Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa


  • Gabriel J. Zanotti (a1) and Nicolás Cachanosky (a2)

We argue that Fritz Machlup’s (1995) interpretation of Mises’s epistemology is at least as, if not more, plausible than Murray N. Rothbard’s (1957) interpretation. The implications of Machlup’s interpretation of Mises and of Austrian epistemology affect Austrians and non-Austrians in their academic interaction. Machlup’s interpretation shows that Austrian epistemology is well grounded in post-Popperian epistemology and that most criticisms of Austrian economics based on its aprioristic character are misplaced. Furthermore, Machlup’s interpretation provides us with a setting to rebuild the academic interaction between Austrians and non-Austrians that was characteristic of the early twentieth century.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Roger. E Backhouse . 2000. “Austrian Economics and the Mainstream: View from the Boundary.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3 (2): 3143.

Gary. S Becker . 1962. “Irrational Behavior and Economic Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 70 (1): 113.

Gary. S Becker . 1963. “Rational Action and Economic Theory: A Reply to I. Kirzner.” Journal of Political Economy 71 (1): 8283.

Gary. S Becker . 1993. “Nobel Lecture: The Economic Way of Looking at Behavior.” Journal of Political Economy 101 (3): 385409.

Mark Blaug . [1980] 1992. The Methodology of Economics: Or, How Economists Explain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Walter. E Block . 1999. “Austrian Theorizing: Recalling the Foundations.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 2 (4): 2139.

Walter. E Block . 2003. “Realism: Austrian vs. Neoclassical Economics, Reply to Caplan.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 6 (3): 6376.

Peter. J Boettke . 1997. “Where Did Economics Go Wrong? Modern Economics as a Flight from Reality.” Critical Review 11 (1): 1164.

Peter. J Boettke . 2010. “Is the Only Form of 'Reasonable Regulation' Self Regulation?: Lessons from Lin Ostrom on Regulating the Commons and Cultivating Citizens.” Public Choice 143 (3–4): 283291. doi:10.1007/s11127-010-9622-9.

Peter. J. Boettke , and Kyle W. O’Donnell . 2013. “The Failed Appropriation of F. A. Hayek by Formalist Economics.” Critical Review 25 (3–4): 305341.

Martin Bronfenbrenner . 1971. “The 'Structure of Revolutions' in Economic Thought.” History of Political Economy 3 (1): pp. 136151. doi:10.1215/00182702-3-1-136.

Ricardo J Caballero . 2010. “Macroeconomics after the Crisis: Time to Deal with the Pretense-of-Knowledge Syndrome.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (4): 85102. doi:10.1257/jep.24.4.85.

Nicolas Cachanosky . 2012. “The Mises-Hayek Business Cycle Theory, Fiat Currencies and Open Economies.” The Review of Austrian Economics 27 (3): 281299. doi:10.1007/s11138-012-0188-2.

Nicolas Cachanosky . 2014a. “The Effects of U.S. Monetary Policy on Colombia and Panama (2002–2007).” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 54 (3): 428436. doi:10.1016/j.qref.2014.03.003.

N. Cachanosky , and Alexander W. Salter . 2013. “The View from Vienna: An Analysis of the Renewed Interest in the Mises-Hayek Theory of the Business Cycle.” SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2363560.

Bruce J Caldwell . 1980a. “A Critique of Friedman’s Methodological Instrumentalism.” Southern Economic Journal 47 (2): 366374.

Bruce J Caldwell . 1980b. “Positivist Philosophy of Science and the Methodology of Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues XIV (1): 5376.

Bruce J Caldwell . 1984a. “Praxeology and Its Critics: An Appraisal.” History of Political Economy 16 (3): 363379.

Bruce J Caldwell . 1984b. “Some Problems with Falsification in Economics.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 14: 489495.

Bruce J Caldwell . 2009. “A Skirmish in the Popper Wars: Hutchison versus Caldwell on Hayek, Popper, Mises, and Methodology.” Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (3): 315324. doi:10.1080/13501780903129306.

Bruce J Caldwell . 2013. “Of Positivism and the History of Economic Thought.” Southern Economic Journal 79 (4): 753767.

Gene Callahan , and Steven G. Horwitz . 2010. “The Role of Ideal Types in Austrian Business Cycle Theory.” Advances in Austrian Economics 14: 205224. doi:10.1108/S1529-2134(2010)0000014013.

Bryan Caplan . 1999. “The Austrian Search for Realistic Foundations.” Southern Economic Journal 65 (4): 823838.

Bryan Caplan . 2003. “Probability and the Synthetic A Priori: A Reply to Block.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 6 (3): 7783.

Douglas W. Diamond , and Raghuram G. Rajan . 2012. “Illiquid Banks, Financial Stability, and Interest Rate Policy.” Journal of Political Economy 120 (3): 552591.

Abraham Hirsch . 1980. “The 'Assumptions' Controversy in Historical Perspesctive.” Journal of Economic Issues XIV (1): 99118.

Andreas Hoffmann . 2010. “An Overinvestment Cycle in Central and Eastern Europe?Metroeconomica 61 (4): 711734. doi:10.1111/j.1467-999X.2010.04103.x.

Hans-Hermann Hoppe . [1995] 2007. Economic Science and the Austrian Method. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Jörg G Hülsmann . 1999. “Economic Science and Neoclassicism.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 2 (4): 320.

Michael Hume , and Andrew Sentance . 2009. “The Global Credit Boom: Challenges for Macroeconomics and Policy.” Journal of International Money and Finance 28 (8): 14261461. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2009.08.009.

Israel M Kirzner . 1962. “Rational Action and Economic Theory.” The Journal of Political Economy 70 (4): 380385.

Israel M Kirzner . 1963. “Rational Action and Economic Theory: Rejoinder.” The Journal of Political Economy 71 (1): 8485.

Roger G Koppl . 2002. Big Players and the Economic Theory of Expectations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Thomas S Kuhn . [1962] 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Ludwig M Lachmann . 1943. “The Rôle of Expectations in Economics as a Social Science.” Economica 10 (37): 1223.

Don C Lavoie . 1986. “Euclideanism versus Hermeneutics: A Re-integration of Misesian Apriorism.” In I. Kirzner , ed., Subjectivism, Intelligibility and Economic Understanding. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 192210.

Don C Lavoie . 2011. “The Interpretive Dimension of Economics: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxeology.” The Review of Austrian Economics 24 (2): 91128. doi:10.1007/s11138-010-0137-x.

Peter T Leeson . 2006. “Efficient Anarchy.” Public Choice 130 (12): 4153. doi:10.1007/s11127-006-9071-7.

Peter T Leeson . 2007a. “An-arrgh-chy: The Law and Economics of Pirate Organization.” Journal of Political Economy 115 (6): 10491094. doi:10.1086/526403.

Peter T Leeson . 2007b. “Better off Stateless: Somalia Before and After Government Collapse.” Journal of Comparative Economics 35 (4): 689710. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2007.10.001.

Peter T Leeson . 2008. “How Important Is State Enforcement for Trade?American Law and Economics Review 10 (1): 6189. doi:10.1093/aler/ahn003.

Peter T Leeson . 2009a. “The Calculus of Piratical Consent: The Myth of the Myth of Social Contract.” Public Choice 139 (34): 443459. doi:10.1007/s11127-009-9403-5.

Peter T Leeson . 2009b. “The Laws of Lawlessness.” The Journal of Legal Studies 38 (2): 471503. doi:10.1086/592003.

Peter T Leeson . 2012. “An Austrian Approach to Law and Economics, with Special Reference to Superstition.” The Review of Austrian Economics 25 (3): 185198. doi:10.1007/s11138-012-0179-3.

Peter T. Leeson , and P. J. Boettke . 2006. “Was Mises Right?Review of Social Economy 64 (2): 247265. doi:10.1080/00346760600721163.

Axel Leijonhufvud . 2009. “Out of the Corridor: Keynes and the Crisis.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 33 (4): 741757. doi:10.1093/cje/bep022.

Peter Lewin . 1997. “Hayekian Equilibrium and Change.” Journal of Economic Methodology 4 (2): 245266.

Fritz Machlup . 1955. “The Problem of Verification in Economics.” Southern Economic Journal 22 (1): 121.

Ludwig von Mises . 1943. “'Elastic Expectations' and the Austrian Theory of the Trade Cycle.” Economica 10 (39): 251252.

Alan Musgrave . 1981. “'Unreal Assumptions' in Economic Theory: The F-Twist Untwisted.” Kyklos 34 (3): 377387.

Robert Nola , and Howard Sankey . 2000. After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend: Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method. Norwell, MA: Klewer Academic Publishers.

Robert Nozick . 1977. “On Austrian Methodology.” Synthese 36 (3): 353392.

Benjamin W. Powell , Ryan Ford , and Alex Nowrasteh . 2008. “Somalia after State Collapse: Chaos or Improvement?Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 67 (3–4): 657670. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2008.04.008.

Benjamin W. Powell , and Edward P. Stringham . 2009. “Public Choice and the Economic Analysis of Anarchy: A Survey.” Public Choice 140: 503538. doi:10.1007/s11127-009-9407-1.

Benjamin W Powell . 2012. “Radical Scholarship Taking on the Mainstream: Murray Rothbard’s Contribution.” The Review of Austrian Economics 25 (4): 315327. doi:10.1007/s11138-011-0167-z.

Matthew Rognlie , Andrei Shleifer , and Alp Simsek . “Investment Hangover and the Great Recession.” Working paper. Accessed 23 November 2014.

Sherwin Rosen . 1997. “Austrian and Neoclassical Economics: Any Gains From Trade?Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (4): 139152.

Murray N Rothbard . 1957. “In Defense of 'Extreme Apriorism.'” Southern Economic Journal 23 (3): 314320.

Larry J Sechrest . 1997. “Austrian and Monetarist Business Cycle Theories: Substitutes or Complements?Advances in Austrian Economics 4: 731.

Parth J Shah . 1997. “The Theory of Business Fluctuations: New Keynesians, Old Monetarists, and Austrians.” Advances in Austrian Economics 4: 3362.

D. B Skarbek . 2014. The Social Order of the Underworld. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Edward P Stringham . 2003. “The Extralegal Development of Securities Trading in Seventeenth-century Amsterdam.” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 43 (2): 321344. doi:10.1016/S1062-9769(02)00153-9.

Edward P. Stringham , and R. Gonzales . 2009. “The Role of Empirical Assumptions in Economic Analysis: On Facts and Counterfactuals in Economic Law.” Journal Des Economistes et Des Etudes Humaines 15 (1): 111. doi:10.2202/1145-6396.1218.

Leland B Yeager . 1997. “Austrian Economics, Neoclassicism, and the Market Test.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (4): 153165.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the History of Economic Thought
  • ISSN: 1053-8372
  • EISSN: 1469-9656
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-history-of-economic-thought
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 18 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 342 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.