Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:12:42.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Sponge Family Guadalupiidae in the Texas Permian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Robert M. Finks
Robert M. Finks*
Affiliation:
Geology Department, Union College, Schenectady, New York 12308,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

New and old species and genera of the family Guadalupiidae (spherulitic hypercalcified demosponges of the order Agelasida) are described or redescribed from the West Texas Permian. The entire family is reviewed and observations are made on the epibionts, growth patterns, functional morphology, ecological relationships, morphologic variability, modular structure, and evolutionary history of these largely reef-dwelling sponges. The stratigraphic distribution of species is also noted; many are limited and can define zones. The new genera Exovasa and Incisimura and the new species Guadalupia auricula, G. cupulosa, G. ramescens, G. microcamera, G. vasa, Cystothalamia megacysta, Lemonea simplex, Incisimura bella, and Exovasa cystauletoides are described. Almost all previously published taxa are redescribed and in some cases redefined. The Guadalupiidae are unique among hypercalcified sponges in having a modular thalamid layer (thalamidarium) covered on the exhalant surface by a non-modular stromatoporoid-like layer (trabecularium).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 84 , Issue 5 , September 2010 , pp. 821 - 847
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bidder, G. P. 1923. The relation of the form of a sponge to its currents. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 67:293–323.Google Scholar
Bidder, G. P. 1929. On the classification of sponges. Proceedings of the Linnaean Society of London, 502:4–6.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A. and Grant, R. E. 1966. Permian rock units in the Glass Mountains, West Texas. U. S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 1244-E:E1–E9.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A. and Grant, R. E. 1976. Permian brachiopods of West Texas, IV. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 21:1923–2607.Google Scholar
Deng, Zhan-Qiu. 1981. Upper Permian sponges from Laibin of Guangxi. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 20(5):418–427.Google Scholar
Dieci, G., Antonacci, A., and Zardini, R. 1968. Le spugne cassiane (Trias medio-superiore) della regione dolomitica attorno a Cortino d'Ampezzo. Bolletino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 7(2):94–155.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1955. Conularia in a sponge from the West Texas Permian. Journal of Paleontology, 29:831–836.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1960. Late Paleozoic sponge faunas of the Texas region: The siliceous sponges. American Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 120(1):1–60.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1969. The evolution and ecologic history of sponges during Palaeozoic times, p. 3–22. In Fry, W. G. (ed.), The Biology of Porifera, Zoological Society of London, Symposium 25. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1971a. Sponge zonation in the West Texas Permian. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Contributions, Paleontology, 3:285–300.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1971b. A new Permian eutaxicladine Demosponge, mosaic evolution, and the origin of the Dicranocladina. Journal of Paleontology, 45:977–997.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1983. Pharetronida: Inozoa and Sphinctozoa, p. 55–69. In Broadhead, T. W. (ed.), Sponges and Spongiomorphs. Notes for a short course organized by J. K. Rigby and C. W. Stearn, Studies in Geology 7. University of Tennessee. Knoxville.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1990. Late Paleozoic Pharetronid radiation in the Texas region, p. 17–24. In Ruetzler, Klaus (ed.), Perspectives in Sponge Biology, 3rd International Sponge Conference 1985. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1995. Some new genera of Paleozoic calcareous sponges. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions (new series) Number 6, p. 1–9, figs. 1-11.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1997. New name for a Permian calcareous sponge and some related corrections. Journal of Paleontology, 71:352.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 2003a. Functional morphology and adaptation, p. 211–222. In Kaesler, R. L. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part E. (Revised), Porifera, vol. 2, The Geological Society of America and The University of Kansas Boulder and Lawrence.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 2003b. Physiology, p. 201–210. In Kaesler, R. L. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part E (Revised), Porifera, vol. 2, The Geological Society of America and The University of Kansas, Boulder and Lawrence.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 2003c. Variability and variation, p. 223–241. In Kaesler, R. L. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part E (Revised), Porifera, vol. 2, The Geological Society of America and The University of Kansas, Boulder and Lawrence.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 2006. Are hypercalcified demosponges a key to the end-Permian extinction? Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, vol. 38, no. 7, p.538.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. and Rigby, J. K. 2004. Hypercalcified sponges, p. 585–758. In Kaesler, R. L. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Pt. E., Porifera (revised). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1908. The Guadalupian Fauna. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 58, 651 p.Google Scholar
Inai, Y. 1936. Discosiphonella a new ally of Amblysiphonella. Proceedings of the Imperial Academy of Japan, 12:169–171.Google Scholar
King, R. H. 1943. New Carboniferous and Permian sponges. State Geological Survey of Kansas Bulletin, 47:1–36.Google Scholar
Rauff, H. 1938. Ueber einige Kalkschwaemme aus der Trias der peruanischen Kordillere; nebst einem Anhang ueber Stellispongia und ihre Arten. Palaeontologische Zeitschrift, 20:177–214.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. and Bell, G. L. Jr. 2006. Sponges from the Reef Trail Member of the upper Guadalupian (Permian) Bell Canyon Formation, Guadalupe Mountains National Park, Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 80(5), supplement, 42 p.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., Senowbari-Daryan, B., and Liu, H. 1998. Sponges of the Permian Upper Capitan Limestone, Guadalupe Mountains, New Mexico and Texas. Geology Studies, 43:19–117.Google Scholar
Roemer, F. A. 1840. Die Versteinerungen des norddeutschen Kreidegebirges. Hahn'schen Hofbuchhandlung Hannover, 145 p.Google Scholar
Russo, F. 1981. Nuove spugne calcaree triassiche di Campo (Cortina d'Ampezzo, Belluno). Bolletino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 20(1):3–17.Google Scholar
Senowbari-Daryan, B. 1990. Die systematische Stellung der thalamiden Schwämme und ihre Bedeutung in der Erdgeschichte. Münchener Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen (Reihe A, Geologie und Paläontologie), 21:1–325.Google Scholar
Senowbari-Daryan, B. and Rigby, J. K. 1988. Upper Permian segmented sponges from Djebel Tebaga, Tunisia. Facies, 19:171–250.Google Scholar
Steinmann, G. 1882. Pharetronen-Studien. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, 2:139–191.Google Scholar
Termier, H. and Termier, G. 1977a. Paléontologie des Invertébrés, p. 255–299. In Termier, H. G., Termier, G., and Vachard, D. (eds.), Monographie Paléontologique des affleurements Permiens du Djebel Tebaga (Sud Tunisien). Palaeontographica, Abteilung A, 56 (1-3), 109 p.Google Scholar
Termier, H. and Termier, G. 1977b. Structure et évolution des spongiaires hypercalcifiés du Paléozoique supérieur. Mémoires de l'Institut Géologique de l'Université de Louvain, 29:57–109.Google Scholar
Vacelet, J. 1985. Coralline sponges and the evolution of Porifera, p. 2–13. In Conway Morris, S. (ed.), Organisms and relationships of Lower Invertebrates. Systematics Association, Special Volume 28.Google Scholar
Vacelet, J. and Lévi, C. 1958. Un cas de survivance, en Méditerranée, du groupe d'éponges afossiles des Pharétronides. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris, 246:318–320.Google Scholar
Von Dunikowski, E. 1883. Die Pharetronen aus dem Cenoman von Essen, und die Systematische Stellung der Pharetronen. Paleontographica, 29:283–323.Google Scholar
Zeise, O. 1897. Die Spongien der Stramberger Schichten. Palaeontologische Studien über die Grenzschichten der Jura, und Kreideformation im Gebiete der Karpathen, Alpen and Apeninen. Palaeontographica, Supplement 2, p. 289–342.Google Scholar
Zhang, W. 1983. Study on the sphinctozoans of Upper Permian Changxing Formation from the Lichuan area, West Hubei, China, p. 1–11. In A collection of theses for Master's Degrees, 1983. Institute of Geology, Academia Sinica, Beijing.Google Scholar