Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-2s2w2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-14T15:36:32.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exact Riemann solver for ideal magnetohydrodynamics that can handle all types of intermediate shocks and switch-on/off waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2013

K. Takahashi  and
S. Yamada
K. Takahashi*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Okubo, Shinjuku 169-8555, Japan
S. Yamada
Affiliation:
Department of Science & Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Okubo, Shinjuku 169-8555, Japan Advanced Research Institute for Science and Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Okubo, Shinjuku 169-8555, Japan
*
†Email address for correspondence: ktakahashi@heap.phys.waseda.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We have built a code to obtain the exact solutions of Riemann problems in ideal magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) for an arbitrary initial condition. The code can handle not only regular waves but also switch-on/off rarefactions and all types of non-regular shocks: intermediate shocks and switch-on/off shocks. Furthermore, the initial conditions with vanishing normal or transverse magnetic fields can be handled, although the code is partly based on the algorithm proposed by Torrilhon (2002) (Torrilhon, M. 2002 Exact solver and uniqueness condition for Riemann problems of ideal magnetohydrodynamics. Research report 2002-06, Seminar for Applied Mathematics, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland), which cannot deal with all types of non-regular waves nor the initial conditions without normal or transverse magnetic fields. Our solver can find all the solutions for a given Riemann problem, and hence, as demonstrated in this paper, one can investigate the structure of the solution space in detail. Therefore, the solver is a powerful instrument to solve the outstanding problem of existence and uniqueness of solutions of MHD Riemann problems. Moreover, the solver may be applied to numerical MHD schemes like the Godunov scheme in the future.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 80 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 255 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andreev, R., Torrilhon, M. and Jorosch, T. 2008 Exact Riemann Solver for Ideal MHD. Available at: https://web.mathcces.rwth-aachen.de/mhdsolver/. Accessed April 1, 2013.Google Scholar
Barmin, A. A., Kulikovskiy, A. G. and Pogorelov, N. V. 1996 Shock-caputuring approach and nonevolutionary solutions in magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 126 (0121), 77–90.Google Scholar
Brio, M. and Wu, C. C. 1988 An upwind differencing scheme for the equation of ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 75, 400–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, J. K. 1995 Intermediate shocks: observations. Adv. Space Res. 15 (8/9), 521–530.Google Scholar
Dai, W. and Woodward, P. R. 1994 Extension of the piecewise parabolic method to multidimensional ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 115, 485–514.Google Scholar
Delmont, P. and Keppens, R. 2011 Paremeter regimes for slow, intermediate and fast MHD shocks. J. Plasma Phys. 77 (2), 207–229.Google Scholar
De Sterck, H. 1999 Numerical Simulation and Analysis of Magnetically Dominated MHD Bow Shock Flows with Applications in Space Physics. PhD thesis, Department of Mathematics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
Falle, S. A. E. G. and Komissarov, S. S. 1997 On the existence of intermediate shocks. In: 12th ‘Kingston meeting': Computational Astrophysics (ed. David, A. Clark and West, Michael J.), ASP Conference Series. 390 Ashton Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94112: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, vol. 123, pp. 66–71.Google Scholar
Falle, S. A. E. G. and Komissarov, S. S. 2001 On the inadmissibility of non-evolutionary shocks. J. Plasma Phys. 65 (1), 29–58.Google Scholar
Feng, H. and Wang, J. M. 2008 Observations of a 2 → 3 type interplanetary intermediate shock. Solar Phys. 247, 195–201.Google Scholar
Feng, H. Q., Wang, J. M. and Chao, J. K. 2009 Observations of a subcritical switch-on shock. A&A 503, 203–206.Google Scholar
Gogosov, V. V. 1961 Resolution of an arbitrary discontinuity in magnetohydrodynamics. J. Appl. Math. Mech. 25 (1), 148–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gogosov, V. V. 1962 On the resolution of an arbitrary discontinuity in magnetohydrodynamics. J. Appl. Math. Mech. 26 (1), 118–129.Google Scholar
Hada, T. 1994 Evolutionary conditions in the dissipative MHD system: stability of intermediate MHD shock waves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 21 (21), 2275–2278.Google Scholar
Inoue, T. and Inutsuka, S. 2007 Evolutionary conditions in dissipative MHD systems revisited. Prog. Theor. Phys. 118 (1), 47–58.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, K. and Inutsuka, S. 2011 Smoothed particle magnetohydrodynamics with a Riemann solver and the method of characteristics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 418 (3), 1668–1688.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, A. and Taniuti, T. 1964 Non-linear Wave Propagation. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kantrowitz, A. R. and Petschek, H. E. 1966 Plasma Physics in Theory and Application. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kulikovskii, A. G., Pogorelov, N. P. and Semenov, A. Yu. 2001 Mathematical Aspects of Numerical Solution of Hyperbolic Systems. Monographs and Surveys in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 118. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Landau, L. D., Lifshitz, E. M. and Pitaevskii, L. P. 1984 Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, 2nd edn., Landau and Lifshitz Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 8. Maryland Heights, MO: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Lax, P. D. 1957 Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws II. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. X, 537–566.Google Scholar
Markovskii, S. A. 1998 Nonevolutionary discontinuous magnetohydrodynamic flows in a dissipative medium. Phys. Plasmas 5 (7), 2596–2604.Google Scholar
Sano, T., Inutsuka, S. and Miyama, S. M. 1999 A high-order Godunov scheme for non-ideal magnetohydrodynamics. In: Numerical Astrophysics: Proceedings of the International Conference on Numerical Astrophysics 1998 (NAP98), Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA, pp. 383–386.Google Scholar
Serre, D. 1999 System of Conservation Laws 1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Takahashi, K. and Yamada, S. 2013 Regular and non-regular solutions of the Riemann problem in ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Plasma Phys. 79 (3), 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrilhon, M. 2002 Exact solver and uniqueness conditions for Riemann problems of ideal magnetohydrodynamics. Research report 2002-06, Seminar for Applied Mathematics, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Torrilhon, M. 2003a Non-uniform convergence of finite volume schemes for Riemann problems of ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 192, 73–94.Google Scholar
Torrilhon, M. 2003b Uniqueness conditions for Riemann problems of ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Plasma Phys. 69 (3), 253–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, C. C. 1987 On MHD intermediate shocks. Geophys. Res. Lett. 14 (6), 668–671.Google Scholar
Wu, C. C. 1988a Effects of dissipation on rotational discontinuities. J. Geophys. Res. 93 (A5), 3969–3982.Google Scholar
Wu, C. C. 1988b The MHD intermediate shock interaction with an intermediate wave: are intermediate shocks physical? J. Geophys. Res. 93 (A2), 987–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, C. C. 1990 Formation, structure, and stability of MHD intermediate shocks. J. Geophys. Res. 95 (A6), 8149–8175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, C. C. and Kennel, C. F. 1992 Structural relations for time-dependent intermediate shocks. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19 (20), 2087–2090.Google Scholar