U.S. Exploring Expedition under the command of Charles Wilkes. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, 2:237–239.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1847. A list of genera of Recent Mollusca, their synonyma and types. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 15:129–182.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. 1991. Eocene bivalves from the Rio Turbio Formation, Southwestern Patagonia (Argentina). Journal of Paleontology, 65:119–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, M. and Hünicken, M. A. 1994. Late Cretaceous–early Tertiary gastropods from southwestern Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of Paleontology, 68:257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, M. and Pastorino, G. 2006. Madrynomya bruneti n. gen. et n. sp. (Bivalvia: ?Modiomorphidae): a Mesozoic survivor in the Tertiary of Patagonia? Journal of Paleontology, 80:272–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, M. and Nielsen, S. N. 2008. A revision of the type specimens of tertiary molluscs from Chile and Argentina described by d'Orbigny (1842), Sowerby (1846) and Hupé (1854). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 6:251–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilding, L. 1834. Observations on Naticina and Dentalium, two genera of molluscous animals. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 17:29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, G. D. and Hertlein, L.G. 1943. Characteristic fossils of California. California Department of Natural Resources, Division of Mines Bulletin, 118:165–182.Google Scholar
Haller, M. 1978. Estratigrafía de la región al poniente de Puerto Madryn, Provincia del Chubut, República Argentina. 6to Congreso Geológico Argentino, Actas 1:285–297.Google Scholar
Haller, M. J. 1982. Descripción geológica de la hoja 43 h Puerto Madryn, Chubut. Boletin del Servicio de Geología Nacional, 184:1–41.Google Scholar
Hatcher, J. B. 1897. The Cape Fairweather beds, a new marine Tertiary horizon in southern Patagonia. The American Journal of Science, 4:327–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedley, C. 1916. Mollusca. Australasian Antarctic Expedition 1911–1914. Under the leadership of Sir Douglas Mawson, D. Sc., B.E. Scientific Reports. R. E. E. Rogers, Adelaide. Series C- Zoology and Botany, 4:1–80.Google Scholar
Hombron, J. B. and Jacquinot, C. A. 1854. Zoologie. Description des Mollusques coquilles et zoophytes, p. 132. InBaudry, G.et J.(ed.)Voyage au Pôle Sud, et dans l'Océanie sur les corvettes l'Astrolabe et la Zélée; executé par ordre du roi pendant les années 1837-1838-1839–1840, sous le commandement de M. J. Dumont-D'Urville, Capitaine de vaisseau. E. Thunot et Ce., Paris.Google Scholar
Hünicken, M. A. 1955. Depósitos Neocretácicos y Terciarios del extremo SSW de Santa Cruz (cuenca carbonífera de Río Turbio). Revista del Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones en Ciencias Naturales, Buenos Aires, Ciencias Geológicas, 4:1–161.Google Scholar
Hutton, F. W. 1886. The Mollusca of the Pareora and Oamaru Systems of New Zealand. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, series 2, 1:205–238.Google Scholar
ICZN. 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, 306p.Google Scholar
Ihering, H. Von. 1897. Os molluscos dos terrenos terciarios da Patagonia. Revista do Museu Paulista, 2:217–382.Google Scholar
Ihering, H. Von. 1899. Die Conchylien der patagonischen Formation. Neues Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, p. 1–46.Google Scholar
Ihering, H. Von. 1907. Les Mollusques fossiles du Tertiaire et du Cretace superieur de l'Argentine. Anales del Museo Nacional de Buenos Aires, Serie III, Tomo VII:1–611.Google Scholar
Ihering, H. Von. 1914. Catálogo de moluscos Cretáceos e Terciarios da Argentina da colleçao do autor. Notas Preliminares da Revista do Museu Paulista, 1:1–148.Google Scholar
Kabat, A. R. 1991. The classification of the Naticidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Review and analysis of the supraspecific taxa. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 152:417–449.Google Scholar
Kabat, A. R. 2000. Results of the Rumphius Biohistorical Expedition to Ambon (1990). Part 10. Mollusca, Gastropoda, Naticidae. Zoologische Mededelingen, 73 (25):345–380.Google Scholar
Kase, T. and Ishikawa, M. 2003. Mystery of naticid predation history solved: Evidence from a “living fossil” species. Geology, 31:403–406.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilburn, R. N. 1976. A revision of the Naticidae of Southern Africa and Moçambique (Mollusca). Annals of the Natal Museum, 22 (3):829–884.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. P. A.de M. de. 1804. Suite des mémoires sur les fossils des environs de Paris. Annals du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 5:28–36.Google Scholar
Leach, W. E. 1819. A list of invertebrate animals discovered by His Majesty's Ship Isabella, in a voyage to the arctic regions, corrected by … W. E. Leach, appendix II, p. 61–64. InJ. Ross, A voyage of discovery… in H.M.S. Isabella and Alexander, for the purpose of exploring Baffin's Bay and inquiring into the probability of a North-west passage, p. 1–252.Google Scholar
Legarreta, L. and Uliana, M. A. 1994. Asociaciones de fósiles y hiatos en el Supracretácico–Neógeno de Patagonia: una perspectiva estratigráfico –secuencial. Ameghiniana, 31:257–281.Google Scholar
Lesta, P. and Ferello, R. 1972. Región Extraandina de Chubut y norte de Santa Cruz, p. 601–653. InLeanza, A. F.(ed.), Geología Regional Argentina. Academia Nacional de Ciencias, Córdoba.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, editio decima, reformata, Stockholm824p.Google Scholar
Majima, R. 1989. Cenozoic fossil Naticidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in Japan. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 96:5–159.Google Scholar
Malumián, N., Camacho, H. H., and Gorroño, R. 1979. Moluscos del Terciario inferior (“Magallanense”) de la Isla Grande de Tierra del Fuego (República Argentina). Ameghiniana, 15:3–4.Google Scholar
Malvicini, L. and Llambías, E. J. 1974. Geología y génesis del depósito de manganeso Arroyo Verde, provincia de Chubut. 5° Congreso Geológico Argentino, Actas, 2:185–202.Google Scholar
Manassero, M., Griffin, M., and Pastorino, G. 1997. Coquinas and shelf deposits of the San Julian Formation (Upper Eocene–Lower Oligocene) southern Patagonia, Argentina. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, 52:286–296.Google Scholar
Manceñido, M. O. and Damborenea, S. E. 1984. Megafauna de Invertebrados Paleozoicos y Mesozoicos. In Geología y Recursos naturales de la Provincia de Río Negro, Relatorio 9° Congreso Geológico Argentino (San Carlos de Bariloche), Actas 2 (5):413–465.Google Scholar
Marincovich, L. 1977. Cenozoic Naticidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda) of the Northeastern Pacific. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 70 (294):169–494.Google Scholar
Martínez Chiappara, S. A., del Rio, C. J., and Reichler, V. 1998. II. Descripciones Sistemáticas . II.1Clase Gastropoda, p.26–151. Indel Río, C.(ed.), Moluscos marinos miocenos de la Argentina y del Uruguay. Monografias de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Buenos Aires, 15:26–151.Google Scholar
Marwick, J. 1924. The Tertiary and Recent Naticidae and Naricidae of New Zealand. Transaction and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 55:545–579.Google Scholar
Marwick, J. 1931. The Tertiary Mollusca of the Gisborne District. New Zealand Geological Survey, Paleontological Bulletin, 13:1–177.Google Scholar
Marwick, J. 1948. Lower Pliocene Mollusca from Otahuhu, Auckland. New Zealand Geological Survey Paleontological Bulletin, 16:1–38.Google Scholar
Masiuk, V. 1967. Estratigrafía del Rocanense del puesto P. Alvarez, curso inferior del Río Chico, provincia del Chubut. Revista del Museo de La Plata (n.s.), 5 Paleontología 34:197–258.Google Scholar
Medina, F. A., Camacho, H. H., and Malagnino, E. C. 1990. Bioestratigrafía del Cretacico superior–Paleoceno marino de la Formación Lefipan. Barranca de los Perros, Río Chubut. 5° Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Bioestratigrafía. Actas, 7:137–142Google Scholar
Montfort, P. D. de. 1810. Conchyliologie systématique, et classification méthodique des coquilles; offrant leurs figures, leur arrangement générique, leurs descriptions caracteristiques, leurs noms; ainsi que leur synonymie en plusieurs langues. F. Schoell, Paris, 676p.Google Scholar
Murdoch, R. 1899. Description of Sigaretus? drewi, n. sp. (fossil), and Cirsonella? neozelanica, n. sp. from New Zealand; with notes on some New Zealand land Mollusca. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 3:320–325.Google Scholar
Nañez, C. 1988. Foraminíferos y bioestratigrafía del Terciario medio de Santa Cruz oriental. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, 43:493–517.Google Scholar
Niemeyer, H., Skarmeta, J., Fuenzalida, R., and Espinoza, W. 1984. Hojas Península de Taitao y Puerto Aisén, Región de Aisén del General Carlos Ibáñez del Campo. Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería, Carta Geológica de Chile, N° 60–61, 80 p., 1 map.Google Scholar
Olivero, E. B. and Malumián, N. 2008. Mesozoic–Cenozoic stratigraphy of the Fueguian Andes, Argentina. Geologica Acta, 6:5–18Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. D. d'1834–1847. Mollusques. InBertrand, C. P.(ed.), Voyage dans l'Amérique Méridionale (Le Brésil, La République Orientale de L'Uruguay, La République Argentine, La Patagonie, La République du Chili, La République de Bolivia, La République du Pérou), exécuté pendant les années 1826, 1827, 1828, 1829, 1830, 1831, 1832 et 1833,. Chez Ve. Levrault, Paris. (For correct dates of plates and pages seeSherborn, C. D., and Griffin, F. J., 1934. On the dates of publication of the Natural History Portions of Alcide d'Orbigny's ‘Voyage Amérique Méridionale, see Annals and Magazines of Natural History, serie 10 13:130–134).Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. d'. 1852. Prodrome de Paléontologie stratigraphique universelle des animaux mollusques et rayonnés faisant suite au cours élémentaire de paléontologie et de géologie stratigraphique, Volume 3. Victor Masson, Paris, 196+190 p.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A. E. 1899. The fauna of the Magellanian beds of Punta Arenas, Chile. American Journal of Science, 4:427–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortmann, A. E. 1900. Synopsis of the Collections of Invertebrate fossils made by the Princeton Expedition to Southern Patagonia. American Journal of Science, Fourth Series, 10:368–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortmann, A. E. 1902. Paleontology, Part II. Tertiary Invertebrates, p. 45–332. InScott, W.B.(ed.), Reports of the Princeton University Expeditions to Patagonia, 1896–1899. Vol. 4, Paleontology I part 2. J. Pierpont Morgan Publication Fund, Princeton New Jersey.Google Scholar
Parodiz, J. J. 1996. The taxa of fossil Mollusca introduced by Hermann von Ihering. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 65:183–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastorino, G. 2005. Recent Naticidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda) from the Patagonian coast. The Veliger, 47:225–258.Google Scholar
Petersen, C. S. 1946. Estudios geológicos en el Río Chubut Medio. Boletín de la Dirección General de Minería y Geología, 59:1–137Google Scholar
Philippi, R. A. 1845 a. Diagnosen einiger neuen Conchylien. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 11:50–71.Google Scholar
Philippi, R. A. 1845 b. Abbildungen und Beschreibungen neuer oder wenig gekannter Conchylien herausgegeben. Cassel, vol. 2 of 3, Natica, p. 41–46; from 1844–1851.Google Scholar
Philippi, R. A. 1887. Los Fosiles Terciarios i Cuartarios de Chile. Brockhaus, Leipzig, 256p.Google Scholar
Pilsbry, H. A. 1929. Neverita reclusiana (Desh.) and its allies. The Nautilus, 42 (4):09–113.Google Scholar
Powell, A. W. B. 1927. On a large Tonna and two other gasteropods of Australian origin. Transaction and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 57:559–562.Google Scholar
Powell, A. W. B. 1933. New species of marine Mollusca from the subantarctic islands of New Zealand. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 20:232–236.Google Scholar
Powell, A. W. B. 1951. Antarctic and subantarctic mollusca: Pelecypoda and Gastropoda. Discovery Reports, 26:47–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Récluz, C. A. 1844. Descriptions of new spcies of Navicella, Neritina, Nerita, and Natica in the cabinet of H. Cuming, Esq. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 11:197–214.Google Scholar
Reichler, V. A. 2010. Estratigrafía y paleontología del Cenozoico marino del Gran Bajo y Salinas del Gualicho, Argentina, y descripción de 17 especies nuevas. Andean Geology, 37:177–219Google Scholar
Riggi, J. C. 1957. Resumen geológico de la zona de los lagos Pueyrredón y Posadas, Provincia de Santa Cruz. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, 12:65–97.Google Scholar
Risso, A. 1826. Histoire naturelle des principales productions de l'Europe méridionale et particulièrement des celles des environs de Nice et des Alpes Maritimes, vol. 4. Levrault, Paris, 438p.Google Scholar
Rochebrune, A. T. d' and Mabille, J. 1885. Diagnoses de mollusques nouveaux, recueillis par les membres de la mission du Cap Horn et M. Lebrun, Préparateur au Muséum, chargé d'une mission à Santa-Cruz de Patagonie. Bulletin de la Société Philomathique de Paris, 7 (9):100–111.Google Scholar
Rochebrune, A. T. d' and Mabille, J. 1889. Mollusques, p. 143–149. InMission Scientifique du Cap Horn, 1882–1883. Gauthier-Villars et fils, Paris.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, G. 2009. Malacolog 4.1.1: A Database of Western Atlantic Marine Mollusca. Online database (version 4.1.1); http://www.malacolog.org/.Google Scholar
Rossi de García, E. 1959. Nuevos moluscos Terciarios del Arroyo Verde (Provincia de Río Negro, Argentina). Ameghiniana, 1 (4):9–15.Google Scholar
Rossi de García, E. and Levy, R. 1977. Fauna de la Formación Arroyo Verde, Eoceno de la provincia de Río Negro, Argentina. Ameghiniana, 14 (1–4):45–52.Google Scholar
Sacco, F. 1890. I molluschi dei terreri terziarii del Piemonte e della Liguria. Part 8 (Galeodoliidae, Doliidae, Ficulidae, Naticidae). Università di Torino, Musei Zoolgia e. Anatomia Comparata, Bolletino, 5 (86):21–43.Google Scholar
Say, T. 1824. An account of some of the fossil shells of Maryland. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 4:124–155Google Scholar
Scasso, R. A., del Rio, C. J., Macarthur, J. M., and Martínez, S. A. 1999. Edades 87Sr/86Sr para el Entrerriense (Miocenos) de península Valdés, provincia de Chubut, Argentina. 14° Congreso Geológico Argentino (Salta, 1999), Resúmenes, Acta, 1:73.Google Scholar
Scopoli, G. A. 1777. Introductio ad historiam naturalem, sistems gnera lapidum, plantarum et animalium hactenus detecta, caracteribus essentialibus donata, in tribus divisa, subinde ad leges naturae. Prague, 506p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, A. and Murchison, R. 1832. A sketch of the structure of the Eastern Alps. Geological Society of London, Transactions, 23 (2), 301–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. 1839. Catalogue of recent shells in the basin of the Clyde and north coast of Ireland; and of shells from the newer Pliocene deposits in the British Isles. Wernerian Natural History Society (Edinburgh) Memoirs, 8:89–113.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F. 1960. Archeogastropoda, Mesogastropoda and stratigraphy of the Ripley, Owl Creek, and Prairie Bluff formations. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 331A, p. 1–151.Google Scholar
Sowerby, G. B. I. 1846. Descriptions of Tertiary fossil shells from South America, p. 249–267. InC. Darwin, Geological Observations on South America. Smith, Elder and Co., London.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. 1812 –1846.The mineral Conchology of Great Britain; or coloured figures and description of those remains of testaceous animals or shells which have been preserved at various times and depths in the earth. B. Meredith, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowerby, J. 1837. Mineral-Conchologie Grossbrittaniens, von James Sowerby; deutsche Bearbeitung, herausgegeben von Hercules Nicolet, durchgesehen von Dr. Agassiz. H. Nicolet, Neuchâtel, 52p.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. B. 1927. Gabb's California fossil type gastropods. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 78:287–447.Google Scholar
Stilwell, J. D. and Zinsmeister, W. J. 1992. Molluscan systematics and biostratigraphy: lower Tertiary La Meseta Formation, Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula. American Geophysical Union, Antarctic Research Series, 55:1–192.Google Scholar
Stoliczka, F. 1868. Cretaceous fauna of southern India. Volume II. The Gastropoda of the Cretaceous rocks of southern India. Palæontologica Indica (Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India), part 7–10, p. 285–498.Google Scholar
Suter, H. 1907. Descriptions of some Tertiary shells from New Zealand. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 7:207–210.Google Scholar
Troschel, F. H. 1852. Verzeichniss der durch Herrn Dr. v. Tschudi in Peru gesammelten Conchylien. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 18:151–208.Google Scholar
Turner, F. E. 1938. Stratigraphy and Mollusca of the Eocene of Western Oregon. Geological Society of America Special Paper 10, p. 1–130.Google Scholar
Uliana, M. A. and Legarreta, L. 1999. Jurásico y Cretácico de la cuenca del Golfo San Jorge. InCaminos, R.(ed.), Geología Argentina. Subsecretaría de Minería de la Nación, Servicio Geológico Minero Argentino, Instituto de Geología y Recursos Minerales, Anales, 29:496–510.Google Scholar
Wilckens, O. 1905. Die Lamellibranchiaten, Gastropoden etc. der Oberen Kreide Südpatagoniens. Berichte der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft Freiburg, 15:97–166.Google Scholar
Wolff, H. and Schenk, V. 1972. Zur Taxonomie, Phylogenie und Paläogeographie von Ampullina (Pseudamaura) (Naticidae, Gastropoda) in der Kreide. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 140 (2):232–254.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P. 1928. Contributions to the geology and palaeontology of the West Indies. Miocene molluscs from Bowden, Jamaica. Part II. Gastropoda and Discussion of Results. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication, 385:1–564.Google Scholar