Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T15:47:34.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hiatus resolution and linking ‘r’ in Australian English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2014

Felicity Cox ,
Sallyanne Palethorpe ,
Linda Buckley  and
Samantha Bentink
Felicity Cox
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Centre for Language Sciences, ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Macquarie University, felicity.cox@mq.edu.au
Sallyanne Palethorpe
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Science, Centre for Language Sciences, ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Macquarie University, sallyanne.palethorpe@mq.edu.au
Linda Buckley
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Centre for Language Sciences, Macquarie University, linda.buckley@mq.edu.au
Samantha Bentink
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Centre for Language Sciences, Macquarie University, samantha.bentink@mq.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hiatus occurs when the juxtaposition of syllables results in two separate vowels occurring alongside one another. Such vowel adjacency, both within words and across word boundaries, is phonologically undesirable in many languages but can be resolved using a range of strategies including consonant insertion. This paper examines linguistic and extralinguistic factors that best predict the likelihood of inserted linking ‘r’ across word boundaries in Australian English. Corpus data containing a set of 32 phrases produced in a sentence-reading task by 103 speakers were auditorily and acoustically analysed. Results reveal that linguistic variables of accentual context and local speaking rate take precedence over speaker-specific variables of age, gender and sociolect in the management of hiatus. We interpret this to be a reflection of the phonetic manifestation of boundary phenomena. The frequency of the phrase containing the linking ‘r’, the frequency of an individual's use of linking ‘r’, and the accentual status of the flanking vowels all affect the /ɹ/ strength (determined by F3), suggesting that a hybrid approach is warranted in modelling liaison. Age effects are present for certain prosodic contexts indicating change in progress for Australian English.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , August 2014 , pp. 155 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allerton, David J. 2000. Articulatory inertia vs ‘systemzwang’: Changes in liaison phenomena in recent British English. English Studies 81, 574–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Guy. 2001. Real and apparent time. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 312–332. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1984. Linking ‘r’ in RP: Some facts. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 14, 74–79.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Ayers, Gayle. 1997. Guidelines for ToBI labelling. http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/research/phonetics/E_ToBI/ (accessed 4 May 2010).Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Edwards, Jan. 1990. Lengthenings and shortenings and the nature of prosodic constituency. In Kingston, John & Beckman, Mary E. (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I, 152–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Alan & Hooper, Joan. 1978. Syllables and segments. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2001. PRAAT: A system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5, 341–345.Google Scholar
Britain, David & Fox, Sue. 2008. ‘Vernacular universals’ and the regularisation of the hiatus resolution system in British English. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 57, 1–42.Google Scholar
Broadbent, Judith. 1991. Linking and intrusive r in English. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 3, 281–302.Google Scholar
Brown, Adam. 1988. Linking, intrusive, and rhotic /r/ in pronunciation models. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 18, 144–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2001a. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2001b. Frequency effects on French liaison. In Bybee & Hopper (eds.), 337–359.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2002. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14, 261–290.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Hopper, Paul (eds.). 2001. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, Dani. 2000. Articulatory vowel lengthening and coordination at phrasal junctures. Phonetica 57, 3–16.Google Scholar
Byrd, Dani & Tan, Cheng. 1996. Saying consonant clusters quickly. Journal of Phonetics 24, 263–282.Google Scholar
Cassidy, Steve & Harrington, Jonathan. 2001. Multi-level annotation in the Emu speech database management system. Speech Communication 33, 61–77.Google Scholar
Church, Kenneth W. & Hanks, Patrick. 1990. Word association norms, mutual information and lexicography. Computational Linguistics 16, 22–29.Google Scholar
Cox, Felicity. 2012. Australian English: Pronunciation and transcription. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Felicity & Palethorpe, Sallyanne. 2007. Australian English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37, 341–350.Google Scholar
Cox, Felicity & Palethorpe, Sallyanne. 2012. Standard Australian English: The sociostylistic broadness continuum. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Standards of English: Codified varieties around the world (Studies in Language), 294–317. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croot, Karen & Taylor, Belinda. 1995. Criteria for acoustic-phonetic segmentation and word-labelling in the Australian National Database of Spoken Language. http://andosl.anu.edu.au/andosl/general_info/aue_criteria.html (accessed 12 October 2012).Google Scholar
Cutler, Anne. 2012. Native listening: Language experience and the recognition of spoken words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, Anne & Butterfield, Sally. 1990. Durational cues to word boundaries in clear speech. Speech Communication 9, 485–495.Google Scholar
Cutler, Anne & Butterfield, Sally. 1991. Word boundary cues in clear speech: A supplementary report. Speech Communication 10, 335–353.Google Scholar
Cutler, Anne & Norris, Dennis. 1988. The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14, 113–121.Google Scholar
Davidson, Lisa. 2006. Schwa elision in fast speech: Segment deletion or gestural overlap? Phonetica 63, 79–112.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2004. BYU–BNC: The British National Corpus. http://corpus.byu.edu/bnc (accessed 22 September 2009).Google Scholar
Dilley, Laura, Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie & Ostendorf, Mari. 1996. Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure. Journal of Phonetics 24, 423–444.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 1989. The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change 1, 245–267.Google Scholar
Ernestus, Mirjam. 2014. Acoustic reduction and the roles of abstractions and exemplars in speech processing. Lingua 142, 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espy-Wilson, Carol Y., Boyce, Suzanne E., Jackson, Michel, Narayanan, Shrikanth & Alwan, Abeer. 2000. Acoustic modeling of American English /r/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108, 343–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, Janet. 2010. The prosody of speech: Timing and rhythm. In Hardcastle, William J., Laver, John & Gibbon, Fiona E. (eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences, 2nd edn., 523–602. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell (electronic edition, accessed 9 October 2013).Google Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile & Keating, Patricia. 1997. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101, 3728–3740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foulkes, Paul. 1997. English [r]-sandhi – a sociolinguistic perspective. Histoire Epistémologie Langage 19, 73–96.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Paul & Docherty, Gerard. 2000. Another chapter in the story of /r/: Labiodental variants in British English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4, 30–59.Google Scholar
Fowler, Carol A. 2005. Parsing coarticulated speech in perception: Effects of coarticulation resistance. Journal of Phonetics 33, 199–213.Google Scholar
Gay, Thomas. 1981. Mechanisms in the control of speech rate. Phonetica 38, 148–158.Google Scholar
Gerfen, Chip & Baker, Kirk. 2005. The production and perception of laryngealised vowels in Coatzospan Mixtec. Journal of Phonetics 33, 311–334.Google Scholar
Gick, Bryan. 1999. A gesture-based account of intrusive consonants in English. Phonology 16, 29–54.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz. 1999. Lexical strata in English: Morphological causes, phonological effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gimson, A. C. 1994. Gimson's Pronunciation of English, 5th edn., revised by Alan Cruttenden. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Goldrick, Matthew & Rapp, Brenda. 2007. Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production. Cognition 102, 219–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, Elizabeth, Campbell, Lyle, Hay, Jennifer, Maclagan, Margaret, Sudbury, Andrea & Trudgill, Peter. 2004. New Zealand English: Its origins and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hannisdal, Rebecca. 2006. Variability and change in Received Pronunciation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Hall, Tracy. 2013. How common is r-epenthesis? Folia Linguistica 47, 55–87.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan, Cox, Felicity & Evans, Zoe. 1997. An acoustic phonetic study of broad, general, and cultivated Australian English vowels. Australian Journal of Linguistics 17, 155–184.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan, Palethorpe, Sallyanne & Watson, Catherine. 2007. Age-related changes in fundamental frequency and formants: A longitudinal study of four speakers. Interspeech – Eurospeech, Antwerp, August 2007, 2753–2756.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Sarah & Slater, Andrew. 1994. Spread of CV and v-to-v coarticulation in British English: Implications for the intelligibility of synthetic speech. 3rd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 1994), 57–60.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer & Maclagan, Margaret. 2010. Social and phonetic conditioners on the frequency and degree of ‘intrusive /r/’ in New Zealand English. In Preston, Dennis & Niedzielski, Nancy (eds.), Methods in sociophonetics, 41–70. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer & Maclagan, Margaret. 2012. /r/-sandhi in early 20th century New Zealand English. Linguistics 50, 745–763.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer & Sudbury, Andrea. 2005. How rhoticity became r-sandhi. Language 81, 799–823.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer & Warren, Paul. 2002. Experiments on /r/-intrusion. Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 14, 47–58.Google Scholar
Heselwood, Barry & Plug, Leendert. 2011. The role of F2 and F3 in the perception of rhoticity: Evidence from listening experiments. 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 17), Hong Kong, 867–870.Google Scholar
Horvath, Barbara M. 1985. Variation in Australian English: The sociolects of Sydney. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hu, Frank B., Goldberg, Jack, Hedeker, Donald, Flay, Bryan R. & Pentz, Mary Ann. 1998. Comparison of population-averaged and subject-specific approaches for analysing repeated binary outcomes. Journal of Epidemiology 147, 694–703.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia, Cho, Taehong, Fougeron, Cécile & Hsu, Chai-Shune. 2009. Domain-initial strengthening in four languages. In Local, John, Ogden, Richard & Temple, Rosalind (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI, 145–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Robert. 1998. An effort-based approach to consonant lenition. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Klatt, Dennis H. 1976. Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59, 1208–1221.Google Scholar
Kleinbaum, David G. & Klein, Mitchell. 2010. Logistic regression: A self-learning text, 3rd edn. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Kochetov, Alexei & Neufield, Chris. 2013. Examining the extent of anticipatory coronal coarticulation: A long-term average spectrum analysis. Poster presented at the International Congress of Acoustics, Montreal, June 7.Google Scholar
Kuehn, David P. & Moll, Kenneth L.. 1976. A cineradiographic study of VC and CV articulatory velocities. Journal of Phonetics 4, 303–20.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1990. The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2, 205–254.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1973. Rhythmic units and syntactic units in production and perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 54, 1228–34.Google Scholar
McEnery, Anthony & Wilson, Andrew. 2001. Corpus linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
McMahon, April. 2000. Change, chance and optimality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McMahon, April, Foulkes, Paul & Tollfree, Laura. 1994. Gestural representation and lexical phonology. Phonology 11, 277–316.Google Scholar
Millar, J. Bruce, Vonwiller, Julia P., Harrington, Jonathan M. & Dermody, Phillip J.. 1994. The Australian National Database of Spoken Language. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers’ International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 1, 97–100.Google Scholar
Mompeán, Jose A. & Gómez, F. Alberto. 2011. Hiatus resolution strategies in non-rhotic English: The case or /r/ liaison. 17th International Congress of Phonetics Sciences (ICPhS 17), Hong Kong, 1414–1417.Google Scholar
Mompeán, Jose A. & Mompeán-Guillamón, Pilar. 2009. /r/-liaison in English: An empirical study. Cognitive Linguistics 20, 733–776.Google Scholar
Mompeán, Pilar & Mompeán, Jose A.. 2007. Phonetic factors in /r/-liaison usage: A first report. 16th International Congress of Phonetics Sciences (ICPhS 16), Saarbrücken, 1397–1400.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene. 2007. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Nieto-Castanon, Alfonso, Guenther, Frank H., Perkell, Joseph & Curtin, Hugh D.. 2005. A modeling investigation of articulatory variability and acoustic stability during American English /r/ production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117, 3196–3212.Google Scholar
Oller, D. Kimbrough. 1973. The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 54, 1235–47.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2002. Word-specific phonetics. In Gussenhoven, Carlos & Warner, Natasha (eds.), Laboratory Phonology VII, 101–140. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Plug, Leendert & Ogden, Richard. 2003. A parametric approach to the phonetics of postvocalic /ɹ/ in Dutch. Phonetica 60, 159–186.Google Scholar
Redford, Melissa A. & van Donkelaar, Paul. 2008. Jaw cycles and linguistic syllables in adult English. In Davis, Barbara & Zajdo, Krisztina (eds.), The syllable in speech production: Perspectives on the frame/content theory, 355–76. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Redi, Laura & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie. 2001. Variation in the realisation of glottalisation in normal speakers. Journal of Phonetics 29, 407–429.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Richard. 2013. Changes in the voice across the adult lifespan: Formant frequency-based likelihood ratios and ASR performance. International Association for Forensic Phonetics and Acoustics (IAFPA), Tampa, Florida, 21–24.Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane. 2007. A sociophonetic investigation of postvocalic /r/ in Glaswegian adolescents. 16th International Congress of Phonetics Sciences (ICPhS 16), Saarbrücken, 1449–1452.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, Barbara G. & Fidell, Linda S.. 2013. Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2009. Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85, 59–108.Google Scholar
Tatnell, Paul. 2010. Is it really Mr Rabbit? The Age, 4 August 2010. m.theage.com.au/federal-election/is-it-really-mr-rabbit-20100804-11ek8.html (accessed 22 April 2014).Google Scholar
Tillmann, Hans G. & Pfitzinger, Hartmut. 2003. Local speech rate: Relationships between articulation and speech acoustics. 15th International Congress of Phonetics Sciences (ICPhS 15), Barcelona, 3177–3180.Google Scholar
Tuinman, Annelie, Mitterer, Holger & Cutler, Anne. 2011. Perception of intrusive /r/ in English by native, cross-language and cross-dialect listeners. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 130, 1643–1652.Google Scholar
Tunley, Alison. 1999. Coarticulatory influences of liquids on vowels in English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Turk, Alice & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie. 2000. Word-boundary–related duration patterns in English. Journal of Phonetics 28, 397–440.Google Scholar
Turk, Alice & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie. 2007. Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words. Journal of Phonetics 35, 445–72.Google Scholar
Uffmann, Christian. 2007. Intrusive [r] and optimal epenthetic consonants. Language Sciences 29, 451–476.Google Scholar
Umeda, Noriko. 1978. Occurrence of glottal stops in fluent speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 64, 88–94.Google Scholar
Vaissière, Jacqueline. 1983. Language independent prosodic features. In Cutler, Anne & Ladd, D. Robert (eds.), Prosody: Models and measurements, 53–65. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1972. Rule inversion, Lingua 29, 209–242.Google Scholar
Vonwiller, Julia, Rogers, Inge, Cleirigh, Chris & Lewis, Wendy. 1995. Speaker and material selection for the Australian National Database of Spoken Language. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 2, 177–211.Google Scholar
Wells, John. 1982. Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Paula. 1999. The extent of coarticulation of English liquids: An acoustic and articulatory study. 14th International Congress of Phonetics Sciences (ICPhS 14), University of California, Berkeley, 1901–1904.Google Scholar
Windsor Lewis, Jack. 1975. Linking /r/ in the general British pronunciation of English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 5, 37–42.Google Scholar
Zhou, Xinhui, Espy-Wilson, Carol Y., Boyce, Suzanne [E.], Tiede, Mark, Holland, Christy & Choe, Ann. 2008. A magnetic resonance imaging based articulatory and acoustic study of retroflex and bunched American English /r/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123, 4466–4481.Google Scholar