Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 15
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Aronoff, Mark Berg, Kristian and Heyer, Vera 2016. Some implications of English spelling for morphological processing. The Mental Lexicon, Vol. 11, Issue. 2, p. 164.


    Berg, Kristian 2016. Graphemic Analysis and the Spoken Language Bias. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7,


    2016. Addressing the “two interface” problem: Comparatives and superlatives. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, Vol. 1, Issue. 1,


    Daland, Robert Oh, Mira and Kim, Syejeong 2015. When in doubt, read the instructions: Orthographic effects in loanword adaptation. Lingua, Vol. 159, p. 70.


    Bekker, Ian 2014. The weak vowels of South African English: A critical review and comparative acoustic analysis. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 133.


    Bricker, Victoria R. and Orie, Olanike O. 2014. Schwa in the Modern Yucatecan Languages and Orthographic Evidence of Its Presence in Colonial Yucatecan Maya, Colonial Chontal, and Precolumbian Maya Hieroglyphic Texts1. International Journal of American Linguistics, Vol. 80, Issue. 2, p. 175.


    Wilson, Colin Davidson, Lisa and Martin, Sean 2014. Effects of acoustic–phonetic detail on cross-language speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 77, p. 1.


    Braun, Bettina Lemhöfer, Kristin and Mani, Nivedita 2011. Perceiving unstressed vowels in foreign-accented English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 129, Issue. 1, p. 376.


    Bürki, Audrey Alario, F. Xavier and Frauenfelder, Ulrich H. 2011. Lexical representation of phonological variants: Evidence from pseudohomophone effects in different regiolects. Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 64, Issue. 4, p. 424.


    Kim, Kyumin and Kochetov, Alexei 2011. Phonology and phonetics of epenthetic vowels in loanwords: Experimental evidence from Korean. Lingua, Vol. 121, Issue. 3, p. 511.


    2011. The Handbook of Phonological Theory.


    Beke, András and Szaszák, György 2010. Automatic recognition of schwa variants in spontaneous Hungarian speech. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, Vol. 57, Issue. 2-3, p. 329.


    Davidson, Lisa 2010. Phonetic bases of similarities in cross-language production: Evidence from English and Catalan. Journal of Phonetics, Vol. 38, Issue. 2, p. 272.


    조현관, 2010. 영어 schwa /ə/에 대한 음성분석. The Journal of Studies in Language, Vol. 26, Issue. 2, p. 359.


    최태환, 2008. Reduced Vowels of the American English Revisited. Korean Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 33, Issue. 4, p. 953.


    ×
  • Journal of the International Phonetic Association, Volume 37, Issue 1
  • April 2007, pp. 83-96

Rosa's roses: reduced vowels in American English

  • Edward Flemming (a1) and Stephanie Johnson (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025100306002817
  • Published online: 01 April 2007
Abstract

Beginning phonetics students are taught that some varieties of American English have two contrasting reduced vowels, transcribed as [e] and [i], illustrated by the unstressed vowels in the minimal pair Rosa's vs. roses (e.g. Ladefoged 2001, 2005). However, little seems to be known about the precise nature or distribution of these vowels. This study explores these questions through acoustic analysis of reduced vowels in the speech of nine American English speakers. The results show that there is a fundamental distinction between the mid central [e] vowel that can occur in unstressed word-final position (e.g. in Rosa), and high reduced vowels that occur in most other unstressed positions, and might be transcribed as [i]. The contrast between pairs like Rosa's and roses derives from this difference because the word-final [e] is preserved when an inflectional suffix is added, so the schwa of Rosa's is similar to the final vowel of Rosa, whereas the unstressed vowel of roses is the high [i] reduced vowel quality found elsewhere. So the standard transcription of the reduced vowel contrast is justified, but the widespread use of [e] to transcribe word-internal reduced vowels is misleading – mid reduced vowels are generally only found in stem-final position.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the International Phonetic Association
  • ISSN: 0025-1003
  • EISSN: 1475-3502
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-international-phonetic-association
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×