Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Phonetics of Tongan stress

  • Marc Garellek (a1) and James White (a2)
Abstract

In this study, we determine the acoustic correlates of primary and secondary stress in Tongan. Vowels with primary stress show differences in f0, intensity, duration, F1, and spectral measures compared to unstressed vowels, but a linear discriminant analysis suggests f0 and duration are the best cues for discriminating vowels with primary stress from unstressed vowels. Vowels with secondary stress are mainly marked by differences in f0 relative to unstressed vowels. With regard to the effects of stress on the vowel space, we find that all five Tongan vowels are higher in the vowel space (have lower F1) when unstressed. Moreover, there is no reduction in the overall size of the vowel space. We interpret this pattern as evidence that unstressed vowels in Tongan are not prone to centralization, vowel reduction, or undershoot. The results, however, are consistent with a sonority expansion account (Beckman, Edwards & Fletcher 1992), whereby stressed vowels are lowered to enhance sonority.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Phonetics of Tongan stress
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Phonetics of Tongan stress
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Phonetics of Tongan stress
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Victoria Anderson & Yuko Otsuka . 2006. The phonetics and phonology of ‘Definitive Accent’ in Tongan. Oceanic Linguistics 45, 2542.

R. Harald Baayen . 2008a. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Taehong Cho & Patricia A. Keating . 2009. Effects of initial position versus prominence in English. Journal of Phonetics 37, 466485.

Christina M Esposito . 2010. The effects of linguistic experience on the perception of phonation. Journal of Phonetics 38, 303316.

Harry Feldman . 1978. Some notes on Tongan phonology. Oceanic Linguistics 17, 133139.

Marc Garellek , Patricia Keating , Christina M. Esposito & Jody Kreiman . 2013. Voice quality and tone identification in White Hmong. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133, 10781089.

Matthew Gordon & Peter Ladefoged . 2001. Phonation types: A cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics 29, 383406.

Matthew Gordon & Latifa Nafi . 2012. Acoustic correlates of stress and pitch accent in Tashlhiyt Berber. Journal of Phonetics 40, 706724.

Helen M. Hanson 1997. Glottal characteristics of female speakers: Acoustic correlates. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101, 466481.

Markus Iseli , Yen-Liang Shue & Abeer Alwan . 2007. Age, sex, and vowel dependencies of acoustical measures related to the voice source. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121, 22832295.

Sun-Ah Jun . 2005. Prosodic typology. In Jun Sun-Ah (ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, 430458. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hideki Kawahara , Ikuyo Masuda-Katsuse & Alain de Cheveigné . 1999. Restructuring speech representations using a pitch adaptive time-frequency smoothing and an instantaneous-frequency-based f0 extraction: Possible role of a repetitive structure in sounds. Speech Communication 27, 187207.

Dennis Klatt & Laura Klatt . 1990. Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 87, 820857.

Greg Kochanski , Esther Grabe , John Coleman & Burton Rosner . 2005. Loudness predicts prominence: Fundamental frequency lends little. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118, 10381054.

Philip Lieberman . 1960. Some acoustic correlates of word stress in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32, 451454.

Björn Lindblom . 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In William J. Hardcastle & Alain Marchal (eds.), Speech production and speech modeling, 403439. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Marta Ortega-Llebaria & Pilar Prieto . 2011. Acoustic correlates of stress in Central Catalan and Castilian Spanish. Language and Speech 54, 7397.

Ingo Plag , Gero Kunter & Mareile Schramm . 2011. Acoustic correlates of primary and secondary stress in North American English. Journal of Phonetics 39, 362374.

Albert J. Schütz 2001. Tongan accent. Oceanic Linguistics 40, 307323.

Adrian P. Simpson 2012. The first and second harmonics should not be used to measure breathiness in male and female voices. Journal of Phonetics 40, 477490.

Agaath M. C. Sluijter & Vincent J. van Heuven . 1996. Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100, 24712485.

Alice E. Turk & Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel . 2000. Word-boundary–related duration patterns in English. Journal of Phonetics 28, 397440.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the International Phonetic Association
  • ISSN: 0025-1003
  • EISSN: 1475-3502
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-international-phonetic-association
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 70 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 206 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.