Skip to main content

Phonetics and phonology of soft ‘g’ in Turkish

  • Özlem Ünal-Logacev (a1), Marzena Żygis (a2) and Susanne Fuchs (a3)

The present study aims to approach soft ‘g’, a highly disputable sound in Turkish phonetics and phonology, from a multidimensional perspective by (i) analysing its historical development, (ii) investigating its distribution in a dictionary of Modern Turkish, and (iii) studying its acoustic realization. In the Ottoman script soft ‘g’ was represented with two letters: <غ>, pronounced [ɣ], was used in the context of preceding back vowels Vback_(Vback, C); <گ>, pronounced [j], was used in the context of preceding front vowels Vfront_(Vfront, C). In 1928, due to a reform in orthography, these two vocalic contexts were obscured by replacing both <غ> and <گ> with <ğ>. Our investigation of the distribution of /ğ/ in the native vocabulary of Modern Turkish reveals that /ğ/ is in complementary distribution with /ɡ/: /ğ/ appears word-finally and word-medially (i.e. syllable-finally Vğ.C and intervocalically V.ğV), while /ɡ/ is found word-initially and word-medially (i.e. syllable-initially when following a consonant C.ğV). However, in loan words which are well assimilated into Turkish by means of phono-morphological rules the complementary distribution is not attested. Moreover, the behavior of soft ‘g’ in phonological processes strongly suggests that the sound is part of the phonemic inventory of Turkish. Finally, the results of our two acoustic experiments show that /ğ/ is phonetically manifested in the lengthening of the preceding vowel (/Vğ/ → [Vː]) independently of the surrounding vowel environment, word position, and participant age. In addition, the results indicate that speakers of Modern Turkish do not realize acoustic properties of a velar gesture.

