Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T11:15:07.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perspective Taking and Empathy: Does Having Similar Past Experience to Another Person Make It Easier to Take Their Perspective?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2015

Adam Gerace*
School of Nursing & Midwifery, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia School of Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Andrew Day
School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne and Geelong, Victoria, Australia
Sharon Casey
School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne and Geelong, Victoria, Australia
Philip Mohr
The University of Adelaide, Adelaide South Australia, Australia
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE: Adam Gerace, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Flinders University of South Australia, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide SA 5001. Email:
Get access


This study tested the hypothesis that it is easier to take the perspective of another person when one has similar past experience. Volunteer participants (N = 154) were asked to take the perspective of a protagonist in one of four problematic interpersonal situations and then to rate the ease with which they felt able to perspective take and the extent of their personal past experience of similar situations. Similar past experience predicted ease of perspective taking, with the relationship influenced by reflection on past experience. Ease of perspective taking mediated the relationship between similar past experience and participant perceptions of their accuracy in understanding the other person, but ease was not associated with emotional arousal. The findings have potential therapeutic applications for attempts to increase empathy and understanding in people for whom perspective taking may be difficult.

Research Article
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (with contributions by Reno, R.R.). (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Allport, F.H. (1967). Social psychology. New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation. (Original work published 1924)Google Scholar
Ames, D.R. (2004). Inside the mind reader's tool kit: Projection and stereotyping in mental state inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 340353.Google Scholar
Barnett, M.A. (1984). Similarity of experience and empathy in preschoolers. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 145, 241250.Google Scholar
Barnett, M.A., Tetreault, P.A., Esper, J.A., & Bristow, A.R. (1986). Similarity and empathy: The experience of rape. The Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 4749.Google Scholar
Barnett, M.A., Tetreault, P.A., & Masbad, I. (1987). Empathy with a rape victim: The role of similarity of experience. Violence and Victims, 2, 255262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 11731182.Google Scholar
Batson, C.D. (1987). Self-report ratings of empathic emotion. In Eisenberg, N. & Strayer, J. (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 356360). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Batson, C.D., Early, S., & Salvarani, G. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 751758.Google Scholar
Batson, C.D., Lishner, D.A., Carpenter, A., Dulin, L., Harjusola-Webb, S., Stocks, E.L., . . . Sampat, B. (2003). ‘. . . As you would have them do unto you’: Does imagining yourself in the other's place stimulate moral action? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 11901201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batson, C.D., Sympson, S.C., Hindman, J.L., Decruz, P., Todd, R.M., Weeks, J.L., . . . Burris, C.T. (1996). ‘I've been there, too’: Effect on empathy of prior experience with a need. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 474482.Google Scholar
Briñol, P., Petty, R.E., & Tormala, Z.L. (2006). The malleable meaning of subjective ease. Psychological Science, 17, 200206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambers, J.R., & Davis, M.H. (2012). The role of the self in perspective-taking and empathy: Ease of self-simulation as a heuristic for inferring empathic feelings. Social Cognition, 30, 153180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ching, C.L., & Burke, S. (1999). An assessment of college students’ attitudes and empathy toward rape. College Student Journal, 33, 573583.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Coke, J.S., Batson, C.D., & McDavis, K. (1978). Empathic mediation of helping: A two-stage model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 752766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, B.A., Lin, S., Keysar, B., & Epley, N. (2008). In the mood to get over yourself: Mood affects theory-of-mind use. Emotion, 8, 725730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronbach, L.J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on ‘understanding of others’ and ‘assumed similarity’. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177193.Google Scholar
Davis, M.H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.Google Scholar
Davis, M.H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark Publishers.Google Scholar
Davis, M.H., & Kraus, L.A. (1997). Personality and empathic accuracy. In Ickes, W. (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 144168). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Davis, M.H., Soderlund, T., Cole, J., Gadol, E., Kute, M., Myers, M., & Weihing, J. (2004). Cognitions associated with attempts to empathize: How do we imagine the perspective of another? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 16251635.Google Scholar
Day, A., Howells, K., Mohr, P., Schall, E., & Gerace, A. (2008). The development of CBT programmes for anger: The role of interventions to promote perspective-taking skills. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 36, 299312.Google Scholar
Deitz, S.R., Blackwell, K.T., Daley, P.C., & Bentley, B.J. (1982). Measurement of empathy toward rape victims and rapists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 372384.Google Scholar
Dymond, R. (1954). Interpersonal perception and marital happiness. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 8, 164171.Google Scholar
Dymond, R.F. (1950). Personality and empathy. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 14, 343350.Google Scholar
Echterhoff, G., & Hirst, W. (2006). Thinking about memories for everyday and shocking events: Do people use ease-of-retrieval cues in memory judgments. Memory & Cognition, 34, 763775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg, N., & Sulik, M.J. (2012). Is self-other overlap the key to understanding empathy? Emotion Review, 4, 3435.Google Scholar
Epley, N., Keysar, B., Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 327339.Google Scholar
Epley, N., Morewedge, C.K., & Keysar, B. (2004). Perspective taking in children and adults: Equivalent egocentrism but differential correction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 760768.Google Scholar
Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M.F., & Buss, A.H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522527.Google Scholar
Gerace, A., Day, A., Casey, S., & Mohr, P. (2013). An exploratory investigation of the process of perspective taking in interpersonal situations. Journal of Relationships Research, 4, e6.Google Scholar
Gibbs, J.G., & Woll, S.B. (1985). Mechanisms used by young children in the making of empathic judgments. Journal of Personality, 53, 575585.Google Scholar
Gordon, R.M. (1995). Folk psychology as simulation. In Davies, M. & Stone, T. (Eds.), Folk psychology: The theory of mind debate (pp. 6073). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. (Original work published 1986)Google Scholar
Greenberg, L.S., Elliott, R., & Lietaer, G. (2003). Humanistic-experiential psychotherapy. In Stricker, G. & Widiger, T.A. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 8. Clinical psychology (pp. 301325). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1992). The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 411435.Google Scholar
Håkansson, J., & Montgomery, H. (2003). Empathy as an interpersonal phenomenon. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 267284.Google Scholar
Hatcher, S.L., Favorite, T.K., Hardy, E.A., Goode, R.L., Deshetler, L.A., & Thomas, R.M. (2005). An analogue study of therapist empathic process: Working with difference. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42, 198210.Google Scholar
Hayes, A.F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hebb, D.O. (1949). The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hodges, S.D. (2005). Is how much you understand me in your head or mine? In Malle, B.F. & Hodges, S.D. (Eds.), Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and others (pp. 298309). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hodges, S.D., Kiel, K.J., Kramer, A.D.I., Veach, D., & Villanueva, B.R. (2010). Giving birth to empathy: The effects of similar experience on empathic accuracy, empathic concern, and perceived empathy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 398409.Google Scholar
Hodges, S.D., & Wegner, D.M. (1997). Automatic and controlled empathy. In Ickes, W. (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 311339). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M.L. (1975). Developmental synthesis of affect and cognition and its implications for altruistic motivation. Developmental Psychology, 11, 607622.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M.L. (1978a). Empathy, its development and prosocial implications. In Keasey, C.B. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (vol. 25, pp. 169217). Lincoln, NV: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M.L. (1978b). Toward a theory of empathic arousal and development. In Lewis, M. & Rosenblum, L.A. (Eds.), The development of affect (pp. 227256). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M.L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, T.R., & Rahe, R.H. (1967). The Social Readjustment Rating Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213218.Google Scholar
Humphrey, G. (1922). The conditioned reflex and the elementary social reaction. The Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Social Psychology, 17, 113119.Google Scholar
Jacoby, L.L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 2138.Google Scholar
Jacoby, L.L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513541.Google Scholar
Jacoby, L.L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306340.Google Scholar
Jacoby, L.L., & Kelley, C.M. (1987). Unconscious influences of memory for a prior event. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 314336.Google Scholar
Johnston, W.A., Dark, V.J., & Jacoby, L.L. (1985). Perceptual fluency and recognition judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 311.Google Scholar
Judd, C.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602619.Google Scholar
Karniol, R., & Shomroni, D. (1999). What being empathic means: Applying the transformation rule approach to individual differences in predicting the thoughts and feelings of prototypic and nonprototypic others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 147160.Google Scholar
Kenny, D.A. (2014). Mediation. Retrieved September 22, 2014, from Google Scholar
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In Gilbert, D.T., Fiske, S.T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (vol. 1, 4th ed., pp. 233265). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kerem, E., Fishman, N., & Josselson, R. (2001). The experience of empathy in everyday relationships: Cognitive and affective elements. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 709729.Google Scholar
Kitano, M., & Chan, K.S. (1978). Taking the role of retarded children: Effects of familiarity and similarity. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 83, 3739.Google Scholar
Koss, M.P., & Oros, C.J. (1982). Sexual Experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455457.Google Scholar
Krebs, D. (1975). Empathy and altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 11341146.Google Scholar
Lerner, M.J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, G.E., Riger, S., & Foley, L.A. (2004). The impact of past sexual experiences on attributions of responsibility for rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 11571171.Google Scholar
Mohr, P., Howells, K., Gerace, A., Day, A., & Wharton, M. (2007). The role of perspective taking in anger arousal. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 507517.Google Scholar
Norbeck, J.S. (1984). Modification of life event questionnaires for use with female respondents. Research in Nursing and Health, 7, 6171.Google Scholar
Paretsky, S. (2005). Fire sale. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
Perrone-McGovern, K.M., Oliveira-Silva, P., Simon-Dack, S., Lefdahl-Davis, E., Adams, D., McConnell, J., . . . Gonçalves, Ó.F. (2014). Effects of empathy and conflict resolution strategies on psychophysiological arousal and satisfaction in romantic relationships. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 39, 1925.Google Scholar
Peternelj-Taylor, C.A., & Yonge, O. (2003). Exploring boundaries in the nurse-client relationship: Professional roles and responsibilities. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 39, 5566.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879891.Google Scholar
Preston, S.D., & Hofelich, A.J. (2012). The many faces of empathy: Parsing empathic phenomena through a proximate, dynamic-systems view of representing the other in the self. Emotional Review, 4, 2433.Google Scholar
Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8, 338342.Google Scholar
Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 4548.Google Scholar
Rogers, C.R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 95103.Google Scholar
Rothman, A.J., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Constructing perceptions of vulnerability: Personal relevance and the use of experiential information in health judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 10531064.Google Scholar
Ruby, P., & Decety, J. (2004). How would you feel versus how do you think she would feel? A neuroimaging study of perspective-taking with social emotions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 988999.Google Scholar
Sarason, I.G., Johnson, J.H., & Siegel, J.M. (1978). Assessing the impact of life changes: Development of the Life Experiences Survey. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 932946.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N. (1998). Accessible content and accessibility experiences: The interplay of declarative and experiential information in judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 8799.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N. (2005). When thinking feels difficult: Meta-cognitive experiences in judgment and decision making. Medical Decision Making, 25, 105112.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195202.Google Scholar
Shaver, K.G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 101113.Google Scholar
Smith, C.A., & Frieze, I.H. (2003). Examining rape empathy from the perspective of the victim and the assailant. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 476498.Google Scholar
Stiles, W.B. (2001). Assimilation of problematic experiences. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 38, 462465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stotland, E. (1969). Exploratory investigations of empathy. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 4, pp. 271314). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stotland, E., & Dunn, R.E. (1963). Empathy, self-esteem, and birth order. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 532540.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207232.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 11241131.Google Scholar
Tormala, Z.L., Petty, R.E., & Briñol, P. (2002). Ease of retrieval effects in persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 17001712.Google Scholar
Unkelbach, C. (2007). Reversing the truth effect: Learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 219230.Google Scholar
Van Boven, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Social projection of transient drive states. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 11591168.Google Scholar
Van Boven, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2005). Empathy gaps in emotional perspective taking. In Malle, B.F. & Hodges, S.D. (Eds.), Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and others (pp. 284297). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Vorauer, J.D., & Cameron, J.J. (2002). So close, and yet so far: Does collectivism foster transparency overestimation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 13441352.Google Scholar
Whittlesea, B.W.A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 12351253.Google Scholar
Whittlesea, B.W.A., Jacoby, L.L., & Girard, K. (1990). Illusions of immediate memory: Evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 716732.Google Scholar
Zaki, J. (2014). Empathy: A motivated account. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 16081647.Google Scholar