Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-bz9xj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-18T00:44:17.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Durational properties of emphatically lengthened consonants in Japanese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2014

Shigeto Kawahara  and
Aaron Braver
Shigeto Kawahara
Affiliation:
The Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies kawahara@icl.keio.ac.jp
Aaron Braver
Affiliation:
Department of English, Texas Tech University aaron.braver@ttu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Languages can make use of phonetic duration to signal two kinds of meanings. The first is a lexical, phonological contrast. For example, in Japanese [kata] with a short [t] means ‘frame’ and [katta] with a long [tt] means ‘bought’. This sort of contrast is usually limited to a binary distinction, and its phonetic properties have been well studied for many diverse languages. The other use of phonetic duration is to express pragmatic emphasis. Speakers of some languages can use lengthening to express emphasis, as in the English example Thank you sooooooo much. This lengthening can employ multiple degrees of duration, beyond the more standard binary contrast. This second use of duration has been understudied, and this paper attempts to fill that gap. To that end, this paper reports the first experimental documentation of the consonant lengthening pattern in Japanese, which expresses pragmatic emphasis. The results show that at least some speakers show six levels of durational distinctions, while other speakers show less clear-cut distinctions among different levels of emphatically lengthened consonants. Nevertheless, all but one speaker showed a linear correlation between duration and level of emphasis.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , December 2014 , pp. 237 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abel, Sharon. 1972. Discrimination of temporal gaps. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 52, 519–524.Google Scholar
Abramson, Arthur S. 1987. Word-initial consonant length in Pattani Malay. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research SR-91, 143–147.Google Scholar
Aizawa, Yoshiko. 1985. Intensification by so-called “choked sounds” – long consonants – in Japanese. In The Phonetic Society of Japan (ed.), The study of sounds 21, 313–324.Google Scholar
Amano, Shigeaki & Hirata, Yukari. 2010. Perception and production boundaries between single and geminate stops in Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128 (4), 2049–2058.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aoyama, Katsura & Reid, Lawrence. 2006. Cross-linguistic tendencies and durational contrasts in geminate consonants: An examination of Bontok geminates. Journal of International Phonetic Association 36, 145–157.Google Scholar
Bals Baal, Berit Anne, Odden, David & Rice, Curt. 2012. An analysis of North Saami gradation. Phonology 29 (2), 165–212.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary. 1982. Segmental duration and the ‘mora’ in Japanese. Phonetica 39, 113–135.Google Scholar
Bellem, Alex. 2007. Towards a comparative typology of emphatics: Across Semitic and into Arabic dialect phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 2001. PRAAT: A system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5 (9/10), 341–345.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 1999–2014. PRAAT: Doing phonetics by computer. Software. http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/.Google Scholar
Campbell, Nick. 1999. A study of Japanese speech timing from the syllable perspective. Onsei Kenkyu [Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan] 3 (2), 29–39.Google Scholar
Cedrus Corporation. 2010. Superlab v. 4.0. Software. http://www.superlab.com.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Cohn, Abigail, Ham, William & Podesva, Robert. 1999. The phonetic realization of singleton–geminate contrasts in three languages of Indonesia. In Ohala, et al. (eds.), 587–590.Google Scholar
Davis, Stuart. 2011. Geminates. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 873–897. Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley.Google Scholar
DiCanio, Christian T. 2012. The phonetics of fortis and lenis consonants in Itunyoso Trique. International Journal of American Linguistics 78 (2), 239–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diehl, Randy, Lindblom, Björn & Creeger, Carl. 2004. Increasing realism of auditory representations yields further insights into vowel phonetics. In Solé, Maria-Josep, Recasens, Daniel & Romero, Joaquín (eds.), 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 15), Barcelona, 1381–1384.Google Scholar
Dresher, Natalie, Korostoff, Sarah, Pangilinan, Melanie, Trombetta, Jessica & Kawahara, Shigeto. 2013. The phonetics of emphatic vowel lengthening in English. Presented at Rutgers University Aresty Symposium.Google Scholar
Engstrand, Olle. 1987. Preaspiration and the voicing contrast in Lule Sami. Phonetica 44, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrand, Olle & Krull, Diana. 1994. Durational correlates of quantity in Swedish, Finnish and Estonian: Cross-language evidence for a theory of Adaptive Dispersion. Phonetica 51, 80–91.Google Scholar
Esposito, Anna & Di Benedetto, Maria Gabriella. 1999. Acoustical and perceptual study of gemination in Italian stops. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106, 2051–2062.Google Scholar
Flemming, Edward. 1995. Auditory representations in phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Fujisaki, Hiroya, Nakamura, Kimihiro & Imoto, Toshiaki. 1975. Auditory perception of duration of speech and non-speech stimuli. In Fant, Gunnar & Tatham, M. A. A. (eds.), Auditory analysis and perception of speech, 197–219. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fukui, Seiji. 1978. Nihongo heisaon-no encho/tanshuku-niyoru sokuon/hisokuon toshite-no chooshu [Perception for the Japanese stop consonants with reduced and extended durations]. Onsei Gakkai Kaihou [Phonetic Society Reports] 159, 9–12.Google Scholar
Garnes, Sara. 1976. Quantity in Icelandic: Production and perception. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew, Munro, Pamela & Ladefoged, Peter. 2000. Some phonetic structures of Chickasaw. Anthropological Linguistics 42, 366–400.Google Scholar
Ham, William. 2001. Phonetic and phonological aspects of geminate timing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Han, Mieko. 1962. The feature of duration in Japanese. Onsei no Kenkyuu [Studies in Phonetics] 10, 65–80.Google Scholar
Han, Mieko. 1992. The timing control of geminate and single stop consonants in Japanese: A challenge for nonnative speakers. Phonetica 49, 102–127.Google Scholar
Han, Mieko. 1994. Acoustic manifestations of mora timing in Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96, 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Benjamin B. 2004. Production of Persian geminate stops: Effects of varying speaking rate. In Agwuele, Augustine, Warren, Willis & Park, Sang-Hoon (eds.), 2003 Texas Linguistics Society Conference, 86–95. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1989. Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 253–306.Google Scholar
Hirata, Yukari. 2007. Durational variability and invariance in Japanese stop quantity distinction: Roles of adjacent vowels. Onsei Kenkyu [Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan] 11 (1), 9–22.Google Scholar
Hirata, Yukari & Amano, Shigeaki. 2012. Production of single and geminate stops in Japanese three- and four-mora words. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 3, 1614–1625.Google Scholar
Hirata, Yukari & Whiton, Jacob. 2005. Effects of speaking rate on the singleton/geminate distinction in Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118, 1647–1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirato, Nobuo & Watanabe, Shinichiro. 1987. Sokuon-no chikaku-to kouzoku boin-no jizoku jikan tono kankei [The relationship between the perception of geminates and the duration of the following vowels]. Onsei Gengo [Spoken Languages] II, 99–106.Google Scholar
Hirose, Aki & Ashby, Michael. 2007. An acoustic study of devoicing of the geminate obstruents in Japanese. In Trouvain, Jürgen & Barry, William J. (eds.), 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 16), Saarbrücken, 909–912.Google Scholar
Homma, Yayoi. 1981. Durational relationship between Japanese stops and vowels. Journal of Phonetics 9, 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idemaru, Kaori & Guion, Susan. 2008. Acoustic covariants of length contrast in Japanese stops. Journal of International Phonetic Association 38 (2), 167–186.Google Scholar
Idemaru, Kaori & Guion-Anderson, Susan. 2010. Relational timing in the production and perception of Japanese singleton and geminate stops. Phonetica 67, 25–46.Google Scholar
Jaeger, Jeri J. 1983. The fortis/lenis question: Evidence from Zapotec and Jawoñ. Journal of Phonetics 11, 177–199.Google Scholar
Kahn, Margaret. 1975. Arabic emphatics: The evidence for cultural determinants of phonetic sex-typing. Phonetica 31, 38–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kato, Hiroaki & Tsuzaki, Minoru. 1994. Intensity effect on discrimination of auditory duration flanked by preceding and succeeding tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan 15 (5), 349–351.Google Scholar
Kato, Hiroaki, Tsuzaki, Minoru & Sagisaka, Yoshinori. 1997. Acceptability for temporal modification of consecutive segments in isolated words. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101, 2311–2322.Google Scholar
Kato, Hiroaki, Tsuzaki, Minoru & Sagisaka, Yoshinori. 2002. Effects of phoneme class and duration on the acceptability of temporal modifications in speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111, 387–400.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto. 2001. Similarity among variants: Output–variant correspondence. B.A. thesis, International Christian University, Tokyo Japan.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto. 2006. A faithfulness ranking projected from a perceptibility scale: The case of [+voice] in Japanese. Language 82 (3), 536–574.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto. 2012. Amplitude changes facilitate categorization and discrimination of length contrasts. IEICE Technical Report (The Institute of Electronics, Information, and Communication Engineers) 112, 67–72.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto. 2013. Emphatic gemination in Japanese mimetic words: A wug-test with auditory stimuli. Language Sciences 40, 24–35.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto. In press. The phonetics of sokuon, obstruent geminates. In Kubozono, Haruo (ed.), The handbook of Japanese language and linguistics: Phonetics and phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto & Braver, Aaron. 2013. The phonetics of emphatic vowel lengthening in Japanese. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 3 (2), 141–148.Google Scholar
Kraehenmann, Astrid. 2003. Quantity and prosodic asymmetries in Alemannic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kraehenmann, Astrid & Lahiri, Aditi. 2008. Duration differences in the articulation and acoustics of Swiss German word-initial geminate and singleton stops. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123 (6), 4446–4455.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S. Y. 1967. Yawelmani phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian. 1996. The sounds of the world's languages, 2nd edn . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lahiri, Aditi & Hankamer, George. 1988. The timing of geminate consonants. Journal of Phonetics 16, 327–338.Google Scholar
Laufer, Asher & Baer, Thomas. 1988. The emphatic and pharyngeal sounds in Hebrew and in Arabic. Language and Speech 31 (2), 181–205.Google Scholar
Lehtonen, Jaakko. 1970. Aspects of quantity in standard Finnish. Jyvaeskylaessae: Osakeyhtioen kirjapainossa.Google Scholar
Liljencrants, Johan & Lindblom, Björn. 1972. Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: The role of perceptual contrast. Language 48, 839–862.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn. 1986. Phonetic universals in vowel systems. In Ohala, John J. & Jaeger, Jeri (eds.), Experimental phonology, 13–44. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lisker, Leigh. 1958. The Tamil occlusives: Short vs. long or voiced vs. voiceless? Indian Linguistics, Turner Jubilee I, 294–301.Google Scholar
Local, John & Simpson, Adrian P.. 1999. Phonetic implementation of geminates in Malayalam nouns. In Ohala et al. (eds.), 595–598.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 1997. Phonetic universals. In Hardcastle, William J. & Laver, John (eds.) The handbook of phonetic sciences, 619–639. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1979. Formal problems in Semitic phonology and morphology. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. [Published by Garland Press, New York, 1985.]Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1994. The phonetics and phonology of Semitic pharyngeals. In Keating, Patricia A. (ed.) Papers in Laboratory Phonology III: Phonological structure and phonetic form, 191–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, Graham. 1980. Medial stop gemination in Rembarrnga: A spectrographic study. Journal of Phonetics 8, 343–352.Google Scholar
Nasu, Akio. 1999. Chouhukukei onomatope no kyouchou keitai to yuuhyousei [Emphatic forms of reduplicative mimetics and markedness]. Nihongo/Nihon Bunka Kenkyuu [Japan/Japanese Culture] 9, 13–25.Google Scholar
Norlin, Kjell. 1987. A phonetic study of emphasis and vowels in Egyptian Arabic (Lund University Department of Linguistics Working Papers 30). Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
Ofuka, Etsuko. 2003. Sokuon /tt/-no chikaku: Akusento gata-to sokuon/hisokuongo-no onkyooteki tokuchoo niyoru chigai [Perception of a Japanese geminate stop /tt/: The effect of pitch type and acoustic characteristics of preceding/following vowels]. Onsei Kenkyu [Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan] 7 (1), 70–76.Google Scholar
Ofuka, Etsuko, Mori, Yoko & Kiritani, Shigeru. 2005. Sokuon-no chikaku-ni taisuru senkoo- kouzoku boincho-no eikyoo [The effects of the duration of preceding and following vowels on the perception of geminates]. Onsei Kenkyu [Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan] 9, 59– 65.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J., Hasegawa, Yoko, Ohala, Manjari, Granville, Daniel & Bailey, Ashlee C. (eds.), 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 14), San Francisco.Google Scholar
Ohala, Manjari. 2007. Experimental methods in the study of Hindi geminate consonants. In Solé, Maria Josep, Beddor, Patrice & Ohala, Manjari (eds.), Experimental approaches to phonology, 351–368. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Padgett, Jaye. 2002. Contrast and postvelar fronting in Russian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21, 39–87.Google Scholar
Payne, Elinor. 2005. Phonetic variation in Italian consonant gemination. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35 (2), 153–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, Emily, Blumstein, Sheila & Burton, Martha. 1999. Effects of speaking rate on the singleton/geminate consonant contrast in Italian. Phonetica 56, 135–157.Google Scholar
Port, Robert, Dalby, Jonathan & O’Dell, Michael. 1987. Evidence for mora timing in Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 81, 1574–1585.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan. 1980. A metrical theory for Estonian quantity. Linguistic Inquiry 11, 511–562.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. 1993–2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Software. http://www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Ridouane, Rachid. 2010. Gemination at the junction of phonetics and phonology. In Fougeron, Cécile, Kühnert, Barbara, D’Imperio, Mariapaola & Valleé, Nathalie (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology X, 61–90. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Jean-Luc, Boë, Louis-Jean, Valleé, Nathalie & Abry, Christian. 1997a. The dispersion focalization theory of vowel systems. Journal of Phonetics 25, 255–286.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Jean-Luc, Boë, Louis-Jean, Valleé, Nathalie & Abry, Christian. 1997b. Major trends in vowel system inventories. Journal of Phonetics 25, 233–253.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1990. A two-root theory of length. In Dunlap, Elaine & Padgett, Jaye (eds.), Papers in phonology (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 14), 123–171. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association (GLSA).Google Scholar
Shrotriya, Nisheeth, Sarma, A. Sada Siva, Verma, Rajesh & Agrawal, S. S.. 1995. Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of geminate Hindi stop consonants. In Elenius, Kjell & Branderud, Peter (eds.), 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 13), Stockholm, 132–135.Google Scholar
Takeyasu, Hajime. 2012. Sokuon-no chikaku-ni taisuru senkoo onsetsu shiin boin-no jizokujikan-no eikyoo [Effects of the consonant and vowel durations in the preceding syllable on the perception of geminate stops in Japanese]. On’in Kenkyu [Phonological Studies] 15, 67–78.Google Scholar
Tserdanelis, Georgios & Arvaniti, Amalia. 2001. The acoustic characteristics of geminate consonants in Cypriot Greek. In Aggouraki, Yoryia, Arvaniti, Amalia, Davy, J. I. M., Goutsos, Dionysis, Karyolaimou, Marilena, Panagiotou, Anna, Papapavlou, Andreas, Pavlou, Pavlos & Roussou, Anna (eds.), The Fourth International Conference on Greek Linguistics, 29–36. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press Google Scholar
Warner, Natasha & Arai, Takayuki. 2001. Japanese mora-timing: A review. Phonetica 58, 1–25.Google Scholar