Hide All
Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steven. 2013. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using eigen and S4. R package.
Bhat, Darbhe N. S. 1978. A general study of palatalisation. In Greenberg, Joseph H., Ferguson, Charles A. & Moravcsik, Edith A. (eds.), Universals of human language, 4792. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2013. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 5.3.53). (accessed 4 October 2013).
Sözlük, Büyük Türkçe. 2010. Türk Dil Kurumu [Online Turkish dictionary]. (accessed February 2010).
Clements, George N. & Keyser, Samuel J.. 1983. CV phonology: A generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Comrie, Bernard. 1997. Turkish phonology. In Kaye, Alan S. (ed.), Phonologies of Asia and Africa 2, 883898. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
de Jong, Kenneth. 1995. The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97, 491504.
Demircan, Ömer. 2002. Türkçenin Ses Dizimi [The phonology of Turkish]. İstanbul: Der Yayınları.
Ergin, Muharrem. 2013. Türk Dil Bilgisi [Turkish grammar]. İstanbul: Bayrak Yayınları.
Gallego, Joaquin R. 1996. Gestural organization in Spanish: An experimental study of spirantisation and aspiration. Ph.D. dissertation: University of Connecticut.
Gelman, Andrew & Hill, Jennifer. 2007. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Geng, Christian. 2010. A cross-linguistic study on the phonetics of dorsal obstruents. Ph.D. dissertation: Humboldt University at Berlin.
Göksel, Aslı & Kerslake, Celia. 2005. Turkish: A comprehensive grammar. London & New York: Routledge.
Hall, T. A., Hamann, Silke & Żygis, Marzena. 2006. The phonetic motivation for phonological stop assibilation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 36, 5981.
Hall, T. A. & Żygis, Marzena. 2010. An overview of the phonology of obstruents. In Fuchs, Susanne, Toda, Martine & Żygis, Marzena (eds.), Turbulent sounds:An interdisciplinary guide, 137. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Halle, Morris & Clements, George N.. 1983. Problem book in phonology. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Hankamer, Jorge. 2011. Turkish vowel epenthesis. In Erguvanlı-Taylan, Eser & Rona, Bengisu (eds.), Puzzles of languages: Essays in honour of Karl Zimmer, 5569. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Kabak, Barış. 2007. Hiatus resolution in Turkish: An underspecification account. Lingua 117, 13781411.
Karaağaç, Günay. 2013. Türkçenin Dil Bilgisi [A grammar of Turkish]. Ankara: Akçağ.
Kılıç, Mehmet. A. & Erdem, Mevlüt. 2013. Türkiye Türkçesindeki ‘yumuşak g’ ünsüzünün fonetik analizi [A phonetic analysis of ‘yumusak g’ in Standard Modern Turkish]. VI. Uluslararası Türk Dili Kurultayı; [The Sixth International Turkish Language Congress], 2809–2826.
Kirchner, Robert M. 2001. An effort-based approach to consonant lenition. New York: Routledge.
Kısıklı, Emine. 2012. Harf devrimi sonrasında yeni harflerin öğretiminde usul ve yöntemler [Methods in the teaching of the alphabet after the ortographic revolution]. Türkoloji sempozyumu [Turkology symposium], Adana, 680–692.
Konrot, Ahmet. 1981. A new phoneme of ‘voiced velar stop erosion’: Phonetic explanation for the phonological status of the so-called ‘soft g’ in Turkish. University of Essex Department of Language and Linguistics Occasional Papers 34, 1224.
Kopkallı-Yavuz, Handan. 2010. The sound inventory of Turkish: Consonants and vowels. In Yavaş, Mehmet & Topbaş, Seyhun (eds.), Communication disorders in Turkish, 2646. London: Multilingual Matters.
Kopkallı-Yavuz, Handan, Koçak, Ismail, Topbaş, Seyhun & Cangökçe-Yaşar, Özlem. 2008. “Soft ‘g’” in Turkish: A phonetic analysis. Poster presented at the 12th Congress of the International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1997. Turkish: Descriptive grammar. London: Routledge.
Krakow, Rena A. 1999. Physiological organization of syllables: A review. Journal of Phonetics 27 (1), 2354.
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Brockhoff, Per Brunn & Christensen, Rune Haubo Bojesen. 2014. lmerTest: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. (R package version 2.0-20).
Lass, Roger & Anderson, John M.. 1975. Old English phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lavoie, Lisa M. 2001. Consonant strength: Phonological patterns and phonetic manifestation. New York: Garland.
Lewis, Geoffrey. 2000. Turkish grammar, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Löfqvist, Anders & Gracco, Vincent L.. 1994. Tongue body kinematics in velar stop production: Influences of consonant voicing and vowel context. Phonetica 51, 5267.
Maddieson, Ian. 1997. Phonetic universals. In Hardcastle, William J. & Laver, John (eds), Handbook of phonetic science, 619639. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mooshammer, Christine, Hoole, Philip & Kühnert, Barbara. 1995. On loops. Journal of Phonetics 23, 321.
Nakipoğlu-Demiralp, Mine, Üntak, Aslı & Furman, Reyhan. 2016. Acquisition of morphophonemic alternations and the role of frequency. In Güven, Mine, Akar, Didar, Öztürk, Balkız & Kelepir, Meltem (eds.), Exploring the Turkish linguistic landscape: Essays in honor of Eser Erguvanlı-Taylan, 157182. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Nivens, Richard. 1992. A lexical phonology of West Tarangan. In Burquest, Donald A. & Laidig, Wyn D. (eds.), Phonological studies in four languages of Maluku, 127227. Arlington, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics & University of Texas at Arlington Publications in Linguistics.
Oftedal, Magne. 1985. Lenition in Celtic and in Insular Spanish: The decondary voicing of stops in Gran Canaria. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Ohala, John. J. 1983. The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In MacNeilage, Peter F. (eds.), The production of speech, 189216. New York: Springer.
Pinheiro, José C. & Bates, Douglas. 2000. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer.
Poppe, Nicholas. 1963. Tatar manual: A descriptive grammar and texts with a Tatar–English glossary (Uralic and Altaic Series 25). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
R Development Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Redhouse, James W. 1884. A simplified grammar of the Ottoman-Turkish language. London: Trubner & Co.
Reubold, Ulrich, Harrington, Jonathan & Kleber, Felicitas. 2010. Vocal aging effects on f0 and the first formant: A longitudinal analysis in adult speakers. Speech Communication 52, 638651.
Selen, Nevin. 1979. Söyleyiş Sesbilimi, Akustik Sesbilim ve Türkiye Türkçesi [Articulatory phonology, acoustic phonology and Standard Modern Turkish]. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu.
Stevens, Kenneth N. 1998. Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Teodorsson, Sven T. 1997. The phonology of Ptolemaic Koine. Göteberg: Acya Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Underhill, Robert. 1976. Turkish grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Vural, Hanifi & Böler, Tuncay. 2012. Ses ve Şekil Bilgisi [Phonology and morphology]. İstanbul: Kesit Yayıncılık.
Winkler, Ralf. 2009. Merkmale junger und alter Stimmen: Analyse ausgewählter Parameter im Kontext von Wahrnehmung und Klassifikation (Mündliche Kommunikation, vol. 6). Berlin: Logos. [Published Ph.D. dissertation]
Zimmer, Karl & Orgun, Orhan. 1999. Turkish. In IPA (ed.), Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet, 154158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the International Phonetic Association
  • ISSN: 0025-1003
  • EISSN: 1475-3502
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-international-phonetic-association
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed