Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hn9fh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-30T05:21:49.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Waves with nonlinear polarization due to a self-generated magnetic field in a plasma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

N. B. Aleksic ,
Yu. M. Aliev ,
V. Yu. Bychenkov  and
S. Vuković
N. B. Aleksic
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, P.O. Box 57. 11001 Belgrade, Yugoslavia
Yu. M. Aliev
Affiliation:
P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute. Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninski Prospect 53, 117 333 Moscow, Russia
V. Yu. Bychenkov
Affiliation:
P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute. Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninski Prospect 53, 117 333 Moscow, Russia
S. Vuković
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, P.O. Box 57, 11001 Belgrade, Yugoslavia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigate a new mechanism of nonlinear wave interaction in a plasma with an electromagnetic wave, a Langmuir plasma wave and a self-generated quasi-stationary magnetic field involved in the three-wave process. It is demonstrated that magnetic field generation supports a new wave of hybrid polarization, which can be changed during the nonlinear evolution. Periodic regimes, as well as regimes of soliton (instanton) formation and kink-shaped transitions, can be realized.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , October 1992 , pp. 325 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abramowttz, M. & Stegun, I. A. 1956 Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover.Google Scholar
Aliev, Yu. M., Bychenkov, V. YU. & Feolov, A. A. 1979 Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 76, 1586.Google Scholar
Berhoer, A. L. & Zaharov, V. E. 1970 Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 58, 103.Google Scholar
Berezhiani, V. I., Tskhakaya, D. D. & Auer, G. 1987 J. Plasma Phys 38, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanović, D. & Vuković, S. 1984 Physica 125C, 369.Google Scholar
Kono, M.. Škorić, M. M. & Ter Haar, D. 1980 Phys. Lett. 77A, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nekeasov, A. K. & Petviashvili, V. I. 1979 Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 77, 605.Google Scholar
Oditlov, S. G. & Sturman, B. I. 1987 Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 92, 2016.Google Scholar
Pitaevskn, L. P. 1960 Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 39, 1450.Google Scholar
Steigee, A. D. & Woods, C. H. 1972 Phys. Rev. A 5, 1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsytovich, V. 1978 Comm. Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion 4, 81.Google Scholar
Vuković, S. & Dragila, R. 1989 Opt. Lett. 14, 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar