Skip to main content
×
Home

A Smithean Perspective on Increasing Returns

  • James M. Buchanan (a1) and Yong J. Yoon (a1)
Abstract

Despite its recent re-emergence to analytical importance, the phenomenon of increasing returns remains outside the central core of neoclassical economics. The history of this idea (or set of ideas) might have been quite different if Adam Smith's explanation of the origins of trade had not been replaced by that of David Ricardo. To Adam Smith, mutually beneficial exchange emerges because of specialization, which, in its turn, implies the presence of increasing returns to the size of the exchange nexus. Even in a world of equals, trade offers mutuality of gain. There is no need for participants in the economic nexus to differ one from another. In the Ricardian logic, by contrast, trade presumably emerges because productive resources differ in their capacities to create economic value, at least among separate “goods.” Specialization is a “natural” feature of resource endowments—a feature that is exploited by trade. Comparative advantage ensures the mutuality of gain. But, in this explanation, there is no direct linkage between the size of the exchange network and the degree of specialization that is viable. There is no need to introduce increasing returns. Comparative advantage may be present even if there are constant returns to scale, both for the economy and for its separate productive sectors.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Arthur W. Brian. 1994. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Borland Jeffrey I. and Yang Xiaokai. 1992. “Specialization and a New Approach to Economic Organization and Growth.” American Economic Review 82 (05): 386–91.
Buchanan James M. 1992. “The Supply of Labour and the Extent of the Market.” In Fry Michael, ed., Adam Smith's Legacy: His Place in the Development of Modern Economics. London: Routledge.
Buchanan James M. and Yoon Yong J., eds. 1994a. Return to Increasing Returns. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Buchanan James M. and Yoon Yong J., eds. 1994b. “Increasing Returns, Parametric Work-Supply Adjustment, and the Work Ethic.” In Return to Increasing Returns. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Buchanan James M. and Yoon Yong J.. 1995. “Constitutional Implications of Alternative Models of Increasing Returns.” Constitutional Political Economy 6 (Winter): 193–98.
Buchanan James M. and Yoon Yong J.. 1999. “Generalized Increasing Returns, Euler's Theorem, and Competitive Equilibrium.” History of Political Economy 31 (Fall): 511–23.
Chamberlin Edward H. 1933. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Dixit Avinash K. and Stiglitz Joseph. 1977. “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity.” American Economic Review 67 (06): 297308.
Ethier Wilfred J. 1982. “National and International Returns to Scale in the Modern Theory of International Trade.” American Economic Review 72 (06): 389405.
Fleming J. Marcus. 1955. “External Economies and the Doctrine of Balanced Growth.” Economic Journal 65 (06): 241–56.
Kaldor Nicholas. 1972. “The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics.” Economic Journal 82 (12): 1237–55.
Kaldor Nicholas. 1985. “Interregional Trade and Cumulative Causation.” In Economics without Equilibrium, the Okun Lectures. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Krugman Paul R. 1979. “Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade.” Journal of International Economics 9 (11): 469–79.
Krugman Paul R. 1987. “Is Free Trade Passé?Journal of Economic Perspectives 1 (Fall): 131–41.
Krugman Paul R. 1992. “Does the New Trade Theory Require a New Trade Policy?The World Economy 15 (07): 423–41.
Lucas Robert E. Jr. 1988. “On the Mechanics of Economic Development.” Journal of Monetary Economics 22 (07): 342.
Marshall Alfred. 1890. Principles of Economics, 9th variorum edn., 2 vols., edited by Guillebaud C. W.. London: Macmillan, 1961.
Reid Gavin. 1989. Classical Economic Growth. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ricardo David. 1953. The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, vol. 1, The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, edited by Sraffa Piero. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Romer Paul. 1987. “Growth Based on Increasing Returns Due to Specialization.” American Economic Review 77 (05): 5662.
Romer Paul. 1990. “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98 (10): S71102.
Rosenstein-Rodan Paul N. 1943. “Problems of Industrialisation of Eastern and South-eastern Europe.” Economic Journal 53 (0609): 202–11.
Smith Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and the Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Modern Library edn. New York: Random House, 1937.
Sraffa Piero. 1926. “The Laws of Returns under Competitive Conditions.” Economic Journal 36 (12): 535–50.
Yang Xiaokai and Ng Yew-Kwang. 1993. Specialization and Economic Organization: A New Classical Microeconomic Framework. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Yang Xiaokai and Ng Siang. 1994. “Specialization and Division of Labor: A Survey.” Department of Banking and Finance and Department of Economics, Monash University, Victoria, Australia, working paper.
Young Allyn. 1928. “Increasing Returns and Economic Progress.” Economic Journal 38 (12): 527–42.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the History of Economic Thought
  • ISSN: 1053-8372
  • EISSN: 1469-9656
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-history-of-economic-thought
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 20 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 236 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.