Skip to main content
×
×
Home

LATE SPANISH DOCTORS ON USURY, AND THE EVOLVING SCHOLASTIC TRADITION

  • Fabio Monsalve (a1)
Abstract

The scholastic intellectual tradition was the dominant scientific paradigm for nearly five centuries in western Europe. That the economic issues of interest to these scholars were similar throughout the period is undisputable, but were the individual views on these issues also similar? This is a pertinent question, upon which an evaluation of the evolution of this intellectual tradition, which often has been considered as monolithic, can be based.

This paper focuses on the analysis of the so-called “natural law case” against usury, and tracks how the lines of intellectual reasoning subtly evolved between early and late scholastics. While the issues, methods, and purposes of scholastic thought remained the same in this period, there also was a systematic evolution within this tradition that makes the essence of the scholastic doctrines conformable to economic realities.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Aristotle, . 1999a. Nichomachean Ethics. Kitchener: Batoche Books.
Aristotle, . 1999b. Politics. Kitchener: Batoche Books.
Auxerre, William of. 1500. Summa aurea in quattuor libros Sententiarum. Paris: Philippus Pigouchet impens. Nicolai Vaultier et Durandi Gerlier.
Ceccarelli, Giovanni. 2001. “Risky Business: Theological and Canonical Thought on Insurance from the Thirteenth to the Seventeenth Century.” Journal of Medieval & Early Modern Studies 31 (3): 607.
Clavero, Bartolome. 1984. Usura: del uso económico de la religión en la historia. Madrid: Tecnos.
Chafuen, Alejandro Antonio. 2003. Faith and Liberty : The Economic Thought of the Late Scholastics. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Daston, Lorraine. 1988. Classical Probability in the Enlightenment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
De Roover, Raymond. 1971. La Pensée Économique des Scolastiques: Doctrines et Méthodes. Montréal: Inst. d’Études Médiévales.
Decock, Wim. 2009. “Lessius and the Breakdown of the Scholastic Paradigm.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 31 (1): 5778.
Decock, Wim. 2012. Theologians and Contract Law: The Moral Transformation of the Ius Commune (ca. 1500–1650). Leiden, Boston: M. Nijhoff Publishers.
Dempsey, Bernard W. 1935. “The Historical Emergence of Quantity Theory.” Quaterly Journal of Economics 50: 174184.
Dempsey, Bernard. 1948. Interest and Usury. London: Dennis Dobson Ltd.
Glaeser, Edward L., and Scheinkman, José. 1998. “Neither a Borrower nor a Lender Be: An Economic Analysis of Interest Restrictions and Usury Laws.” Journal of Law & Economics 41 (1): 136.
Gómez Camacho, Francisco. 1981. “Introducción a Luis de Molina, La Teoría del Justo Precio.” In Molina, La Teoría del Justo Precio. Madrid: Editora Nacional, pp. 3435.
Gómez Camacho, Francisco. 1998. “Later Scholastics: Spanish Economic Thought in the XVIth and XVIIth Centuries.” In Lowry, T. and Gordon, B., eds., Ancient and Medieval Economic Ideas and Concepts of Social Justice. Leiden: E.J. Brill, pp. 503560.
Gómez Camacho, Francisco. 2005. “Treatise on Money by Luis de Molina: Introduction and Text.” Journal of Markets and Morality 8 (1): 167198.
Gordon, Barry J. 1975. Economic Analysis before Adam Smith: Hesiod to Lessius. New York: Barnes & Noble Books.
Koyama, Mark. 2010. “Evading the ‘Taint of Usury’: The Usury Prohibition as a Barrier to Entry.” Explorations in Economic History 47 (4): 420442.
Langholm, Odd Inge. 1984. The Aristotelian Analysis of Usury. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Langholm, Odd Inge. 1992. Economics in the Medieval Schools: Wealth, Exchange, Value, Money, and Usury according to the Paris Theological Tradition, 1200–1350. Leiden, New York: E.J. Brill.
Langholm, Odd Inge. 1998. The Legacy of Scholasticism in Economic Thought: Antecedents of Choice and Power. Cambridge, UK, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lapidus, André. 1991. “Information and Risk in the Medieval Doctrine of Usury during the Thirteenth Century.” In Barber, W. J., ed., Perspectives on the History of Economic Thought. London: Edward Elgar, pp. 2338.
Lapidus, André. 1994. “Norm, Virtue and Information: The Just Price and Individual Behavior in Thomas Aquinas’ Summa Theologiae.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 1 (3): 435473.
Lessius, Leonardus. 1605. De iustitia et iure. Louanii: Ex officina Ioannis Masij, Typ. Iur.
Lugo, Juan de. [1642] 1848. De Iustitia et Iure. In Vivés, L., ed., Disputationes Scholasticae et Morales. Lyon: Vivés.
Molina, Luis de. [1597] 1989. Tratado Sobre los Préstamos y la Usura. Madrid: ICI, Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.
Monsalve, Fabio. 2002. “El pensamiento económico de Juan de Lugo. Un estudio sobre sus teorías del precio justo, del dinero y del interés. PhD diss., Universidad de Castilla-la Mancha, Albacete.
Monsalve, Fabio. 2010. “Economics and Ethics: Juan de Lugo’s Theory of the Just Price, or the Responsibility of Living in Society.” History of Political Economy 42 (3): 495519.
Monsalve, Fabio. 2012. “Scholastic Just Price versus Current Market Price: Is it Merely a Matter of Labelling?The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought: 117. DOI:10.1080/09672567.2012.683019.
Monsalve, Fabio, and Dejuán, Oscar. 2006. “Juan de Lugo y la Libertad en Economía: El Análisis Económico Escolástico en Transición.” Procesos de Mercado 3 (2): 217244.
Nelson, Benjamin. 1969. The Idea of Usury, from Tribal Brotherhood to Universal Otherhood. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Noonan, John Thomas. 1957. The Scholastic Analysis of Usury. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Reed, Clyde G., and Bekar, Cliff T.. 2003. “Religious Prohibitions against Usury.” Explorations in Economic History 40 (4): 347.
Schumpeter, Joseph Alois. 1994. History of Economic Analysis. London: Routledge.
Thomas Aquinas, St. [1270] 1947. “Summa theologica.” New York: Benziger Bros.
Van Houdt, T. 1998. “‘Lack of Money’: A Reappraisal of Lessius’ Contribution to the Scholastic Analysis of Money-lending and Interest-taking.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 5 (1): 135.
Viner, Jacob. 1978. “Religious Thought and Economic Society: Four Chapters of an Unfinished Work.” History of Political Economy 10 (1): 1192.
Wood, Diane. 2002. Medieval Economic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the History of Economic Thought
  • ISSN: 1053-8372
  • EISSN: 1469-9656
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-history-of-economic-thought
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed