Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

FRIEDMAN’S NOBEL LECTURE AND THE PHILLIPS CURVE MYTH

Abstract

In his Nobel lecture, Friedman built on his earlier argument for a “natural rate of unemployment” by painting a picture of an economics profession which, as a result of foolish mistakes, had accepted the Phillips curve as offering a lasting trade-off between inflation and unemployment, and was thereby led to advocate a policy of inflation. It is argued here that, in fact, the orthodox economists of the time often did not accept Phillips’ analysis; almost no one made the mistakes in question; and very few advocated inflation on bases vulnerable to Friedman’s theoretical criticisms. The Phillips curve was put to various uses, but advocating inflation was hardly amongst them. It is suggested that one lasting result of the uncritical acceptance of Friedman’s history is to limit what appears to be within the reasonable range of views about macroeconomic policy.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Frank Brechling . 1968. “The Trade Off between Inflation and Unemployment.” Journal of Political Economy 76 (4, 2): 712–737.

Meghnad Desai . 1975. “The Phillips Curve: A Revisionist Interpretation.” Economica 42: 2–19.

James Forder . 2010. “The Historical Place of the ‘Friedman-Phelps’ Expectations Critique.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 17: 493–511.

Milton Friedman . 1977. “Nobel Lecture: Inflation and Unemployment.” Journal of Political Economy 85: 451–472.

Christopher L Gilbert . 1976. “The Original Phillips Curve Estimates.” Economica 43 (169): 51–57.

Robert J Gordon . 1971b. “Steady Anticipated Inflation: Mirage or Oasis?Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (2): 499–510.

Keith Griffin . 1962. “A Note on Wages, Prices and Unemployment.” Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Economics and Statistics 24 (3): 379–385.

Nicholas Kaldor . 1957. “A Model of Economic Growth.” Economic Journal 67 (268): 591–624.

Nicholas Kaldor . 1959a. “Economic Growth and the Problem of Inflation, Part 2.” Economica 26 (November): 287–298.

K. G. J. C. Knowles and C. B. Winsten 1959. “Can the Level of Unemployment Explain Changes in Wages?Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Economics and Statistics 21 (2): 113–120.

Edwin Kuh . 1967. “A Productivity Theory of Wage Levels—An Alternative to the Phillips Curve.” Review of Economic Studies 34: 333–360.

David E. W Laidler . 1971. “The Phillips Curve, Expectations and Incomes Policy.” In H. G. Johnson and A. R. Nobay , eds., The Current Inflation. London: Macmillan, pp. 75–98.

Robert Leeson . 1997a. “The Trade Off Interpretation of Phillips’s Dynamic Stabilization Exercise.” Economica 64 (253): 155–171.

Robert Leeson . 1997b. “The Political Economy of the Inflation–Unemployment Trade-off.” History of Political Economy 29 (1): 117–156.

Richard G Lipsey . 1960. “The Relation between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wage Rates in the United Kingdom, 1882–1957: A Further Analysis.” Economica 27: 1–31.

Richard G Lipsey . 1981. “The Understanding and Control of Inflation: Is There a Crisis in Macro-economics?Canadian Journal of Economics 14 (4): 545–576.

Richard G. Lipsey and M. D. Steuer 1961. “The Relation between Profits and Wage Rates.” Economica (May): 137–155.

Franco Modigliani and Ezio Tarantelli . 1973. “A Generalization of the Phillips Curve for a Developing Country.” Review of Economic Studies 40 (2): 203–223.

Maurice Peston . 1971. “The Microeconomics of the Phillips Curve.” In H. G. Johnson and A. R. Nobay , eds., The Current Inflation. London: Macmillan, pp. 125–142.

Edmund S Phelps . 1967. “Phillips Curves, Expectations of Inflation and Optimal Unemployment over Time.” Economica 34 (August): 254–281.

A. W. H. Phillips 1958. “The Relation between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wage Rates in the United Kingdom, 1861–1957.” Economica 25 (November): 283–299.

A. W. H. Phillips 1962. “Employment, Inflation and Growth.” Economica 29 (February): 1–16.

Albert Rees . 1970. “The Phillips Curve as a Menu for Policy Choice.” Economica 37 (August): 227–238.

Grant L Reuber . 1964. “The Objectives of Canadian Monetary Policy, 1949–1961: Empirical ’Trade-offs’ and the Reaction Function of the Authorities.” Journal of Political Economy 72 (109–132).

Guy Routh . 1959. “The Relation between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wage Rates: A Comment.” Economica 26 (104): 299–315.

James Tobin . 1972a. “Friedman’s Theoretical Framework.” Journal of Political Economy 80 (5): 1–18.

John Vanderkamp . 1966. “Wage and Price Level Determinants: An Empirical Model for Canada.” Economica 33 (May): 194–218.

Tsunehiko Watanabe . 1966. “Price Changes and the Rate of Change of Money Wage Earnings in Japan 1955–1962.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 31–47.

Nancy J Wulwick . 1987. “The Phillips Curve: Which? Whose? To Do What? How?Southern Economic Journal 53 (4): 834–857.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the History of Economic Thought
  • ISSN: 1053-8372
  • EISSN: 1469-9656
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-history-of-economic-thought
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 65 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 280 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.