Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-2qh69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-09-06T10:40:56.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship between hand preference, hand performance, and general cognitive ability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2010

MICHAEL E.R. NICHOLLS ,
HEIDI L. CHAPMAN ,
TOBIAS LOETSCHER  and
GINA M. GRIMSHAW
MICHAEL E.R. NICHOLLS*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
HEIDI L. CHAPMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
TOBIAS LOETSCHER
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
GINA M. GRIMSHAW
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
*
*Correspondence and reprint requests to: Mike Nicholls, Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia. E-mail: mike.nicholls@unimelb.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The idea that handedness indicates something about a person’s cognitive ability and personality is a perennial issue. A variety of models have been put forward to explain this relationship and predict a range of outcomes from higher levels of cognitive ability in left-handers or moderate right-handers to lower levels of achievement in left- or mixed-handers. We tested these models using a sample (n = 895) drawn from the BRAINnet database (www.brainnet.net). Participants completed a general cognitive ability (GCA) scale and a test of hand preference/performance. Moderate right-handers, as indexed by their performance measures, had higher GCA scores compared with strong left- or right-handers. The performance measure also showed lower levels of GCA for left-handers compared with right-handers. The hand preference data showed little or no association with cognitive ability—perhaps because this measure clusters individuals toward the extremes of the handedness distribution. While adding support to Annett’s heterozygous advantage model, which predicts a cognitive disadvantage for strong left- or right-handers, the data also confirm recent research showing a GCA disadvantage for left-handers. Although this study demonstrates that handedness is related to cognitive ability, the effects are subtle and might only be identified in large-scale studies with sensitive measures of hand performance. (JINS, 2010, 16, 585–592.)

Keywords

IQSinistralDextralLeftRightHand

Information

Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , July 2010 , pp. 585 - 592
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Annett, M. (1970). A classification of hand preference by association analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 61, 303–321.Google Scholar
Annett, M. (1983). Hand preference and skill in 115 children of two left-handed parents. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 17–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Annett, M. (1985). Left, right, hand and brain: The right shift theory. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Annett, M. (1992). Spatial ability in subgroups of left- and right-handers. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 492–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Annett, M., & Kilshaw, D. (1982). Mathematical ability and lateral asymmetry. Cortex, 18, 547–568.Google Scholar
Benbow, C.P. (1986). Physiological correlates of extreme intellectual precocity. Neuropsychologia, 24, 719–725.Google Scholar
Cerone, L.J., & McKeever, W.J. (1999). Failure to support the right-shift theory’s hypothesis of a ‘heterozygote advantage’ for cognitive abilities. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 109–123.Google Scholar
Corballis, M.C. (1997). The genetics and evolution of handedness. Psychological Review, 104, 714–727.Google Scholar
Corballis, M.C., Hattie, J., & Fletcher, R. (2008). Handedness and intellectual achievement: An even-handed look. Neuropsychologia, 26, 374–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, T.J., Close, J.P., Dagnall, A.M., & Priddle, T.H. (2009). Where and what is the right shift factor or cerebral dominance gene? A critique of Francks et al. (2007). Laterality, 14, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crow, T.J., Crow, L.R., Done, D.J., & Leask, S. (1998). Relative hand skill predicts academic ability: Global deficits at the point of hemispheric indecision. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1275–1282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duffau, H., Leroy, M., & Gatignol, P. (2008). Cortico-subcortical organization of language networks in the right hemisphere: An electrostimulation study in left-handers. Neuropsychologia, 46, 3197–3209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francks, C. (2009). Understanding the genetics of behavioral and psychiatric traits will only be achieved through a realistic assessment of their complexity. Laterality, 14, 11–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francks, C., Maegawa, S., Laurén, J., Abrahams, B.S., Velayos-Baeza, A., Medland, S.E., et al. . (2007). LRRTM1 on chromosome 2p12 is a maternally suppressed gene that is associated paternally with handedness and schizophrenia. Molecular Psychiatry, 12, 1129–1139.Google Scholar
Gordon, E. (2003). Integrative neuroscience and psychiatry. Neuropsychopharmacology, 28, 2–8.Google Scholar
Gordon, E., Cooper, N., Rennie, C., Hermens, D., & Williams, L.M. (2005). Integrative neuroscience: The role of a standardized database. Clinical EEG & Neuroscience, 36, 64–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halpern, D.F., Havilland, M.G., & Killian, C.D. (1998). Handedness and sex differences in intelligence: Evidence from the Medical College Admission Test. Brain & Cognition, 38, 87–101.Google Scholar
Heinz, M., & Heinz, W. (2002). No deficits at the point of hemispheric indecision. Neuropsychologia, 40, 701–704.Google Scholar
Johnston, D.W., Nicholls, M.E.R., Shah, M., & Shields, M.A. (2009). Nature’s experiment? Handedness and early childhood development. Demography, 46, 281–301.Google Scholar
Jung, P., Baumgärtner, U., Magerl, W., & Treede, R. (2008). Hemispheric asymmetry of hand representation in human primary somatosensory cortex and handedness. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119, 2579–2586.Google Scholar
Kemp, A.H., Cooper, N.J., Hermens, G., Gordon, E., Bryant, R., & Williams, L.M. (2005). Toward an integrated profile of emotional intelligence: Introducing a brief measure. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 4, 41–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kemp, A.H., Hatch, A., & Williams, L.M. (2009). Computerized neuropsychological assessments: Pros and cons. CNS Spectrums, 14, 118–119.Google ScholarPubMed
Li, C., Zhu, W., & Nuttall, R.L. (2003). Familial handedness and spatial ability: A study with Chinese students aged 14–24. Brain & Cognition, 51, 375–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lidzba, K., Staudt, M., Wilke, M., & Krägeloh-Mann, I. (2006). Visuospatial deficits in patients with early left-hemispheric lesions and functional reorganization of language: Consequence of lesion or reorganization? Neuropsychologia, 44, 1088–1094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKeever, W.F. (1986). The influences of handedness, sex, familial sinistrality and androgyny on language laterality, verbal ability, and spatial ability. Cortex, 22, 521–537.Google Scholar
McManus, I.C. (1985). Handedness, language dominance and aphasia: A genetic model. Psychological Medicine, 8(Suppl.), 1–40.Google ScholarPubMed
McManus, I.C. (2002). Right hand: Left hand. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
McManus, I.C., Shergill, S., & Bryden, M.P. (1993). Annett’s theory that individuals heterozygous for the right-shift gene are intellectually advantaged: Theoretical and empirical problems. British Journal of Psychology, 84, 517–537.Google Scholar
Miller, J.W., Jayadev, S., Dodrill, C.B., & Ojemann, G.A. (2005). Gender differences in handedness and speech lateralization related to early neurologic insults. Neurology, 65, 1974–1975.Google Scholar
Orton, S.J. (1937). Reading, writing and speech problems in children. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Palmer, R.E., & Corballis, M.C. (1996). Predicting reading ability from handedness measures. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 609–620.Google Scholar
Peters, M. (1991). Sex, handedness, mathematical ability, and biological causation. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 415–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, M., & Durding, B.M. (1978). Handedness measured by finger tapping: A continuous variable. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 32, 257–261.Google Scholar
Peters, M., Reimers, S., & Manning, J.T. (2006). Hand preference for writing and associations with selected demographic and behavioural variables in 255,100 subjects: The BBC internet study. Brain & Cognition, 62, 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, J.M., & Lansky, L.M. (1977). Left-handedness among architects: Partial replication and some new data. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45, 1216–1218.Google Scholar
Piro, J.M. (1998). Handedness and intelligence: Patterns of hand preference in gifted and nongifted children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 14, 619–630.Google Scholar
Preti, A., & Vellante, M. (2007). Creativity and psychopathology: Higher rates of psychosis proneness and nonright-handedness among creative artists compared to same age and gender peers. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195, 837–845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramadhani, M., Koomen, I., Grobbee, D., van Donselaar, C., van Furth, A.M., & Uiterwaal, C. (2006). Increased occurrence of left-handedness after severe childhood bacterial meningitis: Support for the pathological left-handedness hypothesis. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2526–2532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Resch, F., Haffner, J., Parzer, P., Pfueller, U., Strehlow, U., & Zerahn-Hartung, C. (1997). Testing the hypothesis of the relationships between laterality and ability according to Annett’s right-shift theory: Findings in an epidemiological sample of young adults. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 621–635.Google Scholar
Rowe, D.L., Cooper, N.J., Liddell, B.J., Clark, R.C., Gordon, E., & Williams, L.M. (2007). Brain structure and function correlates of general and social cognition, Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 6, 35–74.Google Scholar
Satz, P., Orsini, D.L., Saslow, E., & Henry, R. (1985). The pathological left-handedness syndrome. Brain & Cognition, 4, 27–46.Google Scholar
Snyder, P.J., & Harris, L.J. (1993). Handedness, sex, and familial sinistrality effects on spatial tasks. Cortex, 29, 115–134.Google Scholar
Tapley, S.M., & Bryden, M.P. (1985). A group test for the assessment of performance between the hands. Neuropsychologia, 23, 215–221.Google Scholar
Williams, L.M., Simms, E., Clark, C.R., Paul, R., Rowe, D., & Gordon, E. (2005). The test-retest reliability of a standardized neurocognitive and neurophysiological test battery: ‘NeuroMarker’. International Journal of Neuroscience, 115, 1605–1630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, C.J., & Aggleton, J.P. (1991). Occupation and handedness: An examination of architects and mail survey biases. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 395–404.Google Scholar