Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-bt4hw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T00:22:07.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INTROSPECTION, REVEALED PREFERENCE, AND NEOCLASSICAL ECONOMICS: A CRITICAL RESPONSE TO DON ROSS ON THE ROBBINS-SAMUELSON ARGUMENT PATTERN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

D. WADE HANDS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 453 - 478
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Backhouse, Roger and Medema, Steve. 2009. “Robbins's Essay and the Axiomatization of Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought Forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balzer, Wolfgang and Hamminga, Bert, eds. 1989. Philosophy of Economics. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1963. “Intellectual Autobiography.” In Schilpp, P. A., ed., The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. LaSalle, IL: Open Court, pp. 3–84.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy; Cat, Jordi, Fleck, Lola, and Uebel, Thomas. 1996. Between Science and Politics: The Philosophy of Otto Neurath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, Patricia S. 1986. Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Churchland, Paul M. 1984. Matter and Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Colander, David. 2000. “The Death of Neoclassical Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (June): 127–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, John B. 2003. The Theory of the Individual in Economics: Identity and Value. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, John B. 2006. “The Turn in Economics: Neoclassical Dominance to Mainstream Pluralism.” Journal of Institutional Economics 2 (April): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debreu, Gerard. 1959. Theory of Value. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. 1987. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. 1991a. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. 1991b. “Real Patterns.” The Journal of Philosophy 88 (January): 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupré, John. 1993. The Disorder of Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 1999. Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2001. Dynamics of Reason. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1953. “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3–43.Google Scholar
Glimcher, Paul W. 2003. Decisions, Uncertainty, and the Brain: The Science of Neuroeconomics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hands, Wade D. 1985. “The Structuralist View of Economic Theories: A Review Essay.” Economics and Philosophy 1 (October): 303–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hands, D. Wade 2001. Reflection Without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hands, D. Wade. 2006. “Integrability, Rationalizability, and Path-Dependency in the History of Demand Theory.” In Mirowski, P. and Hands, D. W., eds., Agreement on Demand: Consumer Theory in the Twentieth Century. Durham, NC: Duke University Press [Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy Volume 38], pp. 153–85.Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel M. 2000. “Revealed Preference, Belief, and Game Theory.” Economics and Philosophy 16 (April): 99–115.Google Scholar
Houthakker, Hendrik S. 1950. “Revealed Preference and the Utility Function.” Economica 17 (May): 159–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howson, Susan. 2004. “The Origins of Lionel Robbins's Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science.” History of Political Economy 36 (Fall): 413–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kihlstrom, Richard, Mas-Colell, Andreu, and Sonnenschein, Hugo. 1976. “The Demand Theory of the Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference.” Econometrica 44 (September): 971–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koo, Anthony Y. C. 1963. “An Empirical Test of Revealed Preference Theory.” Econometrica 31 (October): 646–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koo, Anthony Y. C. and Hasenkamp Georg, Georg. 1972. “Structure of Revealed Preference: Some Preliminary Evidence.” Journal of Political Economy 80 (July–August): 724–44.Google Scholar
Lewin, Shira B. 1996. “Economics and Psychology: Lessons from Our Own Day From the Early Twentieth Century.” Journal of Economic Literature 34 (September): 1293–323.Google Scholar
Andreu, Mas-Colell, Whinston, Michael D., and Green, Jerry R. 1995. Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Lionel. 2002. Classical General Equilibrium Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 2002. Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan W. 1998. Carnap's Construction of the World: The Aufbau and the Emergence of Logical Empiricism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1935. An Essay on the Nature & Significance of Economic Science, second edition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1938. “Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: A Comment.” The Economic Journal 48 (December): 635–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1953. “Robertson on Utility and Scope.” Economica 20 (May): 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Alexander. 1992. Economics: Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alexander. 1995. Philosophy of Social Science, second edition. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Don. 1999. The Concept of Utility from Bentham to Game Theory. Cape Town, South Africa: University of Cape Town Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Don. 2000a. “Introduction: The Dennettian Stance.” In Ross, D., Brook, A., and Thompson, D., eds., Dennett's Philosophy: A Comprehensive Assessment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Don. 2000b. “Rainforest Realism: A Dennettian Theory of Existence.” In Ross, D., Brook, A., and Thompson, D., eds., Dennett's Philosophy: A Comprehensive Assessment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Don. 2005. Economic Theory and Cognitive Science: Microexplanation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. 1949. The Concept of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1938. “A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behaviour.” Economica 5 (February): 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1948 “Consumption Theory in Terms of Revealed Preference.” Economica 15 (November): 243–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneed, Joseph D. 1971. The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics. Dordrecht, NL: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegmüller, Wolfgang. 1976. The Structure and Dynamics of Theories. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegmüller, Wolfgang, Balzer, Wolfgang, and Sophn, Wolfgang, eds. 1982. Philosophy of Economics. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Suppe, Frederick. 1977. The Structure of Scientific Theories, second edition. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Uebel, Thomas E. 1992. Overcoming Logical Positivism From Within: The Emergence of Neurath's Naturalism in the Vienna Circle's Protocol Sentence Debate. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uzawa, Hirofumi. 1971. “Preference and Rational Choice in the Theory of Consumption.” In Chipman, J. S., Hurwicz, L., Richter, M. K., and Sonnenschein, H. F., eds., Preferences, Utility, and Demand. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, pp. 7–28.Google Scholar
Varian, Hal. 2006. “Revealed Preference.” In Szenberg, M., Ramrattan, L., and Gottesman, A. A. eds., Samuelsonian Economics and the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 99–115.Google Scholar
Wong, Stanley. 2006. The Foundations of Paul Samuelson's Revealed Preference Theory. London: Routledge (first edition1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar