Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 16
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Clarke, Stephanie and Crottaz-Herbette, Sonia 2016. Modulation of visual attention by prismatic adaptation. Neuropsychologia,

    Michel, Carine 2016. Beyond the Sensorimotor Plasticity: Cognitive Expansion of Prism Adaptation in Healthy Individuals. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6,

    Bultitude, Janet H. Van der Stigchel, Stefan and Nijboer, Tanja C.W. 2013. Prism adaptation alters spatial remapping in healthy individuals: Evidence from double-step saccades. Cortex, Vol. 49, Issue. 3, p. 759.

    Guinet, M. and Michel, C. 2013. Prism adaptation and neck muscle vibration in healthy individuals: Are two methods better than one?. Neuroscience, Vol. 254, p. 443.

    Jacquin-Courtois, Sophie O'Shea, Jacinta Luauté, Jacques Pisella, Laure Revol, Patrice Mizuno, Katsuhiro Rode, Gilles and Rossetti, Yves 2013. Rehabilitation of spatial neglect by prism adaptation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. 594.

    Magnani, Barbara Mangano, Giuseppa Renata Frassinetti, Francesca and Oliveri, Massimiliano 2013. The role of posterior parietal cortices on prismatic adaptation effects on the representation of time intervals. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 51, Issue. 13, p. 2825.

    Jacquin-Courtois, Sophie O'Shea, Jacinta Christophe, Laure Rode, Gilles Boisson, Dominique and Rossetti, Yves 2012. Left-Deviating Prism Adaptation in Left Neglect Patient: Reflexions on a Negative Result. Neural Plasticity, Vol. 2012, p. 1.

    Fortis, Paola Chen, Peii Goedert, Kelly M. and Barrett, Anna M. 2011. Effects of prism adaptation on motor-intentional spatial bias in neglect. NeuroReport, Vol. 22, Issue. 14, p. 700.

    Fortis, Paola Goedert, Kelly M. and Barrett, Anna M. 2011. Prism adaptation differently affects motor-intentional and perceptual-attentional biases in healthy individuals. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 49, Issue. 9, p. 2718.

    Bultitude, Janet H. and Woods, Jill M. 2010. Adaptation to leftward-shifting prisms reduces the global processing bias of healthy individuals. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 48, Issue. 6, p. 1750.

    GOEDERT, KELLY M. LEBLANC, ANDREW TSAI, SEN-WEI and BARRETT, ANNA M. 2010. Asymmetrical Effects of Adaptation to Left- and Right-Shifting Prisms Depends on Pre-existing Attentional Biases. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, Vol. 16, Issue. 05, p. 795.

    Nicholls, Michael E. R. and McIlroy, Alissandra M. 2010. Spatial Cues Affect Mental Number Line Bisections. Experimental Psychology, Vol. 57, Issue. 4, p. 315.

    Nijboer, Tanja Vree, Anneloes Dijkerman, Chris and Van der Stigchel, Stefan 2010. Prism adaptation influences perception but not attention: evidence from antisaccades. NeuroReport, Vol. 21, Issue. 5, p. 386.

    Nicholls, Michael E. R. Kamer, Adrian and Loftus, Andrea M. 2008. Pseudoneglect for mental alphabet lines is affected by prismatic adaptation. Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 191, Issue. 1, p. 109.

    Striemer, Christopher Blangero, Annabelle Rossetti, Yves Boisson, Dominique Rode, Gilles Salemme, Romeo Vighetto, Alain Pisella, Laure and Danckert, James 2008. Bilateral parietal lesions disrupt the beneficial effects of prism adaptation: evidence from a patient with optic ataxia. Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 187, Issue. 2, p. 295.

    Striemer, Christopher and Danckert, James 2007. Prism adaptation reduces the disengage deficit in right brain damage patients. NeuroReport, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 99.

  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, Volume 12, Issue 3
  • May 2006, pp. 337-349

Differential influences of prism adaptation on reflexive and voluntary covert attention

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 May 2006

Recent research has demonstrated some beneficial effects in patients with neglect using rightward shifting prismatic lenses. Despite a great deal of research exploring this effect, we know very little about the cognitive mechanisms underlying prism adaptation in neglect. We examined the possibility that prism adaptation influences visual attention by having healthy participants complete either a reflexive or a voluntary covert visual attention cuing paradigm before and after adaptation to leftward, rightward, or sham (no shift) prisms. The results for reflexive orienting demonstrated that a subset of participants with large cuing effects before prism adaptation were faster to reorient attention away from an invalid cue on the side of space opposite the prismatic shift post adaptation. For voluntary orienting, left prisms increased the efficiency of voluntary attention in both left and right visual space in participants with a small cuing effect before prism adaptation. In contrast, right prisms decreased the efficiency of voluntary attention in both left and right space for participants with a large cuing effect before prism adaptation. No significant effects were observed in the sham prism groups. These results suggest that prism adaptation may exert a variety of influences on attentional orienting mechanisms. (JINS, 2006, 12, 337–349.)

Corresponding author
Correspondence and reprint requests to: James Danckert, Canada Research Chair (Tier II) in Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada. E-mail:
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • ISSN: 1355-6177
  • EISSN: 1469-7661
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-international-neuropsychological-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *