Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-qwqd9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-12T05:51:35.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Working memory after severe traumatic brain injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2007

CLAIRE VALLAT-AZOUVI ,
THOMAS WEBER ,
LUDOVIC LEGRAND  and
PHILIPPE AZOUVI
CLAIRE VALLAT-AZOUVI
Affiliation:
Antenne UEROS-UGECAM Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches, France INSERM U 731, Paris, France Université Paris 6, Faculté de Médecine, Laboratoire de Physiologie et Physiopathologie de la Motricité, Paris
THOMAS WEBER
Affiliation:
Antenne UEROS-UGECAM Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches, France Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Université de Versailles Saint Quentin; AP-HP, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches, France
LUDOVIC LEGRAND
Affiliation:
Antenne UEROS-UGECAM Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches, France Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Université de Versailles Saint Quentin; AP-HP, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches, France
PHILIPPE AZOUVI
Affiliation:
INSERM U 731, Paris, France Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Université de Versailles Saint Quentin; AP-HP, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches, France Université Paris 6, Faculté de Médecine, Laboratoire de Physiologie et Physiopathologie de la Motricité, Paris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess the functioning of the different subsystems of working memory after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). A total of 30 patients with severe chronic TBI and 28 controls received a comprehensive assessment of working memory addressing the phonological loop (forward and backward digit span; word length and phonological similarity effects), the visuospatial sketchpad (forward and backward visual spans), and the central executive (tasks requiring simultaneous storage and processing of information, dual-task processing, working memory updating). Results showed that there were only marginal group differences regarding the functioning of the two slave systems, whereas patients with severe TBI performed significantly poorer than controls on most central executive tasks, particularly on those requiring a high level of controlled processing. These results suggest that severe TBI is associated with an impairment of executive aspects of working memory. The anatomic substrate of this impairment remains to be elucidated. It might be related to a defective activation of a distributed network, including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. (JINS, 2007, 13, 770–780.)

Keywords

Head injuryExecutive functionsAttentionDivided attentionCentral executiveShort-term memory

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 13 , Issue 5 , September 2007 , pp. 770 - 780
Copyright
2007 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Allain, P., Etcharry-Bouyx, F., & Le Gall, D. (2001). A case study of selective impairment of the central executive component of working memory after a focal frontal lobe damage. Brain and Cognition, 45, 21–43.Google Scholar
Azouvi, P., Couillet, J., Leclercq, M., Martin, M., Asloun, S., & Rousseaux, M. (2004). Divided attention and mental effort after severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1260–1268.Google Scholar
Azouvi, P., Jokic, C., Van der Linden, M., Marlier, N., & Bussel, B. (1996). Working memory and supervisory control after severe closed head injury. A study of dual task performance and random generation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 18, 317–337.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (1998). Recent developments in working memory. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8, 234–238.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (2002). Fractionating the central executive. In D.T. Stuss & R.T. Knight (Eds.), Principles of frontal lobe function (pp. 246–260). New York: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A., Della Sala, S., Papagno, C., & Spinnler, H. (1997). Dual-task performance in dysexecutive and nondysexecutive patients with a frontal lesion. Neuropsychology, 11, 187–194.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G.A. Bower (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). New York: Academic Press.
Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A.D., Baddeley, H.A., Bucks, R.S., & Wilcock, G.K. (2001). Attentional control in Alzheimer's disease. Brain, 124, 1492–1508.Google Scholar
Brooks, D.N. (1975). Long and short term memory in head injured patients. Cortex, 11, 329–340.Google Scholar
Brouwer, W.H., Ponds, R.W.H.M., Van Wolffelaar, P.C., & Van Zomeren, A.H. (1989). Divided attention 5 to 10 years after severe closed head injury. Cortex, 25, 219–230.Google Scholar
Brouwer, W.H., Verzendaal, M., van der Naalt, J., Smit, J., & Van Zomeren, A.H. (2001). Divided attention years after severe closed head injury: The effect of dependencies between the subtasks. Brain and Cognition, 46, 54–56.Google Scholar
Brouwer, W.H., Withaar, F.K., Tant, M.L.M., & Van Zomeren, A.H. (2002). Attention and driving in traumatic brain injury: A question of coping with time-pressure. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 17, 1–15.Google Scholar
Brown, J. (1958). Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 12–21.Google Scholar
Bublak, P., Schubert, T., Matthes-von Cramon, G., & von Cramon, Y. (2000). Differential demands on working memory for guiding a simple action sequence: Evidence from closed-head-injured subjects. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 176–190.Google Scholar
Cazalis, F., Feydy, A., Valabregue, R., Pelegrini-Issac, M., Pierot, L., & Azouvi, P. (2006). fMRI study of problem solving after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 20, 1019–1028.Google Scholar
Chapman, S.B., Gamino, J.F., Cook, L.G., Hanten, G., Li, X., & Levin, H.S. (2005). Impaired discourse gist and working memory in children after brain injury. Brain and Language, 97, 178–188.Google Scholar
Christodoulou, C., DeLuca, J., Ricker, J.H., Madigan, N.K., Bly, B.M., Lange, G., Kalnin, A.J., Liu, W.C., Steffener, J., Diamond, B.J., & Ni, A.C. (2001). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of working memory impairment after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 71, 161–168.Google Scholar
Cicerone, K. (2002). Remediation of “working attention” in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 16, 185–195.Google Scholar
Collette, F. & van der Linden, M. (2002). Brain imaging of the central executive component of working memory. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 26, 105–125.Google Scholar
Daneman, M. & Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.Google Scholar
Fontaine, A., Azouvi, P., Remy, P., Bussel, B., & Samson, Y. (1999). Functional anatomy of neuropsychological deficits after severe traumatic brain injury. Neurology, 53, 1963–1968.Google Scholar
Greene, J.D., Hodges, J.R., & Baddeley, A.D. (1995). Autobiographical memory and executive function in early dementia of Alzheimer type. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1647–1670.Google Scholar
Jennett, B. & Bond, M. (1975). Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet, 1, 480–484.Google Scholar
Jennett, B. & Teasdale, G. (1981). Management of head injuries. Philadelphia: Davis.
Klingberg, T., Fernell, E., Olesen, P.J., Johnson, M., Gustafsson, P., Dahlstrom, K., Gillberg, C.G., Forssberg, H., & Westerberg, H. (2005). Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD—A randomized, controlled trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44, 177–186.Google Scholar
Leclercq, M. & Azouvi, P. (2002). Attention after traumatic brain injury. In M. Leclercq & P. Zimmermann (Eds.), Applied neuropsychology of attention (pp. 251–273). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Leclercq, M., Couillet, J., Azouvi, P., Marlier, N., Martin, Y., Strypstein, E., & Rousseaux, M. (2000). Dual task performance after severe diffuse traumatic brain injury or vascular prefrontal damage. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 339–350.Google Scholar
Levin, H.S., Hanten, G., Chang, C.C., Zhang, L., Schachar, R., Ewing-Cobbs, L., & Max, J.E. (2002). Working memory after traumatic brain injury in children. Annals of Neurology, 52, 82–88.Google Scholar
Levin, H.S., Hanten, G., Zhang, L., Swank, P.R., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Dennis, M., Barnes, M.A., Max, J., Schachar, R., Chapman, S.B., & Hunter, J.V. (2004). Changes in working memory after traumatic brain injury in children. Neuropsychology, 18, 240–247.Google Scholar
Lezak, M.D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.
Logie, R.H., Della Sala, S., Laiacona, M., Chalmers, P., & Wynn, V. (1996). Group aggregates and individual reliability: The case of verbal short-term memory. Memory and Cognition, 24, 305–321.Google Scholar
Mangels, J.A., Craik, F.I., Levine, B., Schwartz, M.L., & Stuss, D.T. (2002). Effects of divided attention on episodic memory in chronic traumatic brain injury: A function of severity and strategy. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2369–2385.Google Scholar
McAllister, T.W., Flashman, L.A., Sparling, M.B., & Saykin, A.J. (2004). Working memory deficits after traumatic brain injury: Catecholaminergic mechanisms and prospects for treatment—A review. Brain Injury, 18, 331–350.Google Scholar
McAllister, T.W., Saykin, A.J., Flashman, L.A., Sparling, M.B., Johnson, S.C., Guerin, S.J., Mamourian, A.C., Weaver, J.B., & Yanofsky, N. (1999). Brain activation during working memory 1 month after mild traumatic brain injury. A functional MRI study. Neurology, 53, 1300–1308.Google Scholar
McAllister, T.W., Sparling, M.B., Flashman, L.A., Guerin, S.J., Mamourian, A.C., & Saykin, A.J. (2001). Differential working memory load effects after mild traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage, 14, 1004–1012.Google Scholar
McDowell, S., Whyte, J., & D'Esposito, M. (1997). Working memory impairments in traumatic brain injury: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1341–1353.Google Scholar
McMillan, T.M., Jongen, E.L.M.M., & Greenwood, R.J. (1996). Assessment of post-traumatic amnesia after severe closed head injury: Retrospective or prospective? Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 60, 422–427.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., Friedman, N.P., Emerson, M.J., Witzki, A.H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T.D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.Google Scholar
Morris, N. & Jones, D.M. (1990). Memory updating in working memory: The role of the central executive. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 111–121.Google Scholar
Norman, D.A. & Shallice, T. (1980). Attention to action. Willed and automatic control of behavior. University of California, San Diego, CHIP report N°99.
Park, N.W., Moscovitch, M., & Robertson, I.H. (1999). Divided attention impairments after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1119–1133.Google Scholar
Perlstein, W.M., Cole, M.A., Demery, J.A., Seignourel, P.J., Dixit, N.K., Larson, M.J., & Briggs, R.W. (2004). Parametric manipulation of working memory load in traumatic brain injury: Behavioral and neural correlates. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, 724–741.Google Scholar
Peterson, L.R. & Peterson, M.J. (1959). Short term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193–198.Google Scholar
Ponsford, J. & Kinsella, G. (1992). Attentional deficits following severe closed head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 14, 822–838.Google Scholar
Shallice, T. & Burgess, P. (1996). The domain of supervisory processes and temporal organization of behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 351, 1405–1412.Google Scholar
Spikman, J., van Zomeren, A.H., & Deelman, B.G. (1996). Deficits of attention after closed-head injury: Slowness only? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 18, 755–767.Google Scholar
Stablum, F., Leonardi, G., Mazzoldi, M., Ulmita, C., & Morra, S. (1994). Attention and control deficits following closed head injury. Cortex, 30, 603–618.Google Scholar
Stuss, D.T., Ely, P., Hugenholtz, H., Richard, M.T., Larochelle, S., Poirier, C.A., & Bell, I. (1985). Subtle neuropsychological deficits in patients with good recovery after closed head injury. Neurosurgery, 17, 41–47.Google Scholar
Teasdale, G. & Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet, 2, 81–84.Google Scholar
Vallat, C., Azouvi, P., Hardisson, H., Meffert, R., Tessier, C., & Pradat-Diehl, P. (2005). Rehabilitation of verbal working memory after left hemisphere stroke. Brain Injury, 19, 1157–1164.Google Scholar
Van der Linden, M., Coyette, F., & Seron, X. (1992). Selective impairment of the “central executive” component of working memory: A single case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 301–326.Google Scholar
Veltman, J.C., Brouwer, W.H., van Zomeren, A.H., & van Wolffelaar, P.C. (1996). Central executive aspects of attention in subacute severe and very severe closed head injury patients: Planning, inhibition, flexibility and divided attention. Neuropsychology, 10, 357–367.Google Scholar
Vilkki, J., Virtanen, S., Surma-Aho, O., & Servo, A. (1996). Dual task performance after focal cerebral lesions and closed head injuries. Neuropsychologia, 34, 1051–1056.Google Scholar
Withaar, F.K. (2000). Divided attention and driving: The effects of aging and brain injury. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Rijskuniversiteit, Groningen.