Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-8bbf57454-47mcc Total loading time: 0.273 Render date: 2022-01-24T19:22:39.692Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

School Engagement and Achievement in Sibling Pairs: Gender and Birth Order Matter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2018

Larissa M. Troesch*
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Thomas Ledermann
Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA
Joseph W. Jones
Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA
Alexander Grob
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Address for correspondence: Larissa M. Troesch, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Missionsstrasse 60, 4055 Basel, Switzerland. Email:
Get access


School engagement has been shown to be a strong predictor for school achievement. Previous studies have focused on the role of individual and contextual factors to explain school achievement, with few examining the role of siblings. This study used data of 451 adolescent sibling pairs from the Iowa Youth and Families Project to investigate the associations between school engagement and achievement in siblings by considering gender composition and birth order. Data were collected in families’ home and obtained for a target child in the 7th grade and for a sibling within 4 years of age. Average age of younger siblings (55% female) was 11.56 (SD = 1.27), while older siblings (49% female) had an average age of 13.92 (SD = 1.47). Using the two-member, four-group actor-partner interdependence model (APIM), results showed that older siblings’ engagement was positively related with younger siblings’ achievement in same-gender sibling pairs, but not in sibling pairs of opposite gender. Younger siblings’ engagement was independent of older siblings’ achievement regardless of siblings’ gender. Implications for parents and professionals suggest that support for older siblings could also benefit younger siblings in same gender pairs.

Research Article
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Bandura, A. (1969). Social-learning theory of identificatory processes. In Goslin, D.A. (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 213261). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Berk, L.E. (2008). Infants, children and adolescents (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Blake, J. (1981). Family-size and the quality of children. Demography, 18, 421442. doi:10.2307/2060941CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blakemore, J.E.O., Berenbaum, S., & Liben, L.L. (2009). Gender development. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Bouchey, H.A., Shouldberg, E.K., Jodl, K.M., & Eccles, J.S. (2010). Longitudinal links between older sibling features and younger siblings’ academic adjustment during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 197211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Buhrmester, D., & Furman, W. (1990). Perceptions of sibling relationships during middle childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 61, 13871398. doi:10.2307/1130750CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cicirelli, V.G. (1995). Sibling relationships across the life span. New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conger, R.D. (1988). Developed for the Iowa Youth and Families Project (Project no. ICPSR26721). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Conger, R.D., Lasley, P., Lorenz, F.O., Simons, R., Whitbeck, L.B., Elder, G.H., & Norem, R. (2011). Iowa Youth and Families Project, 1989–1992 (Project no. ICPSR26721). Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. (1983). Sibling relationships in early childhood. Child Development, 54, 787811. doi:10.2307/1129886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J. (2015). Siblings. In Grusec, J.E. & Hastings, P.D. (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 182201). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Eccles, J.S., Early, D., Fraser, K., Belansky, E., & McCarthy, K. (1997). The relation of connection, regulation, and support for autonomy to adolescents’ functioning. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12, 263286. doi:10.1177/0743554897122007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles, J.S., & Wigfield, A.W. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elder, G.H. Jr. (1988). Developed for the Iowa Youth and Families Project (Project no. ICPSR26721). Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Farkas, T., & Leaper, C. (2014). Is having an older sister or older brother related to younger siblings’ gender typing? A meta-analysis. In Leman, P. & Tenenbaum, H. (Eds.), Current issues in developmental psychology. Gender and development (pp. 6377). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Paris, A.H. (2004). School engagement: potential of concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froiland, J.M., & Worrell, F.C. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, learning goals, engagement, and achievement in a diverse high school. Psychology in the Schools, 53, 321336. doi:10.1002/pits.21901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1985). Children's perceptions of the qualities of sibling relationships. Child Development, 56, 448461. doi:10.2307/1129733CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gamble, W., Yu, J.J., & Card, N.A. (2010). Self-representations in early adolescence: Variations in sibling similarity by sex composition and sibling relationship qualities. Social Development, 19, 148169. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00532.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guan, S.A., & Fuligni, A.J. (2016). Changes in parent, sibling, and peer support during the transition to young adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26, 286299. doi:10.1111/jora.12191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Im, M.H., Hughes, J.N., & West, S.G. (2016). Effects of trajectories of friends’ and parents’ school involvement on adolescents’ engagement and achievement. Journal of Research on Adolescence 26, 963978. doi:10.1111/jora.12247CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, A.R. (1997). The puzzle of nongenetic variance. In Sternberg, R.J. & Grigorenko, E.L. (Eds.), Intelligence, heredity, and environment (pp. 4288). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, A.C., & McHale, S.M. (2015). What makes siblings different? The development of sibling differences in academic achievement and interests. Journal of Family Psychology, 29, 469478. doi:10.1037/fam0000090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keith, T.Z., & Cool, V.A. (1992). Testing models of school learning: Effects of quality of instruction, motivation, academic coursework, and homework on academic achievement. School Psychology Quarterly, 7, 207226. doi:10.1037/h0088260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, T.Z., Reimers, T.M., Fehrmann, P.G., Pottebaum, S.M., & Aubey, L.W. (1986). Parental involvement, homework, and TV time: Direct and indirect effects on high school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 373380. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.5.373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, L. (2014). Learning emotional understanding and emotion regulation through sibling interaction. Early Education and Development. 25, 160184. doi:10.1080/10409289.2014.838824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, G.W., Ettekal, I., & Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (2017). Peer victimization trajectories from kindergarten through high school: Differential pathways for children's school engagement and achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 826841. doi:10.1037/edu0000177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, S., Jimerson, S., Wong, B.P.H., Kikas, E., Shin, H., Veiga, F.H., … Zollneritsch, J. (2014). Understanding and measuring student engagement in school: The results of an international study from 12 contries. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 213232. doi:10.1037/spq0000057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledermann, T., Rudaz, M., & Grob, A. (2017). Analysis of group composition in multimember multigroup data. Personal Relationships, 24, 242264. doi:10.1111/pere.12176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., & Lerner, R.M. (2011). Developmental trajectories of school engagement across adolescence: Implications for academic achievement, substance use, depression, and delinquency. Developmental Psychology, 47, 233247. doi:10.1037/a0021307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, S., & Shanahan, L. (2010). Sibling experiences in diverse family contexts. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 7279. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00121.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHale, S.M., Updegraff, K.A., & Whiteman, S.D. (2012). Sibling relationships and influences in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 913930. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.01011.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Núñez, J.C., Suárez, N., Rosário, P., Vallejo, G., Valle, A., & Epstein, J.L. (2015). Relationships between perceived parental involvement in homework, student homework behaviors, and academic achievement: Differences among elementary, junior high, and high school students. Metacognition and Learning, 10, 375406. doi:10.1007/s11409-015-9135-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oláh, L.S., Richter, R., & Kotowska, I.E. (2014). The new roles of men and women and implications for families and societies (Report No. 11). Retrieved from Scholar
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 136. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, F.F., Shore, E., Feldman-Rotman, S., Marquis, R.E., & Campbell, S. (1976). Sibling deidentification. Developmental Psychology, 12, 418427. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.12.5.418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schueler, B.E., McIntyre, J.C., & Gehlbach, H. (2018). Measuring parent perceptions of family–school engagement: The development of new survey tools. The School Community Journal, 27, 275301.Google Scholar
Stoneman, Z., Brody, G.H., & MacKinnon, C.E. (1986). Same-sex and cross-sex siblings: Activity choices, roles, behavior, and gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 15, 495511. doi:10.1007/BF00288227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, C.Y. (2017). Do parental attitudes toward and expectations for their children's education and future jobs matter for their children's school achievement? British Educational Research Journal, 43, 11111130. doi:10.1002/berj.3303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, C.J., Barber, B.L., & Eccles, J.S. (1997). Advice about life plans and personal problems in late adolescent sibling relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26, 6376. doi:10.1023/A:1024540228946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, C.J., McHale, S.M., & Crouter, A.C. (2001). Conditions of sibling support in adolescence. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 254271. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.15.2.254CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tucker, C.J., McHale, S.M., & Crouter, A.C. (2008). Links between older and younger adolescent siblings’ adjustment: The moderating role of shared activities. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 152160. doi:10.1177/0165025407087214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadyaya, K., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2013). Development of school engagement in association with academic success and well-being in varying social contexts: A review of empirical research. European Psychologist, 18, 136147. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadyaya, K., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2015). Cross-lagged associations between study and work engagement dimensions during young adulthood. Journal of Positive Psychology, 10, 346358. doi:10.1080/17439760.2014.983958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Updegraff, K.A., McHale, S.M., Whiteman, S.D., Thayer, S.M., & Delgado, M.Y. (2005). Adolescent sibling relationships in Mexican American families: Exploring the role of familism. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 512522. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.19.4.512CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, M.T., & Degol, J. (2014). Staying engaged: Knowledge and research needs in student engagement. Child Development Perspectives, 8, 137143. doi:10.1111/cdep.12073CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, M.-T., Fredricks, J., Ye, F., Hofkens, T., & Linn, J.S. (2017). Conceptualization and assessment of adolescents’ engagement and disengagement in school: A multidimensional school engagement scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, W.B., & Garber, M. (1972). The home environment as a predictor of school achievement. Theory Into Practice, 11, 190195. doi:10.1080/00405847209542394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteman, S.D., McHale, S.M., & Crouter, A.C. (2007). Competing processes of sibling influence: Observational learning and sibling deidentification. Social Development, 16, 642661. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00409.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widmer, E.D., & Weiss, C.C. (2000). Do older siblings make a difference? The effects of older sibling support and older sibling adjustment on the adjustment of socially disadvantaged adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10, 127. doi:10.1207/SJRA1001_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

School Engagement and Achievement in Sibling Pairs: Gender and Birth Order Matter
Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

School Engagement and Achievement in Sibling Pairs: Gender and Birth Order Matter
Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

School Engagement and Achievement in Sibling Pairs: Gender and Birth Order Matter
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *