Skip to main content
×
Home

IMPLICATIONS OF MACHLUP’S INTERPRETATION OF MISES’S EPISTEMOLOGY

  • Gabriel J. Zanotti (a1) and Nicolás Cachanosky (a2)
Abstract

We argue that Fritz Machlup’s (1995) interpretation of Mises’s epistemology is at least as, if not more, plausible than Murray N. Rothbard’s (1957) interpretation. The implications of Machlup’s interpretation of Mises and of Austrian epistemology affect Austrians and non-Austrians in their academic interaction. Machlup’s interpretation shows that Austrian epistemology is well grounded in post-Popperian epistemology and that most criticisms of Austrian economics based on its aprioristic character are misplaced. Furthermore, Machlup’s interpretation provides us with a setting to rebuild the academic interaction between Austrians and non-Austrians that was characteristic of the early twentieth century.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Artigas Mariano. 1998. Lógica y Etica en Karl Popper. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra.
Backhouse Roger. E. 2000. “Austrian Economics and the Mainstream: View from the Boundary.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3 (2): 3143.
Becker Gary. S. 1962. “Irrational Behavior and Economic Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 70 (1): 113.
Becker Gary. S. 1963. “Rational Action and Economic Theory: A Reply to I. Kirzner.” Journal of Political Economy 71 (1): 8283.
Becker Gary. S. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Becker Gary. S. 1993. “Nobel Lecture: The Economic Way of Looking at Behavior.” Journal of Political Economy 101 (3): 385409.
Bird Alexander. 2008. “The Historical Turn in the Philosophy of Science.” In Psillos S. and Curd M., eds., The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge, pp. 7989.
Blaug Mark. [1980] 1992. The Methodology of Economics: Or, How Economists Explain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Block Walter. E. 1999. “Austrian Theorizing: Recalling the Foundations.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 2 (4): 2139.
Block Walter. E. 2003. “Realism: Austrian vs. Neoclassical Economics, Reply to Caplan.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 6 (3): 6376.
Boettke Peter. J. 1997. “Where Did Economics Go Wrong? Modern Economics as a Flight from Reality.” Critical Review 11 (1): 1164.
Boettke Peter. J. 1998. “Introduction.” In Boettke P. J., ed., The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 16.
Boettke Peter. J. 2005. “Anarchism as a Progressive Research Program in Political Economy.” In Stringham E. P., ed., Anarchy, State and Public Choice. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 206219.
Boettke Peter. J. 2010. “Is the Only Form of 'Reasonable Regulation' Self Regulation?: Lessons from Lin Ostrom on Regulating the Commons and Cultivating Citizens.” Public Choice 143 (3–4): 283291. doi:10.1007/s11127-010-9622-9.
Boettke Peter. J. 2011. “Anarchism and Austrian Economics.” New Perspectives on Political Economy 7 (1): 125140.
Boettke Peter. J., and Leeson Peter. T.. 2006a. “Introduction: The Economist as System Builder: Ludwig von Mises as the Architect of Economic Science and Political Economy.” In Boettke P. J. and Leeson P. T., eds., The Legacy of Ludwig von Mises. Volume 1. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. xixx.
Boettke Peter. J., and Leeson Peter. T.. 2006b. “Introduction: Understanding the Economic World: Applications of Misesian Theory.” In Boettke P. J. and Leeson P. T., eds.,The Legacy of Ludwig von Mises. Volume 2. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. ixxiii.
Boettke Peter. J., and O’Donnell Kyle W.. 2013. “The Failed Appropriation of F. A. Hayek by Formalist Economics.” Critical Review 25 (3–4): 305341.
Boland Lawrence A. (1979). “A Critique of Friedman’s Critics.” Journal of Economic Literature XVII (June): 503522.
Borio Claudio, and Disyatat Piti. 2011. “Global Imbalances and the Financial Crisis: Link or No Link?BIS Working Paper No. 346.
Bronfenbrenner Martin. 1971. “The 'Structure of Revolutions' in Economic Thought.” History of Political Economy 3 (1): pp. 136151. doi:10.1215/00182702-3-1-136.
Caballero Ricardo J. 2010. “Macroeconomics after the Crisis: Time to Deal with the Pretense-of-Knowledge Syndrome.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (4): 85102. doi:10.1257/jep.24.4.85.
Cachanosky Nicolas. 2012. “The Mises-Hayek Business Cycle Theory, Fiat Currencies and Open Economies.” The Review of Austrian Economics 27 (3): 281299. doi:10.1007/s11138-012-0188-2.
Cachanosky Nicolas. 2014a. “The Effects of U.S. Monetary Policy on Colombia and Panama (2002–2007).” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 54 (3): 428436. doi:10.1016/j.qref.2014.03.003.
Cachanosky Nicolas. 2014b. Implications of Hayek's Knowledge Problem. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2436649 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2436649.
Cachanosky N., and Salter Alexander W.. 2013. “The View from Vienna: An Analysis of the Renewed Interest in the Mises-Hayek Theory of the Business Cycle.” SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2363560.
Caldwell Bruce J. 1980a. “A Critique of Friedman’s Methodological Instrumentalism.” Southern Economic Journal 47 (2): 366374.
Caldwell Bruce J. 1980b. “Positivist Philosophy of Science and the Methodology of Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues XIV (1): 5376.
Caldwell Bruce J. 1984a. “Praxeology and Its Critics: An Appraisal.” History of Political Economy 16 (3): 363379.
Caldwell Bruce J. 1984b. “Some Problems with Falsification in Economics.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 14: 489495.
Caldwell Bruce J. 2004. Hayek’s Challenge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Caldwell Bruce J. 2009. “A Skirmish in the Popper Wars: Hutchison versus Caldwell on Hayek, Popper, Mises, and Methodology.” Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (3): 315324. doi:10.1080/13501780903129306.
Caldwell Bruce J. 2013. “Of Positivism and the History of Economic Thought.” Southern Economic Journal 79 (4): 753767.
Caldwell Bruce J., and Coats Alfred W.. 1984. “The Rhetoric of Economists: A Comment on McCloskey.” Journal of Economic Literature 22 (2): 575578.
Callahan Gene. 2008. “Economics and Its Modes.” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 14 (2): 128157.
Callahan Gene, and Horwitz Steven G.. 2010. “The Role of Ideal Types in Austrian Business Cycle Theory.” Advances in Austrian Economics 14: 205224. doi:10.1108/S1529-2134(2010)0000014013.
Calvo Guillermo A. 2013. “Puzzling Over the Anatomy of Crises: Liquidity and the Veil of Finance.” IMES Discussion Paper Series (13-E-09).
Caplan Bryan. 1999. “The Austrian Search for Realistic Foundations.” Southern Economic Journal 65 (4): 823838.
Caplan Bryan. 2001. “Probability, Common Sense, and Realism: A Reply to Hulsmann and Block.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 4 (2): 6986.
Caplan Bryan. 2003. “Probability and the Synthetic A Priori: A Reply to Block.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 6 (3): 7783.
Carrier Martin. 2012. “Historical Approaches: Kuhn, Lakatos and Feyerabend.” In Robert Brown James, ed., Philosophy of Science: Key Thinkers. New York and London: Continuum International Publishing Group, pp. 132151.
Champion Rafe 2011. “Defence of Fallible Apriorism.” Nuova Civilta Delle Machine 1–2: 6988.
Devlin Keith. [1988] 2002. El Lenguaje de las Matemáticas. Translated by P. Crespo. Barcelona: Ediciones Reinbook.
Diamond Douglas W., and Rajan Raghuram G.. 2012. “Illiquid Banks, Financial Stability, and Interest Rate Policy.” Journal of Political Economy 120 (3): 552591.
Di Iorio Francesco. 2008. “Apriorism and Fallabilism: Mises and Popper on the Explanation of Action and Social Phenomena.” Nuova Civilta Delle Machine XXVI (4): 532.
Doherty Brian. 2007. Radicals for Capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.
Egger John B. 1978. “The Austrian Method.” In Spadaro L. M., ed., New Directions in Austrian Economics. Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, pp. 1939.
Evans Anthony J., and Tarko V.. 2014. “Contemporary Work in Austrian Economics.” Journal of Private Enterprise 29 (Fall): 135157.
Feyerabend Paul. [1975] 2010. Against Method. London and New York: Verso.
Gallo Ezequiel L. 1987. “La Tradición del Orden Social Espontáneo: Adam Ferguson, David Hume y Adam Smith.” Libertas 6 (Mayo): 131153.
Garrison Roger W. [2001] 2002.. Time and Money. The Macroeconomics of Capital Structure. Edited by Rizzo M. J. and White L. H.. London and New York: Routledge.
Hayek Friedrich A. 1933. Monetary Theory and the Trade Cycle. Translated by N. Kaldor and H. M. Croome. New York: Sentry Press.
Hayek Friedrich A. [1948] 1958.. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hayek Friedrich A. [1931] 1967. Prices and Production. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
Hempel Carl. 1966. The Function of General Laws in History. Philosophy of Natural Science. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hirsch Abraham. 1980. “The 'Assumptions' Controversy in Historical Perspesctive.” Journal of Economic Issues XIV (1): 99118.
Hoffmann Andreas. 2010. “An Overinvestment Cycle in Central and Eastern Europe?Metroeconomica 61 (4): 711734. doi:10.1111/j.1467-999X.2010.04103.x.
Hoppe Hans-Hermann. [1995] 2007. Economic Science and the Austrian Method. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Horwitz Steven G. 2001. “From Smith to Menger to Hayek. Liberalism in the Spontaneous-Order Tradition.” The Independent Review 6 (1): 8197.
Horwitz Steven G. 2012. “The Empirics of Austrian Economics.” Cato Unbound: A Journal of Debate (September). http://www.cato-unbound.org/2012/09/05/steven-horwitz/empirics-austrian-economics. Accessed 23 November 2014.
Hülsmann Jörg G. 1999. “Economic Science and Neoclassicism.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 2 (4): 320.
Hülsmann Jörg G. 2003. “Facts and Counterfacts in Economic Law.” The Journal of Libertarian Studies 17 (1): 57102.
Hume Michael, and Sentance Andrew. 2009. “The Global Credit Boom: Challenges for Macroeconomics and Policy.” Journal of International Money and Finance 28 (8): 14261461. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2009.08.009.
Hutchison Terence W. [1938] 1965. Significance and Basic Postulates of Economic Theory. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
Kirzner Israel M. 1962. “Rational Action and Economic Theory.” The Journal of Political Economy 70 (4): 380385.
Kirzner Israel M. 1963. “Rational Action and Economic Theory: Rejoinder.” The Journal of Political Economy 71 (1): 8485.
Kirzner Israel M. 1976. “On the Method of Austrian Economics.” In Dolan E., ed., The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics. Kansas City: Sheed and Ward, Inc., pp. 4051.
Kohn Meir. 2004. “Value and Exchange.” Cato Journal 24 (3): 303339.
Koppl Roger G. 2002. Big Players and the Economic Theory of Expectations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kuhn Thomas S. [1962] 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lachmann Ludwig M. 1943. “The Rôle of Expectations in Economics as a Social Science.” Economica 10 (37): 1223.
Lakatos Imre. [1978] 1999.. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Edited by Worral J. and Currie G.. Volume I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langlois Richard N., and Koppl R. G.. 1991. “Fritz Machlup and Marginalism: A Reevaluation.” Methodus 3 (2): 86102.
Lavoie Don C. 1986. “Euclideanism versus Hermeneutics: A Re-integration of Misesian Apriorism.” In Kirzner I., ed., Subjectivism, Intelligibility and Economic Understanding. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 192210.
Lavoie Don C. 2011. “The Interpretive Dimension of Economics: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxeology.” The Review of Austrian Economics 24 (2): 91128. doi:10.1007/s11138-010-0137-x.
Leeson Peter T. 2006. “Efficient Anarchy.” Public Choice 130 (12): 4153. doi:10.1007/s11127-006-9071-7.
Leeson Peter T. 2007a. “An-arrgh-chy: The Law and Economics of Pirate Organization.” Journal of Political Economy 115 (6): 10491094. doi:10.1086/526403.
Leeson Peter T. 2007b. “Better off Stateless: Somalia Before and After Government Collapse.” Journal of Comparative Economics 35 (4): 689710. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2007.10.001.
Leeson Peter T. 2008. “How Important Is State Enforcement for Trade?American Law and Economics Review 10 (1): 6189. doi:10.1093/aler/ahn003.
Leeson Peter T. 2009a. “The Calculus of Piratical Consent: The Myth of the Myth of Social Contract.” Public Choice 139 (34): 443459. doi:10.1007/s11127-009-9403-5.
Leeson Peter T. 2009b. “The Laws of Lawlessness.” The Journal of Legal Studies 38 (2): 471503. doi:10.1086/592003.
Leeson Peter T. 2012. “An Austrian Approach to Law and Economics, with Special Reference to Superstition.” The Review of Austrian Economics 25 (3): 185198. doi:10.1007/s11138-012-0179-3.
Leeson Peter T., and Boettke P. J.. 2006. “Was Mises Right?Review of Social Economy 64 (2): 247265. doi:10.1080/00346760600721163.
Leijonhufvud Axel. 2009. “Out of the Corridor: Keynes and the Crisis.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 33 (4): 741757. doi:10.1093/cje/bep022.
Lewin Peter. 1997. “Hayekian Equilibrium and Change.” Journal of Economic Methodology 4 (2): 245266.
Machlup Fritz. 1955. “The Problem of Verification in Economics.” Southern Economic Journal 22 (1): 121.
Maclean Gillis. 1980. “Fritz Machlup’s Quasi-Subjectivism: An Uneasy Marriage Between Austrian Economics and Logical Empirism.” History of Economics Review 14 (1): 8393.
McCloskey Donald N. 1983. “The Rhetoric of Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 21 (2): 481517.
Mill John Stuart. [1848] 1965. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Volume III, The Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy (Books III–V and Appendices). Edited by Robson J. M.. Toronto and London: University of Toronto Press and Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Mises Ludwig von. 1943. “'Elastic Expectations' and the Austrian Theory of the Trade Cycle.” Economica 10 (39): 251252.
Mises Ludwig von. 1962. The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science. Princeton: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc.
Mises Ludwig von. [1912] 1981. The Theory of Money and Credit. Translated by H. E. Batson. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Mises Ludwig von. [1949] 1996. Human Action. Irvington-on-Hudson: The Foundation for Economic Education.
Mises Ludwig von. [1933] 2003. Epistemological Problems of Economics. Auburn: The Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Musgrave Alan. 1981. “'Unreal Assumptions' in Economic Theory: The F-Twist Untwisted.” Kyklos 34 (3): 377387.
Nagel Ernest. 1963. “Assumptions in Economic Theory.” The American Economic Review 53 (2): 211219.
Nola Robert, and Sankey Howard. 2000. After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend: Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method. Norwell, MA: Klewer Academic Publishers.
Nozick Robert. 1977. “On Austrian Methodology.” Synthese 36 (3): 353392.
Popper Karl. R. 1974. “Reply to My Critics.” In Schilpp P. A., ed., The Philosophy of Karl Popper. Volume XIV. La Salle: Open Court, pp. 9611197.
Popper Karl. R. 1983. Realism and the Aim of Science. Edited by Bartley W. W. III. Volume 1, Postscript to the Logic of Scientific Discovery III. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
Mises , Ludwig von. [1935] 2002a. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge.
Mises , Ludwig von. [1957] 2002b. The Poverty of Historicism. New York: Routledge.
Mises , Ludwig von. [1963] 2002c. Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge.
Powell Benjamin W., and Coyne Christopher J.. 2003. “Do Pessimistic Assumptions about Human Behavior Justify Government?The Journal of Libertarian Studies 17 (4): 1737.
Powell Benjamin W., Ford Ryan, and Nowrasteh Alex. 2008. “Somalia after State Collapse: Chaos or Improvement?Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 67 (3–4): 657670. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2008.04.008.
Powell Benjamin W., and Stringham Edward P.. 2009. “Public Choice and the Economic Analysis of Anarchy: A Survey.” Public Choice 140: 503538. doi:10.1007/s11127-009-9407-1.
Powell Benjamin W. 2012. “Radical Scholarship Taking on the Mainstream: Murray Rothbard’s Contribution.” The Review of Austrian Economics 25 (4): 315327. doi:10.1007/s11138-011-0167-z.
Rizzo Mario J. 1978. “Praxeology and Econometrics: A Critique of Positivist Economics.” In Spadaro L. M., ed., New Directions in Austrian Economics. Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, pp. 4056.
Rizzo Mario J. 1983. “Mises and Lakatos: A Reformulation of Austrian Methodology.” In Kirzner I. M., ed., Method, Process, and Austrian Economics. Essays in Honor of Ludwig von Mises. Lexington: Lexington Books, pp. 5374.
Robbins Lionel. [1932] 1945. An Essay on the Nature & Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan and Co., Limited.
Robbins Lionel. [1934] 1971. The Great Depression. Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press.
Rognlie Matthew, Shleifer Andrei, and Simsek Alp. “Investment Hangover and the Great Recession.” Working paper. http://scholar.harvard.edu/shleifer/publications/investment-hangover-and-great-recession. Accessed 23 November 2014.
Rosen Sherwin. 1997. “Austrian and Neoclassical Economics: Any Gains From Trade?Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (4): 139152.
Rothbard Murray N. 1951. “Praxeology: Reply to Mr. Schuller.” The American Economic Review 41 (5): 943946. doi:10.1126/science.151.3712.867-a.
Rothbard Murray N. 1957. “In Defense of 'Extreme Apriorism.'” Southern Economic Journal 23 (3): 314320.
Rothbard Murray N. 1976. “Praxeology: The Method of Austrian Economics.” In Dolan E. G., ed., The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics. Kansas City: Sheed and Ward, Inc., pp. 1939.
Sarjanovic Ivo A. 2008. “Popper y los Austriacos: Atando Cabos.” Revista de Instituciones, Ideas Y Mercados 48 (Mayo): 1732.
Schütz Alfred. 1953. “Common-Sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research XIV (1): 138.
Schütz Alfred. 1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Schütz Alfred, and Wagner Helmuth R.. 1970. On Phenomenology and Social Relations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Sechrest Larry J. 1997. “Austrian and Monetarist Business Cycle Theories: Substitutes or Complements?Advances in Austrian Economics 4: 731.
Selgin George. A. 1990. Praxeology and Understanding. Auburn: The Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Senior Nassau W. [1850] 1854. Political Economy. London and Glasgow: Richard Griffin and Co.
Shah Parth J. 1997. “The Theory of Business Fluctuations: New Keynesians, Old Monetarists, and Austrians.” Advances in Austrian Economics 4: 3362.
Skarbek D. B. 2014. The Social Order of the Underworld. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith Barry 1990. “On the Austriannes of Austrian Economics.” Critical Review 4 (1–2): 212238.
Stringham Edward P. 2002. “The Emergence of the London Stock Exchange as a Self-Policing Club.” Journal of Private Enterprise 17 (2): 119.
Stringham Edward P. 2003. “The Extralegal Development of Securities Trading in Seventeenth-century Amsterdam.” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 43 (2): 321344. doi:10.1016/S1062-9769(02)00153-9.
Stringham Edward P., and Gonzales R.. 2009. “The Role of Empirical Assumptions in Economic Analysis: On Facts and Counterfactuals in Economic Law.” Journal Des Economistes et Des Etudes Humaines 15 (1): 111. doi:10.2202/1145-6396.1218.
White William R. 2009. “Modern Macroeconomics Is on the Wrong Track.” Finance & Development (December): 1518.
Yeager Leland B. 1997. “Austrian Economics, Neoclassicism, and the Market Test.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (4): 153165.
Young Andrew T. Forthcoming. “Austrian Business Cycle Theory: A Modern Appraisal.” In Boettke P. J. and Coyne C. J., eds., Oxford Handbook of Austrian Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zanotti Gabriel J. 2006. “Feyerabend en Serio.” In Dolfi M., ed., Homenaje a Alberto Moreno. Volume V. Buenos Aires: Eudeba, pp. 85198.
Zanotti Gabriel J. 2007. “Intersubjectivity, Subjectivism, Social Sciences, and the Austrian School of Economics.” Journal of Markets & Morality 10 (1): 115141.
Zanotti Gabriel J. 2009. “Thomas Kuhn: el paso de la racionalidad algorítmica a la racionalidad hermenéutica.” Revista de Análisis Institucional 3: 156.
Zanotti Gabriel J. 2011. Conocimiento versus Información. Madrid: Union Editorial.
Zanotti Gabriel J. 2014. “Modelos y Escuela Austriaca: Una Fusión entre Friedman y La Escuela Austriaca Pasando por Mäki.” Unpublished manuscript.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the History of Economic Thought
  • ISSN: 1053-8372
  • EISSN: 1469-9656
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-history-of-economic-thought
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 27 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 430 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.