Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T10:09:33.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

35 MoCA performance as an indicator of NSAb positivity in focal epilepsy: A preliminary analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2023

Maria Pleshkevich*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. NYU Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, New York, NY, USA.
Emily St. John
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. NYU Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, New York, NY, USA. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Claude Steriade
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. NYU Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, New York, NY, USA.
*
Correspondence: Maria Pleshkevich, New York University School of Medicine, mpleshkevich@fordham.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

Researchers are increasingly finding that the presence of neuronal surface antibodies (NSAb) may account for a larger percentage of outpatient epilepsy cases than previously thought (Elisak et al., 2018; Brenner et al., 2013). However, systematic NSAb screening is not included in standard epilepsy care (Kambadja et al., 2022). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; Nasreddine, 2005) is one of the most commonly used screening tools among physicians (Judge et al., 2019) across various neurological conditions, and has previously been validated in populations with autoimmune encephalitis (Hebert et al., 2018). Because patients with NSAb associated epilepsy often present with cognitive dysfunction (Greco et al., 2006), a MoCA is often administered as part of standard clinical care. The present analysis compared MoCA performance profiles in epilepsy patients with and without the presence of serum NSAbs. We explored what specific cognitive profile, as defined by the MoCA, may predict NSAb positivity.

Participants and Methods:

Forty-eight epilepsy patients were enrolled through an outpatient epilepsy clinic or during non-intensive or elective hospital stays. Participants were eligible if they met one of three diagnostic categories: focal epilepsy of unknown cause (n = 33), lesional focal epilepsy (n = 5), or generalized epilepsy (n = 4). All participants signed consent, underwent a comprehensive interview, which included MoCA testing, and serum NSAb testing paralleling standard clinical practice. Mann-U Whitney tests were run to compare overall MoCA and subgroup domain performance between groups.

Results:

Six patients (13%), all with focal epilepsy of unknown cause, had positive NSAb panels (LGI1: n = 3; GAD65: n = 2; CASPR2: n = 1). There was no significant difference in overall MoCA scores between participants with focal epilepsy of unknown cause who were antibody positive versus negative, and antibody positive versus antibody negative lesional or generalized epilepsy. However, when analyzing by MoCA subgroup, we found that antibody positive patients performed significantly worse on delayed recall than antibody negative patients with focal epilepsy of unknown cause (Mdn = 1.5 vs 3), U(Nantibodynegative=27, Nantibodypositive=6) = 69.00, p = .02. There was no significant difference in other MoCA cognitive domain tests, and delayed recall scores did not significantly differ between antibody positive patients and those with lesional focal and generalized epilepsy.

Conclusions:

These preliminary findings suggest that episodic memory impairment, as measured by delayed recall on the MoCA, may predict NSAb antibody positivity among patients with focal epilepsy of unknown cause. This may relate to specific predilection of the hippocampal regions in antibody-mediated epileptogenesis and pathology.

Type
Poster Session 01: Medical | Neurological Disorders | Neuropsychiatry | Psychopharmacology
Copyright
Copyright © INS. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2023