No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
†Estelestes ensis (Mammalia, Metatheria) from the early Eocene of Baja California (Mexico) as a generalized polydolopimorphian
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 January 2023
Extract
Estelestes ensis Novaceck et al., 1991 is a curious Paleogene metatherian mammal recognized on the basis of a single specimen from Baja California (Mexico) in southern North America. It comes from early Eocene (Wasatchian age) levels of the Las Tetas de Cabra Formation at “Marsupial Hill” in the Lomas Las Tetas de Cabra site (also known as Punta Prieta; see Novaceck et al., 1991). The specimen consists of a fragmentary left mandible with the last premolar, the roots of the first two molars, and almost complete last two molars (Fig. 1). It was referred to the Didelphini (Marsupialia, Didelphimorphia, Didelphidae, Didelphinae) even though Novaceck et al. (1991) stated that the overall morphology of the type specimen poses intriguing problems regarding its relationships. For example, the very deep, robust jaw of Estelestes distinguishes it from any other Holarctic “didelphine” (at the time Novaceck et al., 1991 published their work, both the concept and extent of Didelphidae and Didelphinae were much broader than today). Interestingly, they concluded that Estelestes had close affinities with “Mirandotherium” (lapsus calami for Mirandatherium), from the early Eocene of Itaboraí, in southeastern Brazil. “Resemblance between the two taxa is nevertheless striking, once again raising the possibility of close relationships among certain early members of the Northern Hemisphere and South American Didelphinae” (Novaceck et al., 1991, p. 16). The affinities of Mirandatherium are contested, having been regarded as part of the Didelphimorphia (e.g., de Paula Couto, 1952a) or Microbiotheria (e.g., Marshall, 1987; McKenna and Bell, 1997; Oliveira and Goin, 2011), or even as an alphadontian (Carneiro, 2019).
- Type
- Taxonomic Note
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Paleontological Society
References
Ameghino, F., 1901, Notices préliminaires sur des ongulés nouveaux des terrains crétacés de Patagonie [Preliminary notes on new ungulates from the Cretaceous terrains of Patagonia]: Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias, Córdoba, v. 16, p. 349–429.Google Scholar
Ameghino, F., 1902 (1902–1904), Première contribution à la connaissance de la faune mammalogique des couches à Colpodon: Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias, Córdoba, v. 17, p. 71–141.Google Scholar
Archer, M., 1984, The Australian marsupial radiation, in Archer, M., and Clayton, G., eds., Vertebrate Zoogeography and Evolution in Australasia: Perth, Hesperian Press, p. 633–808.Google Scholar
Archer, M., Godthelp, H., and Hand, S.J., 1993, Early Eocene Marsupial from Australia: Kaupia, v. 3, p. 193–200.Google Scholar
Babot, M.J., Rougier, G.W., García-Lopez, D., and Davis, B.M., 2020, New small bunodont metatherian from the late Eocene of the Argentinean Puna: Journal of Mammalian Evolution, v. 27, p. 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, R.M.D., 2017, The skull of Epidolops ameghinoi from the early Eocene Itaboraí fauna, southeastern Brazil, and the affinities of the extinct marsupialiform Order Polydolopimorphia: Journal of Mammalian Evolution, v. 24, p. 373–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, R.M.D., Voss, R.S., and Jansa, S.A., 2022, Craniodental morphology and phylogeny of marsupials: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 457, 350 p.Google Scholar
Boyd, C.A., Person, J.J., and Barnes, B., 2017, Additions to the Lancian mammalian fauna from southwest North Dakota: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 37, n. e1325368, https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2017.1325368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carneiro, L.M., 2019, A new protodidelphid (Mammalia, Marsupialia, Didelphimorphia) from the Itaboraí Basin and its implications for the evolution of the Protodidelphidae: Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, v. 91, n. e20180440, https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201820180440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemens, W.A., 1966, Fossil Mammals of the Type Lance Formation, Wyoming. Part II. Marsupialia: University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, v. 62, 122 p.Google Scholar
Crochet, J.-Y., and Sigé, B., 1993, Les mammifères de Chulpas (Formation Umayo, transition Crétacé-Tertiaire, Pérou): données préliminaires: Documents des Laboratoires de Géologie de la Faculté des Sciences de Lyon, v. 125, p. 97–107.Google Scholar
de Paula Couto, C., 1952a, Fossil mammals from the beginning of the Cenozoic in Brazil. Marsupialia: Didelphidae: American Museum Novitates no. 1567, 26 p.Google Scholar
de Paula Couto, C., 1952b, Fossil mammals from the beginning of the Cenozoic in Brazil. Marsupialia: Polydolopidae and Borhyaenidae: American Museum Novitates no. 1559, 27 p.Google Scholar
de Paula Couto, C., 1962, Didelfídeos fósiles del Paleoceno de Brasil: Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia,” v. 112, p. 135–66.Google Scholar
de Paula Couto, C., 1970, News on the fossil marsupials from the Riochican of Brazil: Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, v. 42, p. 19–34.Google Scholar
Estrada-Ruiz, E., Martínez-Cabrera, H.I., Callejas-Moreno, J., and Upchurch, G.R., 2013, Floras tropicales cretácicas del norte de México y su relación con floras del centro-sur de América del Norte: PoliBotánica, v. 36, p. 41–61.Google Scholar
Ferrusquía-Villafranca, I., Jiménez-Hidalgo, E., Ortiz-Mendieta, J.A., and Bravo-Cuevas, V.M., 2002, El registro paleogénico de mamíferos de México y su significación geológica-paleontológica, in Montellano-Ballesteros, M., and Arroyo-Cabrales, J., eds., Avances en los estudios paleomastozoológicos: México D.F., Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Colección Científica, p. 25–45.Google Scholar
Godthelp, H., Archer, M., Cifelli, R., Hand, S.J., and Gilkeson, C.F., 1992, Earliest known Australian Tertiary mammal fauna: Nature, v. 356, p. 514–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goin, F.J., 2021, Marsupial mammals, in Alderton, D., and Elias, S.A., eds., Encyclopedia of Geology, Volume 3 (second edition): London, Academic Press, p. 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goin, F.J., Candela, A.M., Bond, M., Pascual, R., and Escribano, V., 1998, Una nueva “comadreja” (Mammalia, Marsupialia, ?Polydolopimorphia) del Paleoceno de Patagonia, Argentina: Buenos Aires, Asociación Paleontológica Argentina Special Publication 5, p. 71–78.Google Scholar
Goin, F.J., Abello, M.A., and Chornogubsky, L., 2010, Middle Tertiary marsupials from central Patagonia (early Oligocene of Gran Barranca): understanding South America's Grande Coupure, in Madden, R.H., Carlini, A.A., Vucetich, M.G., and Kay, R.F., eds., The Paleontology of Gran Barranca: Evolution and Environmental Change through the Middle Cenozoic of Patagonia: New York, Cambridge University Press, p. 69–105.Google Scholar
Goin, F.J., Woodburne, M.O., Zimicz, A.M., Martin, G.M., and Chornogubsky, L., 2016, A Brief History of South American Metatherians. Evolutionary Contexts and Intercontinental Dispersals: Dordretch, Springer, 237 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goin, F.J., Vieytes, E.C., Gelfo, J.N., Chornogubsky, L., Zimicz, A.N., and Reguero, M.A., 2020, New metatherian mammal from the early Eocene of Antarctica: Journal of Mammalian Evolution, v. 27, p. 17–36.Google Scholar
Hershkovitz, P., 1982, The staggered marsupial lower third incisor (I3): Géobios, v. 15, supp. 1, p. 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, T.H., 1880, On the application of the laws of evolution to the arrangement of the Vertebrata and more particularly of the Mammalia: Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, v. 1880, p. 649–662.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1758, Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species cum characteribus differentiis, synonymis, locis (tenth edition, reformata): Stockholm, Laurentii Salvii 1, 824 p.Google Scholar
Lucas, S.G., Sullivan, R.M., Lichtig, A.J., Dalman, S.G., and Jasinski, S.E., 2016, Late Cretaceous dinosaur biogeography and endemism in the Western Interior Basin, North America: a critical re-evaluation, in Khosla, A., and Lucas, S.G., eds., Cretaceous Period: Biotic Diversity and Biogeography: New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, v. 71, p. 195–213.Google Scholar
Marshall, L.G., 1987, Systematics of Itaboraian (middle Paleocene) age “opossum-like” marsupials from the limestone quarry at São José de Itaboraí, Brazil, in Archer, M., ed., Possums and Opossums: Studies in Evolution: Chipping Norton, New South Wales, Australia, Surrey Beatty & Sons and the Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, p. 91–160.Google Scholar
McKenna, M.C., and Bell, S.K., 1997, Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level: New York, Columbia University Press, 631 p.Google Scholar
Montellano-Ballesteros, M., and Jiménez-Hidalgo, E., 2006, Mexican fossil mammals, who, where and when?, in Vega, F.J., Nyborg, T.G., Perrilliat, M.C., Montellano-Ballesteros, M., Cevallos, S., and Quiroz, S., eds., Studies on Mexican Paleontology: Dordrecht, Springer, p. 248–273.Google Scholar
Novaceck, M.J., Ferrusquía-Villafranca, I., Flynn, J.J., Wyss, A.R., and Norell, M., 1991, Wasatchian (early Eocene) mammals and other vertebrates from Baja California, Mexico: the Lomas Las Tetas de Cabra Fauna: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 208, 88 p.Google Scholar
O'Leary, M.A., Bloch, J.I., Flynn, J.J., Gaudin, T.J., Giallombardo, A., Giannini, N.P., et al. , 2013, The placental mammal ancestor and the post-K-Pg radiation of placentals: Science, v. 339, p. 662–667.Google ScholarPubMed
Oliveira, E.V., 1998, Taxonomia, filogenia e paleobiogeografia de marsupiais “poliprotodontes” do Mesopaleoceno da Bacia de Itaboraí, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil [Ph.D. Thesis]: Porto Alegre, Brazil, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 327 p.Google Scholar
Oliveira, E.V., and Goin, F.J., 2011, A reassessment of bunodont metatherians from the Paleogene of Itaboraí (Brazil): systematics and age of the Itaboraian SALMA: Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia, v. 14, p. 105–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, E.V., and Goin, F.J., 2012, Marsupiais do Início do Paleógeno no Brasil: Diversidade e Afinidades, in Cáceres, N.C., ed., Os marsupiais do Brasil: biologia, ecologia e conservação: Campo Grande, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMGS), p. 275–307.Google Scholar
Pascual, R., 1983, Novedosos marsupiales paleógenos de la Formación Pozuelos (Grupo Pastos Grandes) de la Puna, Salta, Argentina: Ameghiniana, v. 20, p. 265–280.Google Scholar
Sigé, B., Archer, M., Crochet, J.Y., Godthelp, H., Hand, S., and Beck, R.M.D., 2009, Chulpasia and Thylacotinga, late Paleocene–earliest Eocene trans-Antarctic Gondwanan bunodont marsupials: new data from Australia: Geobios, v. 42, p. 813–823.Google Scholar
Tedford, R.H., 1974, Marsupials and the new paleogeography, in Ross, C.A., ed., Paleogeographic Provinces and Provinciality: Society for Sedimentary Geology Special Publication no. 21, p. 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodburne, M.O., and Case, J.A., 1996, Dispersal, vicariance, and the Late Cretaceous to early Tertiary land mammal biogeography from South America to Australia: Journal of Mammalian Evolution, v. 3, p. 121–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar