Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T14:11:06.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Slip-resistant silver-feet: shell form and mode of life in lower Pleistocene Argyropeza from Fiji

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Alan J. Kohn*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195

Abstract

Asymmetric sculpture in the form of tubercles or ridges on the shells of large (mean shell length ~60 mm) turritelliform gastropods has previously been shown to enhance efficiency of the shell as a penetration anchor in burrowing through coarse sediment. The small (<8 mm) turritelliform shells of all species of Argyropeza (Family Cerithiidae) have both of these ratchetlike sculptural features. Four lines of evidence from Lower Pleistocene A. divina and A. schepmaniana from Fiji support the interpretation that they help resist back-slippage: cross-orientation, frictional asymmetry, allometric shallowing, and allometric densing of sculptural elements. In addition, excellent state of preservation including protoconch sculpture, near coplanarity of aperture and ventral side of shell, and susceptibility to drilling predation by naticids support the conclusion that these gastropods burrowed in the sediment that formed the siltstone in which they are now preserved. A direct relationship is proposed between height of ratchet sculpture on turritelliform gastropod shells of approximate length range 5–100 mm and the grain size of sediments they inhabit ranging from silts to coarse sands.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blow, W. H. 1969. Late middle Eocene to Recent planktonic foraminiferal stratigraphy, p. 199422. In Bronnimann, P. and Renz, N. H. (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Planktonic Microfossils. E. J. Brill, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, L. R. 1960. General characteristics of Gastropoda, p. I84–I169. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, (I) Mollusca 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. and Vrba, E. S. 1982. Exaptation—a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8:415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houbrick, R. S. 1978. The family Cerithiidae in the Indo-Pacific. Part 1: the genera Rhinoclavis, Pseudovertagus and Clavocerithium. Monographs of Marine Mollusca, 1:1130.Google Scholar
Houbrick, R. S. 1980. Review of the deep-sea genus Argyropeza (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia: Cerithiidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 321:130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabat, A. R. and Kohn, A. J. 1986. Predation on Early Pleistocene naticid gastropods in Fiji. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 53:255269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, H. S. 1977. Cenozoic fossil mollusks from Western Pacific Islands; gastropods (Eratoidae through Harpidae). U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 533:184.Google Scholar
Macneil, F. S. 1960. Tertiary and Quaternary Gastropoda of Okinawa. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 339:1148.Google Scholar
Maes, V. O. 1983. Observations on the systematics and biology of a turrid gastropod assemblage in the British Virgin Islands. Bulletin of Marine Science, 33:305335.Google Scholar
Melvill, J. C. and Standen, R. 1901. The Mollusca of the Persian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, and Arabian Sea, as evidenced mainly through the collections of Mr. F.W. Townsend, 1893–1900, with descriptions of new species. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 2:327460.Google Scholar
Noda, H. 1980. Molluscan fossils from the Ryukyu Islands, southwestern Japan. Part 1. Gastropoda and Pelecypoda from the Shinzato Formation in southeastern part of Okinawa-jima. Science Reports of the Institute of Geoscience, University of Tsukuba, Sec. B, Geological Sciences, 1:195.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1966. Geometric analysis of shell coiling: general problems. Journal of Paleontology, 40:11781190.Google Scholar
Rodda, P. 1975. Fiji, p. 278282. In Fairbridge, R. W. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of World Regional Geology, Part I. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savazzi, E. 1981. Functional morphology of the cuticular terraces in Ranina (Lophoranina) (brachyuran decapods; Eocene of NE Italy). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 163:231243.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1973. Fabricational noise in adaptive morphology. Systematic Zoology, 22:451477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Signor, P. W. III. 1982a. Constructional morphology of gastropod ratchet sculpture. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 163:349368.Google Scholar
Signor, P. W. III. 1982b. Resolution of life habits using multiple morphologic criteria: shell form and life-mode in turritelliform gastropods. Paleobiology, 8:378388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Signor, P. W. III. 1983. Burrowing and the functional significance of ratchet sculpture in turritelliform gastropods. Malacologia, 23:313320.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, M. S., Kennett, J. P. and Rodda, P. 1981. Late Neogene planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy, Suva, Fiji. Journal of Paleontology, 55:858867.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1969. Bivalve mollusk burrowing aided by discordant shell ornamentation. Science, 166:634635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanley, S. M. 1981. Infaunal survival: alternative functions of shell ornamentation in the Bivalvia (Mollusca). Paleobiology, 7:384393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takayasu, K. 1978. “Ryukyu Limestone” of Okinawa-jima, south Japan—a stratigraphical and sedimentological study. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyoto University, Series of Geology and Mineralogy, 45:133175.Google Scholar
Wilcoxon, J. A. and Rodda, P. 1983. Calcareous nannoplankton from the Veisari Sandstone, the Lami Limestone, the Suva Marl, and the younger strata at Nakasi. Mineral Resources Department, Fiji, Report, 36:112.Google Scholar