Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-g8tfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T08:14:34.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Langinuir probe measurements of double-layers in a pulsed discharge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

J. S. Levine  and
F. W. Crawford
J. S. Levine
Affiliation:
Institute for P1ama Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
F. W. Crawford
Affiliation:
Institute for P1ama Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Langmuir probe measurements have been carried out which confirm the occurrence of double-layers in an argon positive column. Pulsing the discharge current permitted probe measurements to be performed in the presence of the double- layer. Supplementary evidence, obtained from d.c. and pulsed discharges, indicated that the double-layers formed in the two modes of operation were similar. The double-layers observed were weak and stable; their relation to other classes of double-layers is discussed, and directions for future work are suggested.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , October 1980 , pp. 359 - 383
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCE

Andersson, D. 1978 Report No. 78–103, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Electron Physics, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Andersson, D.Babić, M., Sandahl, S. & Torvén, S. 1969 Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Phenomena in Ionized Gases, p. 142. Academy of the Socialist Republic of Romania.Google Scholar
Armstrong, R. J. 1975 Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Phenomena in Ionized Gases, p. 124. North Holland.Google Scholar
Armstrong, R. J. & Torvén, S. 1974 Report No. 10–74, Auroral Observatory, Troms⊘.Google Scholar
Babić, M., Sandahl, S. & Torvén, S. 1971 Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Phenomena in Ionized Gases, p. 120. Donald Parsons.Google Scholar
Babić, M. & Torvé, S. 1974 Report TRITA-EPP-74−02, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Electron Physics, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Block, L. P. 1978 Astrophys. Space Sci. 55, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, D. 1949 The Characteristics of Electrical Discharges in Magnetic Fields (ed. Guthrie, A. & Wakerling, R. K.), p.77. McGraw.Hill.Google Scholar
Branner, G. R., Friar, E. M. & Medicus, G. 1963 Rev. Sci. Instr. 28, 822.Google Scholar
Carlqvist, P. 1979 Wave Instabilities in Space Plasmas (ed. Palmadesso, P. J. & Papadopoulos, K.), p. 83. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coakley, P. & Hershkowitz, N. 1979 Phys. Fluids, 22, 1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coakley, P. & Hershkowitz, N., Hubbard, R. & Joyce, G. 1978 Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 230.Google Scholar
Coakley, P., Johnson, L. & Hershkowitz, N. 1979 Phys. Lett. 70 A, 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, F. W. & Cannara, A. B. 1965 J. Appi. Phys. 36, 3135.Google Scholar
Crawford, F. W. & Freeston, I. L. 1963 Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Phenomena in Ionized Gases, p. 461. SERMA.Google Scholar
Heald, M. A. & Wharton, C. B. 1965 Plasma Diagnostics with Microwaves, p. 120. Wiley.Google Scholar
Ilić, D. 1973 J. Appl. Phys. 44, 3993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, R. A. & Eubank, H. P. 1973 Plasma Phys. 15, 243.Google Scholar
Langmuir, I. 1929 Phys. Rev. 33, 954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, J. S. & Crawford, F. W. 1980 J. Plasma Phys. 23, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutsenko, E. I., Sereda, N. D. & Kontsevoi, L. M. 1976 Soviet Phys. Tech. Phys. 20,498.Google Scholar
Oleson, N. L. & Cooper, A. W. 1968 Adv. Electronics Elect. Phys. 24, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prewett, P. D. & Allen, J. E. 1976 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 348, 435.Google Scholar
Quon, B. H. & Wong, A. Y. 1976 Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 1393.Google Scholar
Rayment, S. W. & Twiddy, N. D. 1969 J. Phys. D 2, 1747.Google Scholar
Rosa, R. & Allen, J. E. 1970 J. Phys. D 3, 184.Google Scholar
Sandahl, S. 1971 Physica Scripta, 3, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schottky, W. 1924 Phys. Z. 25, 635.Google Scholar
Self, S. A. 1965 J. Appl. Phys. 36, 456.Google Scholar
Stangeby, P. C. & Allen, J. E. 1971 J. Phys. A 4, 108.Google Scholar
Tonks, L. & Langmuir, I. 1929 Phys. Rev. 34, 876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torvé, S. 1979 Wave Instabilities in Space Ptasmas (ed. Palmadesso, P. J. & Papadopoulos, K.), p. 109. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torvén, S. & Andersson, D. 1979 J. Phys. D 12, 717.Google Scholar
Torvén, S. & Babić, M. 1971 Report No. 7 1–20, Royal Institute of Technology, Division of Electron Physics, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Torvén, S. & Babić, M. 1973 J. Phye. E 6, 442.Google Scholar