Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T14:59:21.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Emigré Economists and American Neoclassical Economics, 1933–1945

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Gary Mongiovi
Affiliation:
Economics & Finance Department, St John's University, Jamaica, New York 11439, USA. E-mail: mongiovg@stjohns.edu.

Extract

The rise of European fascism in the 1920s and '30s triggered the greatest migration of intellectual capital the world has ever known. This paper is concerned with the German-speaking economists who formed the core of the original Graduate Faculty of the New School for Social Research. Among émigré economists of the interwar period, those who found refuge at the New School exerted a distinctive influence on American economics, partly owing to their concentration at a single institution, and partly by virtue of the character and quality of their work. The paper has three aims: to provide an overview of the contributions of these economists, to assess their impact on American economics, and to account for the apparent evaporation of their legacy after the onset of the Cold War.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bentwich, N. (1953) The Rescue and Achievement of Refugee Scholars: The Story of Displaced Scholars and Scientists, 1933–1952 (The Hague: M. Nijhoff).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coser, L. A. (1984) Refugee Scholars in America: Their Impact and Their Experiences (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Esslinger, H. U. (1997) Einflüsse der Emigrationserfahrung auf Emil Lederers wirtschaftstheoretische und soziologische Arbeiten, in: Hagemann, H. (Ed.) Die Deutschsprachige Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Emigration nach 1933 (Marburg: Metropolis).Google Scholar
Fermi, L. (1968) Illustrious Immigrants (Chicago, ILUniversity of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Furner, M. O. (1975) Advocacy and Objectivity. A Crisis in the Professionalization of American Social Science (Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky).Google Scholar
Hagemann, H. (1999) Keynes and the Economic “Activists” in pre-Hitler Germany, in: Pasinetti, L. L. and Schefold, B. (Eds) The Impact of Keynes on Economics in the Twentieth Century (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
Heimann, E. (1934) Sociological Preconceptions of Economic Theory, Social Research, 1(1), pp. 2244.Google Scholar
Heimann, E. (1937) What Marx Means Today, Social Research, 4(1), pp. 3351.Google Scholar
Heimann, E. (1945) History of Economic Doctrines (London and New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Krohn, C. D. (1993) Intellectuals in Exile: Refugee Scholars and the New School for Social Research (Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press).Google Scholar
Lederer, E. (1931) Technischer Fortschriftt und Arbeitslosigkeit (Tübingen: Mohr).Google Scholar
Lederer, E. (1936) Commentary on Keynes, II, Social Research, 3(4), pp. 478–87.Google Scholar
Lederer, E. (1937) The Search for Truth, Social Research, 4(3), pp. 277–82.Google Scholar
Lowe, A. (1926) Wie ist Konjoncturteorie überhaubt möglich?, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 24, pp. 165–97. English translation (1997): How is Business Cycle Theory Possible at All?’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 8(2), pp. 245–70.Google Scholar
Lowe, A. (1935) Economics and Sociology (London: Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
Lowe, A. (1976) The Path of Economic Growth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marschak, J. (1940) Peace Economics, Social Research, 7(3), pp. 280–98.Google Scholar
Modigliani, F. (1944) Liquidity Preference and the Theory of Interest and Money, Econometrica, 12(1), pp. 4588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modigliani, F. (2001) Adventures of an Economist (New York and London: Texere).Google Scholar
Mongiovi, G. (1997) Emigré; economists at the New School, 1933–1945, in: Hagemann, H. (Ed.) Zur Deutschsprachigen Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Emigration nach 1933 (Marburg: Metropolis).Google Scholar
Morgan, M. & Rutherford, M. (1998) From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism (Durham: Duke University Press).Google Scholar
Neisser, H. (1932) Lohnhöhe und Beschaftigungsgrad im Marktgleichgewicht, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 36(2), pp. 415–55. English translation 1990: The Wage Rate and Employment in Market Equilibrium, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 1(1), pp. 141–63.Google Scholar
Neisser, H. (1934) General Overproduction: A Study of Say's Law of Markets, Journal of Political Economy, 42(3), pp. 443–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neisser, H. (1936) Commentary on Keynes, I, Social Research, 3(4), pp. 459–78.Google Scholar
Neisser, H. (1942) Permanent Technological Unemployment, American Economic Review, 32(1), pp. 5071.Google Scholar
Neisser, H. (1946) Keynes as an Economist, Social Research, 13(2), pp. 225–35.Google Scholar
Neumann, F. (1953) The Social Sciences, in: Neumann, F., Peyre, H., Panofsy, E., Köhler, W., and Tillich, P., The Cultural Migration: The European Scholar in America (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press).Google Scholar
Alfred, S. (1953) The Scope and Function of the Department of Philosophy within the Graduate Faculty, in: Collected Papers, Vol. IV (Wagner, H., Psathas, G., and Kersten, F., Eds) (Dordrecht: Kluwer).Google Scholar
Speier, H. & Kähler, A. (Eds) (1939) War in Our Time (New York: W.W. Norton).Google Scholar
Yonay, Y. P. (1998) The Struggle over the Soul of Economics: Institutionalist and Neoclassical Economists in America between the Wars (Princeton: Princeton, NJ University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar