Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T02:13:21.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Middle Cambrian fossils from Tizi N'Tichka, the High Atlas, Morocco. Part 1. Introduction and trilobites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Gerd Geyer  and
John M. Malinky
Gerd Geyer
Affiliation:
Institut für Paläontologie, Pleicherwall 1, D-97070 Würzburg, Federal Republic of Germany
John M. Malinky
Affiliation:
Academy of Science, Geological Institute, Rozvojová 135, 16502 Prague 6, Czech Republic
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

New finds of the trilobites Cobboldites tichkaensis Geyer, 1988, Pseudocobboldia pulchra (Hupé, 1953), Protolenus (Protolenus) densigranulatus Geyer, 1990, Latoucheia (Latoucheia) tichkaensis Hupé, 1953, and Acanthomicmacca neltneri Hupé, 1953, from the basal Middle Cambrian near the peak of Tizi n'Tichka in the central High Atlas, Morocco, supplement the known morphology of these species; the trilobites Acanthomicmacca new species, Oreisator tichkaensis new genus and species, and “Parasolenopleura” sp. from that locality are new. Acanthomicmacca neltneri is the first species of the genus and family that is described and figured in detail in terms of morphologic plasticity and ontogeny; Oreisator tichkaensis is the first ptychopariacean trilobite formally described and based on material from Africa. Trilobites and other fossils from the locality suggest a strong affinity to other Mediterranean and to Avalonian faunas, which is well supported by helcionelloid and hyolith genera.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 71 , Issue 4 , July 1997 , pp. 620 - 637
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahlberg, P. 1979. Early Cambrian trilobites from Mount Luopakte, northern Sweden. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, C 765, 73(6):1–12.Google Scholar
Ahlberg, P. 1980. Early Cambrian trilobites from northern Scandinavia. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, 60:153–159.Google Scholar
Ahlberg, P. 1981. Ptychopariid trilobites in the Lower Cambrian of Scandinavia. In Taylor, M. E. (ed.), Short Papers for the Second International Symposium on the Cambrian System 1981, U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 81-743:5–7.Google Scholar
Ahlberg, P.Lower Cambrian trilobites from the Laisvall area, northern Sweden. Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar, 105(3) (for 1983):251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahlberg, P., and Bergstrom, J. 1978. Lower Cambrian ptychopariid trilobites from Scandinavia. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, Avhandlingar i Uppsatser, Series Ca, 49, 40 p.Google Scholar
Bergström, J. 1973. Organization, life, and systematics of trilobites. Fossils and Strata, 2, 69 p.Google Scholar
Bondon, J., and Neltner, L. 1933. Sur la série cambrienne des plateaux du Draa (Sud-marocain) et la presence du Géorgien dans cette série. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences, Paris, 197:170–172.Google Scholar
Boudda, A., Choubert, G., and Faure-Muret, A. 1979. Essai de stratigraphie de la couverture sédimentaire de l'Anti-Atlas: Adoudounien-Cambrien inférieur. Notes et Mémoirs de la Service géologique du Maroc, 271, 96 p.Google Scholar
Bromley, R. G. 1970. Borings as trace fossils and Entobia cretacea Portlock, as an example, p. 49–90. In Crimes, T. P. and Harper, J. C., (eds.), Trace fossils. Seel House Press, Liverpool.Google Scholar
Budd, D. A., and Perkins, R. D. 1980. Bathymetric zonation and paleoecological significance of microborings in Puerto Rican shelf and slope sediments. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 50:881–904.Google Scholar
Wen-Tang, Chang. 1957. Preliminary note of the Lower and Middle Cambrian stratigraphy of Poshan, Central Shantung. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 5:13–31.Google Scholar
Yi-Yuan, Chien, and Yao, B.-J. 1974. Chengkouia, p. 91. In Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica, Atlas of Palaeontology and Stratigraphy of Southwest China. Science Press, Beijing. [In Chinese]Google Scholar
Choubert, G., Boudda, A., and Faure-Muret, A. 1975. Essai de stratigraphie de la couverture sedimentaire de l'Anti-Atlas: Adoudounien-Cambrien. Reunion Limite Cambrien-Précambrien, Agadir-Rabat 1975, Document IB. (Unpublished).Google Scholar
Cobbold, E. S. 1910. On some small Trilobites from the Cambrian Rocks of Comley (Shropshire). Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 66:19–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Destombes, J. 1985. Middle Cambrian. In Destombes, J., Hollard, H., and Willefert, S., Lower Palaeozoic Rocks of Morocco p. 157-184.In Holland, C. H. (ed.), Lower Palaeozoic Rocks of the World. Volume 4. Lower Palaeozoic of north-western and west central Africa: 84, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
Fletcher, T. P. 1972. Geology and Lower to Middle Cambrian trilobite faunas of the southwest Avalon, Newfoundland. Part two. Paleontology and Bibliography. Unpublished Ph. D. thesis, University of Cambridge, 291 p.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1990. Ontogeny, hypostome attachment and trilobite classification. Palaeontology, 33:529–576.Google Scholar
Geyer, G. 1986. Mittelkambrische Mollusken aus Marokko und Spanien. Senckenbergiana lethaea, 67:55–118.Google Scholar
Geyer, G. 1988. Agnostida aus dem höheren Unterkambrium und dem Mittelkambrium von Marokko. Teil 2: Eodiscina. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 177:93–133.Google Scholar
Geyer, G. 1989. Late Precambrian to early Middle Cambrian lithostratigraphy of southern Morocco. Beringeria 1:115–143.Google Scholar
Geyer, G. 1990a. Die marokkanischen Ellipsocephalidae (Trilobita: Redlichiida). Beringeria 3, 363 p.Google Scholar
Geyer, G. 1990b. Revised Lower to lower Middle Cambrian biostratigraphy of Morocco. Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 22:53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyer, G. 1990c. Proposal of formal lithostratigraphical units for the Terminal Proterozoic to early Middle Cambrian of southern Morocco. Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 22:87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyer, G. 1990d. Correlation along the Lower/Middle Cambrian boundary-a puzzling story with an elusory end? In Repina, L. N. and Zhuravlev, A. Yu., (eds.), Tretij mezhdunarodnyj simpozium po kembrijskoj sisteme. 1-9 avgusta 1990 g., SSSR, g. Novosibirsk. Tezisy dokladov:100–102.Google Scholar
Geyer, G. 1993. The giant Cambrian trilobites of Morocco. Beringeria 8:71–107.Google Scholar
Geyer, G., and Landing, E. 1995. The Cambrian of the Moroccan Atlas regions. Beringeria Special Issue 2:7–46.Google Scholar
Geyer, G., Landing, E., and Heldmaier, W. 1995. Faunas and depositional environments of the Moroccan Atlas regions. Beringeria Special Issue 2:47–119.Google Scholar
Geyer, G., and Mergl, M. 1995. Mediterranean representatives of the obolellid Trematobolus Matthew (Brachiopoda) and a review of the genus. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 69:181–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyer, G., and Mergl, M. 1997. Protorthacean brachiopods from the Middle Cambrian of Morocco. Journal of Paleontology, 71:791–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyer, G., and Palmer, A. R. 1995. Neltneriidae and Holmiidae (Trilobita) from Morocco and the Problem of Early Cambrian intercontinental correlation. Journal of Paleontology, 69:459–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golubic, S., Perkins, R. D., and Lukas, K. J. 1975. Boring micro-organisms and microborings in carbonate substrates, p. 229–259. In Frey, R. W. (ed.), The Study of Trace Fossils. A Synthesis of Principles, Problems and Procedures in Ichnology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hupe, P. 1952. Sur les zones de Trilobites du Cambrien inférieur marocain. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris, 235:480–481.Google Scholar
Hupe, P. 1953. Contribution à l'étude du Cambrien inférieur et du Précambrien III de l'Anti-Atlas marocain. Notes et Mémoirs de la Service geologique du Maroc, 103, 402 p. (“1952”).Google Scholar
Hupe, P. 1959. Nouvelle contribution à l'étude du Cambrien marocain. Unpublished thesis, Faculté des Sciences, Université de Paris, 447 p.Google Scholar
Hupe, P. 1960. Sur le Cambrien inférieur du Maroc, p. 75–85. In: Reports of the XXIth International Geological Congress, Norden 1960, 8, 8. Late Pre-Cambrian and Cambrian stratigraphy.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1935. The Cambro-Ordovician Formations and Faunas of South Chosen. Paleontology. Part III. Cambrian Faunas of South Chosen with A Special Study on the Cambrian Trilobite Genera and Families. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo, Section II, Geology, Mineralogy, Geography, Seismicity, 4:49–344.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1939. On the Agnostids (Part I). Journal of the Faculty of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo, Section II, Geology, Mineralogy, Geography, Seismicity, 5:62–198.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1943. Brief Notes on the Eodiscids I, Their Classification with a Description of a New Species and a New Variety. Proceedings of the Imperial University of Tokyo, 19:37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing, E., Geyer, G., and Heldmaier, W. 1995. First African lapworthellid: Lapworthella vandali n. sp. from the Lower-Middle Cambrian boundary interval of Morocco. Beringeria Special Issue 2:243–253.Google Scholar
Marek, L., Malinky, J. M., and Geyer, G. 1997. Middle Cambrian fossils from Tizi n'Tichka, the High Atlas, Morocco. Part 2. Hyolitha. Journal of Paleontology, 71:638–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1887. Illustrations of the fauna of the St. John Group. No. 4.—On the smaller-eyed trilobites of Division I., with a few remarks on the species of the higher divisions of the group. Canadian Record of Science, 2:357–363.Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1888. Illustrations of the fauna of the St. John Group. No. IV. Part I. Description of a New species of Paradoxides (Paradoxides regina). Part II. The Smaller Trilobites with Eyes Ptychoparidœ and Ellipsocephalidœ). Proceedings and Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, 1887, Section 4, 5:115–166.Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1892. Protolenus-A New Genus of Cambrian Trilobites. Bulletin of the Natural History Society of New Brunswick, 10:34–37.Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1895. The Protolenus Fauna. Transactions of the New York Academy of Science, 14 (for 1894-1895):101–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1899. Studies on Cambrian Faunas, Number 4.- Fragments of the Cambrian Faunas of Newfoundland. Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, Series 2, Section 4, 5 (for 1899-1900):67–95.Google Scholar
Mcnamara, K. J. 1986. The role of heterochrony in the evolution of Cambrian trilobites. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 61:121–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mergl, M. 1983. New brachiopods (Cambrian-Ordovician) from Algeria and Morocco (Mediterranean Province). Casopis pro Mineralogii a Geologii, 28:337–348. (English with Czech abstract)Google Scholar
Mergl, M. 1988. Inarticulate brachiopods of early Middle Cambrian age from the High Atlas, Morocco. Vestník Ustredního ústavu geologického, 63:291–295.Google Scholar
Missarzhevskij, V. V. 1969. Opisanie khiolitov, gastropod, khiolitel'mintov, kamenid i form neyasnogo sistematicheskogo polozheniya [Descriptions of hyoliths, gastropods, hyolithelminths, camenids, and forms of an obscure systematic position]. In Rozanov, A. Yu., Missarzhevskij, V. V.Volkova, N. A., Voronova, L. G., Krylov, I. N., Keller, B. M., Korolyuk, I. K., Lendzion, K., Mikhnyak, R., Pykhova, N. G. and Sidorov, A. D.Tommotskij yarns i problema nizhnej granitsy Kembriya. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Ordena Trudovogo krasnogo znameni Geologicheskij Institut, Trudy, 206,105-175, Moscow (Nauka). (In Russian)Google Scholar
Neltner, L. 1938. Etudes géologiques dans le Sud marocain (Haut Atlas et Anti-Atlas). Notes et Mémoirs de la Service des Mines et Carte géologique du Maroc, 42, 298 p.Google Scholar
Odell, J. 1970. The Lower Palaeozoic succession of the area east of the Gare du Tichka, Haut Atlas de Marrakech. Report of the Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge (unpublished, not seen).Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1955. Lower Cambrian ptychopariid trilobites from the conglomerates of Quebec. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 128(7), 35 p.Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1957. Additional fossils from the Middle Cambrian Mount Whyte Formation of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Journal of Paleontology, 31:955–972.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. 1913. On the genera of the Eodiscidae. Ottawa Naturalist, 27:101–106.Google Scholar
Repina, L. N., Petrunina, Z. E., and Khajrullina, T. I. 1975. Trilobity 100-233. IV In Repina, L. N., Yaskovich, B. V., Aksarina, N. A., Petrunina, Z. E., Poniklenko, I. A., Rubanov, D. A., Bolgova, G. V., Golikov, A. N., Khajrullina, T. I., and Posokhova, M. M., Stratigrafiya i fauna nizhnego paleozoya Severnykh predgorij Turkestanskogo i Alajskogo khrebtov (Yuzhnyj Tyan‘-Shan’) [Stratigraphy and fauna of Lower Paleozoic of the northern submontane belt of Turkestan and Alai ridges (southern Tyan-Shan)]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Sibirskoe otdelenie, 278, Nauka, Novosibirsk.Google Scholar
Resser, C. E. 1936. Second contribution to nomenclature of Cambrian trilobites. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 95:29 p.Google Scholar
Richter, R., and Richter, E. 1948. Zur Frage des Unter-Kambriums in Nordost-Spanien. Senckenbergiana, 29:23–39.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A., Rozova, A. V., Rowell, A. J., and Fletcher, T. P. 1977. Cambrian boundaries and divisions. Lethaia, 10:257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, F. 1994. Die Trilobiten der mittelkambrischen Geschiebe. Systematik, Morphologie und Ökologie. Verlag Frank Rudolph, Wankendorf, 309 p.Google Scholar
Sdzuy, K. 1961. Das Kambrium Spaniens. Teil II: Trilobiten. 1. Abschnitt. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur Mainz, Abhandlungen der mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse, 1961:499–594[217-312].Google Scholar
Sdzuy, K. 1969. Unter-und mittelkambrische Porifera (Chancelloriida und Hexactinellida). Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 43:115–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinnerton, H. H. 1915. Suggestions for a Revised Classification of Trilobites. Geological Magazine, 2:487–496, 538-545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Termier, H., and Termier, G. 1950. Paléontologie marocaine. Tome 2. Invertébrés de l'Ere primaire. Fasc. 4: Annélides, Arthropodes, Echinodermes, Conularides et Graptolithes. Notes et Mémoirs de la Service géologique du Maroc, 79, 282 p. [1949].Google Scholar
Westergard, A. H. 1953. Non-agnostidean trilobites of the Middle Cambrian of Sweden, III. Sveriges Geologiska Undersokning, Series C, 525, 46(2), 58 p.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1992. Trilobites. p., Boydell Press, Woodbridge. 145 p.Google Scholar
Zhang, W. T., Lu, Y. H., Zhu, ZH. L., Qian, Y. Y., Lin, H. L., Zhou, ZH. Y., Zhang, S. G., and Yuan, J. L. 1980. [Cambrian Trilobite Faunas of Southwestern China]. Palaeontological Sinica, 159, New Series B, 16, 497 p., Science Press, Beijing. [In Chinese with English summary]Google Scholar
Zhu, ZH. L. 1980. [Family Chengkouiidae Zhu (fam. nov.)]. In Zhang, W. T., Lu, Y. H., Zhu, Zh. L., Qian, Y. Y., Lin, H. L., Zhou, Zh. Y., Zhang, S. G., and Yuan, J. L., [Cambrian Trilobite Faunas of Southwestern China]. Palaeontologica Sinica, 159, New Series B, 16:250-254, 424, 433, Science Press, Beijing. [In Chinese with English summary]Google Scholar